Print Page | Close Window

Sino-Japanese relations through history.

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: Regional History or Period History
Forum Name: East Asia
Forum Discription: The Far East: China, Korea, Japan and other nearby civilizations
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2717
Printed Date: 28-Apr-2024 at 01:22
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: Sino-Japanese relations through history.
Posted By: Spartakus
Subject: Sino-Japanese relations through history.
Date Posted: 27-Mar-2005 at 08:48
How was Japan seeing China,in cultural, political and military field through history and the opposite?I had a discussion on that with a friend and the conclusion was that the Japs were feeling superior to the Chinese. 

-------------
"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)



Replies:
Posted By: demon
Date Posted: 27-Mar-2005 at 09:59

Well, afaik, Japan tends to feel superior over those who are worse off, but tends to praise and worship those who are better.  Like before Meiji revolution, they did consider Ming and other Chinese dynasties as superior, and adopted many of its policies, like the System of Government and it's hieroarchy.  But after they've seen European supremacy over China, they started adopting the Europeans, and starting warshipping it's ideals. 

Currently Japan is better off economically than China, thus Japanese won't care about them.  Unless China economically-wise defeats Japan, which would come in a couple of years.



-------------
Grrr..


Posted By: Mystic
Date Posted: 27-Mar-2005 at 17:16
Japan does have a superiority complex against China in modern times simply due to the fact that Japan was able to modernize whereas China wasn't. Also given the fact the bitter history of war over the past century between these two can also add to the sentiment. Historically speaking however, the Japanese did not look down on the Chinese but on the contrary as role models. A good majority of Japanese cultural and political elements were borrowed from China. But as Demon said, the Japanese saw the superiority of European ways in the 18th-19th centuries and decided to adopt their ideas instead.


Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 27-Mar-2005 at 17:24

for the majority of the last two centuries, the chinese were feeling superior to the japanese and the japanese were feeling inferior to the Chinese sending tributes and regarded the chinese emperor (especially during the tang dynasty) as their overlord. wa japan was regarded as a nation of "short slaves" in chinese during the han dynasty. Much of the japanese government structure and civil system were adopted from Tang China.

the situation didn't get reverse until the end of the 19th century. but it's switching again. i would say for the most time, chinese people have looked down on japanese people throughout the last two centuries. in fact, they still do kinda. in mainland china, japanese people are regarded as "little japs" even today. any chinese person would love to see japan vanish from history. it's a commonly hated country in china.

even today, most japanese still admire ancient chinese culture, poetry, tradition. the japanese emperor's title and year title are still decided based on han chinese tradition. most japanese know about chinese history. for example, dynasty warriors, romance of the three kingdoms, and a lot of games based on chinese history are made by the japanese.

on a greater scale, it was only a brief japanese intervention of chinese domination in east asia.



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: MengTzu
Date Posted: 27-Mar-2005 at 23:14

Hey Spartakus and Coolstorm,

Warning: "jap" is a derorgatory term for Japanese.  I assume you buys weren't aware of that fact (I can see the temptation to write it as an abbreviation, but be warned now that it is not an acceptable term.)  (Clarification: Coolstorm said it in quotation, meaning that it's not his words but the words of others, so I'm not saying he's making a mistake here.  I only included him just in case he isn't aware of the derorgatory connotation of the term.)



Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 27-Mar-2005 at 23:20
i am aware of that. i was just trying to tell others how some chinese people call them even today.

-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Spartakus
Date Posted: 28-Mar-2005 at 06:43
Derorgatory?I did not know.I am sorry.

-------------
"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)


Posted By: jiangweibaoye
Date Posted: 28-Mar-2005 at 11:47

I think there is a love hate relationship between Japan and China.  There is a certain amount of respect reflected by Japan's adaptation of Chinese culture & incorporating it into their own.  I know Japanese students who know far far more about Chinese history (Including Romance of the Three Kingdoms) and my Chinese counterparts.  In the same token, some (I hate to generalize) do feel that if you are not my superior, I must be yours attitude.  This is most prevailing with their feelings about Koreans.  Man, if you think they look down on China, ask them about Korea.

In the same token, Chinese feel that superiority complex also.  Some (again no generalizations) feel that they are Greece and Rome all wrapped up into one great culture.  The difference between the Japanese and Chinese attitude is that Japanese will evaluate the situation and if they see they are inferior, they will admit it (not openly of course) and try to adapt their style to replicate the superior's style (like China and Europeans).  The Chinese will not adapt and stick to their guns at almost all cost.  However, they are more open toward individuals (foreigners) as compared to Japanese. 

On a side note, I think part of the reason why the Chinese fell behind on the technology side (from Middle Ming onward to maybe last couple of years) is because of corruption/greed.  You can say it was the downfall of most, if not all countries.

 



Posted By: MengTzu
Date Posted: 28-Mar-2005 at 15:41
Originally posted by jiangweibaoye

I think there is a love hate relationship between Japan and China.  There is a certain amount of respect reflected by Japan's adaptation of Chinese culture & incorporating it into their own.  I know Japanese students who know far far more about Chinese history (Including Romance of the Three Kingdoms) and my Chinese counterparts.  In the same token, some (I hate to generalize) do feel that if you are not my superior, I must be yours attitude.  This is most prevailing with their feelings about Koreans.  Man, if you think they look down on China, ask them about Korea.

In the same token, Chinese feel that superiority complex also.  Some (again no generalizations) feel that they are Greece and Rome all wrapped up into one great culture.  The difference between the Japanese and Chinese attitude is that Japanese will evaluate the situation and if they see they are inferior, they will admit it (not openly of course) and try to adapt their style to replicate the superior's style (like China and Europeans).  The Chinese will not adapt and stick to their guns at almost all cost.  However, they are more open toward individuals (foreigners) as compared to Japanese. 

I agree that Chinese tend to have a sort of complacency, but when they are humiliated in the most crushing way, their ego shatter and they feel a severe "negative" inferiority complex (as opposed to Japanese "positive" inferority complex that motivates them to learn from others and eventually surpass others.)  When Chinese began to feel inferior (the past century,) the tendency is to turn against themselves, blame everything on their past, and worship the "superior" people (such as the West.)  To demonstrate this, speak fluent English next time you are shopping in, say, Hong Kong: note the difference of attitude they have towards you from if you spoke Cantonese or Mandarin to them (don't even speak Mandarin, especially not with a Mainland accent, Hong Kong people will treat you like dirt.)  You will note a drastic change of attitude, even if you're not White, you just have to speak fluent English.

On a side note, I think part of the reason why the Chinese fell behind on the technology side (from Middle Ming onward to maybe last couple of years) is because of corruption/greed.  You can say it was the downfall of most, if not all countries.

That's a bit oversimplifying.  A major reason that Japan's Meiji Restoration succeeded but the Chinese reformation didn't was that China was much, much larger and the political sectors were too diffuse.  The reformers had a really difficult time uniting themselves.  Japan also had its share of conservatives reluctant to change, but the smallness of size made it much easier for the reformers to oppose the conservatives.



Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 28-Mar-2005 at 17:20

(don't even speak Mandarin, especially not with a Mainland accent, Hong Kong people will treat you like dirt.)

haha, i agree. never ever speak mandarin in hk, or if you do, don't let others hear it...



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: Tobodai
Date Posted: 28-Mar-2005 at 20:49
for most of history Japan looked up at China, the first Sin o-Japanese war and the ease of the victory is the real turning point in attitudes, then it became a racist view.

