QuoteReplyTopic: The Muslim Devastation of India Posted: 28-Sep-2010 at 15:01
Originally posted by balochii
If so many hindus were killed, why is 80% of india still hindu? your numbers dont make sense at all. its pure lie. The tradition among mughals was that they never killed innocent hindus, whenever they met hindus on a battle field, they made sure that every hindu soldier was killed, but not innocent hindus who were not part of the army
No, it is not and there are even Turkish sources that reveal this destruction. Offhand I cannot recall the book's name and it mostly talks about the destruction of Roman-Byzantine culture by the Islamic Invasion. The difference being the Romans were people of the book so they were given three choices: convert, pay the so-called protection tax or die. The Hindus were given only two choices: convert of die. Later on, they were charge this tax because they could not convert them all and this brought in not only revenue but it created so to speak a servant class. Many fled India which was the origins of the gypsies.
Not all the sources I am come across are Hindu at all but I find is a constant denial of the truth by some Muslims, not all. Walid Shoebat a former PLO terrorist has spoken about the Islamic invasions of India but he is now a Christian. Would he be considered a radical Christian source? I find that either there is denial, they divert the topic, or the sources are attacked. Say for instance, Christianity has, on the most part, acknowledged its wrongs but Islam has not. I am not sure if I can say the same about the Hindus. I know little about their faith except the caste system is pure evil but this thread is not about that.
I will have to search so I can find that book written by the Turks in the 13th c. AD.
If you are a peaceful Muslim who believes in the plurality of faith and we are all equal in the sight of God then I respect you. The American Islamic forum for Democracy is one such group of Muslims. I don't think they would deny what happened in India but they are reformers.
^ i Think you guys are confusing mughals with various afghan/pashtun or other turkic rulers, they were not mughals and yes they were violent not just against hindus but against there fellow muslims (mughals). Mughal muslims for the most part are respected by even hindus, other then Aurangzeb i think, no mughal leader killed innocent hindus, i mean they even intermarried among hindus. They were really tolerant considering the times they lived in. infact it was probably because of mughals that india became bit safe from the violent afghan/turkic rulers who were always attacking india before mughals and killing of hindus.
^ i Think you guys are confusing mughals with various afghan/pashtun or other turkic rulers, they were not mughals and yes they were violent not just against hindus but against there fellow muslims (mughals). Mughal muslims for the most part are respected by even hindus, other then Aurangzeb i think, no mughal leader killed innocent hindus, i mean they even intermarried among hindus. They were really tolerant considering the times they lived in. infact it was probably because of mughals that india became bit safe from the violent afghan/turkic rulers who were always attacking india before mughals and killing of hindus.
Good points balochii and it should be pondered. I have heard that the mughals were generally tolerant to the Hindus.
I want to created another thread about Devshirme but this would mostly deal with the Greeks and the Balkans. Your imput would be welcome once I create this thread. I am waiting for an article about this topic, which will soon be published.
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε
Akbar was known to be the most tolerant among Mughal emperors.here is the details of Akbar's secularism
The Real
Akbar, The (not) So Great
ABSTRACT
Akbar is considered as the great
Mughal emperor who put the Mughal empire on a firm and stable footing, with a
reliable revenue system and with expansion of its borders deeper into Indian
heartland. There is a belief prevalent in the present day India that Akbar's
rule was secular and tolerant of the native Hindu faith. This belief is
fostered by the Indian history texts, Hindi movies like Mughal-e-Azam, a TV
serial on Doordarshan and the fictional tales of Akbar and his Hindu court
jester Birbal. Although Akbar did abolish two obnoxious taxes on Hindus namely
the pilgrimage tax in 1563 CE and Jizya (A tax stipulated in the Koran to be
paid by Zimmis or unbelievers) in 1564 CE, his rule was better compared ONLY to
the other Mughal and Turko-Afgani rules. This article illustrates this with two
specific historical events. First, Akbar like all Mughal rulers had the holy
Muslim title of GHAZI (SLAYER OF KAFFIR - infidel). Like Timur Lane and Nader
Shah, AKBAR HAD A VICTORY TOWER ERECTED WITH THE HEADS OF THE CAPTURED/
SURRENDERED ARMY OF HEMU after the second battle of Panipat. Later, AKBAR AGAIN
SLAUGHTERED MORE THAN 30,000 UNARMED CAPTIVE HINDU PEASANTS AFTER THE FALL OF
CHITOD ON FEBRUARY 24, 1568.
This article also relates another
historical event which shows the true dubious nature of Akbar's religious
beliefs which he used merely to suit his convenience.
10 REFERENCES, The Cambridge
History of India, Encyclopedia Britannica and other works based on Akbar-nama
by Abul Fazl.
THE MUGHAL ANCESTRY
Akbar's grandfather Babar founded
the Mughal dynasty. Babar was a direct descendent of Timur Lane from his
father's Barlas Turk side and of Chengiz Khan the Mongol from his mother's
side. The name Mongol had become synonymous with barbarian by the 16 th century
CE, hence Babar was proud of his ancestry from Timur, whose descendents were
regarded as 'cultured Turks'. In a twist of poetic justice, the dynasty founded
by Babar became known through out the world as Mughal - an adaptation of
Mughul, the Persian word for 'Mongol'(1). In Marathi also Mughals are referred
to as 'Mongal' which is close to Mongol.
