Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Empires

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Decebal View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Digital Prometheus

Joined: 20-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1791
  Quote Decebal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Empires
    Posted: 31-Oct-2005 at 10:06
He'd probably say something about insecurity, repression and hatred of our father.
What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte

Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi

Back to Top
Celestial View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 24-Sep-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Celestial Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Nov-2006 at 20:13
I'd say it is the Roman empire. 753 bc to 476 ad. more than 1000 years. It was a hyperpower and the longest lasting empire in history.
Back to Top
Penelope View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Alia Atreides

Joined: 26-Aug-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1042
  Quote Penelope Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Nov-2006 at 23:20
The Byzantine Empire lasted longer than any other empire.
Back to Top
Kapikulu View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Berlin
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1914
  Quote Kapikulu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Nov-2006 at 05:28
Originally posted by Decebal

 
Alright, let's pretend for a second that the Roman and Byzantine empires were actually separate (whhich they were not). And that the Byzantines start out in 476, according to your definition. Then the Byzantine Empire lasted from 476 to 1453, which is 977 years, or quite a bit longer than the Ottoman.

Or if you split hairs, from 395 (the date of the final separation) to 1461 (fall of the Trebizond empire and the true end of the Byzantines). Or 1066 years.

Either way, the Byzantines lasted far longer than the Ottomans.

 
395-1453, but it must not be forgotten that especially in last 250-300 years, it was more like a kingdom sized force than an empire, while already losing whole Middle East except Central and Western Anatolia between beginning from 7th century and further losing presence in Balkans by time.


Edited by Kapikulu - 05-Nov-2006 at 06:09
We gave up your happiness
Your hope would be enough;
we couldn't find neither;
we made up sorrows for ourselves;
we couldn't be consoled;

A Strange Orhan Veli
Back to Top
Penelope View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Alia Atreides

Joined: 26-Aug-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1042
  Quote Penelope Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Nov-2006 at 01:07
Kapikulu, size doesnt matter in this particular situation. What matters is the fact that the empire still existed.
Back to Top
Aster Thrax Eupator View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 18-Jul-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1929
  Quote Aster Thrax Eupator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Nov-2006 at 06:35
I think that it is fair to say that the Byzantine empire is more or less a direct continuation of the Roman empire. Politically, the links are very strong. So I reckon that makes the Roman/Byzantine empire the longest in history. Around 750BC to 1453AD- that's a long time!
Back to Top
Hellios View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
  Quote Hellios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Nov-2006 at 18:17
Originally posted by HALOMAN

Which Great Empires Ruled The World For The Longet Time
 
Various members will tell you the "mini-empires" of their countries were the longest ruling ones and you'll spend a lot of time discussing the definition of "empire" and "world" according the people of the various periods.
 


Edited by Hellios - 06-Nov-2006 at 18:20
Back to Top
Khashayarshah View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 31-May-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Khashayarshah Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Nov-2006 at 19:19
the egyptian empire lasted 3000 years, the persian empire lasted around 300, and the byzintine empire about 900. The roman empire, not the republic, lasted 200-240 years.
Who is the real fool? the man who says what to do, or the man that follows him?
Back to Top
Dream208 View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 22-Jan-2006
Location: China
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 176
  Quote Dream208 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Nov-2006 at 20:32
Does Chinese dynasties count as intact continnum if we deployed Roman-Byzantine standard ? Cool
 
You know... Roman Empires had various dynasties, Chinese empire had various dynasties, the only difference is... Chinese dynasties sometimes last more than 200 years.
 
So.. why when we talk about the Chinese history, the various dynasties suddenly became their own "individual empire" instead of greater continnum?
 
PS: if you wanted to use the great division period to refute this opinion, you should first think about the frequent civil wars happened in Roman everytime should a dynasty collapse.


Edited by Dream208 - 06-Nov-2006 at 20:35
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Nov-2006 at 20:43

Well, Is not the one that lasted longer, but the first where the sun never set LOL, during 300 years!

The Spanish Empire:
 
In 1550:
 
 
And in 1770:
 
 
 
Pinguin
 
 


Edited by pinguin - 06-Nov-2006 at 20:45
Back to Top
Hellios View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
  Quote Hellios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Nov-2006 at 17:49
Compliment: The Spanish empire was big.
 