-------------
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton


Posted By: MengTzu
Date Posted: 28-Mar-2005 at 22:34
Originally posted by coolstorm

(don't even speak Mandarin, especially not with a Mainland accent, Hong Kong people will treat you like dirt.)

haha, i agree. never ever speak mandarin in hk, or if you do, don't let others hear it...

It's quite sad indeed.  A friend of my mom went to Hong Kong, and for some reason people thot they were Mainlanders (they've been living the US for a long time.)  Then they busted out speaking English, and the service people came serving them like bees on honey.  It's disgusting the way Hong Kong people cower at all things English.



Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 29-Mar-2005 at 02:12
Originally posted by MengTzu

Originally posted by coolstorm

(don't even speak Mandarin, especially not with a Mainland accent, Hong Kong people will treat you like dirt.)

haha, i agree. never ever speak mandarin in hk, or if you do, don't let others hear it...

It's quite sad indeed.  A friend of my mom went to Hong Kong, and for some reason people thot they were Mainlanders (they've been living the US for a long time.)  Then they busted out speaking English, and the service people came serving them like bees on honey.  It's disgusting the way Hong Kong people cower at all things English.

that's also why you talk to your friends in english when clubbing. a lot easier to pick up chicks.

well, i think it's been the case in hk for a long time, but it's changing now as the mainlanders are spending big bucks in hk.



-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: MengTzu
Date Posted: 29-Mar-2005 at 02:41
True, money talks in HK.


Posted By: jiangweibaoye
Date Posted: 29-Mar-2005 at 10:55

To MengTzu, Tobodai, & Coolstorm,

I am from HK & you guys hit it right on the mark.  However, I think attitudes are changing because those mainlanders are bringing big bucks to HK.  That is the same attitude as the Japanese with Chinese but I believe it will change in short time.  When you think about it, in all societies, it is all about money.  If you have more money, others will treat you better.  If you have less, you are treated like a surf.  However, i see the tide changing.  Quite a number of foreigners are learning Mandarin because they feel that it will be a important language in business affairs. 

Back to Mengtzu reply to my post, I agree with your statement and like to add that the inferiority complex that Chinese suffered is partly caused by financial constraints.  Individually & as a country.  They see how backward we were compared to the West & Japan.  But it goes further than that.  Again, this is my observations, Japanese stick together and help each other out.  Chinese don't.  You can make the case that there are fewer Japanese around so numbers equate strength.  The Chinese have an more American or individualistic attitude about everything.  That can be a good and bad thing.  When Japanese make a decision, it is a group decision & blame & credit is dispersed evenly.  Chinese make decisions individually and take all the credit when things go well & blame somebody else when things go bad.  On the same token, Chinese are more flexible while Japanese are more rigid in many ways.   Please keep in mind that these are my observations & I hate to generalize.

The teamwork of Japanese and lack of by the Chinese, I get to the Ming Dynasty statement.  Things look so good during the Yongle & Hongwu period.  Land expansion, Technologically superior to everybody, Treasure Fleet to Africa, Taking the fight to the Mongols by Yongle.  Then it all came crashing down.  My feeling that it happened is because not because of Confucius teaching as stated in many of the textbooks.  These teaching was around in the Tang & Song Dynasties & they flourish from trade with other countries.  I believe it is caused by corruption & greed (in a bad way).  The conservatives did not want change because it might diminish their power base.  The Eunech (misspelling) also feared the same.  I can go on and on but I would have to type a college thesis.  If interested, I read a book called "The Year of No Signifiance" which detailed the rule of Emperor Wanli.  Wanli (that fat, self indulgent, lazy sh*t) was the cancer which eventually cause the downfall of the Ming & ushered the rise of the Manchu.  The book is out of print though.

The Meiji rest. materialized, from my view, due to their defeat at Korea buy the Ming & Korean.  Followed by the realization that the western powers was indeed superior to them.  They realized they had to evolve or see their fate like what was currently happening at the time with China. 



Posted By: MengTzu
Date Posted: 29-Mar-2005 at 19:17
Originally posted by jiangweibaoye

The Chinese have an more American or individualistic attitude about everything.  That can be a good and bad thing. 

No way.  The Chinese have a kind of "collective individualism."  There's is a Chinese saying, "every family sweeps the snow in front of its own house."  It is still not individualism, it's clanishness, if you will.  Chinese people are clicky, whether the cliques are families or groups of friends.  Each group takes care of its own, refusing to have greater integration.  Of course, I'm generalizing as well.



Posted By: babyblue
Date Posted: 30-Mar-2005 at 01:18
Originally posted by MengTzu

Originally posted by jiangweibaoye

The Chinese have an more American or individualistic attitude about everything.  That can be a good and bad thing. 

No way.  The Chinese have a kind of "collective individualism."  There's is a Chinese saying, "every family sweeps the snow in front of its own house."  It is still not individualism, it's clanishness, if you will.  Chinese people are clicky, whether the cliques are families or groups of friends.  Each group takes care of its own, refusing to have greater integration.  Of course, I'm generalizing as well.

¡¡¡¡¡¡agreed...like Dr Sun Yat-Sen said in his Three Principles of the People...he said that Chinese will go through great lenghts to protect and expand his clan...he'll even die for it...but when it comes to serving or dying for the nation...he shrugs his shoulders.



-------------


Posted By: jiangweibaoye
Date Posted: 30-Mar-2005 at 10:48

To Mengtzu & Babyblue,

I agree with your interpretation.  I should have been more complete with my statement.  Just alot of stuff in one email.



Posted By: RED GUARD
Date Posted: 30-Mar-2005 at 18:42
        Today, almost everyone in China hates Japan after what they did in WW2. But in Japan, people seem to like the Chinese and some of video games and amine are related to China. I don't why my people still dislike the Japanese, while in Japan, they are treated with amazement. I mean come on, WW2 was like 50 years ago.

-------------
Quotes by your's turly:

"I came, I saw, and I conquered... but only for the weekend"

"This is my tank, this is my weapon, and this is my pride."

"Power comes from a barrel of a gun."



Posted By: coolstorm
Date Posted: 30-Mar-2005 at 22:04
not only because of what they did in ww2, but also what they are doing in modern time.

-------------
���DZj�~�� ��������
�� �� �C �q �D �� �� �� �� �T �� �� �g �A �� �� �� �� �� �U �N �� �� ï


Posted By: jiangweibaoye
Date Posted: 31-Mar-2005 at 10:31

I must agree with red guard.  The Japanese students I meet have a very strong interest in Chinese and Chinese History.  It is a shame the interest is not the same with Chinese Americans over here.

I think some of the hatred against the Japanese stems Kozumi annual visit to that war shrine.  Relations was not good to begin with & his action just makes the situation worse.  Also, the government will not apologize for WWII and even try to marginalize incidents like the Rape of Nanjing stating that the casualitie numbers is inflated.  Again, I speak from my experience with Japanese students, they realize what the truth is and the Japanese Government position is not what they believe. 

On the same token.  There is a Korean girl I use to know and she stated "I hate Japanese people for what they did to us (Korea)!"  She was referring specifically to a Japanese friend (male) that I had.  I just like to state that attitude is just plain wrong.  One must seperate individuals & government policies.



Posted By: Mperor
Date Posted: 15-Apr-2005 at 22:32

Hi everyone.

I must say we have a really interesting forum here! So, being the newbie here, I'll like to say "hi" to everyone!

About the topic...

I agree with jiangwei. Germany admitted what they have done during WW2, and condemned what the Nazis did. I at first thought like Red Guard.

