Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The Battle of Kenyermezo, 1479

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
Raider View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 06-Jun-2005
Location: Hungary
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 804
  Quote Raider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Battle of Kenyermezo, 1479
    Posted: 13-Jun-2005 at 05:26

 

I wonder what the turkish historians think about this battle. Was this an important battle? Is this taught in schools?

In Hungary this battle is considered to a great victory which illustrates the key factors of the ottoman-hungarian wars. (Historians like it.)

Back to Top
Jagatai Khan View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar
Jeune Turc

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1270
  Quote Jagatai Khan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Jun-2005 at 05:51

It isn't taught in the schools.

I have a pretty big Ottoman source that includes the small victories of Jan Hunyadi and Hungarians-which are not known in Turkey so much-against Ottomans but it doesn't include this one.

And I don't know this battle.

Back to Top
aknc View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 12-Mar-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1449
  Quote aknc Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Jun-2005 at 05:54
never heard of itcan anyone educate me on the matter?
"I am the scourage of god appointed to chastise you,since no one knows the remedy for your iniquity exept me.You are wicked,but I am more wicked than you,so be silent!"
              
Back to Top
Raider View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 06-Jun-2005
Location: Hungary
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 804
  Quote Raider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Jun-2005 at 07:34

Well it did not surprise me. It was a minor battle. Neither the hungarian nor the ottoman main army participated in it. In Hungary it is well know because of the propaganda of King Matthias's chronicler. I have just read a good description and  assay of the battle, and I was curious the turkish oppinion.

The historians like this battle  since it illustrates well the changing positions in the ottoman-hungarian power relation. The casulties of the ottomans were two or three times bigger than the hungarians, but they were able to recover much easier. The ottoman manpower and income was much larger than the hungarian. Altough this victory was a succes in the short round it also indicates that the defense of Hungary is increasingly more and more difficult.

About the battle:

In 1479 a smaller ottoman army (cca. 15 000 men) attacked Transylvania with the unwilling aid of the walachian prince Tepelus Basarab. According to my sources it might be a revenge for the earlier hungarian champaigns in Bosnia or to stop the hungarian continous intervention in Wallachia. This army was led by 3 well-known beys: Isa bey the leader of the army, Mihal-oglu Ali bey, Malkoc-oglu Bali bey (Maybe I misspelled their name.) The hungarian army was led by Istvn Bthori the voivod of Transylvania and Pl Kinizsi the general-captain of the Lower Parts of Hungary. The hungarians were aided by the serbian despot Vuk Brankovic and maybe (the sources are obscure) Laiota Basarabs small vlach contingent.

The battle began after duel of a turkish cavalryman and a saxon warrior. At the centre Isa bey rolled back the transylvanian troops. The voivod himself was injured and only saved by one of his soldiers who took him up to his horse. At the ottoman right wing the fight was drawn between Bali bey and the serb-vlach-hungarian troops led by the despot. At the other wing Ali bey frightened by the heavy cavalry of Kinizsi tacticaly withdrawed without a fight. So Kinizsi flanked the ottoman center and saved the day.  The cavalry fled, only the wallachian infantry held out. According to the sources they fight so brave that the hungarians forced to use the heavy calvary to beat them.

There are three main sources of the battle:

1.       The Chronicle of Antonio Bonfini (a hungarian court chronicler)

2.       The Chronicle of Kemalpasazade (in the 7th volume)

3.       The narrative of a saxon participant (in german language)

There is a link to a map of the battle. (I did not find any english description) http://crowland.uw.hu/images/csata/kenyermezo.html



Edited by Raider
Back to Top
Murtaza View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 03-Jun-2005
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 804
  Quote Murtaza Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Jun-2005 at 07:53

I find it but it is not a major war.

 

Back to Top
TJK View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Poland
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 367
  Quote TJK Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 13-Jun-2005 at 16:13
Is the Kenyermezo equal to Bread Field ? I like this battle very much, mainly due to the Kinizsi's "macabra dance" after battle
Back to Top
Raider View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar

Joined: 06-Jun-2005
Location: Hungary
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 804
  Quote Raider Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 14-Jun-2005 at 05:37

Originally posted by TJK

Is the Kenyermezo equal to Bread Field ? I like this battle very much, mainly due to the Kinizsi's "macabra dance" after battle

Yes. kenyr=bread, mez=filed

Kenyrmez is Campia Painii in Roumanian. (I think)

Well this dance may be true, but Bonfini rather changed the story to favour Kinizsi.

Back to Top
Osman View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard


Joined: 07-Jun-2009
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1
  Quote Osman Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Jun-2009 at 09:43
This is one of the biggest Hungarian victories against akindji troops. This battle is not found most of the Turkish chronicles, since this is a border conflist, a raid war made by irregular Ottoman troops (called akindji). almost every year (in spring) akindji troops cross the border and raid the neighbouring countries (in case there is no treaty). they were not paid soldiers, they were irregular light cavalry which depend on booty and slaves that they take during raids. In some cases they are trapped by enemy and defeat is unavaoidable since they are light cavalry. In some cases they defeated the enemy which caught them. ın order to avoid from defeats, they brigng with them 2 or 3 horses, when the horse they ride is dead because of exhaustion, they were riding the other one. They ahd to be faster than defenders. There are many victories of European defenders against Ottomans in their history, which are not well known in Turkey, since these are border clashes and defeats. National histories have a tendancy to exaggerate this kind of victories.
 
 
Back to Top
Hungo View Drop Down
Housecarl
Housecarl
Avatar

Joined: 23-Mar-2009
Location: Hungary
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 46
  Quote Hungo Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Jun-2009 at 11:29
http://www.allempires.net/forum_posts.asp?TID=8772&PN=9

here is my post about the battle of kenyermezo.

Attila király katonája
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.