Originally posted by Denis
I don't see how one huge federal government is implausible. Would you not agree that a ultimate constitution is necessary to protect international rights? Take for example the global capital is in Bucharest. If the federal government of Uruguay misbehaved by fixing the state elections, the ultimate constitution in Bucharest would mean that legally, the Uruguayan election fixers would be immediately arrested by the international police. Just a thought really. |
Yes, i don't see why there can't exist a federal govt. Most of the world is living under economic imperialism today anyway, problem is the havenots are not bourne out of circumstance but policy. In a OWG it would be the same rights for everyone and an inclusive society.
As i said before: "I was envisaging a more modular system, a hierarchal layers of controls, with the main functions of the center would be dealing with issues like the distribution of resources"
It could well be multi-constitutional and should definitely have distributed power structures rather than a concentration of power at the centre.
It seems that some who may have voted for a OWG may have visualized the world under a single imperial power. But it seems like the overwhelming majority are too skeptical of such an evolution. Maybe we are not ready yet.