"It's sooooo long time ago, why hate them still?" My father told me: "You never had the feeling of witnessing your nation's struggle to live, did you?" He was clearly referring to the crazed massacres of Chinese civilians during WW2. "But the army is to be blamed, not Japan itself!" I told him. He shook his head in disappointement and told me: "Think as you wish then."

I personally think that the Japanese (generalizing and excluding the enlightened ones) look down on Chinese (I might be VERY wrong). After all, they once called the Chinese "The Sick of East-Asia". Some stories told by Japanese POWs say that they were very frustrated when they heard about the Chinese success in the Korean War. They were thinking: "How can this army, that we once crushed so easily, drive back the ones who defeated us, the US?" This bad opinion of them might very well change if they actually admit what they did during WW2 as agression and not as "Liberation" as some of them called it. And I really think they shouldn't glorify those military campaigns (ought not to be called campaign, just pushing back the army and killing everything in the path...) like they do in certain books...

I wish to see Japan and China becoming good friends one day too... but that day might be quite far away. (Especially that now, Japan is exposing some will to.. "expand its political influence...")

I also have trouble understand why they have this paranoia of China bombing and invading Japan... It's hard to understand. They were the agressors in the first place!



Posted By: babyblue
Date Posted: 16-Apr-2005 at 02:31
Originally posted by Mperor

I also have trouble understand why they have this paranoia of China bombing and invading Japan... It's hard to understand. They were the agressors in the first place!

    if you killed my father, you too, will live forever with the fear of me repaying this debt to you one hundred fold...

      ...btw, welcome...



-------------


Posted By: General_Zhaoyun
Date Posted: 18-Apr-2005 at 03:47
Originally posted by RED GUARD

        Today, almost everyone in China hates Japan after what they did in WW2. But in Japan, people seem to like the Chinese and some of video games and amine are related to China. I don't why my people still dislike the Japanese, while in Japan, they are treated with amazement. I mean come on, WW2 was like 50 years ago.


The chinese has been brought up with an anti-Japanese attitude b'cos the historical text in China tends to demonize the Japanese as evil and the aggressor, due to the war-time atrocities in China by Japanese. The Chinese Communist Party, which was founded on the basis of anti-Imperialism,  tends to treat any other 'imperialistic' countries such as war-time Japan as evil, and thus such hatred was never erased.

I'm sure Japanese is the most hated people in China, while American is the 2nd most hated people in China. The CCP utilized the hatred/nationalism against imperialism to transform this into a powerful force against external force.

You did notice that CCP's government likes to play around with the emotions of the chinese people, who are sometimes too ignorant to believe that they are true.


-------------
Founder of http://www.chinahistoryforum.com - China History Forum


Posted By: Elanjie
Date Posted: 18-Apr-2005 at 08:00

Originally posted by General_Zhaoyun


You did notice that CCP's government likes to play around with the emotions of the chinese people, who are sometimes too ignorant to believe that they are true.

   I'm not member of the CCP, but i am sucked of your words that treat chinese people as stupid as you are.



Posted By: RED GUARD
Date Posted: 20-Apr-2005 at 07:02
Originally posted by Mperor

"It's sooooo long time ago, why hate them still?" My father told me: "You never had the feeling of witnessing your nation's struggle to live, did you?"



       That's what my daddy used to say!


-------------
Quotes by your's turly:

"I came, I saw, and I conquered... but only for the weekend"

"This is my tank, this is my weapon, and this is my pride."

"Power comes from a barrel of a gun."



Posted By: Elanjie
Date Posted: 20-Apr-2005 at 07:35

Although in my family no one had suffered so much from the invasion of Japan.

   But I also hate the invasion for some special and individual reasons. 

   eg.  Japan airforce had dropped a bomb not explosed  in my high school's guarden in 1941,  only till recently my school had it digged out .Because of my curiosity ,once I had sneak into the locked garden and pissed in the man-made lake that lay the the bomb, what a f*c*, had i know this ,i would'nt do that.



Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 20-Apr-2005 at 16:45
pretty surprised there's noone japanese here

-------------


Posted By: General_Zhaoyun
Date Posted: 21-Apr-2005 at 01:35
Originally posted by Elanjie

Originally posted by General_Zhaoyun


You did notice that CCP's government likes to play around with the emotions of the chinese people, who are sometimes too ignorant to believe that they are true.

   I'm not member of the CCP, but i am sucked of your words that treat chinese people as stupid as you are.



Can mod pls edit Elanjie's post? I believe that is personal insulting, flaming, slander and verbal attack.

I am not criticising mainland chinese people, heck, I'm a chinese myself. Neither am I anti-CCP. I'm just pointing out the historical root cause of why the anti-Japanese sentiment has been deeply rooted amongst chinese people. When examining history, we need to investigate the inside fact. We cannot deny the fact that chinese historical text did portray a negative image of Japanese. Japanese has been an 'historical' enemy of Chinese.

My girlfriend is from mainland China and she told me that when young, some of their classes involve watching 'war-time movie' of PLA fighting against the Japanese. After that, they were told to write reports and commentaries on such incidence. Such was to instilled Patriotism in the chinese people. But equally, the aim was also to re-inforce the idea that Japanese had committed atrocities in China.

However, many young chinese grew up not able to differentiate between patriotism and irrational nationalism. They think that 'boycotting' Japanese products is considered 'patriotism', not knowing that currently Honda car is made in China (Guangzhou), through a joint-venture between China and Japan. Sometimes, irrational nationalism was seen when anything associated with anti-Japanese was seen as 'patriotism'. Now, is hatred equal to patriotism?

Somehow, the Japanese war against China had already been 60 years. The Japanese atrocities committed in China was unprecedented and should be heavily criticised. Japanese should learn to recognise history and learn to apologise to chinese people.

But I feel that the mainland chinese people should also learn to be more civilized and be more moderated. Such will prevent chinese from becoming mobs and gangsters during their anti-Japanese riots.  I don't deny the chinese press had played an important role in stirring up anti-Japanese feelings among the chinese people. And thus, I do not blame these irrational chinese rioteers.

Historical grudge was created by the past generation and IMV, most japanese people are quite moderate today, apart from right-winged group  and we should not be so anti-Japanese, because of the atrocities commmitted by their ancestors. "Blaming on historical atrocities" and  "blaming it on Japanese people today" should be separated.


-------------
Founder of http://www.chinahistoryforum.com - China History Forum


Posted By: Elanjie
Date Posted: 21-Apr-2005 at 07:30

Originally posted by General_Zhaoyun



My girlfriend is from mainland China and she told me that when young, some of their classes involve watching 'war-time movie' of PLA fighting against the Japanese. After that, they were told to write reports and commentaries on such incidence.

  It's true, we even shout like thouder in the hall , it is excited. I don't think it is wrong . Without such taught,  we would hate Japanese too.

Originally posted by General_Zhaoyun


They think that 'boycotting' Japanese products is considered 'patriotism', not knowing that currently Honda car is made in China (Guangzhou), through a joint-venture between China and Japan. Sometimes, irrational nationalism was seen when anything associated with anti-Japanese was seen as 'patriotism'. Now, is hatred equal to patriotism?

[QUOTE]

    They protest, while others buy more , even when those boys grow up they would also do it. You don't know what the cultural influence in china and the civilization is , you are not a complete chinese.

[QUOTE=General_Zhaoyun]
But I feel that the mainland chinese people should also learn to be more civilized and be more moderated. Such will prevent chinese from becoming mobs and gangsters during their anti-Japanese riots. 

