Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Pornography

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>
Author
Le Renard View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 443
  Quote Le Renard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Pornography
    Posted: 26-May-2006 at 14:17
An ominous warning was voiced by Laurence M. Gould, former president of Carleton College: "I do not believe the greatest threat to our future is from bombs or guided missiles. I dont think our civilization will die that way. I think it will die when we no longer care. Arnold Toynbee has pointed out that 19 of 21 civilizations have died from within and not by conquest from without. There were no bands playing and flags waving when these civilizations decayed. It happened slowly, in the quiet and the dark when no one was aware." (Institute of Life Insurance advertisement in Scientific American, May 1968, 56.) (http://www.lds.org/newsroom/voice/display/0,18255,5004-1-161,00.html)
"History repeats itself because nobody listened the first time."
Back to Top
flyingzone View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 11-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2630
  Quote flyingzone Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 15:05
Renard, you do know that, however "illuminating" those stories you quoted are, they are just anecdotes and can never provide real support for any hypothesis you are putting forward. Moreover, there are many many factors that lead to the failure of a marriage, e.g. infidelity, financial pressure, incompatibility of personalities, stress. Maybe addiction to porn is only a symptom rather than the cause of any of those factors.  
 
(It reminds of something that I always tell my students when we are discussing the importance of penis size to women. When a woman tells her partner that his d**k is too small, it's not because she hates his d**k, it's because she hates him. By the same token, if a man spends too much time on porn rather than on his wife, maybe it's not the porn that is the problem here, it's the relationship.)
 
In regard to the "relationship" between pornography and sex crime, it's good that you yourself actually pointed out that it's just a RELATIONSHIP (i.e. a correlation, if you know statistics). It is NOT a causal relationship. Maybe all those sex crime offenders READ more porn than non-sex crime offenders because of some personality predisposition of theirs to violence, hypersexuality, or perverted sexuality. Again, addiction to pornography may be a symptom rather than the cause.
 
Again, I am not an advocate for pornography. I think no one here is. It is a sleazy business and most of the porn is very demeaning to women (and demeaning to men as well). However, conservative or liberal, we cannot allow ourselves to be swayed by our emotions and forget about some of the basic rules in logical argument.  
 
Last but not least, I don't quite understand the purpose of the quote by Gould. Saying that pornography is not the evil of all evils does not mean that one doesn't care. You make it sound as if people who see pornography differently from you either embrace pornography or are indfferent to it. That's simply not the case.    
 


Edited by flyingzone - 26-May-2006 at 15:13
Back to Top
Le Renard View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 443
  Quote Le Renard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 15:11
You make it sound as if people who see pornography differently from you either embrace pornography or are indfferent to it. That's simply not the case.    
I am sorry about that, that was not my intent.  What my intent was was to try to help people see what the dangers of pornography are. 

Edited by Le Renard - 26-May-2006 at 15:11
"History repeats itself because nobody listened the first time."
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 15:12
Arnold Toynbee has pointed out that 19 of 21 civilizations have died from within and not by conquest from without.

Could you name some of them?
Back to Top
Roadkill View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 13-May-2006
Location: Norway
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 106
  Quote Roadkill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 15:20
 -Le Renard, I'd say that you are an active participant in the destruction of society. I especially liked that statistic you brought up; the vice squad advised that 72 percent of the individuals arrested for rape and child-related sexual offenses had in their possession some type of pornographic material.

 -100% of the people who commit crimes eat on a regular basis, it is time to ban food.... Sex and sexual content is part of humanity, sex is one of our strongest urges as it's pivotal to the future existance of humanity and that is why so many people have sexual content on their computers. I think it would be interesting to see how large a percentage of the law-abiding population has sexual content in their posession(This includes erotic novels which to women is pretty much the same as a nude photograph). That statistic would probably be somewhere in the 90% area.

 -And the letter, the letter..... What's that about? It just goes on to prove my statement that supression never works. Religion of the Abrahamic branch is responsible for this, not pornography! How can you blame pornography? The person who got "addicted" did so of his own will, it was not forced upon him and it is he who is responsible for everything that happened due to his "addiction". It disgusts me to know that there are people like that out there, I would rather hang out with a pedophile than someone with such a distorted view on life as the person discussed in that letter.

 -And as for your last post, civilizations haven't just imploded, it's always been due to an external force or a natural force. Rome didn't just collapse in on itself, it was the dilution of power, the growing force of barbarian tribes to the north, the civil unrest in most parts of the empire and the loss of momentum as Roman expansion halted which led to it's demise and other civilizations have collapsed after the demise of it's leaders(Alexander, Mongol Empire, several Japanese shogunates, Chinese empires and so on). Wars and natural catastrophes have taken care of most other civilizations

 -Just about anyone I know have pornography in some form and none of them have had their families or relationships destroyed because of it. Neither do I know anyone who is addicted to pornography. You can't be addicted to pornography, it's just illogical. Pornography is just a visualization of a sexual act and it is the sexual act that the viewer is after, not the pornographic material. Obese people don't have pictures of food everywhere on their walls.