Babar's son Humayun was defeated
by Sher Shah Sur, an Afgan at the battle of Chausa on 26 June 1539. But Humayun
later defeated Sikandar Shah Sur in 1555 to regain Delhi.
SECOND BATTLE OF PANIPAT AND
HOW AKBAR BECAME GHAZI
On 24 th January 1556 CE Mughal
ruler Humayun slipped while climbing down the steps of his library and fell to
his death. The heir to the Mughal throne, 13 year old Akbar was then
campaigning in Punjab with his chief minister Bairam Khan. On February 14,
1556, in a garden at Kalanaur, Akbar was enthroned as emperor. The other rivals
for the throne of Delhi were the three Afgan princes of Sher Shah. However the
main threat to Akbar's future came not from the Afgan princes but from a Hindu.
Hemu, the Hindu chief minister of Afgan prince Adil Shah led a surprise attack
on Delhi in October 1556 . The Mughal forces under its governor Tardi Beg Khan
panicked and went into a sudden ignominious flight. This was Hemu's twenty
second consecutive victory in successive battles. After the capture of Delhi,
Hemu set up himself as an independent ruler under the Hindu title of 'Raja
Vikramaditya'. At this juncture against the advice of most nobles, Akbar and
Bairam Khan took a courageous decision, to press forward against Hemu's
undoubtedly superior forces. On November 5, 1556 the Mughul forces met the army
of Hemu at Panipat.
In this second battle of Panipat,
the Mughals were saved by a lucky accident after a hard fight which looked more
than likely to go against them. An arrow hit Hemu in the eye and although it
did not kill him it had pierced the cerebral cavity enough to make him
unconscious. In any battle of this period the death of the leader meant an end
of the fight, and the sight of Hemu slumped in the howdah of his famous
elephant Hawai was enough to make his army turn tail. Shah Quli Khan captured
the Hawai elephant with its prize occupant, and took it directly to Akbar. Hemu
was brought unconscious before Akbar and Bairam. Bairam pleaded Akbar to
perform the holy duty of slaying the infidel and earn the Islamic holy title of
'Ghazi'. Among much self-congratulation AKBAR THEN SEVERED THE HEAD OF
UNCONSCIOUS HEMU WITH HIS SABER (2,3,4). Some historians claim that Akbar did
not kill Hemu himself, but just touched the infidel's head with his sword and
his associates finished the gory 'holy' work. However the latter version seems
inconsistent with the events that followed. After the battle Hemu's head was
sent to kabul as a sign of victory to the ladies of Humayun's harem, and Hemu's
torso was sent to Delhi for exposure on a gibbet. Iskandar Khan chased the
Hemu's fleeing army and captured 1500 elephants and a large contingent. THERE
WAS A GREAT SLAUGHTER OF THOSE WHO WERE CAPTURED and IN KEEPING WITH THE CUSTOM
OF HIS ANCESTORS TIMUR LANE AND CHENGIZ KHAN, AKBAR HAD A VICTORY PILLAR BUILT
WITH THEIR HEADS. Peter Mundy, an Englishman travelling Mughal empire some 75
years later (during Jahangir and Shah Jahan's rein), found such towers were
still being built. (Reference 2 gives pictures of a sketch by Peter Mundy, and
Mughal painting of the tower of heads during Akbar's reign). Hemu's wife
escaped from Delhi with the treasure and Pir Mohammad Khan's troops chased her
caravan without success. HEMU'S AGED FATHER WAS CAPTURED AND ON REFUSING TO
ACCEPT ISLAM, WAS EXECUTED (3). This is the 'glorious' history of Akbar's
victory at the battle of Panipat.
FALL OF CHITOD AND SLAUGHTER
OF 30,000 CAPTIVE HINDU PEASANTS
Despite nearly five centuries of
Muslim occupation of India, Rajasthan in 1567 CE was still almost entirely
Hindu. Akbar infiltrated the area by marrying into Rajasthan's ruling houses
and by steadily capturing various forts on the eastern fringe of Rajputana. But
the senior house of Rajasthan, Rana of Mewar proudly refused any alliance with
Mughals. Akbar's army started a campaign for Chitod in 1567. Rana of Mewar,
Uday Singh left his capital, the great fort of Chitod to be defended by 8,000
Rajputs under an excellent commander, Jai Mal, and took himself and his family
to the safety of the hills. Akbar arrived on October 24, 1567 and laid a siege
of Chitod. Akbar's huge army's camp stretched for almost ten miles . Akbar
planned two methods of assault -mining and building a 'sabat', a structure
which provides the invading army a cover of a high wall as it progresses
'infinitely slowly' towards the fort wall and tightens the noose around the
fort. The mining proved disastrous since an explosion of a mistimed second mine
claimed Akbar's nearly 200 men including some leading nobles. As the noose of
'sabat' tightened, Akbar forces lost nearly 200 men a day to musket fire from
the fort. Almost four months after the siege, on February 23, 1567, a musket
shot fired from the Mughal army killed Jai Mal. Some chroniclers claim that
this shot was fired by Akbar himself. With the death of their leader Jai Mal,
the Rajputs for a while lost heart. That night flames leapt to the sky as
THOUSANDS OF RAJPUT WOMEN PERFORMED JAUHAR (act of self-immolation, the term is
a corruption of Jay Har - meaning Hail Shiva). They preferred jumping into a
roaring fire, to being captured by Mughal Akbar. Later events do lend credit to
their astute judgement. This was the THIRD JAUHAR IN THE HISTORY OF CHITOD.
