Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Were the Greeks indigenous?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Sharrukin View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain


Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
  Quote Sharrukin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Were the Greeks indigenous?
    Posted: 10-Oct-2005 at 21:40

In short, the legends portray Heracles as of the Mycenaean royal family having been born to Alcmene, the wife of Amphitryon, son of Alcaeus, grandson of Perseus, king of Mycenae, although Zeus was his actual father.  The story goes that Heracles may have been the rightful heir to the Mycenaean throne if only he was born before Eurystheus, son of Sthenelus, grandson of Perseus, but Hera delayed the birth of Heracles and Eurytheus was born first.   As an adult, Heracles, in order to atone for the murder of his own family from a fit of insanity caused by Hera was told by the Delphian Oracle to submit to Eurystheus, now king of Mycenae.  The twelve labors the Mycenaean king imposed on him are seen by some as a series of campaigns (Heracles as a general) which first took place about the Argolis, later, throughout the Peloponnese, and the last ones, overseas, in effect to create an empire for the king of Mycenae. 

Afterwards, as a freeman, Hera continued to cause Heracles greater misfortune which caused him to become a slave to the queen of Lydia.  Some view this as Heracles becoming some mercenary general, because of his adventures in western Anatolia.  Eventually he was freed and became a warlord, engaging in piracy and brigandage.  Establishing a base in Arcadia he reaked havoc on the Peloponnese.  Following this, he left the Peloponnese for central Greece for adventures there where he married his final wife, Deianira.  Among his adventures was his aid to the Dorians against the Dryopes.

With the death of Heracles, Eurysthenes the king of Mycenae began the persecution of his children.  The Heraclidae found refuge with the Athenians.  Eurysthenes attacked the Athenians but was defeated, captured and executed.  The Mycenaeans through an oracle chose the Atreidae to rule them.  Having again been denied the rule of Mycenae, the Heraclidae ravaged the Peloponnese but were defeated by Atreus and their leader Hyllus was killed.  They withdrew from the Peloponnese to Dryopis (the later Doris) where the Dorians excepted them as equals.  For the next two generations the Heraclidae led the Dorians into the Peloponese but were defeated each time.  It was in the third generation of Heraclids that they were successful in leading the Dorians into permanent domination of the Peloponnese. 

The ancient myths do in fact speak of wars between Greek kingdoms.  Thebes, itself was destroyed because of a generation-long war with Argos (The Seven Against Thebes, The Epigoni).  It would therefore not be inappropriate to consider the Return of the Heraclidae as an invasion in the truest sense of the word.  The very regions which they came to dominate are in fact the regions which archaeology has shown to have been depopulated.  The Dorians would have pushed populations into the periphery of their power, and the archaeology does in fact show that regions not touched by the Dorian invasion did gain an increase in population, such as Attica and Euboia.  According to the legends, the Achaeans pushed out the Ionians out of the northern Peloponnese and forced them eastwards into Attica.  Since the Dorians supposedly originated from a region in central Greece within the boundaries of Mycenaean culture, it then stands within reason that their culture would not be particularly different from other parts of Greece.  Their passage into the Peloponnese would be relatively undetectable.

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Oct-2005 at 01:18
Again, a very interesting apportation, Sharrukin. 

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2005 at 04:22
An interesting Discussion. I don't share the knowledge that some of you have of this topic, but it seems like Maju makes the more coherent/cohesive point.

I have read that;

-The dorians were a branch of the Indo-Europeans from the Danube area, who began invading Greece around 1200-1100 BC, and who sparked a massive migration of the people arleady occuping Greece into the Islands of the Aegean Sea and parts of Asia Minor.
          -(according to Pamela Bradley (University of cambridge))

I think that;

-Perhaps the legend of the Dorians Being descendants or companions/brothers of the Hereklids is somewhat akin to all other legends; used to make the main benefactors of the legend look great and noble. The later Greeks (5th century) all used to claim they were descendants of Achillies, yet even if the Myceneans did attack Troy, Mycenae was only one Polis out of many, and there is no proof she had a direct control over any others.

