Print Page | Close Window

WWII Alternate Scenario

Printed From: History Community ~ All Empires
Category: All Empires Community
Forum Name: Historical Amusement
Forum Discription: For role playing and alternative history discussions.
URL: http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=15128
Printed Date: 13-May-2024 at 21:42
Software Version: Web Wiz Forums 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com


Topic: WWII Alternate Scenario
Posted By: kenlaw
Subject: WWII Alternate Scenario
Date Posted: 30-Sep-2006 at 08:36
There is a scenario that i thought up while daydreaming in court one day... waiting for jury selection is so awful boring i take a book or small pen and pad to pass the time.... Anyways here it is:
 
What if Hitler had called a temporary cease fire after the Fall fo France to sit down for talks with Great Britain about an end to the war at that point? I imagined Hitler one one side of the table with Russia as a 'neutral' ally on their side of the table. Across from him would be Great Britain with the U.S. as their neutral ally.
 
Hitler would have the option to resume the war if negotiations went badly - the time spent in the talks would allow Germany to gather stocks, continue to train troops, build more war machines, gather intel, and allow the troops some rest so that they would be fresh for any battle that might follow.
 
The object of the talks: the retention of the Germanic lands that had been overrun in the Blitzkrieg in return for the return of the French government to power and the return of the greater portion of France and affected European smaller nations. And also the reversal of the ridiculous penalties given to Germany with the Versailles Treaty, of course.
 
If Hitler approached the table as the diplomat and the Western allies completely rejected any attempts at diplomacy at that point i wonder if the opinion of the American public would have been so strong should the hostilities resume - since they would be then blamed on the British, painting Hitler as the one whom had attempted a diplomatic solution.
 
The world may have turned out to be a different place.



Replies:
Posted By: rider
Date Posted: 30-Sep-2006 at 14:06
Into Historical Amusement, I deem it going.

-------------


Posted By: Guests
Date Posted: 01-Oct-2006 at 11:26
Churchill would have never accepted the terms. If he did, Stalin's paranoia would have gone through the roof.


-------------


Posted By: Maharbbal
Date Posted: 01-Oct-2006 at 12:17
Churchill DIDN'T accepted it!

Besides for Hitler peace was impossible as both ideologically (politically) and for economic reasons his power depended on war and even victorious war.


-------------
I am a free donkey!


Posted By: J.M.Finegold
Date Posted: 01-Oct-2006 at 14:56
It wouldn't have been in Stalin's best interest to be Hitler's 'neutral ally', as you call it, and I think Great Britain and the United States understood this.  The two European powers were on a collision course since the invasion of Poland, and since late 1940 the Soviet Union was already gearing up for war against the Germans.  In fact, had Operation Barbarossa been launched only a year after it did they would have met a completely different Red Army - one which matched the Werhmacht in operational thinking, and surpassed it completely in manpower.  AFAIK, Stalin had plans to go to war with Germany in some year after 1942, or at least he understood that confrontation was largely inevitable.  Consequently, Stalin would have never painted himself as the neutral ally of Germany because it was in his best interest the the West continue its war with Germany, the Soviet Union's natural rival on mainland Europe.  

-------------



Print Page | Close Window

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a - http://www.webwizforums.com
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz - http://www.webwizguide.com