 -The only way you could get "addicted" to pornography was if your sexual needs were not being satisfied and so it's not an addiction, it's an alternative to a missing part of your life. No matter what you do your sexual urges will still be as potent as ever and they will have to be satisfied in some way, pornography is just an aide, like a dildo for instance.

 -I am appaled at your distorted view of sex and life in general Le Renard and I hope you get out of your bubble and start thinking about things logically, not due to morals and meanings forced upon you by religion, family or friends. If you do that and still come to the same conclusion you had before then get back here and explain using rational thought and logic to argue your case.

"Studies, studies, studies, does everything have to have scientific proof to be true?"

 -Yes, it does. It's not I who tried to argue my case by posting statistics from the 70s. You are truly conservative.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
-- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Back to Top
Le Renard View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 443
  Quote Le Renard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 16:34

Believe what you must.  I cannot convince you to change your mind.  But, I hope that somebody on this forum has read this and agrees with what I have said, and maybe I have done some good. Being one of the few conservatives on this forum, I would like to ask the Liberals to do the same, look outside their belief system a little bit, see it from others perspectives.  You are truly conservative. and proud of it. 

In no way am I trying to start a flame war. Please keep it that way.
 
Please close this topic, it has gotten out of hand.
"History repeats itself because nobody listened the first time."
Back to Top
Le Renard View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 443
  Quote Le Renard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 16:35
Originally posted by Mixcoatl

Arnold Toynbee has pointed out that 19 of 21 civilizations have died from within and not by conquest from without.

Could you name some of them?
 
Nephites, Lamanites, Jacobites,


Edited by Le Renard - 26-May-2006 at 16:35
"History repeats itself because nobody listened the first time."
Back to Top
Emperor Barbarossa View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Jul-2005
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2888
  Quote Emperor Barbarossa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 16:39
Originally posted by Le Renard



Nephites, Lamanites, Jacobites,



The Jacobites died from conquest of the British government at the Battle of Culloden, not from within.


Edited by Emperor Barbarossa - 26-May-2006 at 16:42

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 16:39
Originally posted by Le Renard

Originally posted by Mixcoatl

Arnold Toynbee has pointed out that 19 of 21 civilizations have died from within and not by conquest from without.

Could you name some of them?
Nephites, Lamanites, Jacobites,

I did a quick Internet search and found out that those are all peoples from the Book of Mormon. I don't intend to offend you, but that probably means they are fictional, and the stories of their fall have been made up to serve as a parable.

I'd rather have some real historical examples.

I don't agree with Roadkill that pornography addiction doesn't exist. Many things could be potentially addictive, and pornography is definately one of them. However, if you want to outlaw pornography completely because it's addictive, you should be consequent and also outlaw smoking, alcohol, gambling or even buying. And I don't think those are things many people are willing to outlaw.


Edited by Mixcoatl - 26-May-2006 at 16:41
Back to Top
Emperor Barbarossa View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Jul-2005
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2888
  Quote Emperor Barbarossa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 16:47
I was thinking of the Scottish Jacobites. Anyways, I also did a quick search, and you are right, Mixcoatl, all of those tribes are from the Book of Mormon.

Back to Top
flyingzone View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 11-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2630
  Quote flyingzone Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 17:15
The issue of pornography is a really complex one and I think trying to categorize people (those for and against censorhip) into the "liberal" or "conservative" camp is really oversimplifying it and doing the debate on it a disservice.
 
Take the feminists (all seen to be "liberal") as an example. There are some feminists who advocate strict censorship because according to them, misogyny is more permnicious in pornography than in any other type of media. However, some feminists argue that misguided assaults on pornography ("pornophobia") have resulted in the naive belief that pornography is a weapon that men use to degrade and dominate women. Both, of course, have their reason.


Edited by flyingzone - 26-May-2006 at 17:23
Back to Top
SearchAndDestroy View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 15-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2728
  Quote SearchAndDestroy Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 17:18
I don't agree with Roadkill that pornography addiction doesn't exist. Many things could be potentially addictive, and pornography is definately one of them. However, if you want to outlaw pornography completely because it's addictive, you should be consequent and also outlaw smoking, alcohol, gambling or even buying. And I don't think those are things many people are willing to outlaw.
There's a "feel good" hormone that is released in people. If your a drenline junky, it's because of that hormone(can't remember the name). It's the same hormone that is released during sex, and scientist recently found out that the hormone is released when people go tanning and found out that tanning actually does cause addiction( believe it or not). Anyways, if Pornoagraphy really brewaks families apart like Le Renard says, then we better start outlawing sports, extreme sports, sex, and tanning plus a thousand other activities to keep families together.
 