-The fact that the Dorian 'invasion' coincdies very nicely with the migration of the Ionians to Asia minor, seem to show that it indeed was just that; an invasion. It is not very plausible that they just attacked Mycenae to restore the Hereklids, as this would not have prompted the migration of many different Polis' all at one time.
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2005 at 06:42
Originally posted by Elusive_Grapefruit



-The dorians were a branch of the Indo-Europeans from the Danube area, who began invading Greece around 1200-1100 BC, and who sparked a massive migration of the people arleady occuping Greece into the Islands of the Aegean Sea and parts of Asia Minor.
          -(according to Pamela Bradley (University of cambridge))



Can you give more evidence for that (apparently outdated) theory. I used to think that (connecting Dorians to Urnfields) but it seems that there's no evidence for it. All we know is that Dorians were living in northern Greece and that they spoke a Greek dialect. Of course they could have been an assimilated population but how can you prove that?

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2005 at 09:20
Like i said i only read it, and have no further evidence
Just thought it might be something useful to bring up.

May it be that the Dorians living in Northern Greece originally came from The Danube region, and merely progressed through Greece in stages? are there actually any precise dates for the movement of the Dorians? Because if were talking over a couple of hundred years, assimilation is plausible.

I don't mean to sound demeaning but how do you know that the Dorians were from central greece apart from what the legends say about them?

- in other words.. i don't know enough about this, perhaps you could enlighten me on some of your sources?

 


Edited by Elusive_Grapefruit
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2005 at 09:50
Phallanx and the other Greek members have more info and more clear ideas on Dorians and such. 

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
akritas View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Hegemom

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Location: Greek Macedonia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1460
  Quote akritas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2005 at 16:28

Elusive read the below topic how appeared and estimated the Descent or Invasion of Dorians in the Hellenic peninsula

http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=5730& ; ;PN=2



Edited by akritas
Back to Top
Phallanx View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 07-Feb-2005
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1283
  Quote Phallanx Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Oct-2005 at 18:00
Well while I have heard of this Danube origin theory before, it is obviously an outdated and non-acceptable theory simply because. If this 'group', the Dorians, were originally from that area we'd find some similarities in customs, traditions....etc. something we clearly do not.
While there have been some finds of pottery, who's 'style' can be connected to the area in question, the quantity is too small to support any kind of such a wide scaled invasion..So the pottery may be nothing more that simple imports or immitations..

On the other hand, there are finds of pottery, Doric columns, iron weapons...etc. allegedly brought by these 'invaders' but unfortunately (for the supporters of the theory) all the above mentioned finds, predate the dates suggested for their arrival.. which proves the prior to the suggested date connections and the Dorian presence in the lands of Hellas...

Another interesting problem with this theory is that, if the Dorians were IE, they must be the ones that 'introduced' to the already existing population the IE language.. but this notion again is not acceptable, simply because of our knowledge of Linear B' that predates the 'migration/invasion' by a couple of hundred years.. Not to mention the fact that the Dorians spoke the language of the land in question, so their origin being anything but Hellinic must be rejected..

If we were to take this further, anthropologically speaking.

J. Lawrence Angel studied skeletal material from the Paleolithic to modern times, and participated in examinations of skeletal material throughout the East Mediterranean. With respect to Hellas, he found that the morphological types already established in the third millennium BC, if not before that, persisted in all subsequent ages. He emphasized the racial continuity of the Hellines, stating epigrammatically :

“Racial continuity in Greece is striking.”

see:
Angel, J. Lawrence, 1944, A racial analysis of the ancient Greeks: An essay on the use of morphological types, American Journal of Physical Anthropology
To the gods we mortals are all ignorant.Those old traditions from our ancestors, the ones we've had as long as time itself, no argument will ever overthrow, in spite of subtleties sharp minds invent.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Oct-2005 at 01:46
Very Interesting, thank you Akritas and Phallanx.