[QUOTE]

   Well, it is my word call you stupid , but you throw your verbal attack to all mainland chinese again!!! So ,how civilized you are? I stick to my judgement on you, you are stupid , while childish at the same time.

[QUOTE=General_Zhaoyun]

Historical grudge was created by the past generation and IMV, most japanese people are quite moderate today, apart from right-winged group  and we should not be so anti-Japanese, because of the atrocities commmitted by their ancestors. "Blaming on historical atrocities" and  "blaming it on Japanese people today" should be separated.

  That is the only words i appreciate.

   I know you are some kind of chinese  , if not, I would have more sharp criticize.       Don't just stay in that area the size of Nosesh*t on map, try go around.

 

   The last, i  apologize to all the forumers , I don't hope such quarrel advance to a higher grade. So ,general_Zhaoyun , i would like to discuss with you personally , i offer you a channel , write to me or left your message.



Posted By: Elanjie
Date Posted: 21-Apr-2005 at 08:11

Originally posted by YAFES

pretty surprised there's noone japanese here
 

    No one  like to be target.   



Posted By: King Chulalongkorn
Date Posted: 24-Apr-2005 at 11:33
lol. In my college we have Japanese, Chinese, Korean, Filipino and American students and the fact is no one really hates the Japanese people. Its the government that angers the opposition due to rammifications in historical difference and promulgation of facts.

I think that the Chinese people need to cool down..its not healthy for their image to be seen as protesting and agitated.




-------------
Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk


Posted By: RED GUARD
Date Posted: 24-Apr-2005 at 11:41
      Yeah, it's only the Japanese gournment we should hate, not the people.

-------------
Quotes by your's turly:

"I came, I saw, and I conquered... but only for the weekend"

"This is my tank, this is my weapon, and this is my pride."

"Power comes from a barrel of a gun."



Posted By: King Chulalongkorn
Date Posted: 24-Apr-2005 at 12:05

Yup besides..look at the contributions the japanese people gave to us..anime, ddr, karaoke-jam, video games for ps2 etc..lol!!

 

c'mon!



-------------
Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk


Posted By: Elanjie
Date Posted: 25-Apr-2005 at 23:00

Originally posted by King Chulalongkorn

I think that the Chinese people need to cool down..its not healthy for their image to be seen as protesting and agitated.


   Many chinese also have such thoughts and always being cool and peaceful, but when they walk onto the street, nobody force them, they just join the protesting and demostration.

   Acoording to someone's logic, we generation of mainland chinese grow up under the anti-japanese taught, that is why we hate japan. Basiclly, I don't think so, we could distinguish what the Japan government does and common japanese people. But we are also quite aware what the spirit nature and unique japanese cultureral influence  are, they are "dangerous" in some sense, easy to be inflamed to extreme. They once learned much from China, but they didn't learn to be honest and sincerely. Japanese are real hard-working under high pressure , I don't expect some of them have good health both with body and minds.

   It is not only about the remodify on school books whick would be only a trigger, but also their dirty works done to the Diaoyu island and taiwan issue.

     So, your country had never been real controlled by China as you say, but you are always having strong sensitive and easily to be angered in many areas ,sometimes in words.

     Do you think the image were more important than your country's intergrity and respect?

 

 

     Well, well, I lost my way, for discussion history not to be emotional.

  



Posted By: King Chulalongkorn
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2005 at 01:03
Originally posted by Elanjie

Originally posted by King Chulalongkorn

I think that the Chinese people need to cool down..its not healthy for their image to be seen as protesting and agitated.


   Many chinese also have such thoughts and always being cool and peaceful, but when they walk onto the street, nobody force them, they just join the protesting and demostration.

   Acoording to someone's logic, we generation of mainland chinese grow up under the anti-japanese taught, that is why we hate japan. Basiclly, I don't think so, we could distinguish what the Japan government does and common japanese people. But we are also quite aware what the spirit nature and unique japanese cultureral influence  are, they are "dangerous" in some sense, easy to be inflamed to extreme. They once learned much from China, but they didn't learn to be honest and sincerely. Japanese are real hard-working under high pressure , I don't expect some of them have good health both with body and minds.

   It is not only about the remodify on school books whick would be only a trigger, but also their dirty works done to the Diaoyu island and taiwan issue.

     So, your country had never been real controlled by China as you say, but you are always having strong sensitive and easily to be angered in many areas ,sometimes in words.

     Do you think the image were more important than your country's intergrity and respect?

 

 

     Well, well, I lost my way, for discussion history not to be emotional.

  



So you justify the anger and the protest of the Chinese because of Japan's exercise of its national right to claim its territoriality? You do understand that the islands that Japan claims are recognized by the international community as well as from the United States.

As for the Japanese claim to protect Taiwan, its mere strategy with Taiwan and the United States. Its their national practice to uphold the continuation of the democratic state of Taiwan. Nothing wrong with that.


-------------
Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk


Posted By: TheOrcRemix
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2005 at 02:13

Originally posted by YAFES

pretty surprised there's noone japanese here

 

im 1/2 



-------------
True peace is not the absence of tension, but the presence of justice.
Sir Francis Drake is the REAL Pirate of the Caribbean


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2005 at 06:35
Originally posted by TheOrcRemix

Originally posted by YAFES

pretty surprised there's noone japanese here

 

im 1/2 



-------------


Posted By: King Chulalongkorn
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2005 at 09:22
welcome! 

-------------
Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 26-Apr-2005 at 17:20

Originally posted by King Chulalongkorn

welcome! 

then I should open a new topic in the Tavern. see you there



-------------


Posted By: hannibal
Date Posted: 30-Apr-2005 at 17:36
Originally posted by King Chulalongkorn

Originally posted by Elanjie

Originally posted by King Chulalongkorn

I think that the Chinese people need to cool down..its not healthy for their image to be seen as protesting and agitated.


   Many chinese also have such thoughts and always being cool and peaceful, but when they walk onto the street, nobody force them, they just join the protesting and demostration.

   Acoording to someone's logic, we generation of mainland chinese grow up under the anti-japanese taught, that is why we hate japan. Basiclly, I don't think so, we could distinguish what the Japan government does and common japanese people. But we are also quite aware what the spirit nature and unique japanese cultureral influence  are, they are "dangerous" in some sense, easy to be inflamed to extreme. They once learned much from China, but they didn't learn to be honest and sincerely. Japanese are real hard-working under high pressure , I don't expect some of them have good health both with body and minds.

   It is not only about the remodify on school books whick would be only a trigger, but also their dirty works done to the Diaoyu island and taiwan issue.

     So, your country had never been real controlled by China as you say, but you are always having strong sensitive and easily to be angered in many areas ,sometimes in words.

     Do you think the image were more important than your country's intergrity and respect?

 

 

     Well, well, I lost my way, for discussion history not to be emotional.

  



So you justify the anger and the protest of the Chinese because of Japan's exercise of its national right to claim its territoriality? You do understand that the islands that Japan claims are recognized by the international community as well as from the United States.

As for the Japanese claim to protect Taiwan, its mere strategy with Taiwan and the United States. Its their national practice to uphold the continuation of the democratic state of Taiwan. Nothing wrong with that.

Please do not ignore why people in China are angry at the government of Japan.In fact, we did and do try to forget everthing unpleasant between us,but very funny, the leaders of Japanese government continually reminded us ( by their action not words)they Japanese believe what their former generation did on us were right.
 
