Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Maharbbal
Sultan
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 08-Mar-2006
Location: Paris
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2120
|
Quote Reply
Topic: obesity, how to stop it? Posted: 21-May-2008 at 03:39 |
Yes … but no. If high wages equaled obesity, rich people would be fatter than poor ones. But it is not the case. So the answer must be: the society and the economy bla bla bla.
|
I am a free donkey!
|
|
Peteratwar
Colonel
Joined: 17-Apr-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 591
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-May-2008 at 09:02 |
Economy, money, living conditions etc ?
Sorry those are just poor excuses.
Even on benefits it is perfectly possible to eat well and resonsibly. (I have done so in the past)
Anyone can go for walks which are a good form of exercise, they can even go jogging.
As I said, mainly laziness
|
|
Styrbiorn
Caliph
Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2810
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-May-2008 at 09:30 |
Originally posted by Maharbbal
are you both for real? People are hardly starving any more, at least in the West. Well off people are ready to put a lot of money on the table for good healthy food, this leaves the poor with the fattening stuff such as Mars barre and chips and soda. Usually poverty takes away your drive to care for yourself and your children, a prefect field for obesity to spread.
|
Bah, it's all about horrible food culture. In for example Scandinavia poor people doesn't eat junk food all the time. It's rather the other way around. The poorer people are, the more they make their own food, bake their own bread etc. I don't buy the poverty excuse. It's totally impossible that it's cheaper to eat at McDonalds than baking your own bread. It's all about getting the thumbs out of where they don't belong. And about the Forbes article, do remember it's based on BMI, which is a ridiculous scale. I'm personally overweight according to it, but in reality I'm skinny.
Edited by Styrbiorn - 21-May-2008 at 09:32
|
|
Chilbudios
Arch Duke
Joined: 11-May-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1900
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-May-2008 at 11:02 |
Originally posted by Maharbbal
are you both for real? People are hardly starving any more, at least in the West. Well off people are ready to put a lot of money on the table for good healthy food, this leaves the poor with the fattening stuff such as Mars barre and chips and soda. Usually poverty takes away your drive to care for yourself and your children, a prefect field for obesity to spread. |
This "West" of yours is not even half of this people's planet. If you bothered to open that list at its bottom are only non-Western countries, the very bottom contains countries like Ethiopia, Afghanistan, Nepal. I wonder how many Mars bars are eaten in these countries? How hard is to make a decent google search to see that starvation is still a problem and even a cause of death in 21st century:
While you are right that healthy food is generally expansive, I also agree with Styrbiorn. I happen to live in a country where the price of a Mars bar is the price of 3-4 breads (lowest quality, of course). With the latter you can feed a family, with a Mars bar at the best you got yourself a snack. Fast-foods and snacks are not the cheapest foods here.
|
|
Maharbbal
Sultan
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 08-Mar-2006
Location: Paris
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2120
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-May-2008 at 16:27 |
A mars bar is cheaper than say a home-made sandwich! Of course money wise it is not necessarily, but in terms of time and attention, it is way lighter. A single mum may have no time or energy to allocate to her children's diet.
What is really bad for you is not only eating fattening stuff but also eating too much (anybody who has seen portions in US restaurants knows what I am talking about) and too often (imagine how you would look like if your parents hadn't told you not to ruin your appetite).
Next to my place there is a big Mexican community. Many are dirt poor but it is nearly impossible to find one adult who is not obese. Kids are devoting their lunch money to chocolates and chips, and their parents are eating enormous amounts of very rich traditional corn-based food (very good when on the point of starvation in the Chiapas, not so healthy when eaten in huge quantities).
Besides, don't give me the "yes but you are only considering the rich countries" as far as I know Bangladesh and Ethiopia are not facing wide-spread obesity.
|
I am a free donkey!
|
|
Chilbudios
Arch Duke
Joined: 11-May-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1900
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 21-May-2008 at 18:18 |
A mars bar is cheaper than say a home-made sandwich! Of course money wise it is not necessarily, but in terms of time and attention, it is way lighter. A single mum may have no time or energy to allocate to her children's diet. |
A home-made thin sandwich (bread with a cheap something) is definately cheaper than a Mars bar, and also easy to make (many people even tear the bread with their hands). I don't understand about what time and energy are you talking? (to put together a piece of bread a piece of something else). It would be few seconds but I don't know about joules. Let me give you the case of some hard times food from my own experience. Cooking for many with little money (and that saves also time) is done with some large pots (5-10-15 liters) so one dish was enough for several days. One common dish for hard times is the soup which is made of water and whatever green (sometimes based on a main ingredient like beans, salad, pigweed, etc.) else (and if you want taste of meat, often bones or claws can replace succesfully meat or chicken - you don't eat them but they leave a nice flavor and color). Other common "poor" dishes are based on bread but also dough (flour, water and something else), potatoes, rice, cabbage, beans (green in summer, dried in the winter). Sometimes bread can be a dish in itself, can be with garlic, with mustard, with sugar, with tomatoes, with onions, sometimes with butter or cheese, but sometimes just bread. My experience here is perhaps too European (maybe even too East-European), but it's a point of view you don't seem to have it considered.
