Who was in charge of the Armenian Genocide?

Sorry but  you even call what Abdulhamit did genocide too. what type of sciencific words are this, I dont remember  any jew attacked hitler and killed a  lot people.

It is true a lot of people killed, It is false even this trio acted like hitler. Even they have not much  justification what they did, they  have  good reasons. hitler have not.

For abdulhamit, It   is complately rubish to call his act as genocide.

since armenians arent able to capture their so called "western provinces" they do it the other way, the way that the whole world are supporting them. Letting Turkey acknowledging and acceptin the so called biased lie about the armenian genocide gaves them the chance to get their "western provinces" back with support of other organisation on their back.

Firstly give youre poor armenians food instead of telling all those bull, they die of hunger...

My grand-grand father had been killed by the Armenian rebellions who were in the service of Russian Imperial Army.So I invite everyone respect the victims of each side...it is irritating..

Genocide is a very serious crime,and requires much more work than a documantery...

If there is evidence,why dont the allegators appeal to the court?

Not every death,massacere is a genocide..Calling any event as genocide spreads this crime and hence reduce the extremity of the Nazi Party.

Under which conditions can you classify this?May I see you expertise on the international law related with these issue?...Otherwise,reading the definition,2-3 papers and using imagination is not enough...This is called intellectual arrogantness...

In order to classify events genocide,you ''have to'' be an expert on international law,have distinguished information on geography,history,social pyschology of that period.

May I ask also how you also define the atrocities committed by the Greek(or hellas? ) army in western Turkey against the Turkish population which eventually compelled the Greek side to pay compensation?

The fact that we are on an internet forum does not mean that you can insult any other nation so easily,my Greek fellower.

If you have an argument,you are supposed to back it up.Simple as that.

As a fellow-forumer,since you claim to be presenting so-called facts,then I am entitled to ask your background on the issue,briefly how you proove it.It has nothing to do with being Turkish...I let the science be my guide.

You information as follows''...are the ones refusing to be absorbed into the dominant culture, does not take an expert in international law to define as a genocide, just some common sense.'' demonstrate the fact that you got the info on a brain-washing source,which tried to put paralels between the Holocaust and this issue,so that they could persuade people easily for their own arguments.

Please let me tell you that The Ottoman Armenian population were not required to be absrobed into the dominant culture in the 20.cebtury,as the Armenians themselves were practising Turkish customs on their won after living together for centuries.

As for the atrocities committed by the Greek Army forces in western Turkey following the WWI,I just wanted to hear you opinion on the definition of the issue no who killed more,since you acted as if an expert on crimes...

Not to my suprise,I saw that you even didnt know Greece herself paid compensation(giving a town to Turkey) for the atrocities committed by herself during the Turkish Independence War.

One of the most important sources of international law is ''international treaties'',so you got to be well-informed on the treaties if you want your allegations to be persuasive.