There is nothing wrong with our angerness and protest, what's wrong was the violent action,but 99% Chinese demonstrators kept the peace. Western media, such as CNN and washington post(through my reading)deliberately exaggerated the negative side of the protest and distain the true feeling of us. In their eyes, a people under the rule of  communist party,  never have their own voice,if there is a voice,it must be utilized by the CCP government. Wrong!

My  friend, don't justify what Japan did because of their Karaok.If Japan did as 1/2 good as German did on history, everything will be ok.

As for the Diaoyu Island,Japanese government not only claims it,but also occupying it now. This does not mean the Island belong to Japan, for international community including USA, never recognized what Japan did on our Island was legal,if you don't believe,please ask your government.
 
China are doing bussiness with Japan, perhaps the CCP goverment think business is the most important thing at present, and does not willing to spoil the commercial relationship between China and Japan just because of the tiny Island. So I can  tell you that the ultimate solution will come once the time is appropriate.

As for Taiwan,I,a mainlander, uphold the continuation of its' democratic state  too. But we do not need Japan,a former criminal,uphold the continuation of democracy of a part of my country by its military force.

 



-------------
Who am I?
I'm General of Carthage;
Eternal biggest enemy of Rome.


Posted By: moreshige
Date Posted: 05-May-2005 at 01:29
Originally posted by coolstorm

for the majority of the last two centuries, the chinese were feeling superior to the japanese and the japanese were feeling inferior to the Chinese sending tributes and regarded the chinese emperor (especially during the tang dynasty) as their overlord. wa japan was regarded as a nation of "short slaves" in chinese during the han dynasty. Much of the japanese government structure and civil system were adopted from Tang China.

the situation didn't get reverse until the end of the 19th century. but it's switching again. i would say for the most time, chinese people have looked down on japanese people throughout the last two centuries. in fact, they still do kinda. in mainland china, japanese people are regarded as "little japs" even today. any chinese person would love to see japan vanish from history. it's a commonly hated country in china.

even today, most japanese still admire ancient chinese culture, poetry, tradition. the japanese emperor's title and year title are still decided based on han chinese tradition. most japanese know about chinese history. for example, dynasty warriors, romance of the three kingdoms, and a lot of games based on chinese history are made by the japanese.

on a greater scale, it was only a brief japanese intervention of chinese domination in east asia.




You forgot to mention Hideyoshi wanted to conquer Ming because he felt superior.


Posted By: Elanjie
Date Posted: 05-May-2005 at 22:31

Originally posted by moreshige



You forgot to mention Hideyoshi wanted to conquer Ming because he felt superior.

   Did he really feel superior? I doubt. For people sometimes  like to show superior when he was inferior complex.

   I would consider it as ego-boost more than confidence for Hideyoshi at that time. Japan was lacked of necessarily resource and prosperity to feel superior to Ming then.  Well, in the WWII, Germen slaughtered Jewrish, For excuse they said they were superior while the truth is Jewish's factual superior bring  disasters to Jewrish themselves.

 



Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 05-May-2005 at 23:12
Either that, or it was just a ploy to get his political enemies killed.

-------------


Posted By: moreshige
Date Posted: 06-May-2005 at 07:50
Originally posted by Elanjie

Originally posted by moreshige



You forgot to mention Hideyoshi wanted to conquer Ming because he felt superior.

   Did he really feel superior? I doubt. For people sometimes  like to show superior when he was inferior complex.

   I would consider it as ego-boost more than confidence for Hideyoshi at that time. Japan was lacked of necessarily resource and prosperity to feel superior to Ming then.  Well, in the WWII, Germen slaughtered Jewrish, For excuse they said they were superior while the truth is Jewish's factual superior bring  disasters to Jewrish themselves.

 



Being superior or inferior is subjective.  Nobody is actually superior or inferior. By what grounds?  lol  But Hideyoshi actually did feel he was superior and believed in the right to conquer Ming.



Posted By: moreshige
Date Posted: 06-May-2005 at 07:53
Originally posted by Gubook Janggoon

Either that, or it was just a ploy to get his political enemies killed.


His political enemies were the other daimyos by which time he became sole ruler of Japan. 


Posted By: jiangweibaoye
Date Posted: 06-May-2005 at 13:37
Hideyoshi had a large amount of restless army which knew nothing better than war.  To keep his army active, kill off some enemies, and keep himself preoccupied with war.  Also concentrating on waging war is far more entertaining than setting tax rates, building dams, establishing a solid economy.  What's that old saying "You can conquer the world from horseback, but you cannot rule from horseback." or something like that.


Posted By: Aura
Date Posted: 05-Jul-2006 at 13:25

Would it have been possible for a 15-year-old, single, Japanese girl, to travel from Japan to China during the late 1700s, preferrably between the years 1769-1773?

 
(please reply asap, today if possible!)


Posted By: xi_tujue
Date Posted: 05-Jul-2006 at 15:44
the relationship of japan and china is the same as that of england and france or similar
 
or am I wrong


-------------
I rather be a nomadic barbarian than a sedentary savage


Posted By: Illuminati
Date Posted: 05-Jul-2006 at 16:15
similiar, but I'd say current sino-japanese relations are nowhere near as good as British-French relations currently are


Posted By: flyingzone
Date Posted: 05-Jul-2006 at 20:29
I would say it's not the same at all. While England and France had always been rivals, if not enemies, historically, the two world wars have definitely changed that. The rivalries that exist between Britain and France now these days are more cultural and economic ones. I don't see any deep-seated HATRED and contempt between people of these two countries.
 
In the case of the Sino-Japanese relations, prior to Japan's modernization, China had always been like a "parent figure" to Japan. However, of course the Japanese modernization changed all that which eventually led to the Japanese aggression in China. There are several consequences of that. First, it has completely reversed the traditional "parent-child" relation between the two countries and I think psychologically it's still quite hard for the Chinese people to accept that these former "barbarians" have now surpassed them in both economic achievement and international prestige. There may be some jealousy involved. However, this sentiment pales in comparison with another one - that of anger. The atrocities that the Japanese committed in China during the Second World War were unprecedented in human history. As has been witnessed in the many flame wars between sworn enemies in this forum, these memories have become so deeply engraved into the national psyche of the Chinese people that it's hard to imagine that they could be erased in generations to come. And the fact that the Japanese nation seems to be quite indifferent to such sentiment definitely doesn't help.
 
   


-------------


Posted By: The Charioteer
Date Posted: 05-Jul-2006 at 20:52

I agree with Flyingzone's input on this matter. Using western standard to judge Asian affairs or non-European affairs in the general in the practical world often result in "tragic" outcomes.

Flyingzone is well aware of this problem with "euro-centric" views,(the counter part would be "sino-centric", so no offense there)

I remember long time ago I (innocently)started a thread entitled "Koreans: the Italians of Asia". It was meant to be a "compliment" to the success of contemporary Korean pop culture and its conquest of the East Asian pop cultural scene. However, a very perceptive and wise Korean forumer correctly pointed out to me that why should Koreans be called "Italians of Asia" and why aren't Italians called "Koreans of Europe." It totally woke me up. This "Eurocentric" mindset is so prevalent in so many of us that sometimes if affects the way we see the world. "
http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2589&PN=2 - http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2589&PN=2
 
When the mind is gone, one need the body to deliver.


-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 06-Jul-2006 at 09:42
Originally posted by The Charioteer

I agree with Flyingzone's input on this matter. Using western standard to judge Asian affairs or non-European affairs in the general in the practical world often result in "tragic" outcomes.