Next day the Rajputs under a new
young leader Patta Singh donned on the saffron robes - Kesariya, in preparation
for a fight to death, flung open the gates of the fort and charged on to the
Mughal army. Patta Singh, his mother and his wife duly died in the ensuing
battle as did many Rajput warriors. Later, the victorious Mughal army entered
the fort of Chitod. At the time there were 40,000 Hindu peasants and artisans
residing on the fort besides the Rajput army. AKBAR THEN ORDERED A MASSACRE OF
ALL THE CAPTURED UNARMED 40,000 HINDUS, some artisans indeed were spared and
taken away but THE SLAIN AMOUNTED TO AT LEAST 30,000 (5,6,7,8,9) Akbar was
particularly keen to avenge himself on the thousand musketeers who had done
much damage to his troops, but they escaped by the boldest of the tricks.
Binding their own women and children, and shoving them roughly along like new
captives, the Rajput musketeers successfully passed themselves off as a
detachment of the victorious Mughals and so made their way out of the fort
(5,6,7,8,9).
The MASSACRE OF 30,000 CAPTIVE
HINDUS AT CHITOD BY AKBAR has left an indelible blot on his name. No such
horrors were perpetrated by even the brutal Ala-ud-din Khilji who had captured
the fort in 1303 CE. Abul Fazl, Akbar's court chronicler is at pains in trying
to justify this slaughter. In the later period of his rule, Akbar later had
statues of Patta and Jai Mal, riding on elephants, installed at the gate of his
imperial palace at Agra. Although probably intended as a compliment for their
heroism, it was open to misconstruction since in the earlier history Jai Chand
had placed a similar statue of Prithvi Raj Chauhan at the gate of his palace
(as a Dwarpal) at the Swayamvar of his daughter Sanyogita.
Sir Thomas Roe, an Englishman who
visited Chitod some fifty years later, found the fort deserted. In fact, it
remained a firm tenet of Mughal policy throughout the next century that
fortifications of Chitod, which till then was the capital of the then strongest
Hindu Rana, should remain unrepaired, perhaps as a lesson to Hindus who dared
to take on the Mughals (5).
Rana Pratap Singh of Mewar, son
of Rana Uday Singh, kept the Rajput resistance to Akbar alive and tried to
reclaim the glory of Chitod.
AKBAR AND RELIGION
In the later part of his rule
Akbar founded a new religion Din-e-Ilahi in which he vaguely tried to combine
practices of Islam and Hinduism. He observed Muslim, Hindu and Parsee
festivals. He had Jesuit priests in his courts. However, this founder of
Din-e-Ilahi was practically illiterate. Till the end of his rule only seventeen
nobles yielded to Akbar's wishes (and pressure) and converted to his new
religion, among whom Raja Birbal was one. None of Akbar's children adopted his
religion. To top it all, Jahangir, Akbar's son from his Hindu wife Jodhabai,
later killed a Kaffir (Hindu infidel) and gained the holy Islamic title of
Ghazi. It is indeed true that Akbar drifted from orthodox Islamic practices and
became more tolerant of other religions. However, more often Akbar used and
twisted religious principles to his own advantage. Let us look at one such
example.
Akbar used marriage alliances
with various royal houses as a way of expanding his empire. The political
advantages of this steady stream of presentation of princesses were
incalculable. In the end Akbar had more than 300 wives. The actual number of
women in the harem was nearer to 5,000. Many of these were older women, but
there were also young servant girls, or Amazons of Russia or Abyssinia as armed
guards, all with the status only of slaves. It was these who, if so required,
were the emperor's concubines. The three hundred were technically wives, even
though the Koran limits the number to four. Akbar wanted religious sanction of
all these 300 wives. Now as per the Persian Shia interpretation of Muslim
scriptures (and also by the present day 'Mohammedan Act of India'! ) a Muslim
can have a 'Mutta' marriage with a free women of OTHER religion. A 'Mutta'
marraige involves no ceremony , but is a private pact between a man and a woman
for, officially, 'a limited period time (as short as one night)' agreed between
them. As per Shia interpretation, 'Mutta' constituted a legal Muslim marriage.
Akbar used 'Mutta' principle to justify his300 wives. But the Sunni Ulemma
(Islamic scholars) from his courtdisagreed. The The arguments between Akbar and
Ulemma raged back andforth, until -completing the parallel with Henry VIII-
Akbar dismissed the Kazi, the highest religious officer from his court, aSunni,
and replaced him with a Shia who did agree with him! (10)
Later, Akbar had effrontery to
decree that 'it was best for ordinary men to to have only one wife'! (10)
DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION
Akbar killed an unconscious Hemu
(a Hindu) to become a 'Ghazi' at the second battle of Panipat, he later ordered
slaughter of all the captives from Hemu's army and had a victory tower built
with their heads. Similarly, Akbar later on ordered a massacre of 30,000 plus
unarmed captive Hindu peasants after the fall of Chitod on February 24, 1568.
Are these the characteristics of a truly 'secular' and 'tolerant' emperor ?
These events reveal Akbar's true nature during early part of his reign. Should
Akbar be called 'Great' and 'Secular' only because he was a lesser despot than
the rest of the Mughal emperors ? In the entire Indian history of thousands of
years NOT A SINGLE HINDU KING EVER SLAUGHTERED THOUSANDS OF PRISONERS OF WAR.
