Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Whats killing the Blue Whales?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Penelope View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Alia Atreides

Joined: 26-Aug-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1042
  Quote Penelope Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Whats killing the Blue Whales?
    Posted: 21-Sep-2007 at 01:39

In the month of September alone, 3 immense Blue Whale carcasses have washed up on beaches along California coasts, from Ventura County to Long Beach harbor, and a fourth is on its way. It is actually normal for dead carcasses to wash up every once in a while, but now, the occurances have become far more frequent. Scientists appear to be baffled by the phenomenon at the moment. What is killing these animals?

 

 

Back to Top
Praetor View Drop Down
Consul
Consul

Suspended

Joined: 26-Jun-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 386
  Quote Praetor Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Sep-2007 at 02:16
One question firstly; do you know if the whales are in tact (decomposing) or are riddled with abrasions, bumps, scars, bite marks, lacerations.etc?
If the latter, this option seems the most possible cause:
- Killed by Orcas (Killer Whales). Blue Whales are a prey item for pods of Orcas, the top of the ocean's food chain.

A paper into Blue Whales investigated further possible causes for this phenomenon. It was prepared by the US Fisheries department.

Here are the two most plausible causes in my opinion:
- Entanglement and subsequent drowning by oceanic fishing nets
- Interference by ships, whether it be outright collisions, or sonic interference of a ship's sonar, and the whale's become disoriented (their echolocation signals are distorted)

Perhaps this disorientation resulted in a collision or entanglement. Blue Whales have set migratory routes, and getting lost would have serious consequences on food and other resource availability.

Regards,
Praetor

Back to Top
Penelope View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Alia Atreides

Joined: 26-Aug-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1042
  Quote Penelope Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Sep-2007 at 03:02
They apparently did examine the carcasses, and after stripping a layer of blubber off of them,  they discovered that one of them had a massive bruise which couldve only been caused by a ship. However, the director of veterinary science at the Marine Mammal Center stated that the conclusion will remain tentative until scientists can check for broken bones and other signs of trauma. But that would only explain the death of one, not the others.
 
 
Back to Top
Knights View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3224
  Quote Knights Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Sep-2007 at 22:09
Good ideas people. This article confirms our suspicions on one of the three:

"SHIP KILLS BLUE WHALE"

Although blue whales are making a remarkable recovery from the devastation meted out during the peak whaling years of the late 19th and early 20th centuries, the endangered species still occasionally runs afoul of human activities. The blue whale found dead in the Santa Barbara Channel on Tuesday, September 11 was confirmed to have been killed by a large vessel traveling through the shipping lanes in the channel.

Researchers from the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History, working with the Channel Islands Marine and Wildlife Institute (CIMWI) and the County of Ventura Public Works Department, performed a necropsy on the whale, burying under the beach at Faria County Park what remains werent kept for research. According to Paul Collins, the Natural History Museums curator of vertebrate zoology, relatively minor exterior lacerations were seen initially. However, as the research team peeled back layers of blubber and delved deeper into the carcass of the deceased animal, significant bruising, many broken vertebrae, and a severed spinal cord confirmed that it was killed by a ship. The abdomen was full of blood from major damage to the organs, Collins said. These fresh bleeds were consistent with a ship strike.

Collins explained that they received a call from a research vessel from Oregon  which was tagging blue whales for tracking purposes  that one was floating in the channel near the northwest end of Santa Rosa Island. A National Geographic film crew was aboard and filmed the sighting, including underwater shots that showed several sharks feeding on the underside of the carcass. During the necropsy, we measured one shark bite as being 22 inches across, Collins said.

Although Collins and his team were alerted to the animals presence on Tuesday, it took until Wednesday evening to gain the permits required from the National Park Service to land the whale on Santa Rosa Island. By that time, it had washed all the way to Ventura County and onto the beach at Hobsons County Park. The necropsy indicated that the animal had been dead for almost a week and a half.

Collinss necropsy team was comprised of himself, Sausalito Marine Mammal Center veterinarian Frances Guillard, CIMWI president Sam Dover, his vice president Greg Cocklin, and the Natural History Museums entomologist, Michael Caterino. Collins recalled a dead whale he worked with in 1980 at Hollister Ranch, saying it took nearly a month and a half to remove the skeleton. Heavy equipment certainly helps, he said, referring to the machines provided by public works. We couldnt have gotten the head off in this amount of time without it.

The skull and much of the skeleton of the whale  described by Collins as a 72-foot female, approximately three to five years old  were taken to CIMWIs headquarters, located at the old Vista del Mar School site near Gaviota. For the next year and a half, researchers from the Natural History Museum and CIMWI will study the skeleton and prepare it for display.