It's this feel good hormone that is released that keeps people going back for more, that causes a "addiction". To say this keeps ppl away from each would mean that we are just a instictual species and if we are blinded by such things to not take part in our daily lives then we should be extinct.
"A patriot must always be ready to defend his country against his government." E.Abbey
Back to Top
Genghis View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2656
  Quote Genghis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-May-2006 at 23:26
I believe that hormone is called endorphin.
Member of IAEA
Back to Top
white dragon View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 27-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 356
  Quote white dragon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-May-2006 at 11:22
    Here, Romans, incans, Chinese(many times over), you could probably include the aztecs, and that is just a list i generated in about 3 seconds. i could probably come up with more though...
Back to Top
flyingzone View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 11-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2630
  Quote flyingzone Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-May-2006 at 11:31
Originally posted by Genghis

I believe that hormone is called endorphin.
 
Actually, if I am not mistaken, it's not a hormone but the neurotransmitter dopamine that has been found to be closely linked to addiction. Some say both sex and food help to release this neurotransmitter.
Back to Top
Roadkill View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 13-May-2006
Location: Norway
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 106
  Quote Roadkill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-May-2006 at 11:52
 -White Dragon, that list of yours is it a list of civilizations that have collapsed from within? If so then they're all wrong. Read up on the history of these civilizations.
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
-- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Back to Top
Le Renard View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 443
  Quote Le Renard Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-May-2006 at 15:29
Originally posted by Roadkill

 -White Dragon, that list of yours is it a list of civilizations that have collapsed from within? If so then they're all wrong. Read up on the history of these civilizations.
 
Is white Dragon wrong? Yes, they were destroyed from outside influences, but internal problems also led to their downfall.  If you read the records from the people of ancient america, immoral practices, violence, corruption, all led to their downfall.  In most cases, however, their enemies came from outside and destryed them because they were not united from the inside.  Porography may not destroy them by itself but it does speed up the destruction of any civilization. 
"History repeats itself because nobody listened the first time."
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-May-2006 at 15:41
Originally posted by white dragon

Romans

The great 'moral decay' (Caligula, Nero & co) was long before the downfall of the Roman Empire. In fact, the time the Romans were on the height of their power (2th century) was fter that.

incans

I don't even think the Incans had pornography. If you're very creative you might perhaps call sex one of the causes for the downfall of the incan empire (the emperors married their sisters, giving more and more defective offspring, eventually causing a war of sucession), but still desease brought by the Spanish was by far the nr. 1 reason their empire fell

include the aztecs

Again I don't think Aztecs had pornography (or at least not on a large scale), and desease brought by the Spanish, and Native American tribes who joined the conquerors were the main reasons for the fall of the Aztecs, which are both external causes.

Really, saying pornography has led to the fall of civilizations is as inprovable as saying that music, blue clothes or ducks have led to the fall of civilizations


Edited by Mixcoatl - 27-May-2006 at 15:43
Back to Top
white dragon View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 27-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 356
  Quote white dragon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-May-2006 at 20:36
actually for the romans, i was suggesting the constant civil wars, the the "moral Decay"
for the incans again i was refering to the civil war right before the spainards came
when i said the aztecs, i was refering to the other natives who joined the spainards, who made the conquering of the aztecs possible (at least Initially, eventually the spainards would have won even without native assitance)
and for the chinese, i was actually refering to the many dynasties that fell to internal strife.
all in all, i wasn't refering to pornograpghy, i was just refering to internal decay and strife that
led to the collaspe.

Edited by white dragon - 27-May-2006 at 20:37
Back to Top
Roadkill View Drop Down
Samurai
Samurai
Avatar

Joined: 13-May-2006
Location: Norway
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 106
  Quote Roadkill Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-May-2006 at 21:43
 -Well, the question then is; would these civilizations have collapsed if not for the influence of external forces.

 -It is unavoidable that not all citizens of a civilization are pleased with the civilization they are part of, it has always been that way no matter it's morals. So, internal strife will always be present, but not potent if the civilization in question attains control. If influenced by an external force such as an invading army then that might create a room for these unsatisfied citizens and then the external force is then responsible for the internal collapse.

 -What you need to show me is decisive facts of a single civilization that has in it's lifetime grown large, prosperous and then collapsed internally without any serious shift in power(Such as the death of a leader) or any external influence near the time where internal collapse started. This does not exclude external influence, it merely excludes external influence at the beginning. Lets say five years for instance. If no external influence has been present until five years after the internal collapse started then the external influence would most likely be a reaction and not a cause. Now, the five year example I stated here is purely so for conceptualisation and is not some rule.

 -Now, as fascinating as I find this discussion I would like for the contents of posts to remain somewhat close to the original topic and it feels as if we're moving away from that so I would ask you to refrain from wandering too far off. If you wish to discuss the decay of civilizations in general then start a new thread and I'd be happy to join in as I find it to be an intrigueing discussion. For now, lets keep it topic related, that being Pornography and it's cause(s) and effect(s).


Edited by Roadkill - 27-May-2006 at 21:44
"Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I'm not sure about the former."
-- Albert Einstein (1879-1955)
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234 5>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.