Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Deano
Knight
Joined: 11-Oct-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 70
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Most sucsesfull empire in world history Posted: 01-Nov-2007 at 20:21 |
What to you is the most Sucsesfull empire in history,Alexanders or maybe French colonial.Mine is the brititsh empire under queen victoria.But whats yours?
|
I AM FARTAKUS!
|
|
Justinian
Chieftain
King of Númenor
Joined: 11-Nov-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1399
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Nov-2007 at 21:12 |
Its a toss up between the romans and alexander.
|
"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Nov-2007 at 21:59 |
In terms of population and culture spreading, the Spanish Empire was the more sucessful.
|
|
Panther
General
Joined: 20-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 818
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Nov-2007 at 22:45 |
I'm kind of torn, in regards to three on your list. In terms of length of duration: The Chinese and Roman empires. In terms of the ultimate extension in size, would be the British empire. Who to vote for, who to vote for...???
Ah... the heck with it. I'll just go with some other state and leave everybody guessing!
|
|
longshanks31
Colonel
Joined: 03-Jul-2007
Location: Great Britain
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 572
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Nov-2007 at 09:39 |
british empire, how we ever managed to do it god alone knows
|
|
WolfHound
Knight
Joined: 30-Jun-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 80
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Nov-2007 at 15:17 |
I say British for the simple reason of the sun never sets on the British empire.
|
|
Penelope
Chieftain
Alia Atreides
Joined: 26-Aug-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1042
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Nov-2007 at 18:09 |
Originally posted by WolfHound
I say British for the simple reason of the sun never sets on the British empire. |
Keep in mind that the British empire, was not the only empire in which the "sun never set".
|
|
Deano
Knight
Joined: 11-Oct-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 70
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Nov-2007 at 18:45 |
Actualley the spanish empire was the first empire for the sun never to set on once they conquered the phillipines,followed by russia then britan.
|
I AM FARTAKUS!
|
|
andrew
Earl
Joined: 31-May-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 253
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Nov-2007 at 19:29 |
For what the British Empire had in size, it certainly lacked in humanity to people thought of 'lesser' than them.
They had a large navy and diverted mass amounts of their own peoples to their colonies in an age when discovery was very prevelant among the European Powers.
The British Empire lasted how long 300, 250 years? Yeah, no competition Roman Empire that ruled for more than 1000 years and the way they kept their territories under control and how they survived for this long is the true befuddlement of the world.
Not to damper the hopes of the British but quite simply when comparing the British Empire to the Roman Republic and Roman Empire, the British Empire is a mere infant.
|
|
Mughal e Azam
Colonel
Joined: 10-Jul-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 646
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Nov-2007 at 21:29 |
Punjabi Empire under Thakur Singh.
O balle balle!
|
Mughal e Azam
|
|
TheARRGH
Colonel
Over-Lord of the Marching Men
Joined: 29-Jun-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 744
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 02-Nov-2007 at 23:57 |
I realize that this may be unconventional...
The Inka Empire, (or Tawantinsuyu.)
The only reason I give them a higher rating as most successful than the romans (my first thought for who to vote for) is that they made a truly huge domain, bigger than ming dynasty china or Peter the Great's Russia, without beasts of burden besides the llama, without using steel or iron (I realize that they had very effective tools, and were very good smiths, but lets' face it-steel and iron are EXTREMELY useful, far more so than bronze or copper, for more than just weapons or armor), and started from more or less nothing, just as the romans did. Thus, I consider their accomplishments slightly more impressive, given certain limitations they lived with. And their ability to make their more-or-less communist economic system actually work very well bespeaks incredible skill. As does their capacity for hegemonically extending their political control.
|
Who is the great dragon whom the spirit will no longer call lord and god? "Thou shalt" is the name of the great dragon. But the spirit of the lion says, "I will." - Nietzsche
|
|
longshanks31
Colonel
Joined: 03-Jul-2007
Location: Great Britain
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 572
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Nov-2007 at 08:23 |
andrew the romans were hardly the most caring of conquerers, and after all the british empire was never conquered a claim the roman empire can not make.
Also the romans constantly paid tribute to potential barbarian tribes that threatened to raid them.
The british empire is new york compared to the romans model village.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Nov-2007 at 11:35 |
Originally posted by TheARRGH
I realize that this may be unconventional...
The Inka Empire, (or Tawantinsuyu.)
The only reason I give them a higher rating as most successful than the romans (my first thought for who to vote for) is that they made a truly huge domain, bigger than ming dynasty china or Peter the Great's Russia, without beasts of burden besides the llama, without using steel or iron (I realize that they had very effective tools, and were very good smiths, but lets' face it-steel and iron are EXTREMELY useful, far more so than bronze or copper, for more than just weapons or armor), and started from more or less nothing, just as the romans did. Thus, I consider their accomplishments slightly more impressive, given certain limitations they lived with. And their ability to make their more-or-less communist economic system actually work very well bespeaks incredible skill. As does their capacity for hegemonically extending their political control.
|
Interesting.