Addition: The British Empire, later called the British Commonwealth, later called the British Commonwealth of Nations, later called the Commonwealth of Nations, was a 53 country confederation of nations.
 
 


Edited by Hellios - 07-Nov-2006 at 18:54
Back to Top
Hellios View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
  Quote Hellios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Nov-2006 at 18:01
Originally posted by Dream208

Does Chinese dynasties count as intact continnum if we deployed Roman-Byzantine standard ? Cool
 

Yes, everything counts if you consider the wording of the topic title and opening question, because what was considered the "world" changed through different periods of history, therefore if somebody says one of their country's empires ruled the known world for longer than the empire you propose, they're right.



Edited by Hellios - 07-Nov-2006 at 18:02
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Nov-2006 at 19:25
Originally posted by Hellios

Compliment: The Spanish empire was big.
 
Addition: The British Empire, later called the British Commonwealth, later called the British Commonwealth of Nations, later called the Commonwealth of Nations, was a 53 country confederation of nations.
  
 
And don't forget the Portuguese Empire either.
 
 
 
Back to Top
Hellios View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
  Quote Hellios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Nov-2006 at 20:11
Pinguin, why did the Spaniards not conquer the Portuguese?
 
Back to Top
Dan Carkner View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 07-Nov-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 490
  Quote Dan Carkner Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Nov-2006 at 22:45
Heh, according to that map the Portuguese had a toehold in Newfoundland?
Back to Top
flyingzone View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 11-Dec-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2630
  Quote flyingzone Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Nov-2006 at 23:31
In the course of the 16th century, the Portuguese made two settlements in Cape Breton, one in 1521 and the other in 1567. These two colonies were then annexed by Spain.
 
In the early charts, the Portuguese flag was frequently represented as waving over Labrador, Newfoundland (Baccaloas), and Nova Scotia, which were sometimes described as "the Land of the Corte Reals" and as the "country discovered by Joao Alvares (early 16th century explorer to Northeastern America)."
  
Little or nothing is known about these colonies.


Edited by flyingzone - 07-Nov-2006 at 23:37
Back to Top
Aster Thrax Eupator View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 18-Jul-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1929
  Quote Aster Thrax Eupator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Nov-2006 at 06:12

the egyptian empire lasted 3000 years

Khashayarshah, I really don't think that it was one empire. Each of the 25 (roughly) dynasties were were individual and the countless civil wars and interrmediate periods clearly show that between the pharoahs, the empires that they forged did fall and fragment. I don't think that you can call Egypt from Ahu/Scorpion/Namer to Nectabo II is one empire, but hundereds of small statelets.
Back to Top
Penelope View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Alia Atreides

Joined: 26-Aug-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1042
  Quote Penelope Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Nov-2006 at 23:01

Egypt definately did not have an empire for that long. There were times when the Nubians and other powers invaded and annexed the area as a whole.

Back to Top
Aster Thrax Eupator View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 18-Jul-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1929
  Quote Aster Thrax Eupator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Nov-2006 at 13:23
...Not to mention the period of Syrian rule in the 1st intermidate period. There is a ridiculous conception that throughout Ancient history, Egypt was a united and strong empire that managed to retain its own culture through hell and back. This is a huge misconception- Egypt has inherited a vast amount of its culture from Caanan, Mespotamia, North Africa and the Arabian peninsula. When the Egyptians were simple hunter gatherers on the banks of the upper nile, Leonard Wooley's harp of Ur was being plucked for the king for his entertainment. When the Egyptians were building mud brick huts, Gudea of Lagash was building the Zigguart in Larsa, when the Egyptians were making the first basic hyroglyphs, the first centralized state was being founded by Sargon of Akkad. The Egyptians are as absolutley unique and united as we think. A great people and one of finest civilizations on the earth, yes- but many of humanities' first steps into civilization were occuring in Mesopotamia and the further east.
Back to Top
think View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 435
  Quote think Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Nov-2006 at 20:27
But the Egyptians have the Pyramids, which is why everyone likes Egypt..


Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.080 seconds.