Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Who was Chiu?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
hansioux View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Aug-2004
Location: Taiwan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 537
  Quote hansioux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Who was Chiu?
    Posted: 02-Sep-2004 at 17:05
demon, that word is also the word for leader in the Miao tribes of China.
Begging plea of the weak can only receive disrespect, violence and oppression as bestowments. Blood and sweat of the weak can only receive insult, blame and abuse as rewards.

Lai Ho, Formosan Poet
Back to Top
demon View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Brazil
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1185
  Quote demon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Sep-2004 at 17:06
Interesting
Grrr..
Back to Top
MengTzu View Drop Down
General
General

Retired Moderator

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 957
  Quote MengTzu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Sep-2004 at 18:24
Originally posted by demon

Okay, the point of Chiu:

The word for leader

The origin of the character Iron

His victories that set example

It is the symbolic character of Chiu that makes his existence doubtful.  In other words, it's the fact that he's a "trope," an icon that stands for something, that makes him prominent, not whether or not he featured in historically verifiable sources.

Back to Top
hansioux View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Aug-2004
Location: Taiwan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 537
  Quote hansioux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Sep-2004 at 18:56

Originally posted by MengTzu

It is the symbolic character of Chiu that makes his existence doubtful.  In other words, it's the fact that he's a "trope," an icon that stands for something, that makes him prominent, not whether or not he featured in historically verifiable sources.

His symbolic character?  You mean how he has the head of a bull?  Or how he is the symbol of everything that stood against (Huagn Di, Yellow King)?

Actually, I think he is a real historical figure.  There real historical sources (vO Shi-Ji and ˮѬ~ (Zhu-Shu-Ji-Nian) mentioned him without any mythical exaggerations.

It is very easy for the ancient Chinese to put the thing their tribe worships with their heros or their enemy.  So every ancient history has a myth of their half man half animal origin.  With the beginning of heavy agriculture, most tribes in central Asian stopped migrating in (Shang) dynasty.  Individual ownership of land is established and the tribal culture basically died, and the transition from a Female dominant society to the Male dominant society.

That's when Chinese people became confused between their last name and their tribal name.  It is obvious it is a male dominant society because most Chinese today are using some type of tribal name as their last name.

Begging plea of the weak can only receive disrespect, violence and oppression as bestowments. Blood and sweat of the weak can only receive insult, blame and abuse as rewards.

Lai Ho, Formosan Poet
Back to Top
MengTzu View Drop Down
General
General

Retired Moderator

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 957
  Quote MengTzu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Sep-2004 at 02:04

Hey Hansioux,

    I have some doubts about Shi Ji, especially when it discusses about things that who knows when they actually happened.  Sima Qian wrote it in circa 200 BC, so how sure could he be about things that supposed to happened more than a thousand years before him?  And symbolic character: I mean what he stood for.  For similar reasons existence such people as Huangdi and Moses is also doubtful.  Excessively skeptical as this might seem, the very hero I honor, Kong Tzu, might also be legendary.  The problem is that just because some records are supposed to be official and discussed widely public figures do not mean that they were accurate.  It's hard to be wrong about things that happened in public nowadays, but it's not difficult to be wrong about things that happened centuries ago, and at a time when communication was more difficult.

    Many people try to come up with a compromise and say that historical figures had been distorted by myths.  This is a viable possibility, but it's merely that, a possibility.  The fact remains that it wasn't logically necessary that these figures actually existed.  Furthermore, this theory also poses a faulty historical formula: that the myths are only myths if they are exaggerated.  The most important thing about myths, in fact, is not their exaggerations, but their symbolism.  Ancient Chinese accounts such as Shang Shu are very plain and not exaggerated; its accounts of wars is very dull and rarely mentions heroes of great valor, like other myths would.  But this cannot prove that they were therefore accurate, because myths are popular when they sell to popular appeal; if, at the time, the popular appeal is not supernatural strenght but human wisdom, then the Zhou Gong who reformed the rituals would have greater appeal than the Zhou Gong who went against the Shang Dynasty leading a group of superheroes who became gods and immortals.

    Recommended reading: Emile Durkheim's Elementary Forms of Religion.  It gives a good theory that explains the fact that even figures who are viewed as fundamentally important to a culture did not have to be actual figures in order to be celebrated.

Peace,

Michael

9-2-2004



Edited by MengTzu
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.