The evidence does seem to be overwhelmingly in favour of them originating from mainland Greece, but it still seems (to me) as if invasion is the proper term as;

-Even though we see them all one general 'culture', the concepts of nationality we have today were not the same back then. For example the Dorian Spartans in the Peloponnese obviously saw themselves as superior. For example; you would not see the Peloponnesian war of  431BC as Civil war, but rather as a war between different bodies, i.e Sparta was seen as 'invading' Attica, even by historians of the time (e.g Thucydides), or even though Macedon was basically Helenistic they still 'invaded' about 50 years later. Thus the unity of the Hellas over 500 years before this would be even more loose.

-They also brought about changes in this 'culture' (i.e geometric potery, and iron), so therefore they can't have been completely similar to those who had been dominant before.

-Their 'invasion' and exapnsion (e.g to Rhodes, Cyprus, etc.) conincides with the migration of existing polis' as well, thus it is plausible that the agression of percieved invaders was one of the reasons behind this expansion.

-The notion that they were simply 'returning' to the Peloponese seems more like a pretext or a later addition, as if they were there originally from this region, how and why did they migrate to northern Greece in the first place, why weren't the effects on culture observed at earlier times? In truth i do not really understand what you mean by this 'returning' (as discussed in other threads).

   




Edited by Elusive_Grapefruit
Back to Top
Ellinas View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary
Avatar

Joined: 06-Dec-2005
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Ellinas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Dec-2005 at 05:42

Have a look at this website: http://www.aee.gr/ .

It is a scientific society founded by Aris Poulianos, an anthropologist with researches claiming that Greeks are indigeous and the theories of the West about Greeks being an Indo-European race are not correct. The beliefs of this society are not recognised by the Greek state.

The English version of the page is not so rich, but it has many info.

 

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
  Quote Maju Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Dec-2005 at 07:03
Originally posted by Ellinas

Have a look at this website: http://www.aee.gr/ .

It is a scientific society founded by Aris Poulianos, an anthropologist with researches claiming that Greeks are indigeous and the theories of the West about Greeks being an Indo-European race are not correct. The beliefs of this society are not recognised by the Greek state.

The English version of the page is not so rich, but it has many info.



There's no IE "race". When we talk of IEs, we talk of language, maybe culture and ethicity but not biology. This is because it seems obvious that like Arabs or Turks after them, IEs mixed with locals up to the point of near disapearence in the genetic pool. This was helped by the fact that they migrated in diferent stages, diluting their blood as they advanced and also because most of those invaded regions, such as Greece, were densely populated.

But there are no IE "races", just IE-speaking peoples of any "races", including non-Caucasoids, like Jamaicans, Haitians or Filipinos.

In fact the very concept of "race" is so ridiculous and outdated that there should not be any half-serious paper using that term. Race is something that applies to dogs and other domestic animals, it doesn't work with humans and other wild species. The concept of race implies artificial selection favoring "purity", often through controled incest and eugenesia, but neither our species nor wild animals are selected that way.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Alkiviades View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 01-Sep-2005
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 469
  Quote Alkiviades Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Dec-2005 at 14:31
I am spaniel terrier 
Back to Top
maks View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 20-May-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 21
  Quote maks Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Aug-2012 at 18:07
I was wondering how Romans viewed the case of Greek "autochthony" in Balkans. Even though its authenticity remains questionable as I am not able to verify the sources, Tiberius Claudius deemed Upper Pannonia as the cradle of the first Greeks:

Among these Celts, if the word is to have any significance, (are included) even the Achaen Greeks, who had established themselves for some time in the Upper Danube Valley before pushing southward into Greece. Yes, the Greeks are comparative newcomers to Greece. They displaced the native Pelasgians ... This happened not long before the Trojan War; the Dorian Greeks came still later -eighty years after the Trojan War. Other Celts of the same race invaded France and Italy at about the same time.

