Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The Friendly dictators

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>
Author
Aelfgifu View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 25-Jun-2006
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3387
  Quote Aelfgifu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Friendly dictators
    Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 05:10
America is, for all purposes, an oligarchy. And Bush jr. is all the proof one could ever possibly need to see that birth and money are very bad criteria for leadership indeed.

Women hold their councils of war in kitchens: the knives are there, and the cups of coffee, and the towels to dry the tears.
Back to Top
Giannis View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 25-May-2006
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 493
  Quote Giannis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 06:04

I disagree, George Bush was elected by the american people with democratic elections. We maybe don't like him, but the majority of the american citizens choosed him as president.

Give me a place to stand and I will move the world.
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 06:21
that first election was a little dodgy to say the least, Giannis. it was the judges that decided

the second was more sound.
Back to Top
Aelfgifu View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 25-Jun-2006
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3387
  Quote Aelfgifu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 06:26
Originally posted by Giannis

I disagree, George Bush was elected by the american people with democratic elections. We maybe don't like him, but the majority of the american citizens choosed him as president.

 
Yes, but my point is that only people from senatorial families and people with lots of money make any chance of ever becoming candidate. If Bush sr. had not been president, I very much doubt his son would have gotten any votes at all. Poor people don't seem to stand a chance to get anywhere in politics there, nor people from less grand families. That's a oligarchy: when only people from a certain group have political power.
 
And those first election were very dodgy... There were lost of stories of people being banned from voting without proper reasons and of voting billiets being made too complicated on purpose to confuse poor democratic voters. They might not be all true, but some probably are.


Edited by Aelfgifu - 11-Jul-2006 at 06:28

Women hold their councils of war in kitchens: the knives are there, and the cups of coffee, and the towels to dry the tears.
Back to Top
Giannis View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 25-May-2006
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 493
  Quote Giannis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 06:44
Well it maybe ''dodgy'', but if people really wanted, they could change him, for example, I can't remember which year, in a past turkish election 80% of the parliament was newly elected people. Turkey done it once, every democratic counrty can do it.
Give me a place to stand and I will move the world.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 06:52
In this case I think there are two aspects of democracy, that get easily confused. In a true democracy:
a) everybody is able to choose their leaders
b) everybody has a reasonable chance to be elected
A is the case in the US (more or less, regarding all the irregularities) but b definately isn't. Therefore the US is not as democratic as several other countries.
Back to Top
Giannis View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 25-May-2006
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 493
  Quote Giannis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 07:12
Originally posted by Mixcoatl

In this case I think there are two aspects of democracy, that get easily confused. In a true democracy:
a) everybody is able to choose their leaders
b) everybody has a reasonable chance to be elected
A is the case in the US (more or less, regarding all the irregularities) but b definately isn't. Therefore the US is not as democratic as several other countries.
 
The USA constitution doesn't agree with you.
 
Article 1, Section 1
No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five years, and been seven years a citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state in which he shall be chosen.
 
Article 1, Section 3
No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the age of thirty years, and been nine years a citizen of the United States and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state for which he shall be chosen.
 
Article 2, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States.
 
 
Give me a place to stand and I will move the world.
Back to Top
Aelfgifu View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 25-Jun-2006
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3387
  Quote Aelfgifu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 09:19

In theory, yes, America is a democracy. my point is, that in practice, it is not. Can you name one American president who did not come from a very rich and influential family?


Women hold their councils of war in kitchens: the knives are there, and the cups of coffee, and the towels to dry the tears.
Back to Top
Giannis View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 25-May-2006
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 493
  Quote Giannis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 09:33

No, but I can name you numerous candidates who didn't come from a rich and influential families.

People, feel more safe to vote for a person who can recognize and that he has some fortune. They, believe that if he can manage his factory, well then maybe he can manage the country too.
 
But, that doesn't make the system oligarchic. The people votes, the people has the chance to change everything.
 
 
Give me a place to stand and I will move the world.
Back to Top
Omar al Hashim View Drop Down
King
King

Suspended

Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
  Quote Omar al Hashim Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 09:54
And those first election were very dodgy... There were lost of stories of people being banned from voting without proper reasons and of voting billiets being made too complicated on purpose to confuse poor democratic voters. They might not be all true, but some probably are.

I heard that happened in the second too.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 16:39
A recount was supposed to take place due to lost ballots and all sorts of strange things happening out in Florida. War broke out instead. Im still not too sure on why the recount never happend though.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 16:42
Originally posted by Giannis

 
The USA constitution doesn't agree with you.
 
