PAC or Pak Afghan Confederation

It is an internet forum...what you think or not about my origin and also what i think about yours is of no use...these useless nad pity attacks like "if you are really an Afghan." is really laughable... I�m as Afghan as one can get so lets leave this..magar maloom namesha ke khudet afghan bashe/ Dasi na akhkar che ta Afghan yee..no allah o allaham.

Again pitty personal attacks.. you would save youself lots of trouble if you argue you point and say why you think what i state is "amature"!

 

Yet arguing my own point back to me.  

 

 

What I wanted to say and see is that I want the same environment what used to be there, the FIRST ever Afghan Empire (I am sure you know that the Word Afghanistan came into existance in the year 1747) of Ahmad Shah Baba (Durrani) which consisted of the entire Pakistan of today and then we stood togather for a long long period of time.   We didn't have things similar to each other but we came to know each others traditions better, know each others way of life better and then all the sudden a foriegn force (GB) comes and divides us, AS FAR AS MY THINKING IS CONCERNED, THAT'S THE DAY THAT MY HOUSE WAS DIVIDED, THAT'S THE DAY WHEN TWO BROTHERS SEPARATED!

  

The word "Afghanistan" is much older then Durranis...you should read Babur e Nahman he mentions "Afghanistan"...great Farsi/Dari poet Ferdawsi also mentions Afghanistan.  

In Tarikh-e Herat authored by Saifi Herawi (circa 1342) who calls the western lands, as far as the Indus---Afghanistan. From this it is evident that when Herat was the capital of the Kurts, and after the passing of the period of polItical unity of the Ghaznavids and the Ghorids, when the country was being vanquished by the belligerent armies of Genghiz, Afghanistan was a customary name but not to the extent as in the period of Ahmad Shah Durani. 

Anyways when I talk about Afghanistan I was talking the in terms of modern Political borders�as example of states as in terms of their racial-historical background . It seems like you have misunderstood me and got confused by the political means of these borders which no Afghan recognizes. When we say Afghan land---Afghanistan--We meant the land of Racial and culturally Afghan habitats. While both Balochistan and Pashtonistan are righteous afghan land but Punjab and Sind are not�although it were part of same empire a few times. Indeed im not sure if you are aware or not of sentiment of Punjabis against Afghans� and im not talking about Sikh Punjabis but Muslims� here what Punjabi poet� Waris Shah wrote when Ahmad Shah Durrani come to Hindustan upon invitation of Shah Waliullah, a renowned religious intellectual of Delhi�who ask Ahmad Shah Durrnai to liberate Muslim from Hindus.

Wang Kabuli kuttian gird hoyan dow dow alalhisab laga gayyan

You should ask one of Punjabis here to translate the poems to you. This shows that while religion can be same but culturally and racial difference will always be strong.

Religion can not bind people...if it was the case Bangladesh would have still remain part of Pakistan. What is interestingly that you try to unite with same people who proudly boast to be �Mahras khoraan of Angriz� (British succor) who have kept our pashton people backward with savage collective punishment British Raj rule and regulation under stricture of FATA and PATA. 

Indeed even in term of Number/ population there 100 times more Indic people---PUNJABIS/Sindi/Saraki and�then Afghanian thus the union you preach will undermine Afghan culture and Afghan identity� it will not be long when Afghans will dance Bangra and practice other indic culture(not that there is anything wrong with it but its not our culture) as we see some of Fathan of Peshawar already do that�so what you basically preach is slavery of Afghanian race to that of Indic.

The only solution is the reunion of Afghanian people with their motherland---mind you we in Afghanistan are not greedy we simple want what is righteous ours. The fact is that Pakistan would not have emerged as a nation, had it not been for narrow minded and radical �two nation theory� which uphold religion as base for identity! Thus obious Pakistan will nurtured and imposed an �Islamic Nationalism� which defied geographic boundaries among Muslims.(radicalization of Pashton youth in Pakistais run Madrassa)�this way they enter in an alliance with the old Pashton yearning for unity with their brethren in their father/mother land�-Afghanistan, while keeping the rest of Pakistan intact. Thus the problems in region is because of Pakistan concept�religion identity...the union you preach would be yet again base on religion---because there is absolutely no linkage other then religion�thus the continuation of the problems we face.

Don't worry Afghans have already claimed their "lost" territory

You should read some British Raj area books about India.. specially those about character and habits of people of India�Nevertheless what I state was not meant to offend Punjabi people� I have great memories from Punjab both Lahore and Amritsar and I like punjabi people..in fact some of my best friends are Punjabis.