Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Caesar invades Parthia

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
  Quote Zagros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Caesar invades Parthia
    Posted: 08-Apr-2006 at 04:38
Originally posted by c00lizz

Key here is. Caesar would not trust the Amernians. And he would not march in the open plains.

Crassus was not defeated by millitary might. He was defeated by deceit and stupidity.

He wasn't just defeated, he was annihilated. The best part was that the Parthians made him drink molten gold as an execution to punish him for the greed that led him to invade. Poetic justice.

Back to Top
mamikon View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar

Joined: 16-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2200
  Quote mamikon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2006 at 12:19
The Armenian King did warn Crassus not to carry out the attack, but since Crassus followed his plan anyway, the Armenians withdrew their units to "skip" the onslaught....no deceit there, just stupidity  (by Crassus)

Zagros

I thought he was already dead. I have read somewhere that he was killed, gold was put down his throat, he was beheaded and his head was sent to Rome


Edited by mamikon
Back to Top
shock and thunder View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard


Joined: 18-Aug-2015
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4
  Quote shock and thunder Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Aug-2015 at 10:58
An ancient thread

but ironically, by adopting Seleucid arms Caesar could be very successful.  Incorporating Seleucid cataphracts, medium & light horse, mass Syrian archers and decent spearmen (not pikemen as that would probably be going too far :) ) would be the foundation for facing a steppe army.

Essentially evolving much like the Eastern Roman doctrine against cavalry armies of later date :)Though Caesar would be more successful, apart from simply being Caesar, because: 

1) Rome has much more manpower than in later eras, is much more vigorous, and 2) remember the Parthians are not like the Sassanids.

What matters is if there is the political will to go further afield.  Trajan handily swept through Mesopotamia and Elymais as the Seleucids did, retiring due to his age.  The Roman homeland is far to the west, whereas the Seleucids were based in Asia and thought of the Iranian domains as theirs.  If Caesar is willing, and evades the regularly scheduled mountain pass ambush after taking Media, he could go all the way.

As for the rebellions troubling the rear for which Hadrian pulled back from Trajan's conquests, at this early date the Parthians might not have a substantial hold on the local populations.  Local opinion and resistance may be significant.  Seleucus himself held Babylon & returned to Babylon from exile easily with the popular support of the people.


Edited by shock and thunder - 18-Aug-2015 at 11:00
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.