Article 1, Section 1
No person shall be a Representative who shall not have attained to the age of twenty five years, and been seven years a citizen of the United States, and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state in which he shall be chosen.
 
Article 1, Section 3
No person shall be a Senator who shall not have attained to the age of thirty years, and been nine years a citizen of the United States and who shall not, when elected, be an inhabitant of that state for which he shall be chosen.
 
Article 2, Section 1
No person except a natural born citizen, or a citizen of the United States, at the time of the adoption of this Constitution, shall be eligible to the office of President; neither shall any person be eligible to that office who shall not have attained to the age of thirty five years, and been fourteen Years a resident within the United States. 
That's not what I meant. It's not unreasonable to bar children or foreigners from being elected. What I mean is that the vast majority of the people who are legally allowed to be elected, won't have the slightest chance to get actually elected. And that's not democratic. Of course to a certain extent that is true for all elective democracies, but in the United States it's stronger than in most Western European countries.
 
One may even argue that selecting leaders by lot is more democratic than selecting them by election.
Back to Top
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 18:39
But Bush's re-election shows the true horror of democracy, after 4 years of failure and a possibly fake original election the average joe america actually voted this guy in for a second term!  They saw the failure and decided it was not as important as preventing same gender mairriages.  Its nonsensical, and non sensical things happen when  any idiot gets a say in politics.
 
Personal privacy and democracy are completely incompatable because the will of the people is always trite and conformist.  The current King of Morrocco is a far more benevolent ruler than most elected ones.  Look at freedoms and rights granted in the US, they are usually made by the oligarchic courts and then the backlash comes from the populace. 
 
All those senators are idiots because they dont need to earn their position, instead they pander to the lowest common denominator: the people.
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
Gloval View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 27-Jun-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Gloval Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 20:29
Brezhnev would be proud to find a rival in Bush, why the incompetence they both exude in their decisions is impressive to say the least.

I can say this about american presidents, they were once humble, but super powerdem can change that. I think maybe Carter was the last president not from a rich family, idk. Abraham lincoln however is well known for having been born dirt poor, whatever happend to modesty. Anyway, the american people don't usually vote in strange ways because they're not presented with madness. Gay marriages are just to elicit conservative support and nothing else. The whole war in Iraq was undertaken because it was easy to attack a weak iraq and presumably get away with it. There are so many things i can mention that are debilitating to our government but it's depressing to go on. All i can say is that it wasn't always like this, so maybe the american people will revert back to sanity once bush and his cronies leave the white house. I think he was being told what to do the whole time he's been around and the man can barely think for himself, he's just an image, nothing more.

Interesting to note though, individual states have all sorts of different attitudes and problems that people often neglect the national problems until it's voting time. That's what happens when you live in such a large and diverse country.

PS what can i say, this really isn't saving any face. We just all have to wait until Iraq cools down and people aren't crazy in their politics.
You don't spread democracy through the barrel of a gun.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jul-2006 at 01:07

But Bush's re-election shows the true horror of democracy, after 4 years of failure and a possibly fake original election the average joe america actually voted this guy in for a second term!  They saw the failure and decided it was not as important as preventing same gender mairriages.  Its nonsensical, and non sensical things happen when  any idiot gets a say in politics.

 
 
 
I would have to agree. The first time around, It seemed that the U.S mind control device ( Fox News ) appealed to the tabloid reader in middle America by focusing the nation on President Clinton's personal life rather than the amazing thing he accomplished in terms of foreign policy ( with the exception of Somalia ). I believe that cost Al Gore the election. It is a shame because although he may be a dull person, He is a smart one who had good ideas. Now he focuses on the ever growing problem of Global Warming while President Bush continues to violate peoples basic rights here and abroad. Sometimes i think that if this happend in the 60's, there would be protests and such. Now everyone is wating " Date My Mom ' on MTV. I am quite depressed at the United States current relations abroad. Anyway, enough babbling.
Back to Top
Aelfgifu View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 25-Jun-2006
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3387
  Quote Aelfgifu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 12-Jul-2006 at 04:42
Originally posted by Tobodai

 
Personal privacy and democracy are completely incompatable because the will of the people is always trite and conformist.  The current King of Morrocco is a far more benevolent ruler than most elected ones.   
 
 
 
I wonder if all those political prisoners rotting away in sub-human conditions in prisons in Morocco agree. I very seriously doubt it.
 