Consequently some Romans recognized some northern components on the Greeks. Yet it remains doubtful what inspired them to ascribe a Celtic origin. The proponents of IE theory asserts that both Illyrians, Thracians and Proto-Greeks cohabited for some time in Upper Danube valley before they swamped into Balkans. But the Greeks of Classical age did not feel any affinity with the Celts. They were ascribed as barbarians. Other scholars argued that Greek mythology was full of Celtic deities. The fact that Greeks adored the deities with white hair from Hyperborea (even though its location is never defined) suggest that Greeks retained some memories of their northern origin. What are your thoughts?
Back to Top
TITAN_ View Drop Down
Baron
Baron
Avatar

Joined: 21-Jun-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 480
  Quote TITAN_ Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Aug-2012 at 15:25
Originally posted by maks

I was wondering how Romans viewed the case of Greek "autochthony" in Balkans. Even though its authenticity remains questionable as I am not able to verify the sources, Tiberius Claudius deemed Upper Pannonia as the cradle of the first Greeks:

Among these Celts, if the word is to have any significance, (are included) even the Achaen Greeks, who had established themselves for some time in the Upper Danube Valley before pushing southward into Greece. Yes, the Greeks are comparative newcomers to Greece. They displaced the native Pelasgians ... This happened not long before the Trojan War; the Dorian Greeks came still later -eighty years after the Trojan War. Other Celts of the same race invaded France and Italy at about the same time.

Consequently some Romans recognized some northern components on the Greeks. Yet it remains doubtful what inspired them to ascribe a Celtic origin. The proponents of IE theory asserts that both Illyrians, Thracians and Proto-Greeks cohabited for some time in Upper Danube valley before they swamped into Balkans. But the Greeks of Classical age did not feel any affinity with the Celts. They were ascribed as barbarians. Other scholars argued that Greek mythology was full of Celtic deities. The fact that Greeks adored the deities with white hair from Hyperborea (even though its location is never defined) suggest that Greeks retained some memories of their northern origin. What are your thoughts?

Bear in mind that Tiberius Claudius' sources were earlier Roman and Greek historians. The theory that the Greeks came from the North is dubious. According to DNA research, the ancient Greeks, just like the modern Greeks, were a mixture of indigenous and other Anatolian and Balkan tribes.
Nordic presence in ancient Greece was close to zero, before 279 BC (Celtic invasion of Brennus).
Between 279 and 235 BC, there were massive Celtic migrations to Greece and Anatolia (modern Turkey). However, most of them were expelled from Greece, afterwards. The Celts settled in Anatolia and those tribes were known as Galatians. 

The Greeks did not adore Northern deities. It's the other way around..... The Greek/Roman gods became known to the Northern tribes, gradually. 

Back to Top
Don Quixote View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4734
  Quote Don Quixote Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Aug-2012 at 17:00
The theory about the Pelasgians seems kinda dubious to me - first, it has to go with teh so called "Dorian invasion"that is and old and t some perconet artifiial theory; second, I cannt really find modern academic works that talk about the Pelasgians and prove their existence in an archeological way. It seems to me that the Greeks developed form the whoever lived in Greece/Balkans since the Neolithic times.
This is my favorite archeological work on the Aegean area from the Darthmouth College site http://www.dartmouth.edu/~prehistory/aegean/?page_id=104 - it follows the archeological string of evidence from the Paleolithic forward, and to my eyes more or less proves that the Greeks are indeed indigenous to the area.
Back to Top
TheAlaniDragonRising View Drop Down
AE Moderator
AE Moderator
Avatar
Spam Fighter

Joined: 09-May-2011
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6084
  Quote TheAlaniDragonRising Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 21-Aug-2012 at 17:33
" Greek sources of the Classical period acknowledge the prior existence of indigenous people(s), whom they referred to as "Pelasgians". These peoples inhabited lands surrounding the Aegean Sea before the subsequent migrations of the Hellenic ancestors claimed by these authors. The disposition and precise identity of this former group is elusive, and sources such as HomerHesiod and Herodotus give varying, partially mythological accounts. However, it is clear that cultures existed whose indigenous characteristics were distinguished by the subsequent Hellenic cultures (and distinct from non-Greek speaking "foreigners", termed "barbarians" by the historical Greeks)......". http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indigenous_peoples#Classical_antiquity

