Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
TeldeInduz
General
Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Aryan Indians Posted: 09-Nov-2006 at 18:56 |
Originally posted by ashokharsana
The scholars of Racial Science and languages are of the opinion that Gurjars are the purest Aryans. The anthropological report by Sir Herbert Risely published in 1901, states that Gurjars tribe is the purest Aryan race, having their nasal index 66.9, which is much finer than any other caste.
Indo-Aryan Tribe Nasal Index
No. Tribe Nasal Index Nasal Type 1. Gurjar 66.9 Leptorrhine 2. Sikh 68.8 Leptorrhine 3. Brahman (Bengal) 70.3 Sub-Leptorrhine 4. Kayasth (Bengal) 70.3 Sub-Leptorrhine 5. Rajput 71.6 Sub-Leptorrhine 6. Vellala 73.1 Sub-Platyrrhine 7. Brahman (Bihar) 73.2 Sub-Leptorrhine 8. Brahman (Bhojpur) 74.6 Sub-Leptorrhine 9. Tamil Brahman 76.7 Sub-Leptorrhine 10. Vaisya (Bania) 79.6 Sub-Leptorrhine 11. Pariah 80.0 Sub-Platyrrhine 12. Irula 80.9 Sub-Platyrrhine 13. Kol 82.2 Sub-Platyrrhine 14. Dom 83.0 Sub-Platyrrhine 15. Bhil 84.1 Sub-Platyrrhine 16. Chamar 86.0 Platyrrhine 17. Musahar 88.7 Platyrrhine 18. Santal 88.8 Platyrrhine 19. Kadia 89.8 Platyrrhine 20. Munda 89.9 Platyrrhine 21. Paniyans (Malabar) 95.1 Platyrrhine 22. Asur (Lohardaga) 95.9 Platyrrhine
|
1) These are only for Indian groups. The further Northwest you go, generally you perhaps do get lower nasal indexes.
2) Get over this Aryan thing and nasal index. There is no definition of Aryan as being related to nasal index. the whole thing beats me
Edited by TeldeInduz - 09-Nov-2006 at 18:57
|
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
|
|
ashokharsana
Consul
Joined: 05-Aug-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 342
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 09-Nov-2006 at 23:15 |
Hello Brother,
Nasal Index is considered to be a good way, among scientists and historians, to find the actual hisotry of any race........(You must know a famous saying in Indian upper castes "Naak ke liye kuchh bhi karenge" means "anything for our nose" where nose denotes the purity of one's race.)
Anyways
The Thread's name is "Aryan Indians" Thats why i provided data related to Indians only.....
You said that "the further nothwest you go lower the nasal index will be."
I said that Gurjars are the purest aryan race...
Research says that Aryans were residing in caucasian reagion before coming to Indian subcontinent...
Dont you think you are suppoting my claim....
|
The Real Ranas, The Real Emperors of India. http://ashokharsana.proboards107.com/index.cgi?board=gurjars
|
|
rollopollo
Janissary
Joined: 28-Jul-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 25-Nov-2006 at 04:41 |
these kids are sooo cute.
|
|
northpakistani
Knight
Joined: 31-Mar-2007
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 63
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2007 at 14:57 |
This is a typical aryan face from north pakistan,(kalash tribe) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalash compare these faces to those "light eyed" Indians, and you will see a major difference in facial bone structure and cranium proportions. Indians should be proud of being Dravidians while the rest 28% of them are Aryan mixes, which is only in the minority. Please straighten out your statistics because 72% of India is NOT Aryan, & stop trying to find excuses to try to prove yourselves as Aryan because everyone can see the truth.
Thank you.
Edited by northpakistani - 31-Mar-2007 at 14:58
|
A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
-- Albert Einstein
|
|
Rajputana
Knight
Joined: 30-Mar-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2007 at 16:05 |
Originally posted by northpakistani
This is a typical aryan face from north pakistan,(kalash tribe) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kalash compare these faces to those "light eyed" Indians, and you will see a major difference in facial bone structure and cranium proportions. Indians should be proud of being Dravidians while the rest 28% of them are Aryan mixes, which is only in the minority. Please straighten out your statistics because 72% of India is NOT Aryan, & stop trying to find excuses to try to prove yourselves as Aryan because everyone can see the truth. Thank you.
|
NorthPakistani,
Are you Kalash? Kalash are a people with a colorful and rich history. "Many Kalash claim that they are the direct descendants of either Greek settlers of the Alexander the Great's army, or even Alexander himself."