In fact the Hindu virtue of generosity to the surrendered (SharaNaagat Vatsal
Bhav), came to haunt them later. Prithvi Raj Chauhan defeated Mohammed Ghori
several times and generously let the loser free each time. This generosity of
Pritviraj was paid back by Mohammed Ghori who after having finally defeated
Prithvi Raj in 1193 CE, blinded him and carried him to Afganistan in chains where
Prithvi Raj died an ignominious death. The Mughals were the descendents of
brutal Mongol Chengiz Khan and the Turk Timur Lane. The above incidences
clearly show that MUGHAL EMPERORS WERE FOREIGN AND NOT INDIAN, AND AKBAR BY HIS
ACTIONS WAS NO EXCEPTION. Thus to call Akbar as 'The Great' is nothing but an
insult to all civilized societies. This article also has shown Akbar's dubious
use of religious principles.
If we are to take example from
the 20 th century, then even the Nazis did not kill 30,000 prisoners of war in
cold blood during the second World War. However scores of Nazis were sentenced
to death during the Nuremburg trials for their War Crimes against POWs.
Readers are encouraged to read
more about the true brutality of Mughal empire.
The readers should ponder upon
following questions:
If Akbar 'the epitome of secularism' was so cruel and brutal, what
must have been the extent of brutality of Timur Lane, Babar, Aurangzeb and
Nader Shah?
Why don't the Indian School texts give these details of Akbar and
What else are they hiding?
REFERENCES
1.The Great
Moghuls, By B.Gascoigne, Harper Row Publishers, New York, 1972, p.15
2.Same as ref.
1, pp. 68-75
3.The Cambridge
History of India, Vol. IV, Mughal India, ed. Lt. Col. Sir W.Haig, Sir R.Burn,
S,Chand & Co., Delhi, 1963, pp. 71-73
4.The Builders
of The Mogul Empire, By M.Prawdin, Barnes & Noble Inc, New York, 1965, pp.
127-28
5.Same as ref.
1, pp. 88-93
6.Same as ref.
3. pp. 97-99
7.Same as ref.
4, pp. 137-38
8.An Advanced
History of India, by R.C.Majumdar, H.C.Raychoudhury, K.Datta, MacMillen &
Co., London, 2nd Ed, 1965, pp. 448-450
^ i dont disagree that a lot of temples were destroyed also idols, however hindus were not killed off, mughals could have easily killed them off but they didn't
Temple destruction is not a practice of secularism or tolerance.
The most tolerant among the Mughals the Akbar himself is known to have murdered thousands of Hindu peasants.
Mughals easily did what they could do and Aurangazeb did the best of it but even he couldnt wipe out hindus from India.They destroyed the culture,traditions,artforms,universities like Nalanda and other Hindu learning centres all studies that were going on in Astronomy,mathematics,medicine(ayurveda).
North India is totally wiped out of temples and almost all the Hindus practices and traditions were wipped out from there due to 700 years of Islamic rule.All the ancient tempples were destroyed and converted to mosques & those werent practices of tolerance.
^ i Think you guys are confusing mughals with various afghan/pashtun or other turkic rulers, they were not mughals and yes they were violent not just against hindus but against there fellow muslims (mughals). Mughal muslims for the most part are respected by even hindus, other then Aurangzeb i think, no mughal leader killed innocent hindus, i mean they even intermarried among hindus. They were really tolerant considering the times they lived in. infact it was probably because of mughals that india became bit safe from the violent afghan/turkic rulers who were always attacking india before mughals and killing of hindus.
Mughals themselves were Turko mongols.Babur was known to be the descendent of Genghis Khan & Timurlane from his Father's & Mother's line.And it is for Babur's misdeeds that Hindus & Muslim's of India are having problems today (ie Ramjanmabhumi: Babri Masjid).
Babur Destroyed the Ram temple of Ayodhya and built a mosque there.
And temples were not destroyed without bloodshed.Thousands of innocent Hindus mainly Brahmins were killed during every temple destruction.
Zahiru’d-Din Muahmmed
Babur(CE 1526-1530) Source: Babur NamaPlace:Chanderi (Madhya Pradesh)
In AH 934 (CE 1528) I attacked Chanderi and by the grace of Allah captured it
in a few hours…We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been
daru’l – harb for years was made into a daru’l-islam.
Babur’s poem on killing Hindus
For the sake of Islam I became a wanderer;I battled infidels and Hindus.I
determined to become a martyr.Thank God I became a Ghazi(killer of non-Muslims)
Quoted in Dr. Harsh Narain’s article:Rama-Janma Bhumi Muslim testimony Indian
Express Feb,26,1990 Place:Uttar Pradesh
Since the establishment of Zahiru’d-Din Ghazi’s rule …officers and religious
leaders spread Islam vigorously destroying Hindu faith. We cleared of the filth
of Hinduism from Faizabad and Avadh. Guru Nanak on Babur’s atrocities:Source:Rag Asa Guru Nanak Dev
witnessed first hand the atrocities Babur committed on Hindus and recorded them
in his poems. He says:
Having attacked Khuraasaan, Babar terrified Hindustan. The Creator Himself does
not take the blame, but has sent the Mugal as the messenger of death. There was
so much slaughter that the people screamed. Didn’t You feel compassion, Lord?
pg (360) On the condition of Hindu women in Babur’s monster rule:
Those heads adorned with braided hair, with their parts painted with vermillion
– those heads were shaved with scissors, and their throats were choked with
dust.They lived in palatial mansions, but now, they cannot even sit near the
palaces…. ropes were put around their necks, and their strings of pearls were
broken. Their wealth and youthful beauty, which gave them so much pleasure,
have now become their enemies. The order was given to the soldiers, who
dishonored them, and carried them away. If it is pleasing to God’s Will, He
bestows greatness; if is pleases His Will, He bestows punishment pg(417-18)
On the nature of Mughal rule under Babur:
First, the tree puts down its roots, and then it spreads out its shade above.
