Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Most...Stubborn Balkan Nation? Posted: 23-Mar-2007 at 01:14 |
Originally posted by Yugoslav
Originally posted by es_bih
Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Macedonia, Greece, Turkey. |
Uh, NOW I understand; this poll is referring to Balkan COUNTRIES.
|
......
|
|
Yugoslav
General
Joined: 18-Mar-2007
Location: Yugoslavia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 23-Mar-2007 at 19:36 |
Originally posted by es_bih
Originally posted by Yugoslav
Originally posted by es_bih
Slovenia, Croatia, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Serbia, Montenegro, Romania, Bulgaria, Albania, Macedonia, Greece, Turkey. |
Uh, NOW I understand; this poll is referring to Balkan COUNTRIES.
|
...... |
Speak, man.
|
|
Arbr Z
Colonel
Joined: 26-May-2006
Location: Albania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 598
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2007 at 14:26 |
Originally posted by Yugoslav
Originally posted by Arbr Z
Originally posted by Yugoslav
The title's slightly controversial.
If we go throughout history, Albanians could've been considered a part of Turkish nation and Macedonians either Bulgarian or Serbian (Montenegrins still of Serbian).
BTW, Bosnia and Herzegovina is hardly a nation.
Clarification is needed.
|
oh my god Yugo, you are a genius. Can you explain us more regarding the albanians and their turkish ethno - nationality?
And yes, you should beg your pardon, and wait for apologies if you continue posting nonsense!
About the topic, well...ok I wont comment it |
By the fact that the Ottomans were one nation, which included most parts of the modern-nation Turks and Albanians (but some Greeks and Slavs [Bulgarians and Serbs] too; although not to that far extent). Today however everything is recorded to the Turkish nation.
Why's that nonsense? If you posted "Yugoslavia" as a nation too, I'd daresay it's controversial because "Montenegro", "Bosnia and Herzegovina", "Serbia", "Macedonia", "Croatia" are all already mentioned).
EDIT: Did you know that a regional Egyptian dynasty was founded by an Albanian? However, you could read this only in several places as a side-info; mostly you'll here he was a Turk (Ottomans, remember?).
|
It is nonsense, and tautologic.
Are we all romans just because the roman empire (which lasted even longer than the ottoman) held the balkans for centuries?
Did i know about Mehmet Ali? Do you have any idea what kind of people frequent this forum? Or perhaps you thought we are here to discuss Formula 1?
|
Prej heshtjes...!
|
|
Yugoslav
General
Joined: 18-Mar-2007
Location: Yugoslavia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2007 at 18:26 |
Originally posted by Arbr Z
Originally posted by Yugoslav
Originally posted by Arbr Z
Originally posted by Yugoslav
The title's slightly controversial.
If we go throughout history, Albanians could've been considered a part of Turkish nation and Macedonians either Bulgarian or Serbian (Montenegrins still of Serbian).
BTW, Bosnia and Herzegovina is hardly a nation.
Clarification is needed.
|
oh my god Yugo, you are a genius. Can you explain us more regarding the albanians and their turkish ethno - nationality?
And yes, you should beg your pardon, and wait for apologies if you continue posting nonsense!
About the topic, well...ok I wont comment it |
By the fact that the Ottomans were one nation, which included most parts of the modern-nation Turks and Albanians (but some Greeks and Slavs [Bulgarians and Serbs] too; although not to that far extent). Today however everything is recorded to the Turkish nation.
Why's that nonsense? If you posted "Yugoslavia" as a nation too, I'd daresay it's controversial because "Montenegro", "Bosnia and Herzegovina", "Serbia", "Macedonia", "Croatia" are all already mentioned).
EDIT: Did you know that a regional Egyptian dynasty was founded by an Albanian? However, you could read this only in several places as a side-info; mostly you'll here he was a Turk (Ottomans, remember?).
|
It is nonsense, and tautologic.
Are we all romans just because the roman empire (which lasted even longer than the ottoman) held the balkans for centuries?
Did i know about Mehmet Ali? Do you have any idea what kind of people frequent this forum? Or perhaps you thought we are here to discuss Formula 1? |
That cannot be applied in that case. Tell me, which nation claims heritage (fully founded, and with global support) of the Roman Empire? None. Because that is extinct. However, the Ottomans are not extinct. They "are Turks", roughly said.
|
|
Spartakus
Tsar
terörist
Joined: 22-Nov-2004
Location: Greece/Hellas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4489
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2007 at 18:36 |
One nation which claim heritage to Ancient Romans,is the Romanians.
Edited by Spartakus - 24-Mar-2007 at 18:37
|
"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)
|
|
The Hidden Face
Chieftain
Ustad-i Azam
Joined: 16-Jul-2005
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1379
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2007 at 18:49 |
I think "Yugoslav" is just trolling.
|
|
Yugoslav
General
Joined: 18-Mar-2007
Location: Yugoslavia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Mar-2007 at 10:09 |
Originally posted by The Hidden Face
I think "Yugoslav" is just trolling. |
What? Why on earth did You come that conclusion?
|
|
Yugoslav
General
Joined: 18-Mar-2007
Location: Yugoslavia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 769
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Mar-2007 at 10:28 |
Originally posted by Spartakus
One nation which claim heritage to Ancient Romans,is the Romanians. |
Yes, but they descend from romanized Dacians, and do not claim heritage of the entire Roman civilizations (which should logically most likely go to the Italians, but doesn't).
|
|
Spartakus
Tsar
terörist
Joined: 22-Nov-2004
Location: Greece/Hellas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4489
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Mar-2007 at 15:12 |
Yet,they are the only Balkanians who claim heritage from Romans,not only from Romanized Dacians.
|
"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)
|
|
Mortaza
Tsar
Joined: 21-Jul-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Mar-2007 at 15:30 |
ah sh*t. Pleasee. If serbs are not turks, than albanians are not.
why do we even talk about this bullsh*t?
|
|
Leonidas
Tsar
Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Mar-2007 at 05:58 |
Originally posted by Yugoslav
By
the fact that the Ottomans were one nation, which included most parts
of the modern-nation Turks and Albanians (but some Greeks and Slavs
[Bulgarians and Serbs] too; although not to that far extent). Today
however everything is recorded to the Turkish nation. |
by your definition we all are Turkish. Many Albanians fought with and against the ottomans throughout their history and generally no matter what side they fought for they fought well. heard of the millet system?
|
|
medenaywe
AE Moderator
Master of Meanings
Joined: 06-Nov-2010
Location: /
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 17084
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Jul-2015 at 12:29 |
One for all all for one!
|
|
Aeoli
Shogun
Joined: 13-Feb-2015
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 243
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Jul-2015 at 14:33 |
In Turkey, Bosnians and Albanians are known like that
|
|