Flyingzone is well aware of this problem with "euro-centric" views,(the counter part would be "sino-centric", so no offense there)

I remember long time ago I (innocently)started a thread entitled "Koreans: the Italians of Asia". It was meant to be a "compliment" to the success of contemporary Korean pop culture and its conquest of the East Asian pop cultural scene. However, a very perceptive and wise Korean forumer correctly pointed out to me that why should Koreans be called "Italians of Asia" and why aren't Italians called "Koreans of Europe." It totally woke me up. This "Eurocentric" mindset is so prevalent in so many of us that sometimes if affects the way we see the world. "
http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2589&PN=2 - http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=2589&PN=2
 
When the mind is gone, one need the body to deliver.
 
Now clear this up for me, is the success of Italian Pop Culture only as recent as the rise of Korean Pop Culture?
 


Posted By: The Charioteer
Date Posted: 06-Jul-2006 at 09:52
Originally posted by Ryukyu Magic

 
Now clear this up for me, is the success of Italian Pop Culture only as recent as the rise of Korean Pop Culture?
 
 
ask Flyingzone, its his idea.
I merely wanted to use the notion that he has admitted that "euro-centric" mindset does sometimes affect the way they(westerners) see the world.
 
perhaps i should edit the length of the quote?


-------------


Posted By: The Charioteer
Date Posted: 06-Jul-2006 at 10:19
Originally posted by moreshige


You forgot to mention Hideyoshi wanted to conquer Ming because he felt superior.
 
 
notice his hat is Chinese-style, the hat was given by emperor Wanli of Ming dynasty to Hideyoshi.


-------------


Posted By: flyingzone
Date Posted: 06-Jul-2006 at 21:14
Originally posted by Ryukyu Magic

 
Now clear this up for me, is the success of Italian Pop Culture only as recent as the rise of Korean Pop Culture?
 
 
If I am to speak for the person who argued against the use of the Italian analogy to describe the rise and growing influence of Korean pop culture in East Asia, while unquestionably the success of the Italian pop culture did precede that of the Korean one, the huge difference in the nature between the two renders such comparison meaningless in the first place. That of the Italian pop culture is more related to the fashion, culinary, and design industries whereas the Korean one is more related to the entertainment industry. (I personally also don't think that the Italian entertainment industry has made any huge impact on the world.)
 
So I think that forumer who accused me of being subtly Eurocentric does have a point. I was focusing on one and only one thing that the Italians did "better" than their Korean counterparts - that they did it EARLIER. But any comparison between the two (if comparison itself is necessary or even justified) should be looked at from many different angles. One could, for instance, argue that the Italians could have a lot to learn from the Koreans when it comes to the creativity and diversity of their ENTERTAINMENT industry.
 
Am I being too politically correct here? Maybe. But tell you what, if that Korean forumer had not been here to raise that point, I would have never even thought that that apparently "innocent" statement might not be that "innocent" to some after all. Anything that makes any of us THINK twice is a good thing.
  


-------------


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 07-Jul-2006 at 14:21
The question of whether Hideyoshi wanted to invade the Ming is an interesting one.  On one side of the argument, Hideyoshi really did see himself as rightful heir to all of Asia, even sending out scouts to find suitable locations for palaces as far as India.  The fact that he's wearing a cap given to him by the Ming emperor does nothing to prove that he did not in fact feel superior to the Ming.  On the other side we have the idea of Hideyoshi as a political genius.  Sending the restless samurai off to a foreign land so that they wouldn't cause trouble at home and sentencing his political enemies to an early death without having to ever really fight them.


-------------


Posted By: The Charioteer
Date Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 04:12
Originally posted by Gubook Janggoon

The question of whether Hideyoshi wanted to invade the Ming is an interesting one.  On one side of the argument, Hideyoshi really did see himself as rightful heir to all of Asia, even sending out scouts to find suitable locations for palaces as far as India.  The fact that he's wearing a cap given to him by the Ming emperor does nothing to prove that he did not in fact feel superior to the Ming.  On the other side we have the idea of Hideyoshi as a political genius.  Sending the restless samurai off to a foreign land so that they wouldn't cause trouble at home and sentencing his political enemies to an early death without having to ever really fight them.
 
He was furious when Ming granted him only king of Japan, rather than heir to Ming, the war resumed after that. The cap is symbolic, but can be very different in the eyes of Ming to Hideyoshi. But he did wear it on formal occasions, at least it indicate he recognized the importance of Ming at the time, why would he wear a cap which was supposedly given to king of Japan,rather than what he demanded for, heir to Ming? May be he wanted to show Japanese samurai, that his legitamacy as sovereign of Japan is also acknowledged by Ming. Added bonus to the second idea you mentioned.


-------------


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 19:29
There's no doubt that Hideyoshi valued objects from the Ming.  There are few countries in the world who would have looked in disdain at presents from the Ming court, but his appreciation for Chinese material goods may have been overshadowed by a superiority complex based around the idea that it was Hideyoshi's destiny to conquer all of Asia, if that assumption itself is even true in the first place.

-------------


Posted By: The Charioteer
Date Posted: 11-Jul-2006 at 22:01
Originally posted by Gubook Janggoon

There's no doubt that Hideyoshi valued objects from the Ming.  There are few countries in the world who would have looked in disdain at presents from the Ming court, but his appreciation for Chinese material goods may have been overshadowed by a superiority complex based around the idea that it was Hideyoshi's destiny to conquer all of Asia, if that assumption itself is even true in the first place.
 
The cap is not just some " material objects", not some presents by Ming court or goods purchased or acquired from Ming. It is politically symbolic to Ming as well to Hideyoshi. But its interesting to see, he resumed the fighting because Ming rejected his idea of becoming heir to Ming, yet actually wearing a cap that was symbolicly of that rejection. How would that be fitted into the explanation, if one presume Hideyoshi had this Superiority complex towards the Ming, then how was the second interpretation of his invasion may be incorporated into understanding of his motives and objectives regarding the war.


-------------


Posted By: Gubook Janggoon
Date Posted: 12-Jul-2006 at 04:31
How else would Hideyoshi have attained the cap if it wasn't a gift from the Ming court?  I'd like to see your source that the hat he's wearing in the painting was actually given to him by the Ming.  Could someone also provide a date on the painting?  This may have been painted pre or post war, so that may explain a part of your question.  That last part I don't really get.  Could you clarify?

-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 06-Aug-2006 at 20:35
Ironicly, this penchant for superior/inferior ranking of the world was one of the things Japan imported from China while it was learning from the Confuscian Chinese prior to the 1600's . . . failure to grasp the world in all its dimensions and hence pluralism but preferring a linear order was one of the trade marks of Confuscianism.
 
Japan was settled relatively late by old world standards.  Unified Japan did not take place until after Mongo invasion, which had a severely tramatic impact on Japanese psyche, not unlike the Japanese invasion of China in the 20th century had on Chinese psyche.  That's why Japan was obsessed with seeing to it that the continental hordes never sail down from the Korean pennisula again to conqure Japan.  Japan turned into a unitary state for that purpose, just like China got rid off worlordism after Japanese invasion in the 20th century, and going backwards, France got its own centralized government after the 100-year war enduring what later historians paid by the French government would consider invasion by England.
 