"The Proto-Greeks probably arrived at the area now called Greece, in the southern tip of the Balkan peninsula, at the end of the 3rd millennium BC,[49][50][a], though a later migration by sea from eastern Anatolia, modern Armenia, has also been suggested.[51] The sequence of migrations into the Greek mainland during the 2nd millennium BC has to be reconstructed on the basis of the ancient Greek dialects, as they presented themselves centuries later and is subject to some uncertainties. There were at least two migrations, the first of the Ionians and Aeolians which resulted inMycenaean Greece by the 16th century BC,[39][52] and the second, the Dorian invasion, around the 11th century BC, displacing the Arcadocypriot dialects which descended from the Mycenaean period. Both migrations occur at incisive periods, the Mycenaean at the transition to the Late Bronze Age and the Doric at the Bronze Age collapse.

There were some suggestions of three waves of migration indicating a Proto-Ionian one, either contemporary or even earlier than the Mycenaean. This possibility appears to have been first suggested by Ernst Curtius in the 1880s. In current scholarship, the standard assumption is to group the Ionictogether with the Arcadocypriot group as the successors of a single Middle Bronze Age migration in dual opposition to the "western" group of Doric......" http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Greeks#Origins



What a handsome figure of a dragon. No wonder I fall madly in love with the Alani Dragon now, the avatar, it's a gorgeous dragon picture.
Back to Top
Don Quixote View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4734
  Quote Don Quixote Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Aug-2012 at 04:56
Wiki is not a match to an academic research book or a certified textbook. I reccomend to everyone who is really interested in the subject to read the archeologically supported story of the people of the Balkans, not to fill holes with easy accessible and very suspiscious as content wiki pages. In any case I don't buy the last.
Back to Top
Don Quixote View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4734
  Quote Don Quixote Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 22-Aug-2012 at 05:23
In any case I would like someone who subscribe for the existence of the Pelasgians to read the posted textbook and to tell me with which one of the about at least 20 archeologcal culture the said "Pelasgians" can be identified. Otherwise I'm not interested in un-connected to hard proof general talk.

The archeological history of the region is a very complicated one, and cannot be simplified to one indigenous people and some migrants from the North.

Otherwise there was movement of poeple then as now, there is nothing new about that, but this movement was mostly through Anatolia, not from the North - cultural connection with Anatolia are archeologically proven. However, the number of the locals is always more than the one of the migrants - and the DNA shows that the Greeks are so called Mediterranean people, with markers typicals for the said area; not Nordic ones, to my best knowledge. The Dorian Hypothesis is not proved, and in fact got even more wobbly with the current DNA data.


Edited by Don Quixote - 22-Aug-2012 at 05:27
Back to Top
maks View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 20-May-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 21
  Quote maks Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2012 at 14:49
Originally posted by TITAN_


The Greeks did not adore Northern deities. It's the other way around..... The Greek/Roman gods became known to the Northern tribes, gradually. 


You did not get my point at all. I was saying that Classical Greeks were apparently addicted to the 'northern' background of many deities. Mythological stories do mention that Zeus, Apollo, etc journeyed as far as the land of Hyperboreans. This might have been an indication of several migrations which occurred in early times from North to south and vice versa too. A Greek writer stated in one occasion that Celts have same customs as Greeks.
Back to Top
Don Quixote View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 29-Dec-2010
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4734
  Quote Don Quixote Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Aug-2012 at 15:56
The gReeks always conneced isdon and special knowledge with North, the land of the Hyperboreans; bt I don't see how that can be any indication to migrations from North; mby be for some real Greeks journeying to there, if the myths are to be taken at face value, but not migrations from there. I don't remember mythological migrations that state that so and so Greek guy came from Hyperborea per se.

Which writer mentioned the last detail and where? Which Greek customs are the same as those of the Celts? Every such custom has to be followed by itself, so the time of possible cultural borrowing to be stipulated; sometimes there are just coincidences too, not every similaity shows borrowing.
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.218 seconds.