Print Page | Close Window

Favorite Renaissance Artist

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Regional History or Period History
Forum Name: Early Modern & the Imperial Age
Forum Discription: World History from 1500 to the end of WW1
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=485
Printed Date: 23-May-2024 at 01:36
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Favorite Renaissance Artist
Posted By: ArmenianSurvival
Subject: Favorite Renaissance Artist
Date Posted: 05-Sep-2004 at 05:31

For me, Da Vinci. Not only did he paint the famous Mona Lisa, but he invented so many great things that were ahead of his time. His list of inventions is astounding.

Also, Michelangelo and his frescoes in the Sistine Chapel, along with his detailed sculptures are all great.



-------------
Mass Murderers Agree: Gun Control Works!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Resistance

Քիչ ենք բայց Հայ ենք։



Replies:
Posted By: Tobodai
Date Posted: 05-Sep-2004 at 14:14
Da Vinci for the dastardly desiges of weapons of war, as im no fan o flooking at portraits of people sitting around doing nothing.

-------------
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton


Posted By: ihsan
Date Posted: 05-Sep-2004 at 17:33
Leonardo Da Vinci definitially, followed by Michalengelo.

-------------
[IMG]http://img50.exs.cx/img50/6148/ger3.jpg">

Qaghan of the Vast Steppes

http://steppes.proboards23.com - Steppes History Forum


Posted By: Cywr
Date Posted: 06-Sep-2004 at 10:25
Pieter Bruegel, Hieronymus Bosch for wierdness, the two of them represent in my eyes the best of what has come to be called the 'Northern Rennasiance'.
Just to get some other names in the thread.


-------------
Arrrgh!!"


Posted By: JanusRook
Date Posted: 08-Sep-2004 at 00:12

Cywr I love Northern Rennasaince. My favorite painter is Van Eyck, although my favorite painting is Vermeer's Girl with a Pearl Earing, also I like Hans Holbein as I love portraiture. Here are examples of each (in order):

Other artists I like are Velazquez, Durer and Ingres.



-------------
Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.

Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.


Posted By: Cornellia
Date Posted: 08-Sep-2004 at 07:01

DaVinci, definitely but a very close second is Raphael.

Though known for his religious subjects, Raphael did so much more.  Here's a large number of examples  

http://www.artrenewal.org/asp/database/art.asp?aid=124&page=1&order=q - http://www.artrenewal.org/asp/database/art.asp?aid=124&p age=1&order=q

Actually, the whole site is a wonderful place to visit to view works by your favorite artist.

http://www.artrenewal.org/index.html - http://www.artrenewal.org/index.html

And a sonnet by Raphael (who is buried in the Pantheon in Rome)

Sonnet by the Artist to his Beloved
by Raphael Sanzio


Sweet remembrance! Hour of bliss
    When we met, but now the more
I mourn, as when the sailor is
    Star-less, distant far from shore.

Now tongue, tho' 'tis with grief, relate
    How love deceiv'd me of my joy;
Display the unaccustom'd cheat,
    But praise the nymph, and thank the boy.

It was when the declining sun
    Beheld another sun arise;
And there were actions should be done,
    No talking, only with the eyes.

But I tormented by the fire
    That burnt within, was overcome:
Thus when to speak we most desire
    The more we find we must be dumb.

 



-------------
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas


Posted By: Lannes
Date Posted: 08-Sep-2004 at 16:32
Michelangelo.  His work in the Sistine Chapel was gorgeous.

-------------
τρέφεται δέ, ὤ Σώκρατης, ψυχὴ τίνι;


Posted By: Landsknecht_Doppelsoldner
Date Posted: 13-Sep-2004 at 08:22

There are so many great artists to choose from!

I'll have to go with ALBRECHT DURER, the master of the woodcut.

I'm also a fan of URS GRAF, the Swiss soldier who did countless illustrations of 16th century battles, based on his own experiences.  His sketches and other pieces of art are almost like "Renaissance Combat Photography".

TITIAN is another favorite of mine, especially because his portrait of Ippolito de Medici looks just like me!  It's really creepy...

I like DA VINCI more for his inventions than his art, although he clearly excelled at both.

Hans Holbein was great too.

Finally, the bizarre quality of EL GRECO cannot be denied--good stuff.

 

Peace,

David Black Mastro



-------------
"Who despises me and my praiseworthy craft,

I'll hit on the head that it resounds in his heart."


--Augustin Staidt, of the Federfechter (German fencing guild)


Posted By: demon
Date Posted: 13-Sep-2004 at 08:36
RAfael or that guy who drew plato's school....I don't remember his name....help!!

-------------
Grrr..


Posted By: Evildoer
Date Posted: 13-Sep-2004 at 09:42

It was Rafael all right. The painting was called "School of Athens".