After the Japanese warring state period in the 14th through 16th century, Hideyoshi finally unified Japan.   He then had a huge surplus army with nothing to do, the same problem Mao had after Chinese Civil War.  Mao's solution was throwing that element of potential social instability into the meat grinder that was called Korean War . . . Hideyoshi too found Korea to be the perfect place to get rid of his surplus warriors . . . with some ridiculous design of world domination.  Even Hideyoshi probably knew that there was no way Japan could conqure the world . . . not the least because Hideyoshi's own mentor Nobunaga's success was largely built on imported Portugese aquebus.
 
The first disturbance in the Japanese attitude towards China as something high in the superior/inferior ranking system came with the Mongol Invasion.  Mongols conqured China but failed to conqure Japan.  It was only a relatively small disturbance because China overthrew their Mongol overlords in little over half a century.  What really killed Japanese perception of China came after Manchu conquest of China . . . and China's collaborationist co-existence with the conquror for hundreds of years.  After that, Japan pursued its own closed door policy until Commodore Perry forced Japan open to international trade. 
 
BTW, up till the 16th century Japan was the primary supplier of monetary silver to China.  So they had very close relationship.  With the arrival of Spanish galleons carrying silver from south america to the Phillipines, they trade between Japan and China became increasingly carried out by Portugese, Spanish and Dutch merchants  . . . especially as both asian countries pursued closed door policies.
 
 
 
 
 


Posted By: flyingzone
Date Posted: 06-Aug-2006 at 21:51
Interesting analysis on when Japan's perception of China started to change (from admiration to condescension). I personally would push the timeline for that happening much later - after the Meiji Restoration.
 
Brightness, could you provide some more concrete evidence that supports your arguments that Japanese attitude towards China started to change:
(1) After the successful Mongol invasion of China
(2) After the Manchu conquest
Or are those arguments just speculations of yours?
 


-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 07-Aug-2006 at 09:46
The change in Japanese attitude after Mongol invasion was not condescension towards Chinese per se, but the realization that out of that continent could come not only cultural enlightenment (like the Tang period and Song period) but also mortal threat.  Mongol occupation of southern China was relatively short, so it did not damage Japanese perception of China all that much.  Japan was always more closely linked to southern China than northern China.  In any case, Japan was mired in couple hundreds years of civil war of unification after the Mongols, similar to China prior to 221BC.  In fact, Japanese calls the period "Sengoku Jidai," exactly the same kanji for the Chinese Warring State period prior to 221BC.  Of course, instead of bronze age weapons, Japanese were fighting with firearms in their Warring State Period one and a half millinia later. 
 
The Manchu conquest of China however became entirely different.  For two reasons:
 
(1) Chinese seem to have made long-term peace with their Manchu overlords;
 
(2) Tokugawa Bakufu was established in Japan not long after Manchu conquest of China.  The newly centralized Japanese government pursued closed door policy and actively promoted its own cultural superiority over China, theorizing that the contemporary China was no longer run by the Chinese blood of the classical period . . . and that Japan was the true inheritor of Chinese civilization.   The term "slaves from a dead state" (wang guo nu) came to describe Chinese under Manchu rule.


Posted By: Hando
Date Posted: 02-Sep-2006 at 12:02
Originally posted by jiangweibaoye

In the same token, some (I hate to generalize) do feel that if you are not my superior, I must be yours attitude.  This is most prevailing with their feelings about Koreans.  Man, if you think they look down on China, ask them about Korea.


I totally diasgree. I teach Japanese, Korean and Chinese students as a TESOL teacher. I have to say that the Japanese get along better and treat the Korean classmates with more respect than they do the Chinese. Maybe, your generalization is due to expeirences you have had, but in my experience the Japanese totally look down at the Chinese and have more respect for their Korean counterparts.
The Japanese and Korean students always hang out together outside of class, but the Japanese students dont really have much to do with the Chinese students.

Once during a student party, a drunk Japanese girl told everyone she was not Chinese and that she would rather be called Korean, but please never to call her Chinese.
I was not present but was told this by a fellow teacher.
Such sentiments only confirm for me the racism behind the way thr Japanese treated the Chinese as opposed to the way they treated the Koreans.
Both were treated bad, but the Chinese were treated more like animals.


Posted By: Gun Powder Ma
Date Posted: 02-Sep-2006 at 12:30
Japan profited culturally immensely from China, and China was thankful that Japan almost never got its act together to produce a viable military threat at China's soft belly. With and after the Imjin War, Japan got even more introspective than China, but still managed to made itself somehow the most advanced East Asian society by the time of the arrival of the black ships. The result was a headstart in modernity on everybody else in its neighbourhood and the rest is history.


Posted By: Hando
Date Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 01:01
Originally posted by jiangweibaoye

I think there is a love hate relationship between Japan and China.  There is a certain amount of respect reflected by Japan's adaptation of Chinese culture & incorporating it into their own.  I know Japanese students who know far far more about Chinese history (Including Romance of the Three Kingdoms) and my Chinese counterparts.  In the same token, some (I hate to generalize) do feel that if you are not my superior, I must be yours attitude.  This is most prevailing with their feelings about Koreans.  Man, if you think they look down on China, ask them about Korea.



Ohhh please...Nice try, but its very telling and obvious what your trying to do.

You see, the truth cannot be hidden by your pathetic but very telling and obvious attempts. You are trying to make others think that the Japanese think the Chinese are superior to Koreans? That the Japanese look down on the Koreans more than they do on the Chinese? Ohh please. I dont think so and you know it too.

No one believes that. Not even white people.

The Japanese always tried to pursuade the subjugated Koreans that Koreans and Japanese were the same race. On the other hand, the Japanese thought the Chinese were Vermin/Animals and so they just tried to eliminate them with mass murder and they raped, did scientific testing and used a lot of brutality on the Chinese. Way way more than they did towards the Koreans, because the Japanese tried to at least assimilate the Koreans who they felt were related to them, while they tried to genocide the Chinese. They didt care about the Chinese at all. Not one bit. You know what I am talking about.

Even whites feel this way. When my white friends want to tease a Korean, they tease him by saying he is chinese, although they know he is Korean. So even to them, the Chinese are lower than Koreans. Its an unsaid but firmly believed opinion with everyone around the world.

So it is already known that Japanese look down more on the Chinese than they did on the Koreans.

So try your devious, but tellingly unsuccesful Chinese attempts at trying to create your lies and illusions, another way. We all know how your type operate.

The Japanese have done so much to increase the west's respect for Asia, but this has been futile, because the Chinese have embarassed the Asians for every good thing the Japanese have done for us. The Chinese ar an embarrassment to Asians. Everybody knows this, so don't even try to put down Koreans. It aint working.
I'd rather be Puerto Rican than a delivery boy. I'm outta here and won;t be visiting this post or any other ones.

Goodbye.
I am done wasting my time here with morons like you who make me sick.


Posted By: flyingzone
Date Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 15:45
Hando, the tone of your post is totally unacceptable and clearly violate AE Codes of Conduct. To the best of my recollection, it is not the first time you made this kind of statement. In this post, you not only insulted the Chinese people and the Puerto Rican people. You also insulted your OWN people by showing the ugliest side of bigotry, hatred, and ethnic intolerance.
 
I remember you are a teacher (or at least you claim yourself to be one). Imagine those kids whose parents have entrusted you to educate them - kids of various ethnic descent, Chinese, Puerto Rican, kids whose parents may work for delivery. How do you face them if they had the chance to read your post and saw the real you?
 
You should be absolutely ashamed of yourself and disgusted by your own behaviour.
 
Consider yourself getting an official warning. Angry 


-------------


Posted By: Paul
Date Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 18:53
And they let him loose on students............

