Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

AmericasWheel

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456
Author
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: AmericasWheel
    Posted: 27-Jul-2007 at 23:38
Omg, you are as subtle as a one legged sailor on heat! What you call ignorance applies to every nation. Every good government on earth needs to bring about all those conditions and more. As personally upsetting as it may be to you, the real world facts don't lie. To talk about Columbian gold in any bar on earth, bar none, will immediately convince people you are not interested in talking about gold bullion on the stock market!
elenos
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jul-2007 at 08:33
Originally posted by elenos

Omg, you are as subtle as a one legged sailor on heat! What you call ignorance applies to every nation. Every good government on earth needs to bring about all those conditions and more. As personally upsetting as it may be to you, the real world facts don't lie. To talk about Columbian gold in any bar on earth, bar none, will immediately convince people you are not interested in talking about gold bullion on the stock market!
 
LOLLOL
 
Yeap friend, you are right. I am trying to convince you that the image of Latin America most of the world has come from the 40s and the movie "The three Caballeros" LOL
 
Almost everything projected abroad is either false, imprecise or biassed. Yes, including the gold of the Spaniards, because most of what they got in the Americas was silver rather than gold.
 
With respect to development and organization, Latin America has to be understood as two worlds living side by side: a poor third world of crime and chaos right besides a developed world of manufacturing, business, culture and richness. Things are improving slowly, not as spectacularly like in Asia, though, but you have to remember that Lat Am was never as poor as Asia.
 
Chile, my country, that in many aspects is leading the pack, is expected to get rid of poverty in 20 years. A Country like Colombia that has suffered a continues civil war during half a century, is today relatively more peaceful that in the past. Brazil today is a lot richer that at the middle of the century, when it has a standard of living similar to Africa and no manufacturing at all.
 
Every single country has made some progress, but when you see reports on the region the only thing the foreigners want is to highlight poverty, forgetting that even in developed countries a segment of the population is poor
 
Pinguin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Back to Top
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jul-2007 at 08:55
So you think I don't know poverty and third world conditions? What can I say, I have lived among them. You misunderstand me there, I'm talking about what I have experienced in real life not in movies (reel life!).  
elenos
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jul-2007 at 09:01
Originally posted by elenos

So you think I don't know poverty and third world conditions? What can I say, I have lived among them. You misunderstand me there, I'm talking about what I have experienced in real life not in movies (reel life!).  
 
OK. I was wrong then. (Anyways, I hate the term "third world" because it gives the impression the realities and mentalies of Africa, Asia, Middle East and Lat Am are the same; they aren't)
 
By the way, I also know the topic because  I am a former "third world" poor LOLLOL
 
 
Back to Top
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jul-2007 at 09:51
Like they say we cannot reinvent the wheel but we can reinvent ourselves! That's what I have been trying to say all through this thread. If the wheel was not invented in America they really did use the best of what they could in their circumstances. I have lived that way and see no reason why didn't in South America, but my suggestion of putting ourselves in their place and think of what could have been invented was trampled on. 

Edited by elenos - 28-Jul-2007 at 09:53
elenos
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jul-2007 at 10:10
Originally posted by elenos

Like they say we cannot reinvent the wheel but we can reinvent ourselves! That's what I have been trying to say all through this thread. If the wheel was not invented in America they really did use the best of what they could in their circumstances. I have lived that way and see no reason why didn't in South America, but my suggestion of putting ourselves in their place and think of what could have been invented was trampled on. 
 
Interesting. I have a thesis about it. There are some inventions and discoveries that have been made more than once in two or several regions. Others were invented only once.
 
These are examples of inventions that were made in several part of the world, particularly in parallel in the Americas and Eurasia:
 
(1) Paper
(2) the Zero
(3) hanging bridges
(4) Convex mirrors to produce fires
(5) Air pressure toys
(6) Metalurgy
(7) Agriculture
(8) Writing
(9) Arithmetic
(10) Abacos
(11) Backgamon-like games
 
These are examples of inventions done only once in human history, and spread to Eurasia by diffusion:
 
(1) the Alphabet (Ancient Middle East)
(2) the Wheel (Ancient Summer)
(3) Logic (sylogisms) (Greece)
(4) Axiomatic geometry (Greece)
(5) Toothed wheel (Greece)
(6) Pumps (Greece)
 
So, some things seem more difficult to achieve than others. Perhaps there is a very basic invention out there that has escaped to us, up to this day. And perhaps we will never invent LOLLOL. Seen the case of the Wheel and the Alphabet in the Americas, I have no doubt there is a chance we could be blind to something.
 
