Hinduism Under Siege

How do you know? 

In other words, no Muslim, or Gujerati Muslim did anything, committed any crime whatsoever, yet 2000 or so Gujerati Muslims were massacred (and countless rapes as is well documented by neutral human rights groups) by Indians. So much for AlokoParyetra and Rajpot's Indian passivity praising session.

Ok, so there is still no evidence of violence against Muslims, or any group for that matter, in response to the varanasi bombing. A few people getting beaten up? Understandable, even in times of no crisis, and like you said, if it did occur, it was clearly not important enough for the news. I think you would be surprised at how quickly an Indian newspaper would pick up on something like that. Read an Indian newspaper, and you would see how they would make a papercut seem like a life lost.

I could pull out the usual card of, "but they are not real Hindus," but i think you're too intelligent for that stuff.

I admit, the words, "Perhaps that is a fault of our religion (our passiveness)," we're not needed. And i admit, though i would not like to, that my religion has emperical and historical examples of aggression.

Congradulations.

However, i still stand by the rest of my statement, that the lack of counter-violence is something to praise, and i do so proudly.

And i would like to make the case that regardless of what you may think of the religion, Hindus in general (the people) have gotten more passive over the years due to increased economic opportunities and a better standard of living. The richer you are, the more you got to lose. Hindus (and Muslims, Sikhs, Jains, and all others in India) are also becoming more educated, and as India moves forward to becoming a global power, people in India are realizing what it takes to make India seem like a good place to do business.

In fact, i would venture to say the lack of counter-violence is a direct result of increased wealth. Look at India at the time of the Gujerat incident, and look at India during the varanasi incident. I would venture to say Indians are much, much wealthier at the time of Varanasi than they were at the time of Gujerat.

Before you (any of you) try to accuse me of being ______, this is just a theory, and discussion is good.

more so? ok, this is new. Not to sound like a right-wing nut here, but last time i checked, the current kill count for Hindus in the name of Hinduism, as compared to, let's say, Muslims for Islam or Christians for Christianity, is behind. Significantly.

and though i feel embarrased to say this, cause i sound like jerry falwell (replace Hindus with Christians), how many Hindus have blown themselves up, flown airplanes into buildings, launched jihads or crusades, killed thousands upon thousads of native americans in attempts to convert, slaughtered entire cities for the sake of slaughtering cities, taken little children to convert into good little propaganda machines, or destroyed giant statues of buddha carved into a cliff?

Dear Rajput,
First of all I really am glad that you have limited your comments to the topic and haven't used slang language, really appreciate it as it makes one to argue, afterward:

Ok dear could you first of all tell me how did you areyou 110% sure that it was muslims (it means you had a hand in it  ). You said that no one else had the capability to do such act, I really don't think it's a wise thing to appreciate this act. You said "Uttar Pradesh has a very strong muslim population", does it really make any sense, oh or may be you're comparing this with the booming that took place in Delhi which was done by hindus (since they are in majority in Delhi), so dear having a large number of population in an area doesn't mean that no one else could do these sort of acts.

Dear I realy don't think that your not mistaken, first Mecca is just a city and Kaabah is the Holy Masjid and as far as I know and remember I don't see any act such like rolling of tanks in or even near to the Kaabah (Holy Masjid) in Mecca.

So you say that they are week enough and can't protect their temple(what seem to be as holy as Kaabah to Muslims.), that everyone comes and distroys it and you build it again and again. Or may be I got your words wrong if so I am sorry for it.

Bingoo! That's what I was looking for and I really appreciate that you also didn't used the word "Some foriegn countries" instead of using the word Pakistan, as your politicians most of the times do.
Dear I would like to say that India has got a very good weapon which is blaming Pakistan, whenever the government has failed to deal with a situation they say; "It's the foreign/neighbor country who has hand in it.", very simple technique when your not able accuse!

Dear what you have started is a much talked about topic, where I really don't want to say anything but " Prove it that there was a temple! ".
It's just like saying that Muslims distroyed the Golden Temple because it was built on a Masjid (claiming for something while having no prove in hand.).

Spoken like a true Nazi. Bravo! You have learned a lot from your European masters. If Hitler was there he would have patted your head and given you a bone. You are by far the best coconut Nazi-wannabe I've ever seen.

I wrote that because it's what scare mongering Indian fascists like you say. As to Israel, what's your problem, have you run out of Western seating organs?

No, you're advocating counter-terrorism.  That's much worse than any of those things.  And since when do you speak for all of India?  Consider whomever you wish as your personal enemy but it's the height of silliness that you're trying to explain to me, an Indian citizen, what 'India' does and does not want to do 

Well that would explain his issues, but what is your excuse for making assinine comments like a troll?  You obviuosly haven't contributed anything worthwhile to this topic and are just trying to instigate people like your turk brother here who uses a polish flag on his avatar to hide his muslim identity, if he really is a turk!

why are you avoiding his question omar why don't you answer it ?  I for one, and I would like to speak for majority of Hindus out there, have much respect for human life and ALL RELIGIONS unlike you and your people so quit stalling and answer his question you troll! 

wow, in all honesty, i never knew there was any sort of Hindu following in Turkey. Thanks for enlightening me. The things you learn on this forum...

The Nazis said the same things you say for the Jews. You keep proving that you are just a Nazi wannabe coconut.

I don't like Nazis because I am a Communist. Most Indians fought on the Allied side because their colonial masters drafted them, not because they were anti-Nazi. There were also Nazi supporters in India, as wel as Hindu SS. 'A good part of Muslims' on the other hand, weren't Nazis nor Nazi supporters. You'll need to find more than a picture of a clown to prove that. Anyway, you say this because your are either a shameless liar, or ignorant about history, or both. I think both.

No. Indian fascists sympathise with Israeli fascists. Majority of the Indian people are civilised and sympathise with the side which is being oppressed by imperialist invaders.

Don't think that you are talking for India. It's just you and fascists like you who are trying to woo the West, because you are coconuts. But history teaches us the end of fascist dogs. We will flush you down the toilet as well, like we flushed Hitler.

I am indeed from Turkey, but it doesn't explain jacksh*t, because I am NOT Muslim. My being Turk is no secret, and active members of this forum already know that. I changed my flag to the Polish one, because Stanislaw Lem, a Polish author I like, whom you see as my avatar, died recently.

Next time I'll make similar changes, I'll PM all the imbeciles in AE who can't figure it out for themselves to avoid confusion. 

Originally posted by jayeshks Consider whomever you wish as your personal enemy but it's the height of silliness that you're trying to explain to me, an Indian citizen, what 'India' does and does not want to do

All that 'Indians' do best is fight eachother and w/o unification there is no hope for India.

http://www.coolbuddy.com/videos/video_clip.asp?id=404