Originally posted by Iskender Bey ALBO
Not very accurate. The whole book is one big fictionalization. The characters, sub-plots, side-stories and even the battle in general is very....romanticized. Some of the stuff that occur will also turn your stomach. |
Hmm, a few amazon.com reviewers praised it for its historical accuracy. Here's part of someone's review:
The text centers around a fictional Spartan squire named Xeones, the lone Laconian warrior to survive the battle (albeit with a multitude of serious wounds). In reality, the only Spartan to survive was a fellow named Aristodemus. Supposedly, he was a messenger who tarried along the path to Thermopylae and missed the battle. He spent the rest of his life in disgrace in the eyes of his fellow Spartans, despite a heroic showing at the battle of Plataea (the decisive battle of the Persian war).
Back to Xeones. Pressfield's presentation of the story is nothing short of brilliant. Captured by the Persians, Xerxes orders his personal historian to record the infantryman's story. Through the persona of Xeones, we are informed of events in the Persian war before, during and after the battle of Thermopylae. Xeones interacts with historical figures on both sides of the war, such as the Spartans Leonidas and Dienekes, as well as Xerxes, Orontes and Artemisia. |
Granted, this guy might not be the best to speak of historical accuracy given that he got Aristodemus's reason for not being at the battle mixed up (Aristodemus had actually been sent back home by Leonidas because of some illness, along with another. Pantites is the messenger he refers to.)
Originally posted by Iskender Bey ALBO
The very nature of the phallanx is very glamorized. |
Heh, what do you mean? (This guy's gotta be one hell of an author if he can make a phalanx seem glamorous...)