Like Pakistan under Musharaf vs. next-door Iran under the mullah's.
Pakistan under Musharaf is currently a secular military dictatorship . . . a relatively benign one at it. Next-door Iran is an Islamic Republic where Democracy as in "majority rule" is practiced, much to the detriment of the unprotected minority.
In an idealized world, non-denominational representative republic (like the US) or even with a titular monarch (like the Netherlands) are probably the most conducive to personal freedom and ecomic prosperity. However, for much of the world, such a choice is not viable yet . . . just look at what a mess Iraq has turned into under the tutelage of "liberals mugged by reality" (Carl Rove's definition of "neoconservative") yet forgot all that mugging altogether and back in their social engineering dreamland. For places like that, including much of middleast, the realistic choice really is between dictatorship vs. dictatorship by mullahs under the disguise of democracy.
Let's not forget, religious freedom was put into large scale practice only twice in world history. The first time was under the Mongol military dictatorship, in order to rule their polyglot land empire. The second time by the Dutch (and subsequently the rest of West), only after decades of mutual slaughter between Protestants and Catholics.
Edited by brightness - 07-Aug-2006 at 10:27