Anyway, that about personal privicy is of course crap. Personal priviacy is not bigger in countries where you are not allowed to have your own thoughts, and there are plenty of European countries where personal privacy is protected and valued. In fact, I keep hearing complaints in the news here that people do not know their neighbours anymore, which is true. Mine dont spy on me. Why would they? They dont give a crap for what I'm doing.
And here, the police is still not allowed to ask for a ID unless they have a proper reason (which is only when you are breaking the law).

Women hold their councils of war in kitchens: the knives are there, and the cups of coffee, and the towels to dry the tears.
Back to Top
QueenCleopatra View Drop Down
Earl
Earl
Avatar

Joined: 03-Apr-2006
Location: Ireland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 292
  Quote QueenCleopatra Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 31-Jul-2006 at 15:56
Friendly dictator?
 
Not exactly a word I'd have used to describe Saddam. Or Hitler. Or Stalin. Name me one good selfless  thing each of these did for their people? And don't tell they improved infrastructure or gave them running water because a dictator onyl does these things to win support for himself.
 
And why on earth should we alter  our views to please the yanks? Its not as if they'd do that for any of us. Since when do they hold sway of the earth?
Her Royal Highness , lady of the Two Lands, High Priestess of Thebes, Beloved of Isis , Cleopatra , Oueen of the Nile
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Aug-2006 at 23:43
Originally posted by R_AK47

There is nothing wrong with the USA supporting friendly dictators.  Many dictators are fair rulers and if they support American policy then we (the USA) should support them as well, particularly in the global struggle against communism.
 
So you wouldn't mind then, in a hypothetical situation, if a superpower Greece decided to instate a Greek backed Military dictatorship in Washington?
 
The world can no longer be held hostage to the never-ending and regenerative fear that the American people suffer from in general.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2006 at 00:01
Originally posted by Aelfgifu

America is, for all purposes, an oligarchy. And Bush jr. is all the proof one could ever possibly need to see that birth and money are very bad criteria for leadership indeed.
 
I was thinking about this myself actually, and I wondered whether the people living in the Roman Republic in the 2nd and 1st centuries BC actually believed they were living in a democracy, certainly residents of city states in the Italica peninsula didn't (as the Social Wars show), but did residents of Rome actually believe they were?
 
My best guess would be yes, for the most part the Roman people - for better or for worse largely bought into the the quasi-altruistic Ciceronian rhetoric regarding 'our allies being attacked' and so forth (as there was very rarely inter-class violence in Rome - despite events that could be confused for it, and the poor analysis of several communist historians) that served as pretexts for war, on top of this they also bought into the rhetoric of the res publica itself being threatened (numerous Roman leaders used this as pretexts for various things).
 
But in actuality, Rome was not a democracy, and you will find very, very few Historians who will conclude that the input of the people had any real tangible effect. While the facade of elections etc were kept up, the real power lay with the landed or business owning aristocratic families and with the Senate as they wielded the apparatus of Government (as well as the Army - but the point is moot as Generals were largely Senators anyway). And it does not need to be said that the divergence in opinion was pretty minimal, even the Optimates and the Populares still believed in Elites governing things, it was just that the Optimates believed in doing it under the cover of a supposedly civically-reactive republic. The irony is of course that the majority of 'working class' (if i can use the term) Romans viewed the dissasemblage of the Republic by successive Emperors in the first century AD as a method of empowerment.
 
It is interesting to draw parralels to America, not just in the propagandistic rhetoric, but in WHO actually governs the country - I mean, look at the Reagan era, the US Government basically functioned without a Chief Executive for 8 years, things were basically run by big business interests, especially in the case of Latin American foreign policy (anyone who has studied case examples like Nicaragua will know what I'm talking about).
 
I think issues such as this highlight just why History is so important, it gives us the benefit of foresight when looking at the present because of past examples.
Back to Top
bagelofdoom View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 27-Jul-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 81
  Quote bagelofdoom Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Aug-2006 at 00:37
Originally posted by Aelfgifu

In theory, yes, America is a democracy. my point is, that in practice, it is not. Can you name one American president who did not come from a very rich and influential family?



Abraham Lincoln's parent's couldn't even read.  He was born in a one room log cabin on a farm on the frontier. 

Andrew Jackson was born to Scots-Irish immigrants in backwoods South Carolina.

in more recent history, Bill Clinton's father was a traveling salesman and his stepfather owned a car dealership. 

Look at the histories of some US presidents.  Not all pulled a Kennedy or a Bush and got the job based on familial connections.

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.