I like Massaccio, Rafael and a number of Dutch masters.

The reason I dislike Michelangelo is that all his humans are unrealisitically muscular, and there is too much nudity in Sistine "Chaple" ceiling!!!! 



Posted By: Genghis
Date Posted: 03-Oct-2004 at 21:32
I think the Renaissance was the height of artistic thought.  I'm no art fan, but when I'm in Europe, I love seeing Renaissance artwork.

-------------
Member of IAEA


Posted By: Evildoer
Date Posted: 06-Oct-2004 at 15:41
Not the height I would say... Art continues to live on without diminishing...


Posted By: Cornellia
Date Posted: 06-Oct-2004 at 19:58

Evildoer, Michelangelo didn't paint the aristocrats, he painted the average working individual which is why his men and women are beefier and more muscular than in other paintings.

These models were people who worked hard at physical labor for a living.

The Renaissance, for me anyway, marks a time when artists moved away from the stylized and began to experiment and find joy in the human condition.  Instead of just portraying an event or a person, they found the soul.



-------------
Felix qui potuit rerum cognoscere causas


Posted By: Colchis
Date Posted: 06-Oct-2004 at 20:48
Originally posted by Cornellia

Evildoer, Michelangelo didn't paint the aristocrats, he painted the average working individual which is why his men and women are beefier and more muscular than in other paintings.



Also he was an admirer of the male figure, and men in general, and he apparently didn't find the female figure all that interesting; hence all the masculinity.  It is known that for certain female figures at least he used males only to give them a little more curve later on. He admired the classic figures of ancient Greece and Rome and the reason why he shows his figures in distressed and agonising situations is a. because he was a very tragic figure himself and b. because that's when the human figure looks its most dramatic.

I'm more of a Northern Renaissance person myself and the first names that come to my mind are Jan van Eyck and Hugo van der Goes and Holbein the Younger. Rafaello and Da Vinci are, of course, obvious giants.


Posted By: cattus
Date Posted: 06-Oct-2004 at 22:06
Yes, Colchis, because of my sexual preference.. i am attracted to females. Their bodies are wonderful but i have to say that mens bodies are a work of art, superior if i may. Maybe a little harsh of me.

-------------


Posted By: Colchis
Date Posted: 06-Oct-2004 at 22:17
Originally posted by Catt

Yes, Colchis, because of my sexual preference.. i am attracted to females. Their bodies are wonderful but i have to say that mens bodies are a work of art, superior if i may. Maybe a little harsh of me.


I find good examples of both the male and the female body very aesthetic but after an art education I must admit that drawing the male figure is actually much harder, even for males! A man's body is much more detailed, especially those of Michelangelo was fond of painting.


Posted By: Evildoer
Date Posted: 07-Oct-2004 at 19:17

I don't like nudity in art. I like drawing the flowing folds of cloth instead!

Early Renaissance artists are good for me as well.



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 10-Oct-2004 at 12:33
i think Leonardo da Vinci, Michel Angelo and Giovanni Bellini...


Posted By: Quetzalcoatl
Date Posted: 10-Oct-2004 at 20:02

 

 Vermeer, the best.



-------------


Posted By: JanusRook
Date Posted: 11-Oct-2004 at 17:57

Vermeer, the best.

Preach it brother! What's your favorite painting by him?



-------------
Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.

Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.


Posted By: Quetzalcoatl
Date Posted: 11-Oct-2004 at 18:19

Preach it brother! What's your favorite painting by him?

 

 "View of the Delft" is fascinating and the "Art of Painting".




-------------


Posted By: JanusRook
Date Posted: 13-Oct-2004 at 00:16

Art of Painting is very good, although on a more personal note I'm not such a big fan of view of delft. Sorry but landscapes just don't appeal to me. I need something less.....how should I put this.....airy, ethereal, open to interpretation. I like to see things as they are or as someone wants them to be seen. Sorry if I confused you like art you just can't put it into words.



-------------
Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.

Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.


Posted By: Quetzalcoatl
Date Posted: 13-Oct-2004 at 18:47

 

 The beauty of the view of the Delft, is its aura, something you can't explain but just feel, the feeling is good for me so it is a great work.



-------------


Posted By: Don Quixote
Date Posted: 14-Apr-2012 at 15:47
I have quite a few, actually. I can start with Raphael:
http://www.artinthepicture.com/artists/Raphael/sistine.jpeg



-------------


Posted By: Don Quixote
Date Posted: 17-Apr-2012 at 03:19
Raphael, "Madonna"
http://www.oilpainting-frame.com/upload1/file-admin/images/new16/Aragon%20jose%20Rafael-778233.jpg


-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com