The kings are tigers, and their officials are dogs; they go out and awaken the
sleeping people to harass them. The public servants inflict wounds with their
nails. The dogs lick up the blood that is spilled. Source:Rag Malar, (pg.1288)
Jahangir(1605-1628)
Source: Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri
Though in the beginning of his rule Jahangir followed the humanistic rule of
his father Akbar the great -the policy of sulehkul even issued a proclamation
against the forcible conversion of Hindus to Islam, he revoked Akbar’s orders
that those who have been forcibly converted from Islam could return to
Hinduism. He severely punished Kaukab, Sharif and Abdul Latif for showing
inclination to Hinduism. He also prohibited the free inter-marriage customs
between Hindus and Muslims in Kashmir. Hindus marrying Muslim girls and those
who had already married were given a choice between Islam and death. Many were
killed.
Jahangir’s torture of Guru Arjun Dev ji: Guru was imprisoned at Lahore fort. He
was chained to a post in an open place exposed to the sun from morning to
evening in the summer months of May to June. Below his feet a heap of sand was
put which burnt like a furnace. Boiling water was poured on his naked body at
intervals. His body was covered with blisters all over. In this agony Guru used
to utter.
Tera Kiya Metha lage, naam padarath Nanak mange(whatever you ordain appears
sweet. I supplicate for the gift of name)
The Guru was ordercd to be executed. In addition a fine of Rupees two lakhs was
imposed on him. Some historians say that, as a measure of clemency at the
intervention of Mian Mir, this fine was imposed in lieu of the sentence of
death. The Sikhs offered to pay the fine themselves but the Guru forbade them
to do so. He replied to the Emperor,
“Whatever money I have is for the poor, the friendless and the stranger. If
thou ask for money thou mayest take what I have; but if thou ask for it by way
of fine, I shall not give thee even a Kaurz (penny).” The Guru accepted death
by torture
Shah Jahan(1658-1707)
In 1632 Shah jahan ordered that all Hindu temples recently erected or in the
course of construction should be razed to the ground. In Benares alone seventy
six temples were destroyed. Christian churches at Agra and Lahore were
demolished. In a manner befitting the Prophet he had ten thousand inhabitants
executed by being “blown up with powder, drowned in water or burnt by fire”.
Four thousand were taken captive to Agra where they were tortured to try to
convert them to Islam. Only a few apostacised, the remainder were trampled to
death by elephants, except for the younger women who went to harems.
Shahjahan put enormous eonomic pressure on Hindus particularly peasents to
become Muslims. The criminals too were forced to become Muslims.
Source: Badshah Nama, Qazinivi & Badshah Nama , Lahori
When Shuja was appointed as governor of Kabul he carried on a ruthless war in
the Hindu territory beyond Indus…The sword of Islam yielded a rich crop of
converts….Most of the women (to save their honour) burnt themselves to death.
Those captured were distributed among Muslim Mansabdars.
Source: Manucci, Storia do Mogor vol-II p.451 & Travels of Frey Sebastian
Manrique
Under Shahjahan peasents were compelled to sell their women and children to
meet their revenue requirements….The peasents were carried off to various Markets
and fairs to be sold with their poor unhappy wives carrying their small
children crying and lamenting. According to Qaznivi Shahjagan had decreed they
should be sold to Muslim lords. Aurangazeb(1658-1707)
Aurangzeb considered himself “The Scourge Of The Kafirs” (non-believers) and
closed Hindu schools and libraries. In his lifetime he destroyed more than
10,000 Hindu, Buddhist and Jam temples and often erected mosques in their
stead.3 In 1669 in Agra he had hacked off the limbs of the recalcitrant Hindu
King Gokla and in 1672 several thousand revolting Hindus were slaughtered in
Mewat.
Source: Maasi-i-Alamgiri
· Issued general order to destroy all centers of Hindu learnings including
Varnasi and destroyed the temple at Mathura and renamed it as Islamabad
· In Khandela (rajastan) he killed 300 Hindus in one day for they resisted the
destruction of their temple.
· In Udaipur all Hindus of the town were killed as they vowed to defend the
temple of Udaipur from destruction.
· 172 temples were destroyed in Udaipur.
· 66 temples were pulled down in Amber. All Hindu clerks were dismissed from
the office of the Imperial empire.
· In Pandhpur , Maharashtra, the Emperor ordered and executed the destruction
of temple and butchering of cows within the temple.
