QuoteReplyTopic: Axed Canadian Posted: 14-May-2009 at 20:32
Originally posted by Zagros
Some of those concepts are too complicated for American strategists to bother with. As history demonstrates, they would much rather use a sledge hammer to push a pin to cork since it is more economically viable. In addition there is a latent institutionalised racism and contempt for non-European/white nations which deems them unworthy of constructive engagement.
(2) Is exactly how the Soviet Union left the army, but that didn't stop the Taliban. rather than being defeated in battle the commie Afghans were defeated in will and the same shall be repeated. And after the crimes inflicted on non-combatant Afghans in the last 8 years they will be hungry for revenge.
...Schoolyard humour isn't a good guide to anything.
But experience is.
Originally posted by gcle2003
Basically that's just silly. They were more common before the British even arrived, and they have become common again since the British left. Take responsibility for your own history.
I have never said that I am not responsible for my history, but me and you can not change a world known fact, can we?
Then you can hardly expect anyone else to recognise you, can you?
Now that's the most amazing thing I have heard, it means before 26 June 1945 no one recognized that there was a country by the name of Afghanistan, or US or USSR or Britain or Persia or Greece and so on.
That's quite silly. No it doesn't at all. I meant since you, Gharanai, don't recognise the UN, then you can't expect anone else to recognise you, Gharanai.
No dear it is your own diplomatic status that makes you recognize a government not the UN, if you were true then how Pakistan and Saudi Arabia recognized the Taleban government while Northern Alliance's representive was present in UN HQ, doesn't that sound like a funny joke?
Not in the least. The UN recognises Afghanistan, it's you that don't. It would be nice if you didn't just try and make up smart-ass jokes and instead paid attention to what people say.
Originally posted by Gharanai
Anyway as far as Russia and China was concerned regarding the Taleban, more than any other country those two were interested in the removal of Taleban as it was growing in number and strenght day after another, while Russia was already fighting the religious uprisings in Chechnya in the west they didn't wanted another religious group in Uzbekistan (most of whose nationals are still fighting in the ranks of Taleban)
Originally posted by glce
You just make this stuff up, don't you? Uzbeikstan was one of the foremost leaders in proposing and supporting action against the Taliban in 2001/2.
Did I sound the opposite as I guess I too said that the Russians didn't wanted another religious group in Uzbekistan, which for sure is with the support of then (and current) government of Uzbekistan.
I know about the IMU, and I said you would find some Islamic extremists from Uzbekistan with the Taliban. After all there were even Islamic militants from the US and Britain. However, unlike your ridiculous claim, the majority of the population of Uzbekistan are most definitely not fighting for the Taliban.
So for sure Uzbekistan will offers assistance to NATO in Afghanistan as it doesn't want the IMU in power and an end to Mr. Islam Karimov's government (which is by most western countries counted illegitimate, refere to Link1 and Link2 for more).
So admit you were wrong with that silly stuff about the majority of the Uzbek population. Apart from anything else, statements like that destroy any credibility the rest of your posts may have.
s
I simply would like to say that I don't think we have a common understanding of a matter and as argueeing with your SIL..., anyway with your comments will have no information and will certainly be moving out of the context.
So I am sorry for wasting soo much of your precious time in the past few day.
Gharanai! I have read the old posts above, and you are, indeed, a great spokesman and defender for your nation! But!
You also wrote these words;
"4- Differentiate between Islam and extreamism and englighten our people (our people of our region) not to ruin the name of Islam."
Of all of your retorts, the above one was the only one that I really have a problem with! I have such a problem since I have actually read translations of your Holy Book! I will not bother to use the multiple spellings of it, but suffice it to say, I did not find anything friendly about it! When I read something to the effect "Have neither a christian nor a jew as a neighbor!" I do not feel safe! When the "Book" says "..either convert the jew or christian or kill them..!" Again, I do not feel safe!
NO, I do not now have the "Book" available, but I am sure you might well be able to show us all the chapter and verse where the above quotations appear? If you can make an adequate explaination for them, that is, if you even consider that they are correct quotes, then please make it your job, to make me, as an American, feel ready to welcome you as my neighbor?
By the way if my remembrance of the "Word" is not correct (or not mostly correct?), and you can show me some modern example of a "Good name for Islam" then please retort? ( Indonesia doesn't count!) chuckle!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum
Share Topic
Printable Version
Google
Delicious
Digg
StumbleUpon
Windows Live
Yahoo Bookmarks
reddit
Facebook
MySpace
Newsvine
Furl
Topic Search 
Topic Options
Quote 
Topic: Axed Canadian