Yes, the Inca Empire had many achievements, and perhaps the most important was that people lived relatively well in there and wasn't expossed to the continuos hunger and wars that affected other regions of the world at the time.
Now, I wonder if the people itself was so happy under it. It was a "socialist" Empire indeed. Or rather, an absolute monarchy that regulated every aspect of life, from what to wear to what to eat. Even wives were chosen by the bourocrats.
With respect to technology, the Incas have commerce with llama caravans from central Chile and northern Argentina up to Ecuador. From there there was also interchange with Central America along the Pacific coast on balsa rafts. Incas build hanging bridges, stone roads, knew the principle of refrigeration, were master metalurgist that invented authomatic wind furnaces, used copper axes as coin, produced some of the best textiles ever, had air pressure toys and convex mirrors to start fires, had topographic tools to trace straight lines miles long on the ground, build large buildings, recorder events in accounting strings, the music bands of theirs times could reproduce all the tonal diversity of classical music, etc.
For the people that today lives in the lands of former Inca Empire it doesn't seem primitive at all. The more we know about it the more we admire it.
What is certain is that it was the largest state in the pre-contact Americas and perhaps the most organized.
Edited by pinguin - 03-Nov-2007 at 11:40
|
|
xi_tujue
Arch Duke
Atabeg
Joined: 19-May-2006
Location: Belgium
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1919
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Nov-2007 at 12:07 |
^I wonder how thing would develop if the Americas never were discovered....
|
I rather be a nomadic barbarian than a sedentary savage
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Nov-2007 at 12:33 |
Yeap. I wonder too. I am certain they will have discovered modern tech and science and will reach the moon some day.
|
|
Mughal e Azam
Colonel
Joined: 10-Jul-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 646
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Nov-2007 at 14:54 |
The Punjabi Empire began in 330 and ended in 571 CE. It began by Mirza Gulab Jamun and spread over the Indus continent in South Asia. They invented many forms of mithai.
|
Mughal e Azam
|
|
Mughal e Azam
Colonel
Joined: 10-Jul-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 646
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Nov-2007 at 14:59 |
Maya Civilization
Aztec Empire
Tahuantinsuyu Empire
Roman Empire
Hittite Empire
Carthagian Empire
Egyptian Empire
Assyrian Empire
Byzantine Empire
Ottoman Empire
Sassanid Empire
Parthian Empire
Achemanhid Empire
Mamluke Empire
Mongol Empire
Safavid Empire
Mughal Empire
Mauryan Empire
Gupta Empire
Pala Empire
Chola Empire
Rastrakhuta Empire
Satavahana Empire
Russian Empire
British Empire
Portuguese Empire
Spanish Empire
Dutch Empire
French Empire
Han Empire
Sung Empire
Tang Empire
Sui Empire
Ming Empire
Qin Empire
Japanese Empire
Mali Empire
Songhai Empire
Kanuri Empire
Axum Empire
Fatimid Empire
Al Andalus Sultanate
Seljuk Empire
Delhi Empire
and that about sums up the more influential empires in world history. of course there were more:
Golden Horde Empire
Chagatai Empire
Median Empire
but the more influential ones are listed.
Edited by Mughaal - 03-Nov-2007 at 15:01
|
Mughal e Azam
|
|
SuN.
Pretorian
Joined: 26-Sep-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 156
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Nov-2007 at 15:59 |
Convex mirrors for starting fire? How is that done ?
I would list down the best empires of today. I have given importence to age of the empire, it's continuity, whether present or not in today's world. (How can we consider an empire successful if it has been wiped out or is just a shade of what it was earlier. Those that have preserved & been what they were thousands of years back would be the most successful):
1. Chinese - One of the oldest, still existing & prospering, all iots old values intact. So successfull that the whole empire has become one nation.
2. India - Again one of the oldest, but still exactly the same culture as it was
thousands of years ago. Not as big as Russia or China but quite big
& thriving well.
3. Russia - The biggest empire in terms of size though not age, It's success is that it is till very much united, growing & prospering
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Nov-2007 at 16:16 |
Originally posted by SuN.
Convex mirrors for starting fire? How is that done ?
|
Small convex hand held mirrors made of bronze. They were pointed to the sun and focus into some dry grass, so the ceremonial fires stars. The god Inti himself (the sun) it was supposed to light the fire. Actually the principle is the same that lighting fire with a magnifying glass.
I couldn't find a picture on the web, but documentation exists in paper.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 03-Nov-2007 at 16:17 |
Originally posted by Deano
Actualley the spanish empire was the first empire for the sun never to set on once they conquered the phillipines,followed by russia then britan. |
That's true. The Spanish empire extended through Europe, North Africa, the Americas up to the Phillipines, and even a small post in Ecuatorial Guinea, Africa. I wonder, though if in the Portuguese dominions the sun never set either.
|
|