Pinguin
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 


Edited by pinguin - 29-Jul-2007 at 08:03
Back to Top
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 28-Jul-2007 at 14:10
An old story is of how in ancient court the king was very rich from the glassware of his country. Then a man in his kingdom claimed he had invented unbreakable glass. The king called the man to court and asked to inspect this new invention. He held up the dish and then dropped it on the floor - and it didn't break.The king then had the man executed immediately for people to break less glass would have been a threat to his profits.

The there was the one of the man who in the Middle Ages worked all his life on a perpertual motion machne. He then told his friends of how he had found the secret, so they broke into his workshop and smashed it, fearing he would be caught by the Inquisition who called all inventions that broke new grounds the work of the devil. Look what happened to Galileo.So you see I'm not talking amazing stories, but the downside of history.
elenos
Back to Top
Yaomitl View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 05-Jul-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote Yaomitl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Jul-2007 at 07:38
Pinguin - I'd agree with you on all those points except logic which I'm convinced should be in the previous list, although it depends upon what you define as logic. The usual definition seems to refer (for example) to developments in ancient Greece which still apply today, but only because we're applying the context of our culture to theirs, and it fits. One thing which annoys me about the common perception of ancient cultures in general (and by the way, I know this is not something you're doing, I'm making a general point) is the dismissal of everything under the heading of superstition, which is itself only truly possible when taking a very cursory look at the facts (human sacrifice, no wheel, worshipped animals blah blah blah) without examining underlying causes and comparing them to the present day (ie - we no longer sacrifice people, we are cultured, therefore they weren't). More or less everything I've investigated under the general heading of Mesoamerica is supported by a well-reasoned body of native thought. The Nahua conception of the tripartite soul for example, Jill Furst's book (History of the Soul in Ancient Mexico - Yale) left me in no doubt that their ideas were entirely valid in their time, and furthermore were derived from observation and conclusion. I suppose the point of what I'm saying is that (to oversimplify this for the sake of argument) if you believe that thunder is caused by roaring jaguars and live in a culture which lacks any means of testing the hypothesis (weather balloons, electronic equipment etc) then it's still a form of logic even if future generations will see much room for improvement. As I said before, Nezahualcoyotl and Einstien had the same type of brain. The latter knew his sums but the former wrote better poems.
 
Should probably stop mentioning Nezahualcoyotl. Always prefferred Ahuizotl myself - hard as f****** nails, pal!
"For as long as the world shall endure, the honour and the glory of Mexico-Tenochtitlan must never be forgotten."
- Chimalpahin Quautlehuanitzin
<a href="http://www.theotherconquest.com
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Jul-2007 at 08:21
Originally posted by Yaomitl

Pinguin - I'd agree with you on all those points except logic which I'm convinced should be in the previous list, although it depends upon what you define as logic. The usual definition seems to refer (for example) to developments in ancient Greece which still apply today, but only because we're applying the context of our culture to theirs, and it fits.
 
Yes, you are right. I was not precise. Every people on planet earth has common sense and reasoning. Mayan astronomy, mathematics and writings show Amerindians were not the exception at all.
 
What I meant was the development of "sylogisms" by Greeks, that is the origin of "mathematical logic"; what is known as Boolean Algebra. That was a formal system of mathematics, an algebra really, that was first developed by Aristotles, and that was a unique Greek achievement.
 
Originally posted by Yaomitl

One thing which annoys me about the common perception of ancient cultures in general (and by the way, I know this is not something you're doing, I'm making a general point) is the dismissal of everything under the heading of superstition, which is itself only truly possible when taking a very cursory look at the facts (human sacrifice, no wheel, worshipped animals blah blah blah) without examining underlying causes and comparing them to the present day (ie - we no longer sacrifice people, we are cultured, therefore they weren't).
 
Yes, I know. Is hard to explain to contemporary people the way the Ancients thought. The modern fellow preffer the easy cartoon rather than analyse the facts.
 
Originally posted by Yaomitl

More or less everything I've investigated under the general heading of Mesoamerica is supported by a well-reasoned body of native thought. The Nahua conception of the tripartite soul for example, Jill Furst's book (History of the Soul in Ancient Mexico - Yale) left me in no doubt that their ideas were entirely valid in their time, and furthermore were derived from observation and conclusion. I suppose the point of what I'm saying is that (to oversimplify this for the sake of argument) if you believe that thunder is caused by roaring jaguars and live in a culture which lacks any means of testing the hypothesis (weather balloons, electronic equipment etc) then it's still a form of logic even if future generations will see much room for improvement.
 
Indeed! It is not a "logic" but what it is called a "cosmology": a model of the world.
 