Aurangazeb also tortured to death the disciples of Guru Tegh bahadur before his
death and also killed Guru. Guru Tegh Bahadur – the pride of Hindustan was
martyred for he spoke for the persecuted Hindus of Hindustan. Aurangazeb also
killed Guru Gobind singh’s two children aged less than ten by walling them
alive for not accepting the choice of Islam. In Punjab Muslim governors killed
hundreds of Sikh children and made Sikh women eat the flesh of their own killed
children. Banda Bahadur another great Sikh martyr before being tortured to
death was also made to eat the flesh of his own children killed before his
eyes. Any Muslim bringing the head of a dead Sikh was also awarded money. Guru Tegh Bahadur’s Supreme sacrifice for Kashmiri Hindus
In 1674 CE Aurangzeb ordered that the Hindus of J&K be converted to Islam
by force from the Kashmir side. Harassed beyond any human measure by Sher Afgan
Khan, the Governor of Kashmir, the prominent Brahmins of Kashmir led by Pandit
Kirpa Ram (who later became Sanskrit tutor of Guru Govind Singh, appeared
before the Guru at Anandpur on the 25th May, 1675 CE, and appealed for
protection. In His infinite compassion Guru tegh Bahadur assured them total
protection. Guru proclaimed His resolve to protect the Dharma of Bharath,
“Go and tell the Governor that Guru Tegh Bahadur is our leader. If you convert
him to Islam, we shall become Muslims of our own accord.”
On getting this message, Aurangzeb ordered the arrest of the Guru. For courting
arrest, the Guru started towards Agra from Anandpur on the 11th July, 1675 CE
At Agra, when the soldiers came to arrest the Guru.
Aurangazeb tortured Guru’s disciples before his own eyes to break Guru’s
resolve.The qazis asked Bhai Mati Dass a disciple of Guru ,
“Embrace Islam and enjoy the pleasures provided by the goveInment. Moreover
when you die as a Muslim, you will go to heaven where there will be streams of
milk, many kinds of wine to drink and beautiful women to enjoy. If you do not
embrace Islam, your body will be sawn into two.”
Bhai Mati Dass replied,
“I can sacrifice hundreds of such heavens for Dharma. I don’t need women nor
wine. I see all the happiness in the path of Dharma.”
After his refusal, the qazis asked him his last wish, to which he replied,
‘When I am being cut with the saw, let my face be towards my mentor so that I
may behold my Guru till my last breath and he may keep on seeing me so that he
may be convinced how happily I reach my last destination.’
By the order of the qazis, the executioners sawed Bhai Mati Dass into two by
axe on the 8th November, 1675 CE, in Chandani Chowk, Delhi.
On the 9th November, 1675 C.E, the Qazis ordered that Bhai Dayal Dass be seated
in a cauldron of boiling water… Before putting Bhai Dayal Dass in the cauldron
of boiling water, the qazis said,
“There is still time. Embrace Islam and save yourself from pains otherwise you
will face greater agony than your companion. You have seen how cruelly he was
sawn.”
Bhai Dayal Dass replied,
“You could not harass my companion. Did you notice, how calmly he was meditating
on the word of his Guru when he was being sawn. Having made mockery of bodily
pains, he had diffused into the Supreme Being. Hurry up and let my soul attain
unity with the Lord.”
On his reply in the negative, the executioners sat him in the cauldron of
boiling water. He stayed on sitting in the water with an unwavering mind. His
flesh separated from his bones and his soul merged into the Supreme Being.
(Source: From the work of Sri.Santok Singh Jagdev.Published by SGPC)
Established in His Divine resolve of Dharma Guru Tegh Bahadur tolerated all the
tortures of Aurangazeb with smile. Guru Tegh Bahadur was threatened and given a
choice to embrace Islam or death.
Guru chose Death rather than deviating from the path of Dharma. Guru sat in
meditation and was beheaded by Aurangazeb. Aurangazeb killed Guru physically
but Guru’s words eternally power the hearts of every child of Hindustan. He had
said in the face of death:
Bah Jinahn di pakariyeSar dije bah na chhoriyeTegh Bahadur bolyaDhar payae
dharma na chhoriye
Give up your head,but forsake not those whom you have undertaken to
protect.Says Tegh Bahadur, sacrifice your life,but relinquish not your Dharma
^ i Think you guys are confusing mughals with various afghan/pashtun or other turkic rulers, they were not mughals and yes they were violent not just against hindus but against there fellow muslims (mughals). Mughal muslims for the most part are respected by even hindus, other then Aurangzeb i think, no mughal leader killed innocent hindus, i mean they even intermarried among hindus. They were really tolerant considering the times they lived in. infact it was probably because of mughals that india became bit safe from the violent afghan/turkic rulers who were always attacking india before mughals and killing of hindus.
Mughals never married Hindu girls or princesses.
Mughals married Rajput princesses after getting them converted to Islam , that is not intermarriage or inter-religious marriage.
In most of such cases they used force and pressure tactics and even blackmail to persuade the Rajput king to offer his sister's/daughter's hand to a powerful Muslim king( Mughals)
ranjithvnambiar
I appreciate your posts and agree with you on many points but maybe put in the first paragraph and then summarize the rest. But, please don't cut and paste the entire article.
