What are Indians classified as?

I agree with Jazz in this, due to current arcaheological research there was a shift via coastal first, I never said one was more african then another. I personally do not believe in the African theory or hypothesis. This is a theory with not enough supporting evidence.

Another factor that disaproves africa is The bones found of a hominod species dating at 8 million years 1 million more then the Leaky's finding of their bones, this was discovered in November last year and I look foward hungrily at their results and research.

But I have loved this topic alot and found it very interesting

Hi Jazz sorry to interrupt.This is not the current political map of India.About 5 years ago 3 new states were formed.Uttaranchal{carved out of Uttar Pradesh},Chattisgarh{Madhya Pradesh} n Jharkhand{Bihar}.

I never said anything about neanderthals at all, Fact is modern humans came from Homo Erectus and there is mutliple theories as to how we appeared, oldest dated Human is at 195,000 years ago, fact is only the female Gene is said to come from africa, again that is not enough evidence to state we all come from africa, for all we know they could have migrated there and since the oldest bones found is there we are under the assumption we originated there.

The fact is archaeologists have fallen into a trap, they search in Africa, why? because some of the first bones are found there, but also hominod species have been found outside of africa which evolved differently, this shows that there is a strong possibility early human species evolved outside of africa.

Again as you noted a single group of Homo-Sapien sapiens, this does not actually contend that all homo-Sapien sapiens came from africa, only a single group, until more archaeology is done, and a result of the 8 million year old bones in Russia are released we will not truely know.

If this is the case then it shows hominod species evolving out of Africa, the evolutionary theory again I will state is just that a thoery, with not enough solid evidence to support it. The problem with DNA and genetic testing is, you have to test every person in the world and every country in the world.

You said case of different species mixing is totally disregarded, this my friend is not true, we know that several human species mixed, the fact that Homo-Erectus is our ancestor showed he contributed to Homo-Sapiens sapien.

there are 3 major theories of human evolution, adaptive raditation, recobination of genes (interbreeding/mixing) and the last I always forget

(Of all sampled DNA of the World not a single one has been fond that doesn't  fit the fact of being descendant of the pseudo-Eve and the pseudo-Adam. Both archaeological and genetic dispersion studies are totally coincident with the out-of-Africa theory.) Uhmm who research are you basing this on? No not all archeologisits agree with the out of africa theory and all are open to new work and additon, central asia and the middle east have not had much research done due to the Cold war, War, governments etc etc

So this whole put up or shut up response of your sorry I think you should look into it, your obviously a drone and not open to new ideas, no no I mean that the fact that even archaeologisit agere there is not enough evidence you still contend we all agree... I am an archaeologist like my Friend Aryan Khadem and he and I both share similar ideas and theories.

So my response to you is, no there is not enough evidence to support the out of Africa, yes there is strong factors to maybe but not solid and conclusive at all.

And yes you do need to test every Human stats does not work and can be manipulated to suit the agenda......