People today really don't understand the symbolic thinking of the Ancient people. I was in freemasonry when younger, so I got some feeling of the way they though. Let me illustrate you with an example.
 
Mapuche Natives in my country have a foundational myth about the original battle between the evil Serpent of the Sea and the protector of men, the Serpent of the land. In that battle the country was crashed in small islands, volcanes (that also were spirits) exploted, and water arose and get down again. It is a pretty interesting myth, but lets go to the point.
 
The really important thing is from where the Ancient got the idea of a giant serpent? Just supertition? I doubt.
 
I wonder about it for some time but then in 1985 a major earthquate strike my city. It was the biggest earthquake I've ever seen... and I live in Chile: earthquake country LOL
 
Well, if I told you I saw the Serpent of the Land at that time you would think I was crazy! But the ground waved like water and you could pretty easily imagine a giant serpent was moving houses, trees, buildings and everything in a macabre dance.
 
At that point I realize myths are symbolic ways to describe events. People that live in earthquake countries -like in my example- do have some myth about underground monsters. The meaning of the serpent is obvious to anyone that have lived and survived a earthquake of degree 8.
  
Originally posted by Yaomitl

 As I said before, Nezahualcoyotl and Einstien had the same type of brain. The latter knew his sums but the former wrote better poems.
 
 
Agree.
 
 
 
Originally posted by Yaomitl

Should probably stop mentioning Nezahualcoyotl. Always prefferred Ahuizotl myself - hard as f****** nails, pal!
 
No way to change Nezahualcoyotl, the genious, for Ahuizotl, the brute LOL
 
For our friends to understand it would be like preffering Neron, the criminal, instead of Seneca his advisor.
 
No way.Big%20smile
 
 
 


Edited by pinguin - 29-Jul-2007 at 08:29
Back to Top
Yaomitl View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 05-Jul-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote Yaomitl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Jul-2007 at 15:53
WaaaH! Primal serpent myths as an illustration of volcanic activity. That is absolutely brilliant! I've ocasionally wondered at the ubiquity of such myths on a global scale and that is the finest, most credible idea I've come across by a long, long way. I tip my hat to you and your enquiring mind, sir!Clap
Seriously, I figured on something somewhere between the ridges on an alligators back looking somewhat mountainous and the (debatable) fear of serpents in some cultures, but that's a serious idea you have there. The last time I had this discussion, the other guy's well reasoned argument descended into crap about how the church promoted whaling so that we don't find out the "truth" about the common (whale-based) origin of world mythology.Ermm

Edited by Yaomitl - 29-Jul-2007 at 16:00
"For as long as the world shall endure, the honour and the glory of Mexico-Tenochtitlan must never be forgotten."
- Chimalpahin Quautlehuanitzin
<a href="http://www.theotherconquest.com
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Jul-2007 at 16:00
Originally posted by Yaomitl

WaaaH! Primal serpent myths as an illustration of volcanic activity. That is absolutely brilliant! I've ocasionally wondered at the ubiquity of such myths on a global scale and that is the finest, most credible idea I've come across by a long, long way. I tip my hat to you and your enquiring mind, sir!
 
Just cite me when you publish the paper or the book LOLLOL.
 
I don't advise though, to be present in a major earthquake to see the serpent with your own eyes. By the way, earthquakes are some magical moments in life. It is a mystical experience simply because you are never sure if you are going to survive them. You may not.
 
Those particular moments in life, as you realize, are ideal to express feelings and experience with symbolism. And what more representative of earth and waving movement that the serpent. I bet Quetzalcoatl had a similar origin and in fact Mexico is a earthquake country, like Japan (think Godzila LOL)
 
 
Pinguin
 


Edited by pinguin - 29-Jul-2007 at 16:01
Back to Top
elenos View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 13-Jun-2007
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1457
  Quote elenos Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Jul-2007 at 20:58
I'm a serious dragon freak myself and have never yet seen a explanation where I cry out - gotcha! Quetzalcoatl and the plumed serpent is a world away from Merlin and the dragon in Wales. The Welsh marshes have never been known as earthquake country, nor for active volcanoes either. Then there are the Chinese dragons. The whole Asiatic culture cares more for creatures they have never seen than the ones they have.
elenos
Back to Top
Yaomitl View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 05-Jul-2007
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 85
  Quote Yaomitl Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 02-Aug-2007 at 06:10
Originally posted by pinguin

 
Just cite me when you publish the paper or the book LOLLOL.
 
 
 
 
You got it, buddy!
"For as long as the world shall endure, the honour and the glory of Mexico-Tenochtitlan must never be forgotten."
- Chimalpahin Quautlehuanitzin
<a href="http://www.theotherconquest.com
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1 456

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.172 seconds.