Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Hwarang
Janissary
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Vietnamese military Posted: 04-Dec-2004 at 17:43 |
before the vietnamese obtained firearms, what was their army liek? What kinds of weapons and armor did they use? what units did they have
|
Myyeeeeararrrrgghhh!!!-~Howard Dean
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Gubook Janggoon
Sultan
Retired Global Moderator
Joined: 08-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2187
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Dec-2004 at 17:55 |
I would assume similar to Chinese and Korean military except with elephants.
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Tobodai
Tsar
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Dec-2004 at 19:39 |
and war canoes, they werent to big on body armor either.
|
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Hwarang
Janissary
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 04-Dec-2004 at 22:36 |
does anyone have any websites or links?
|
Myyeeeeararrrrgghhh!!!-~Howard Dean
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
King Chulalongkorn
Samurai
Joined: 23-Apr-2005
Location: Thailand
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 121
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 24-Apr-2005 at 13:11 |
Wrong. Vietnamese military never used elephants; this was only used by the Thais, Khmers, Champas as well as the Burmese and Indians.
Vietnamese military was similar as their former Ming overlords, used regular infantry and some calvalry.
|
![](http://www.mymanila.net/gallery2005/001_20050122.jpg) Kha Wora Phutthachao Nop Phra Phumiban Bunya Direk
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TranHungDao
Earl
Joined: 31-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 277
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Jun-2007 at 04:45 |
Originally posted by King Chulalongkorn
Wrong. Vietnamese military never used
elephants; this was only used by the Thais, Khmers, Champas as well as
the Burmese and Indians. |
Hmm, perhaps you should take a look at the pic:
http://130.94.23.9/wigi/thumb2.php?f=Haiba.jpg
It is a reenactment of the Trung sisters rebellion back in 43 CE.
The Vietnamese used Elephants galore in their defeat of the Ming.
Legend has it that Ming troops were terrorized at the mere sight of the
rampaging elephants.
Originally posted by King Chulalongkorn
Vietnamese military was similar as their former Ming overlords, used regular infantry and some calvalry. |
Actually, the Ming only ruled a divided Vietnam for only 20
years. When Vietnam was united, the Chinese were were always very
quickly dealt with. The Ming were actually invited in by a weak
Vietnamese monarch--and a foolish one at that, to help secure his
throne from other ambitious nobles.
Also, it is explicitly written in Chinese records that the Ming
borrowed cannon technology from the Vietnamese. The Chinese may
have invented the cannons, but the Vietnamese made significant
techological improvement which the Chinese took back home with them.
Edited by TranHungDao - 01-Jun-2007 at 04:47
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TranHungDao
Earl
Joined: 31-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 277
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Jun-2007 at 04:53 |
"The Trưng Sisters are highly revered in Vietnam, as they led the first
resistance movement against the occupying Chinese after 247 years of domination.
Many temples are dedicated to them, and a yearly holiday, occurring in February,
to commemorate their deaths is observed by many Vietnamese. A district in Hanoi is named after them. In addition, numerous large streets
in major cities are named after them. They are often depicted riding on
elephants into battle."
Source: http://www.answers.com/topic/trung-sisters
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
Sander
AE Moderator
Joined: 20-Mar-2007
Location: Netherlands
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 597
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Jun-2007 at 19:35 |
Originally posted by TranHungDao
Actually, the Ming only ruled a divided Vietnam for only 20 years. When Vietnam was united, the Chinese were were always very quickly dealt with. The Ming were actually invited in by a weak Vietnamese monarch--and a foolish one at that, to help secure his throne from other ambitious nobles. |
something similar is said in this thread where Ming China is claimed as militairy superior over SEA in general.
That tendency is interesting. In most cases Ming and ( and post Ming) lost against SEA states.
Also, it is explicitly written in Chinese records that the Ming borrowed cannon technology from the Vietnamese. The Chinese may have invented the cannons, but the Vietnamese made significant techological improvement which the Chinese took back home with them.
|
seems more states in SEA produced better and larger cannons than Chinese.
Anyway, any pics of genuine Vietnamese cannons?
Edited by Sander - 01-Jun-2007 at 19:52
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |
TranHungDao
Earl
Joined: 31-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 277
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 01-Jun-2007 at 20:59 |
Originally posted by Sander
something similar is said in this thread where Ming China is claimed as militairy superior over SEA in general.
That tendency is interesting. In most cases Ming and ( and post Ming) lost against SEA states.
|
Chinese nationalists have serious problem understanding their own history, as any nationalist would.
Ever since independence in 938 CE, Vietnam has 9 or 10 straight
victories over the Chinese, often they were overwhelmingly
outnumbered. The scale of these invasions typically made the
medieval European wars look very small.
2nd Mongol/Yuan Invasion: 200,000 Vietnamese vs 500,000 Mongol & Chinese Chinese
3rd Mongol/Yuan Invasion: 200,000 Vietnamese vs 300,000 Mongol & Chinese
Ming Invasion, 1420's: 100,000 Vietnamese vs 200,000 Chinese
Q'ing Invasion, late 1700s: 100,000 Vietnames vs 200,000 Chinese
1979 War: 100,000 Vietnamese vs 200,000 - 250,000 Chinese
Originally posted by Sander
seems more states in SEA produced better and larger cannons than Chinese.
|
At the risk of sounding nationalistic, it was the Vietnamese who were
the gatekeepers who kept the Chinese out of SE Asia. Vietnam once
sent an expeditionary force into Burma even, forcing Thailand to pay
tribute, not unlike how Vietnam, Korea, etc., use to pay tribute to
China. Even Indonesia has paid tribute to a hegemonistic Vietnam
in the past; now I'm not at all sure when and how long these various
tributes lasted. Vietnam, Champa, the Khmer, the Thai, were
constantly fighting each other, no unlike how European countries did
amongst themselves.
Originally posted by Sander
Anyway, any pics of genuine Vietnamese cannons?
|
Nope, but I got this:
http://www.ari.nus.edu.sg/showfile.asp?pubid=545&type=2
It is a 30 page paper on how the Chinese borrowed Vietnamese cannon
technology. It hypothesizes and says explicitly at the end that
the Chams and other SE Asians did not have the same cannon technology
(by the early 1400's anyway), which is why Vietnam was able to overrun
Champa.
Note that it is written by a Chinese author from Singapore.
Edited by TranHungDao - 02-Jun-2007 at 05:25
|
![Back to Top Back to Top](forum_images/back_to_top.png) |