The Vista del Mar isnt abandoned anymore, like people thought it was, Dover said. Were developing a stranding center up there. He described the site as ideal for their work because of the available space and its distance from developed areas. There the smell of decaying cetacean parts should not raise protests from neighbors.

As for the significance of the blue whale killed last week, Collins said the incident was both good and bad. It was good because it indicates an increase in the number of whales out there, he said, and bad because we dont like to see any endangered animals killed. According to recent studies, the population of blue whales in the Northern Hemisphere is currently between 3,000 and 4,000. Pre-whaling estimates indicate that their numbers were once as high as 350,000 worldwide.



The shipping lines are meant to be very busy of the Californian coast, namely the Santa Barbara Channel. This seems the most plausible death for a number of them, but I think we are just going to have to wait for the judgment by the scientists.

I would have thought the whales would echolocate the positioning of ships, but that's where sonic interference may have chipped in. It really is quite disturbing, and this latest event should spark concern about the risk large ships pose to the graceful giants of the sea.

- Knights -
Back to Top
Knights View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3224
  Quote Knights Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 25-Sep-2007 at 02:11
It seems that biologists are close to concluding on the cause of death for the 3rd whale. The first two are confirmed victims of ship collisions. Further testing is being done, but at this stage the third whale appears to have been a victim of domoic acid poisoning. Domoic acid is produced by algae, but at natural levels is not lethal.

However, algal blooms cause an excessive amount of domoic acid to be produced. The algae gather around krill masses in the open ocean - the food source of the Blue Whale. Basically, opon ingesting the krill, the whales also ingest large amounts of algae and thus domoic acid.
This amount can be fatal, as it has all but proved to be in this case.

Here's an article on the matter:

Biologists speculate domoic acid may be killing blue whales along Central Coast

"Three blue whales are found dead off the Southern California Coast this month.     

Here are the Facts First:

    * Scientists believe two of the three whales had been struck by a ship.
    * Tissue samples on the third whale are being tested for domoic acid.
    * The algae has already caused a number of marine mammals to become sick and even die.

Last spring, domoic acid caused the deaths of hundreds of sea lions and birds in Southern California waters. Now, biologists speculate whether the acid is causing problems for larger marine mammals.

A 65 foot blue whale may be the third and latest casualty from a collision with a ship.  

A sad ending for the enormous marine mammals that biologists think may not be a coincidence.

"When you have three dead animals from ship strikes you start pondering what else could be going on," said Michelle Berman, a Biologist at the Santa Barbara Museum of Natural History said a toxic algae found in the Central Coast may be a factor contributing to the whales deaths.

"Our first question is maybe there is something that is making these animals sick that's making them predisposed to being hit by a ship and so domoic acid is our first theory," said Berman.

Domoic acid is a toxic chemical produced by algae or plankton when it blooms.

If ingested, the acid can cause neurological damage. In the last two years, hundreds of sea lions have died from domoic poisoning along the Central Coast.

"It's free floating in the water and for the blue whales to ingest it it's mixed among their krill," said Berman.

While the acid typically affects smaller marine mammals, biologists say whales still have the capacity to get sick.

Whale researchers say domoic acid was at record high levels in Southern California this year.

The whales ingest the algae because it grows near the krill they eat. Researchers say sonar testing done near San Diego did not play a role in the whales deaths.  

Biologists expect the test results from the whale's tissue samples in the next three weeks.  
The carcass of the whale was taken 11 miles off the shore, where it is expected to sink.
"

http://www.ksby.com/Global/story.asp?S=7122777http://www.ksby.com/Global/story.asp?S=7122777

The end of this article states "the whale was taken 11 miles off shore, where it is expected to sink". I have a bit of a problem with this. If in fact domoic acid did cause the death, the whale will still have stores of the lethal substance in its tissue. A blue whale carcass is a rarity, and predators and scavengers from far and wide gather to gorge themselves.

You may be familiar with bioaccumulation - each level of the "food chain", concentration of foreign chemicals/substances increase. If levels were lethal in a blue whale, then surely consuming the tissue poses a great threat to predators/scavengers. I feel it would have been better burnt or buried (preferably the former). What do you think about this?

- Knights -
Back to Top
malizai_ View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Alcinous

Joined: 05-Feb-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2252
  Quote malizai_ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Oct-2007 at 01:12
In a macabre way, could this be a positive sign of recovery of overall population numbers. Interestingly, is there any statistical monitoring of whale population.
Back to Top
Knights View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3224
  Quote Knights Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Oct-2007 at 01:19
It could well be. Though probably not the best way to be monitoring increasing populations, I'd imagine. Statistical monitoring is very hard. Some Marine Biologists do different parts of the ocean and try to get distribution and abundance estimates, but I don't think they would be all that accurate. Any ideas on how you could get a good estimate of whale populations worldwide? 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.078 seconds.