What is really bad for you is not only eating fattening stuff but also eating too much (anybody who has seen portions in US restaurants knows what I am talking about) and too often (imagine how you would look like if your parents hadn't told you not to ruin your appetite). |
When poverty means not having enough food, eating too much is somehow not a daily issue. Poor people around here do not go in restaurants. Even fast foods are often too expansive for their almost inexistent budget. Also this fattening stuff sometimes a scarecrow (for this obesity issue, I'm not saying is healthy, though sometimes is damn tasty). Fattening foods can cause obesity but you won't become obese just because you eat fat food. There are a lot of skinny people eating fats and not becoming balloons over night.
Next to my place there is a big Mexican community. Many are dirt poor but it is nearly impossible to find one adult who is not obese. Kids are devoting their lunch money to chocolates and chips, and their parents are eating enormous amounts of very rich traditional corn-based food (very good when on the point of starvation in the Chiapas, not so healthy when eaten in huge quantities). |
Not quite next to my place, but near, there are some poor neighbourhoods. Not many fat people, and actually many of them look undernourished. Poor kids here do not have lunch money. Though my family was not that poor, I also did not have lunch money in my childhood and I actually don't remember much money on my hands until university when I started to work part-time. The difference betewen your story and mine rather suggests that this entire poverty-obesity equation must be enriched with further consideration of culture and other aspects which contribute to a sedentary, gluttonous life. Becuase I don't think this is a characteristic for poor people in the world, not even for all poor people in the "Western world".
Besides, don't give me the "yes but you are only considering the rich countries" as far as I know Bangladesh and Ethiopia are not facing wide-spread obesity. |
You said "Poor people are more likely to be fat." and similar generalizing remarks on poor people and poverty. On the other hand, true, you picked examples mostly from America's ghettos and reservations but then say "(North) American poor people are more likely to be fat.". Because the Ethiopian ones are not.
|
|
pebbles
Baron
Joined: 12-Oct-2008
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 409
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2009 at 11:56 |
The saying goes " you're what you eat ",amount of food consumption & one's metabolism do matter.
|
|
Menumorut
Chieftain
Joined: 02-Jun-2006
Location: Romania
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1423
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2009 at 13:24 |
Is interesting that the savage peoples are having almost not at all excedentary fat. The fat comes from a disordered way of life inevitable to modern man.
Being vegan is another way to avoid fatness. I eat great quantities of food (1-2 kgs of fruits, 1 kg of vegetables, a big bread and sometimes even more daily) and I don't have any problems.
I also walk daily 5-6 kms and beside being pleasantful and useful for thinking, it gives you a good physical and mental state.
|
|
|
Dolphin
Arch Duke
Suspended
Joined: 06-Feb-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1551
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2009 at 13:45 |
1: Stop eating so much. 2: Parents need to take responsibility for cooking proper food for their children, not just taking the lazy option. 3: Government tax cuts on healthy food items. Price is one of the key factors, so make good food cheaper and the health of the populace will increase. You'll get the lost money on taxes back on healthcare anyway. 4: Exercise. It's simple in a way, a lot of fat people eat too much and exercise too little, we can make excuses for people like this all we want, and blame wider problems in society, but if some people can stay slim, then others can too. Metabolism is mainly an excuse.
|
|
Parnell
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 04-Apr-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1409
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2009 at 15:37 |
Metabolism is mainly an excuse. |
Yes, but a very convenient one!
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2009 at 16:05 |
The problem is evolution. Back in the days when food was scarce, we evolved a preference for the most nutricious, fatty calorie laden food because this aided our survival. This is why we prefer to eat junk food to healthy food. Now this calorie laden food is abundant we have an obesity, a natural consequence. I suppose in the long term evolution will solve this as it's difficult for the obese to breed.
Edited by Paul - 24-Mar-2009 at 16:06
|
|
|
Temujin
King
Sirdar Bahadur
Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Mar-2009 at 19:28 |
this is not history...moved
|
|