The question now is, how are the Kalash aryan if they are remnants of a people which historically are recent arrivals to the area and more importantly come much later than the Aryans which are mentioned as per hindu scriptures residing in the Indian lands?
As far as Dravidians are concerned, they are a proud people as well and have a strong culture, economy, architecture and society.
|
|
Rajputana
Knight
Joined: 30-Mar-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 31-Mar-2007 at 21:42 |
Originally posted by ashokharsana
Thats what a Gujar herdsman or shepherd look like:
And This is a local Gujari
Regards
Ashok Harsana |
These two above mentioned people are NOT GUJJARS they are Europeans (Italians) who decided to settle in Rajasthan. This post caught my eye because the attire of the two is that of a Rabari tribal of Rajasthan while that of a gujjar is different.
Edited by Rajputana - 31-Mar-2007 at 21:43
|
|
K. V. Ramakrishna Rao
Earl
Joined: 06-Apr-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 287
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 07:32 |
I think miscegenation is not taken into account.
But, Un and other organizations claim that there is no 'race' on the earth.
Why then, interpretation on race, racism and racialism?
|
History is not what was written or is written, but it is actually what had happened in the past.
|
|
TeldeInduz
General
Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 07:33 |
Good find Rajputana.. the average Gurjjar has completely different features to those..
That's also not an average North Pakistani face, though there are many blonde haired and blue eyed people in North Pakistan, and also I dont think Kalash are "Aryan" in the dictionary definition of the word.
|
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
|
|
Rajputana
Knight
Joined: 30-Mar-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 09:58 |
Originally posted by TeldeInduz
Good find Rajputana.. the average Gurjjar has completely different features to those..
That's also not an average North Pakistani face, though there are many blonde haired and blue eyed people in North Pakistan, and also I dont think Kalash are "Aryan" in the dictionary definition of the word. |
lol yea teldeinduz i came across that article some time back plus those two look nothing like indians man thats pretty obvious. Check this video out about the people of Kalash: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1BPbLgwOwBI
|
|
northpakistani
Knight
Joined: 31-Mar-2007
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 63
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 16:54 |
TeldeInduz, the kalash have adopted variations of Pakistani culture and carried on with their own traditions . However, their genes don't really match the Greeks nor the south asians, so if they aren't Aryan, what would you call them?
Edited by northpakistani - 01-Apr-2007 at 17:24
|
A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
-- Albert Einstein
|
|
northpakistani
Knight
Joined: 31-Mar-2007
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 63
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 17:15 |
Rajputana- Your correct. India is a successful nation solely because the people are united and regardless of their religions or castes, the nation seems to be thriving by supporting one another. That creates a political ground of stability for India, and we are definitely inspired by that.
But why do you say they are "proud Dravidian's " because those pictures of Italians (trying to be Gujjars) contradicts your statement. The Indian's consider them as their own race. This is happening everywhere, including the world-wide web where Indian's try so hard to prove they're white. The nation spends billions of dollars in skin bleaching (the most profitable industry in India). This is enough evidence to prove that Indian's are not pleased with their race.
Edited by northpakistani - 01-Apr-2007 at 17:26
|
A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
-- Albert Einstein
|
|
TeldeInduz
General
Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 17:31 |
Originally posted by northpakistani
TeldeInduz, the kalash have adopted variations of Pakistani culture and carried on with their own traditions . However, their genes don't really match the Greeks nor the south asians, so if they aren't Aryan, what would you call them?
|
They're not descendants of Greeks or Macedonians either. Their genes dont match anyone elses because they've been subject to genetic drift that's quite normal for small sequestered populations. "Aryan" is a very misused term, but not necessarily incorrect given the genetic evidence for many of the surrounding groups imo (and the Kalash group to an extent). They're just caucasians I suppose. Their historical tribal identity is another matter. Better still is calling them "Chitrali" I think.
