Liberalism & atheism linked to higher IQ's

Originally posted by opuslola TGS wrote; "What the heck are you talking about?" The obvious TGS, Bush obviously thought more about a single mother with one child than does the current administration! It is most obvious! Regards,

What are you saying? Look at the chart, Obama decreased taxes even further. Do you know understand that $2,281 > $1,881?

And look at the rest, Obama drastically cut taxes for poor and middle class Americans across the board, and gave them health insurance.

the Know Nothing Party.

Originally posted by opuslola Lets see TGS, it seems that Bush increased the "Earned Income Tax Credit" by $953 during his stud! But, Obama only gave the same group (single women with one child) an increase of only $400.00!, I.E., only less that one half of what Bush gave them! Thus, just whom loves single women with one child more? Bush or Obama? Regards,

Ok, so according to your logic, because Obama reduced their taxes by a further $400 dollars, and gave them health insurance on top of that, this means that he doesnt care for them? Interesting. I'll let other people judge for themselves, I need not say anything more.


Edited by TheGreatSimba - 27-May-2010 at 17:16

Wow, so you are also against solar energy? May I ask why people in your camp are against any form of innovation or change? You know why our car companies cant compete anymore right? Interesting, exactly what type of a world do you imagine your great grandchildren living in?

This is something that shouldnt even be a right vs left issue, this is simply common sense.

Obviously the solar panels will not all be in those locations, they will be spread out, what this chart is trying to show is that 500,000 square kilometers of solar panels can satisfy our planets needs.

Now, large parts of the Western United States are uninhabited, as well as large parts of Western China, the Australian continent, large parts of the Arabian peninsula, and the Sahara desert. These locations also get a large amount of sunlight.


Edited by TheGreatSimba - 09-Jun-2010 at 18:13

"Obviously the solar panels will not all be in those locations, they will be spread out, what this chart is trying to show is that 500,000 square kilometers of solar panels can satisfy our planets needs."

So, just whom will protect these panels from Volcanic eruptions, which might well cloud these skies for months or years? Or, from terrorist attacks? Or from our variable Star?

Why don't we instead use a "variable" power system that uses all of the resources still available to us today?



Edited by opuslola - 09-Jun-2010 at 18:40

"I'm curious to know if there is an actual underlying reason for your ridiculous argument."

It is because people like you would literally force it down our throats! Because, like you imply almost every post, the normal person does not have the good sense to do the correct thing!

Hell, I have not problem with placing solar cells, or solar what evers, you want in undeveloped areas of this planet, even upon the roof of my home!

What I want, and what every American wants, is to wait until these sources become economically viable!


We just do not want "skyrocketing electrictity prices" to hit us in our pocket books because of a bunch of idiots, like Al Gore, and his kind, that stand to make billions from it!

Most all persons like you TGS, who now say "we will build nuclear power plants", etc., fo not actually want to see "one new plant built!" It is most obvious that the majority of those whose gratitutiy you tend to look for, do not want it, now or never!


Just look at the regulations designed to prevent the building of one!

Rather than see America and the West go back to the Stone Age, I would rather have a good old American coal mine, in my back yard, and a oil drilling rig in my front yard!

"And that the way it is!" To quote from an old, radical, and now peacefully dead former CBS newsman!

Yours in love!

By the way TGS. It seems that Spain has made more investment in Solar Power than anyother nation!

So, just how has this experiment worked out?

http://www.businessweek.com/news/2010-04-30/spain-pricks-solar-power-bubble-as-greek-fate-looms-update1-.html

http://www.climatechangefraud.com/politics-propaganda/6822-the-scandal-of-solar-power-in-spain

So, it seems Spain, which our President held out as a perfect example of a nation dedicated to Green Energy, has not been able to afford Solar Power, so how can we?

Edited by opuslola - 10-Jun-2010 at 08:54

If environmentalists, etc., had not sabotaged the ability of Americah utility companies to actually construct and finish Nuclear facilities for the last 25 or so years, we might well have a safe, and secure electric grid today? Without having to burn natrual gas, coal and oil to produce electricity!

Heck these same groups have even prevented the construction of refineries, etc.,not to mention all of the drilling crap!

What is really funny is that Iran has failed to build any refineries! They have to ship all of their crude out of the country to then get the refined products shipped back to them! Weird?

Edited by opuslola - 10-Jun-2010 at 15:56

Originally posted by opuslola So, they do not have the capability to build a "cracking tower", but they have the ability to build "atomics?"

Your are spot on. Technologically its different and investment in nuclear energy today is much more beneficial in the long run than investing in building refineries.

Think about it this way, why waste years researching on a technology that is outdated when you can spend the same amount of time and money investing in a technology of the future.

Furthermore, if Iran were to build a refinery, it would not change the fact that it would have to use most of its own oil to supply its own countries energy needs, meaning it will have less oil to export, which would be disastrous for the Iranian economy.

Its simply common sense.


Edited by TheGreatSimba - 13-Jun-2010 at 19:15