Evolution????

next, of course there are going to be many different types of human sculls, do to possible injureis, climate, problems in childberth, and things inherited from your parents that may not be right. also, the system of carbon dating is completely out of wack, things have been proven to be one age, then tested again another year, and been shown to be younger, or a few MILLION years older than the original test. a man once bearied his dog in his back yard, leaving him for 5 years, then dug part of him up and brought him to the scientific community. then they showed that it was a couple million years old. the fact is the carbon dating is almost completely irrelevent.

Cremmo and Thompson??

Red Clay, I really admire your patience in conversing with The Philosopher who is the author of the following post:

Originally posted by The Philosopher well i have a question, is it possible that people with different color skin are a different species of human kind?? i mean, a cat, with a different color of fur, same with dogs, is usually a different species of the dogs. i wonder if perhaps this is true with us humans, we are only animals after all. I am NOT a racist, i'm just curios.

  

Edited by flyingzone - 22-Sep-2006 at 19:55

Originally posted by The Philosopher yes, bacteria, is its own species, whenever they find a species, they find it abruptly appearing in the fossil record. the oldest bat that they found has all the exact same parts that a bat does today, nothing has changed. next, Evolution does try to explain how the first single celles organism came to be. otherwise, you would be cancelling out everything from the big bang to the finding of the bacteria.

Evolution is only a marxist lie

Originally posted by Genghis Originally posted by The Philosopher yes, bacteria, is its own species, whenever they find a species, they find it abruptly appearing in the fossil record. the oldest bat that they found has all the exact same parts that a bat does today, nothing has changed. next, Evolution does try to explain how the first single celles organism came to be. otherwise, you would be cancelling out everything from the big bang to the finding of the bacteria. � First of all, saying nothing has changed is not true, we only know very little.� Bat fossil records are poor, one reason being how light they are so they can fly, that doesn't stand up well to the elements like the fossils of large animals or the hard shells of many crustaceans.� � The whole "no intermediate species" argument is incredibly outdated.� Darwin admitted that when he wrote The Origin of the Species but new research has shown many intermediate species like archaeopteryx.� When creationists ask for "where's the intermediate species between an ant and a bear" its either incredibly ignorant or a loaded question. � Second, even if there is no "ancient bat" species we have found, bats emerged along with a lot of other mammals in the post Cretaceous extinction world and mammals were having a field day as the dinosaurs died off.� The only thing would definitively prove that evolution isn't true is if you found an organism that was much more complex than the other ones at that time, like if we found a fossil of a deer during the Cambrian period. � That brings me to another question, how do young Earth Creationists believe dinosaurs and all the other fossils of extinct creatures came about?

during the flood, which covered the earth, all of the dinosaurs execpt those on noahs arc were wiped out, along with alot of other animals, following that, during the flood, the Earths surface was rearanged, like filling a bottle with sand of different layers, and water, and shaking it. this sifted the dead dinosaurs, and the other animals, into different layers, some with more pressure than others, and the such. thus making the fossils, besides, that was 5000 years ago, by our calender, and as far as i know, that is what the belief is.     

Originally posted by The Philosopher yes, bacteria, is its own species, whenever they find a species, they find it abruptly appearing in the fossil record. the oldest bat that they found has all the exact same parts that a bat does today, nothing has changed. next, Evolution does try to explain how the first single celles organism came to be. otherwise, you would be cancelling out everything from the big bang to the finding of the bacteria.

Originally posted by The Philosopher so, we originally came from bacteria?

Edited by DukeC - 23-Sep-2006 at 17:32

Originally posted by DukeC Originally posted by The Philosopher so, we originally came from bacteria? � Yes, according to evolution, bacteria are the base lifeform that all other life evolved from.

but how could a single celled organism, such as bacteria, evolve into a many-celled organism, such as a human being?? and why would it need to??    

And also during the evolution of blue-green algae which produced O2 which is harmful to anaerobic bacteria, the anaerobic bacteria began to clump together to reduce the diffusion of O2 into themselves, leading to the formation of some larger plant and animal cells.