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε
Zahiru’d-Din Muahmmed Babur(CE 1526-1530) Source: Babur NamaPlace:Chanderi (Madhya Pradesh) In AH 934 (CE 1528) I attacked Chanderi and by the grace of Allah captured it in a few hours…We got the infidels slaughtered and the place which had been daru’l – harb for years was made into a daru’l-islam. Babur’s poem on killing Hindus For the sake of Islam I became a wanderer;I battled infidels and Hindus.I determined to become a martyr.Thank God I became a Ghazi(killer of non-Muslims) Quoted in Dr. Harsh Narain’s article:Rama-Janma Bhumi Muslim testimony Indian Express Feb,26,1990 Place:Uttar Pradesh Since the establishment of Zahiru’d-Din Ghazi’s rule …officers and religious leaders spread Islam vigorously destroying Hindu faith. We cleared of the filth of Hinduism from Faizabad and Avadh. Guru Nanak on Babur’s atrocities:Source:Rag Asa Guru Nanak Dev witnessed first hand the atrocities Babur committed on Hindus and recorded them in his poems. He says: Having attacked Khuraasaan, Babar terrified Hindustan. The Creator Himself does not take the blame, but has sent the Mugal as the messenger of death. There was so much slaughter that the people screamed. Didn’t You feel compassion, Lord? pg (360) On the condition of Hindu women in Babur’s monster rule: Those heads adorned with braided hair, with their parts painted with vermillion – those heads were shaved with scissors, and their throats were choked with dust.They lived in palatial mansions, but now, they cannot even sit near the palaces…. ropes were put around their necks, and their strings of pearls were broken. Their wealth and youthful beauty, which gave them so much pleasure, have now become their enemies. The order was given to the soldiers, who dishonored them, and carried them away. If it is pleasing to God’s Will, He bestows greatness; if is pleases His Will, He bestows punishment pg(417-18) On the nature of Mughal rule under Babur: First, the tree puts down its roots, and then it spreads out its shade above. The kings are tigers, and their officials are dogs; they go out and awaken the sleeping people to harass them. The public servants inflict wounds with their nails. The dogs lick up the blood that is spilled. Source:Rag Malar, (pg.1288)
Jahangir(1605-1628) Source: Tuzuk-i-Jahangiri Though in the beginning of his rule Jahangir followed the humanistic rule of his father Akbar the great -the policy of sulehkul even issued a proclamation against the forcible conversion of Hindus to Islam, he revoked Akbar’s orders that those who have been forcibly converted from Islam could return to Hinduism. He severely punished Kaukab, Sharif and Abdul Latif for showing inclination to Hinduism. He also prohibited the free inter-marriage customs between Hindus and Muslims in Kashmir. Hindus marrying Muslim girls and those who had already married were given a choice between Islam and death. Many were killed. Jahangir’s torture of Guru Arjun Dev ji: Guru was imprisoned at Lahore fort. He was chained to a post in an open place exposed to the sun from morning to evening in the summer months of May to June. Below his feet a heap of sand was put which burnt like a furnace. Boiling water was poured on his naked body at intervals. His body was covered with blisters all over. In this agony Guru used to utter. Tera Kiya Metha lage, naam padarath Nanak mange(whatever you ordain appears sweet. I supplicate for the gift of name) The Guru was ordercd to be executed. In addition a fine of Rupees two lakhs was imposed on him. Some historians say that, as a measure of clemency at the intervention of Mian Mir, this fine was imposed in lieu of the sentence of death. The Sikhs offered to pay the fine themselves but the Guru forbade them to do so. He replied to the Emperor, “Whatever money I have is for the poor, the friendless and the stranger. If thou ask for money thou mayest take what I have; but if thou ask for it by way of fine, I shall not give thee even a Kaurz (penny).” The Guru accepted death by torture
Shah Jahan(1658-1707) In 1632 Shah jahan ordered that all Hindu temples recently erected or in the course of construction should be razed to the ground. In Benares alone seventy six temples were destroyed. Christian churches at Agra and Lahore were demolished. In a manner befitting the Prophet he had ten thousand inhabitants executed by being “blown up with powder, drowned in water or burnt by fire”. Four thousand were taken captive to Agra where they were tortured to try to convert them to Islam. Only a few apostacised, the remainder were trampled to death by elephants, except for the younger women who went to harems. Shahjahan put enormous eonomic pressure on Hindus particularly peasents to become Muslims. The criminals too were forced to become Muslims. Source: Badshah Nama, Qazinivi & Badshah Nama , Lahori When Shuja was appointed as governor of Kabul he carried on a ruthless war in the Hindu territory beyond Indus…The sword of Islam yielded a rich crop of converts….Most of the women (to save their honour) burnt themselves to death. Those captured were distributed among Muslim Mansabdars. Source: Manucci, Storia do Mogor vol-II p.451 & Travels of Frey Sebastian Manrique Under Shahjahan peasents were compelled to sell their women and children to meet their revenue requirements….The peasents were carried off to various Markets and fairs to be sold with their poor unhappy wives carrying their small children crying and lamenting. According to Qaznivi Shahjagan had decreed they should be sold to Muslim lords. Aurangazeb(1658-1707) Aurangzeb considered himself “The Scourge Of The Kafirs” (non-believers) and closed Hindu schools and libraries. In his lifetime he destroyed more than 10,000 Hindu, Buddhist and Jam temples and often erected mosques in their stead.3 In 1669 in Agra he had hacked off the limbs of the recalcitrant Hindu King Gokla and in 1672 several thousand revolting Hindus were slaughtered in Mewat. Source: Maasi-i-Alamgiri · Issued general order to destroy all centers of Hindu learnings including Varnasi and destroyed the temple at Mathura and