Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The first battles?

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The first battles?
    Posted: 04-Dec-2005 at 06:16
What are the first recorded battles on land and in sea? I believe that KAdesh isn't the first or is it?
Back to Top
Ahmed The Fighter View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Lion of Babylon

Joined: 17-Apr-2005
Location: Iraq
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1106
  Quote Ahmed The Fighter Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Dec-2005 at 16:36

There are many opinion.

I think Megiddo 1457 B.C is the first recorded battle in history.

what you say?

"May the eyes of cowards never sleep"
Khalid Bin Walid
Back to Top
Hannibal Barca View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 23-Sep-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 168
  Quote Hannibal Barca Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Dec-2005 at 17:40
I think he might mean that battle since it was Thutmose against the King of Kadesh and yes that is the first recorded battle in history. Actually a prophecy tells that the last battle on earth between heaven and hell would take place at Megiddo. So military history ends where it began.
"In the absence of orders go find something and kill it!"

-Field MArshall Erwin Rommel
Back to Top
Paul View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
AE Immoderator

Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
  Quote Paul Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Dec-2005 at 18:50

Recorded how? I suppose is the key to answering the question.

The Sumerians recorded their battles on written records and depicted them in stone going back a 1000 years before Megiddo.

Megiddo is a written account, so trumps the Sumerians,

but then again Egyptian writing is itself nothing like the clear concise written accounts the Greeks gave.



Edited by Paul
Light blue touch paper and stand well back

http://www.maquahuitl.co.uk

http://www.toltecitztli.co.uk
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Dec-2005 at 18:58
The first explicit historical mention of a war that I know of dates from c. 2800, when Aha of Egypt is entitled with vitories over Nubians and Lybians and maybe over Northern Egyptians as well. His successors Djer and Uadjy also campigned out of Egypt. Udimu (Den) is shown fighting against Asians.

C. 2700, Snefru of Egypt left records of campaigns in Nubia, returning with 7,000 prisioners and 200,000 cows, against Lybia, capturing 11,000 men and 13,100 cows.
 
In Sumer, c. 2700 BCE, Enmebargesi or Mebaragesi of Kish, is the firsthistorical king mentioned at war: he fought "victoriously" against Elam. His son, Agga, fought against Gilgamesh of Uruk, without success. The Royal List states: "Kish was abated by the force of arms, royalty was transfered to Eanna", the temple of Uruk.

In an unclear but seemingly earlier moment, other registries, mention that Enmerkar of Uruk had to fight aganits the Martu (Semites), who even besieged Uruk once. Here we find a clear mention of a specific bellic episode or battle: the siege of Uruk by the Martu. This Enmerkar is antecessor of Gilgamesh, so the even had to happean earlier than the previously mentioned dates. The siege of Uruk could then be the first recorded battle, even if its description is vague.

Another king of Kish, Mesalim, launched a campaign into Syria, destroying Ebla, a major rival. This seems to have happened c. 2600, during the hegemony of Uruk. This one could be the first recorded major campaign.

C. 2550 Uruk "is defeated by arms, royalty passed to Ur"

There are other sumerian mentions of wars and related episodes: Lagash fought for its borders against Ur and, specialy Umma, capturing one king of this city (Pabilgaltuk), who was executed.

C. 2450, Elam launched a major campaig, campuring Kish, what caused all Sumerian cities to movilize against it. Eannatum of Lagash defeated the invaders and destroyed Susa, the Elamite capital. Then he defeated Mari, captured Umma, Ur, Uruk, Ki-utu and Kish.

Despite all these struggles and victories the more clearly recorded is the old dispute with Umma on strategical border issues. It seems that Eannatum benefitted from his power in the dispute of Lagash, what caused Ush (or Gish) of Umma to attack him. Eannatum soon defeated the Ummaites, killing 3600 enemies, who he ordered to bury in 20 large mounds. Umma then rebelled and killed Ush, what allowed for peace. The stele of ravens narates this Lagash*te victory.

Meanwhile, in Egypt, Sahure' and other monarchs of the 5th dynasty are recorded campigning in Nibia, Lybia and Sinai. Same did Pepi I, third pharaoh of the 6th dynasty, c. 2300, who sent expeditions to Nubia and Asia.

At this same time, Sargon or Sharrukin of Akkad is entitled not just with many campaigns, including the conquest of Uruk and dismantling its defenses but also with the stabilishment of the first historically recorded Empire after Egypt.

Yet, according to Wikipedia, Kadesh is the first documented battle as such.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
tadamson View Drop Down
Baron
Baron


Joined: 25-Jul-2005
Location: Scotland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 451
  Quote tadamson Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Dec-2005 at 21:27
Originally posted by Maju


Yet, according to Wikipedia, Kadesh is the first documented battle as such.


Wikipedia is unmoderated and full of highly dubious information.  Not a good source to use.
rgds.

      Tom..
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Dec-2005 at 22:09
Originally posted by tadamson

Originally posted by Maju


Yet, according to Wikipedia, Kadesh is the first documented battle as such.


Wikipedia is unmoderated and full of highly dubious information.  Not a good source to use.


That's also an unmoderated, descontextualized and very dubious information. And off topic, btw.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Dec-2005 at 12:18

Very well. Thank you.

But on sea the first recorded. I believe that recorded usually means that they have a name, place, competitors and outcome said.

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Dec-2005 at 20:16
With your criteria, Rider, I gess that the siege of Uruk is the first battle. Name: siege of Uruk, place: Uruk and surroundings, competitors Martu tribes and Uruk, outcome: victory of Uruk.

I think that Kadesh is considered the first oe recorded because it is described with much more detail, including a description of the contingents, etc. Something not done before, at least that we know about.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Dec-2005 at 13:12

Hmmh.. Well, thanks.

Is The Battle of Salamis the earliest naval battle?

Back to Top
fastspawn View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote fastspawn Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Dec-2005 at 23:46
rider,

I would hardly think so.

Battle of Salamis was 480 BC, as such the Phoenicians must have existed before that and so there must be earlier Naval Battle. Logical, No?

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Dec-2005 at 00:13
Actually, thinking about it, the first land and naval battle recorded is the battle of Atlantis. According to Plato, who quotes Solon and even a named Saite priest: the Athenians fought against the Atlanteans c. 9500 BCE and won... but then a catastrophe came around and the island sunk and so on.

Is that ok for you Rider? It is actually recorded.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
The_Last_Byzantine View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 25-Dec-2005
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote The_Last_Byzantine Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Dec-2005 at 19:04
The first recorded naval battle is between the egyptians and the Sea people in 1200 B.C.

Edited by The_Last_Byzantine
Back to Top
rider View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Suspended

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
  Quote rider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Dec-2005 at 03:12

Well, did it have a name Last Byzantine?

 

Maju, well, I believe that Atlantis... well, Atlantis... is... not the... then the Athenians must have known... where.. was Atlantis but... Naval tlantis against Athenians... in 9500 BC... there were.. no good... boats and I believe that the Biremes are a later invention too.. no... no... Atlantis... battle ... not fitting....

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.109 seconds.