Edited by TeldeInduz - 01-Apr-2007 at 17:32
|
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
|
|
TeldeInduz
General
Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 17:38 |
Originally posted by Rajputana
NorthPakistani,
Are you Kalash? Kalash are a people with a colorful and rich history. "Many Kalash claim that they are the direct descendants of either Greek settlers of the Alexander the Great's army, or even Alexander himself."
|
They're not Greek, or related to Alexander, it's been proved more or less.
The question now is, how are the Kalash aryan if they are remnants of a people which historically are recent arrivals to the area and more importantly come much later than the Aryans which are mentioned as per hindu scriptures residing in the Indian lands?
|
They didn't come with the Greeks, so they didn't come much later than the "Aryans". The scriptures your referring to would be the Vedas, the Rig Veda in particular, which mentions the Aryans coming to modern Pakistan, not to modern India.
As far as Dravidians are concerned, they are a proud people as well and have a strong culture, economy, architecture and society. |
Indeed.
Edited by TeldeInduz - 01-Apr-2007 at 17:39
|
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
|
|
Rajputana
Knight
Joined: 30-Mar-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 17:53 |
Originally posted by northpakistani
Rajputana- Your correct. India is a successful nation solely because the people are united and regardless of their religions or castes, the nation seems to be thriving by supporting one another. That creates a political ground of stability for India, and we are definitely inspired by that. |
India has come a long way especially for a country which is driven by caste and segregation.
Originally posted by nothpakistani
But why do you say they are "proud Dravidian's " because those pictures of Italians (trying to be Gujjars) contradicts your statement. The Indian's consider them as their own race. This is happening everywhere, including the world-wide web where Indian's try so hard to prove they're white. The nation spends billions of dollars in skin bleaching (the most profitable industry in India). This is enough evidence to prove that Indian's are not pleased with their race. |
No, there are dravidians (pure dravidians) in India and they're a proud lot, they have a proud culture, history etc. But these are dravidians and not Northerners yet they share a common religion and even a similar culture to some degree.
Those pictures of Italians were not put up by me hence they cant contradict my beliefs and they're not trying to be gujjars they just appreciate these people as Indians and dont look to distinguish hell probably dont even know what a gujjar is since they're in Rabari attire!
I have no personal agenda of portraying Indians as europeans just to gain brownie points on behalf of my people. Personally I have no problem with my skin and it depends on which Indians you speak to, bleaching or no bleaching man people should learn to appreciate their ancestrys and not make up fairytales like the one I uncovered above lol.
|
|
northpakistani
Knight
Joined: 31-Mar-2007
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 63
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 19:09 |
hehe...your right
|
A man should look for what is, and not for what he thinks should be.
-- Albert Einstein
|
|
K. V. Ramakrishna Rao
Earl
Joined: 06-Apr-2006
Location: India
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 287
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Apr-2007 at 19:33 |
In the case of Aryan race, Max Mueller confessed,
I have declared again and again that if I say Aryan, I mean neither blood nor bones,, nor hair, nor skull, I mean simply those who speak an Aryan languageTo me an ethnologist who speaks of Aryan race, Aryan blood, Aryan eyes and hair, as great sinner as a linguist who speaks of a dolicocephalic dictionary or brachycephalic grammar.
Then, why believe in "Aryan race"?
|
History is not what was written or is written, but it is actually what had happened in the past.
|
|
Rajputana
Knight
Joined: 30-Mar-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-Apr-2007 at 01:42 |
The Sikhs (Siques) are majority Jatts which are in turn classified by Tod and Cunningham as having scythian origins.
|
|
|
Kashmiri
Samurai
Joined: 07-Mar-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 117
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-Apr-2007 at 02:22 |
yeah sikh sure do look different from an average indian.
|
|
TeldeInduz
General
Joined: 07-Mar-2006
Location: Paraguay
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 857
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-Apr-2007 at 08:58 |
In fact a lot of Sikhs have their origins in Pakistan (Punjab), though Todd & Cunningham is an old outdated piece.
Edited by TeldeInduz - 07-Apr-2007 at 09:01
|
Quoo-ray sha quadou sarre.................
|
|
Rajputana
Knight
Joined: 30-Mar-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 59
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 07-Apr-2007 at 09:44 |
Yea guys many sikhs are originally from pakistan and they migrated during partition. Even many hindus I know of, that migrated are fair in their features.
|
|
|