renamed it as Islamabad · In Khandela (rajastan) he killed 300 Hindus in one day for they resisted the destruction of their temple. · In Udaipur all Hindus of the town were killed as they vowed to defend the temple of Udaipur from destruction. · 172 temples were destroyed in Udaipur. · 66 temples were pulled down in Amber. All Hindu clerks were dismissed from the office of the Imperial empire. · In Pandhpur , Maharashtra, the Emperor ordered and executed the destruction of temple and butchering of cows within the temple. Aurangazeb also tortured to death the disciples of Guru Tegh bahadur before his death and also killed Guru. Guru Tegh Bahadur – the pride of Hindustan was martyred for he spoke for the persecuted Hindus of Hindustan. Aurangazeb also killed Guru Gobind singh’s two children aged less than ten by walling them alive for not accepting the choice of Islam. In Punjab Muslim governors killed hundreds of Sikh children and made Sikh women eat the flesh of their own killed children. Banda Bahadur another great Sikh martyr before being tortured to death was also made to eat the flesh of his own children killed before his eyes. Any Muslim bringing the head of a dead Sikh was also awarded money. Guru Tegh Bahadur’s Supreme sacrifice for Kashmiri Hindus In 1674 CE Aurangzeb ordered that the Hindus of J&K be converted to Islam by force from the Kashmir side. Harassed beyond any human measure by Sher Afgan Khan, the Governor of Kashmir, the prominent Brahmins of Kashmir led by Pandit Kirpa Ram (who later became Sanskrit tutor of Guru Govind Singh, appeared before the Guru at Anandpur on the 25th May, 1675 CE, and appealed for protection. In His infinite compassion Guru tegh Bahadur assured them total protection. Guru proclaimed His resolve to protect the Dharma of Bharath, “Go and tell the Governor that Guru Tegh Bahadur is our leader. If you convert him to Islam, we shall become Muslims of our own accord.” On getting this message, Aurangzeb ordered the arrest of the Guru. For courting arrest, the Guru started towards Agra from Anandpur on the 11th July, 1675 CE At Agra, when the soldiers came to arrest the Guru. Aurangazeb tortured Guru’s disciples before his own eyes to break Guru’s resolve.The qazis asked Bhai Mati Dass a disciple of Guru , “Embrace Islam and enjoy the pleasures provided by the goveInment. Moreover when you die as a Muslim, you will go to heaven where there will be streams of milk, many kinds of wine to drink and beautiful women to enjoy. If you do not embrace Islam, your body will be sawn into two.” Bhai Mati Dass replied, “I can sacrifice hundreds of such heavens for Dharma. I don’t need women nor wine. I see all the happiness in the path of Dharma.” After his refusal, the qazis asked him his last wish, to which he replied, ‘When I am being cut with the saw, let my face be towards my mentor so that I may behold my Guru till my last breath and he may keep on seeing me so that he may be convinced how happily I reach my last destination.’ By the order of the qazis, the executioners sawed Bhai Mati Dass into two by axe on the 8th November, 1675 CE, in Chandani Chowk, Delhi. On the 9th November, 1675 C.E, the Qazis ordered that Bhai Dayal Dass be seated in a cauldron of boiling water… Before putting Bhai Dayal Dass in the cauldron of boiling water, the qazis said, “There is still time. Embrace Islam and save yourself from pains otherwise you will face greater agony than your companion. You have seen how cruelly he was sawn.” Bhai Dayal Dass replied, “You could not harass my companion. Did you notice, how calmly he was meditating on the word of his Guru when he was being sawn. Having made mockery of bodily pains, he had diffused into the Supreme Being. Hurry up and let my soul attain unity with the Lord.” On his reply in the negative, the executioners sat him in the cauldron of boiling water. He stayed on sitting in the water with an unwavering mind. His flesh separated from his bones and his soul merged into the Supreme Being. (Source: From the work of Sri.Santok Singh Jagdev.Published by SGPC) Established in His Divine resolve of Dharma Guru Tegh Bahadur tolerated all the tortures of Aurangazeb with smile. Guru Tegh Bahadur was threatened and given a choice to embrace Islam or death. Guru chose Death rather than deviating from the path of Dharma. Guru sat in meditation and was beheaded by Aurangazeb. Aurangazeb killed Guru physically but Guru’s words eternally power the hearts of every child of Hindustan. He had said in the face of death: Bah Jinahn di pakariyeSar dije bah na chhoriyeTegh Bahadur bolyaDhar payae dharma na chhoriye Give up your head,but forsake not those whom you have undertaken to protect.Says Tegh Bahadur, sacrifice your life,but relinquish not your Dharma
I need the source for this article, i need to make sure its not coming from some racist hindu site
^ i Think you guys are confusing mughals with various afghan/pashtun or other turkic rulers, they were not mughals and yes they were violent not just against hindus but against there fellow muslims (mughals). Mughal muslims for the most part are respected by even hindus, other then Aurangzeb i think, no mughal leader killed innocent hindus, i mean they even intermarried among hindus. They were really tolerant considering the times they lived in. infact it was probably because of mughals that india became bit safe from the violent afghan/turkic rulers who were always attacking india before mughals and killing of hindus.
Mughals never married Hindu girls or princesses.
Mughals married Rajput princesses after getting them converted to Islam , that is not intermarriage or inter-religious marriage.
In most of such cases they used force and pressure tactics and even blackmail to persuade the Rajput king to offer his sister's/daughter's hand to a powerful Muslim king( Mughals)
so are you telling me that Rajputs were that weak and impotent? i thought they were suppose to be warriors like pashtuns?
I dont think what you are saying is true, because there are even some cases of hindu men marrying mughal women
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum