In a recent post it was mentioned that Byzantine Emperor Justin I was really a puppet Emperor, an illeterate peasant whose rule was overshadowed by the workings of his brilliant nephew and heir Justinian.
What I am questioning, is whether such a view is correct. IIRC the claims that Justin was a mere puppet were put forward in Procopius's Secret History which clearly goes above and beyond to portray Justinian as the ultimate power obsessed megalomaniac (even going so far as to claim he is a demon from the underworld!)
It is clear that during Justin's reign the Empire suffered no disasters. Justin himself rose to power through the military. While Procopius may attribute this to divine intercession the logical historian can only conclude that for a poor Thracian peasant with no family contacts or wealth to back him, Justin must have shown himself to have outstanding command ability and been a natural leader of men to rise to captain of the Imperial Guard.
Furthermore, Procopius himself admits that Justinian's attempts to have himself crowned and married to his love Theodora were thwarted simply by Justin's order. Clearly, Justin had more authority and power than one would normally attribute to a dottery old fool. Only when Justin himself became gravely ill and the end was in sight was Justinian allowed to go ahead with both his wishes.
So what is your view? Was Justin the helpless puppet of his brilliant nephew or was he the sort of man who fitted comfortably into the autocratic robes of a Roman Emperor?