-------------
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk - http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk - http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk


Posted By: flyingzone
Date Posted: 19-Oct-2006 at 19:45
Originally posted by Hando

  
Goodbye.
I am done wasting my time here with morons like you who make me sick.
 
Since Mr. Hando has already declared his disinterest in hanging out with us "morons" here, we have decided to make his life even easier for banning him from AE.
 


-------------


Posted By: DukeC
Date Posted: 20-Oct-2006 at 03:54
Originally posted by Paul

And they let him loose on students............
 
Be afraid, be very afraid...


-------------


Posted By: TMPikachu
Date Posted: 20-Oct-2006 at 17:24
Originally posted by MengTzu

Originally posted by jiangweibaoye

The Chinese have an more American or individualistic attitude about everything.  That can be a good and bad thing. 

No way.  The Chinese have a kind of "collective individualism."  There's is a Chinese saying, "every family sweeps the snow in front of its own house."  It is still not individualism, it's clanishness, if you will.  Chinese people are clicky, whether the cliques are families or groups of friends.  Each group takes care of its own, refusing to have greater integration.  Of course, I'm generalizing as well.



So do Americans. Example such as Fraternety groups that develope in college who then help each other later in life, political parties

and of course sports, a very serious serious business Smile

Originally posted by brightness

(2) Tokugawa Bakufu was established in Japan not long after Manchu conquest of China.  The newly centralized Japanese government pursued closed door policy and actively promoted its own cultural superiority over China, theorizing that the contemporary China was no longer run by the Chinese blood of the classical period . . . and that Japan was the true inheritor of Chinese civilization.   The term "slaves from a dead state" (wang guo nu) came to describe Chinese under Manchu rule.


I hadn't heard of this before, what source did you get this from?

From the little contact I've had with Japanese, I asked on pretty much the question "so what's Japanese opinion on China" he said something along the lines of " We borrowed stuff in the past, but the political identity today isn't the same"


Posted By: intem
Date Posted: 22-Oct-2006 at 23:33

hmmm........ I smell some ultranationalistic agenda from this hando guy. I'll take a guess that he's a korean nationalists, as he replied with a bad tone about chinese people looking down at the koreans.

Its ashamed that he firmly claimed himself as a teacher as he has racial problems with other ethnics such as the chinese as he seems to be more aggressive towards to. I wonder how he became a teacher? He doesn't seem knowledgable at all.
 
Just a reminder to anyone who has children to be aware to this kind of person when sending your child to be educated by such shameless person and rather uneducated person if i should say it.


-------------
J.T.I.J


Posted By: skylance
Date Posted: 30-Oct-2006 at 23:28
for God's sake,even poorest or  humblest Chinese never take korea seriously.me to.China completely ignores the existence of Korea for 2000 years untill now.
but I really like ancient Japanese culture and history,I am a fan of Oda NubunagaLOL,Japan really developed a kind of bloody and elegant culture of itself after importing ancient China civilzation systemly.
if they frankly face their war crimes in WW2,I will love even modern Japanese  too.


Posted By: Easternknight
Date Posted: 31-Oct-2006 at 19:58
Guess this is why Flying Zone created the
reality of Aggressive nationalism of China and Korea thread.
 
"for God's sake,even poorest or  humblest Chinese never take korea seriously.me to.China completely ignores the existence of Korea for 2000 years untill now".
I don't suppose you actually have any real proof supporting this? I'll be waiting for a serious response.


Posted By: skylance
Date Posted: 31-Oct-2006 at 20:57
Originally posted by Easternknight

Guess this is why Flying Zone created the
reality of Aggressive nationalism of China and Korea thread.
 
"for God's sake,even poorest or  humblest Chinese never take korea seriously.me to.China completely ignores the existence of Korea for 2000 years untill now".
I don't suppose you actually have any real proof supporting this? I'll be waiting for a serious response.


that's simple reality,comparing with the influence from modern western and Japan,influence from ancient nomadic tribes ,and influence from ancient India,what Korea had brought to China?

I don't want to argue what China had brought to Korea,I just want to see these Koreans could give me a little reasonable history of themselves since 2000 years ago,stop dreaming and lying,ok?
 Japan was even barbarian tribes  in  about 3th century AD,but now it stands as one of the greatest nations with unique and attractive culture,doesn't it?


Posted By: skylance
Date Posted: 31-Oct-2006 at 21:36
and I am far away from any "agressive nationalism",only ignorant young chinese boys could be called "agressive nationalism",so I think this word is completely meaningless.the core of modern chinese nationalism is to protect chinese dignity and national profits.
Americans want too much,Japanese try to erase his dirty in past century,we all know these simple things.
that's why modern chinese nationalism exits.



Posted By: flyingzone
Date Posted: 31-Oct-2006 at 21:52
AE do not need people like skylance polluting our space. Angry
 
He has been banned without any official warning because he has made fewer than 10 posts.


-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 31-Oct-2006 at 22:19
lol Modern Chinese Nationalism exists because Chinese people exist. Give me a break.


Posted By: flyingzone
Date Posted: 31-Oct-2006 at 22:33

I think that is an unfair generalization. I don't think the Chinese people are on average more or less "nationalistic" than people of other nationalities. While my personal opinion towards nationalism is rather low, I think some degree of nationalism is acceptable (and is inevitable too). What really concerns me is extreme or aggressive nationalism, and that is definitely not a monopolistic characteristic of the Chinese. It is everywhere, evident even in a small community like AE. That's actually what most of the bans are about.

When one accuses the Chinese of being more "nationalistic" than other nationalities, is one guilty of making a biased statement oneself too?



-------------


Posted By: gremlinlord
Date Posted: 07-Dec-2006 at 10:37
I would have to agree...every country has some type of excessive jingoism. By no means is China a rude exception. It is a fact of human nature to be proud of their nationality, but taking it to the level in which one is putting down other countries is taking it too far.
 
The theme of bad relations between Japan, Korea, and China are still apparent today, unfortunately...all of these nations fascinate me. The discussion that was going before, in August (long time ago!) I find rather intriguing. I too would have thought it would have occured after the Meiji Restoration, but this is an interesting argument.


Posted By: R3V3RI3
Date Posted: 23-Jan-2018 at 00:32
Originally posted by

The change in Japanese attitude after Mongol invasion was not condescension towards Chinese per se, but the realization that out of that continent could come not only cultural enlightenment (like the Tang period and Song period) but also mortal threat.  Mongol occupation of southern China was relatively short, so it did not damage Japanese perception of China all that much.  Japan was always more closely linked to southern China than northern China.  In any case, Japan was mired in couple hundreds years of civil war of unification after the Mongols, similar to China prior to 221BC.  In fact, Japanese calls the period "Sengoku Jidai," exactly the same kanji for the Chinese Warring State period prior to 221BC.  Of course, instead of bronze age weapons, Japanese were fighting with firearms in their Warring State Period one and a half millinia later. 
 
The Manchu conquest of China however became entirely different.  For two reasons:
 
(1) Chinese seem to have made long-term peace with their Manchu overlords;
 
(2) Tokugawa Bakufu was established in Japan not long after Manchu conquest of China.  The newly centralized Japanese government pursued closed door policy and actively promoted its own cultural superiority over China, theorizing that the contemporary China was no longer run by the Chinese blood of the classical period . . . and that Japan was the true inheritor of Chinese civilization.   The term "slaves from a dead state" (wang guo nu) came to describe Chinese under Manchu rule.

The Chinese brought it upon themselves with their Confucian worldview. An idea of harmony and peace which ironically led to war.



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com