Welcome to Sweden - rapists paradise

Originally posted by Mosquito Originally posted by Aeoli Don't try to proof legal statue of Polish immigrant or try to find historical connection. There is no need.  The main point is people reaction against rapid population changes. The point is local people attitude. Also people in big cities don't like even villiagers in their neighbourhood. Its not about immigrants coming to my country, its about enemies coming to my country. You are trying to paint me as neonazi or fascist idiot, racist.... while the problem is that such people like you are guilty that there is such situation like in Sweden or such like in Britain. And my activity in PDL is limited to giving them money.

True local ie. nationalistic traditional values and attitudes do play a part. Especially as regards immigrant 'value'.

The pcer's would have it as 'all immigrants' are... and that's a ludicrous statement; as history shows their not

The real value lies in their 'potential' for immigration and assimilation into a gaining nation state.

And when it's seen by natives; that a genuine willingness to assimilate and share the better values of the original immigrant customs and traditions can be merged... with their adopted homeland's ones... the process is much easier.

And KEY among them is the acceptance of local and national host laws.

And no your not racist or neo Nazi...u can be ultra nationalistic in the defense of your homeland and native peoples at times but that's not necessarily an evil. Because I can be as well.

In the end it's my recommendation to u as a 'member' that:

A. you have made your point admirably.

And I would suggest you hence just move on.

As any more links, articles etc...are, or would be, superfluous imo.

That it remains a complex and serious issue ie. immigrant assimilation and acceptance by all sides is obvious.

But in the end the greater responsibility for assimilation and acceptance....is the burden of the immigrant; not the potential gaining nation.

Originally posted by Aeoli I prefer suffering to having a blackened heart.

I prefer my country and civilisation to survive, not to dissapear. We in Poland have been the defenders of western civilisation againt islam and barbarians in the past and it looks like we will have to fight for it today. Like Rogawski at Humenne saving Vienna first time, Sobieski saving Vienna second time, or Chodkiewicz at Khotyn or Pilsudski at Warsaw.

Originally posted by Aeoli At least you are not a guy who has blood on his hands, you are just the person who gives money him to hit someones

PDL dont have anyone's blood on its hands. This is another not fair argument. But I understand that presenting those who defend their own culture, language, country and nation as extremists is favourite leftist tactic.

However it must be said that other muslims are also the targets of those islamists, especially Iranians because they are not arabs and not sunni.

Edited by Mosquito - 03-Jul-2015 at 16:44

Mosquito 

http://www.spiegel.de/international/europe/how-eu-promises-to-introduce-refugee-quotas-failed-a-1040226.html


EU on the problem of refugees distribution

In the early morning hours of Sunday, April 19, 2015, a 20-meter fishing boat, overloaded with people, capsized about 70 nautical miles off the Libyan coast and 180 kilometers (107 miles) from Europe. In the hours and days after the accident, this boat seemed to be the straw that broke the camel's back. This shipwreck, with an estimated 800 dead, had seemingly brought a sense of humanity back to Europe. The accident became a test for Brussels and, for the eight weeks that followed, Europeans took a critical look at the purpose of their 28-country union.

Three days later, on April 23, European leaders rushed to Brussels to attend a special summit. Acknowledging Europe's responsibility, they turned their attention to the Mediterranean. No one questioned the seriousness of the hour -- and no one refuted the claim that saving refugees had become a priority, that it was now time for action.

The meeting began with a minute of silence and ended with an emotionally charged statement: The European Union will "do everything possible to save people from dying at sea," the statement read. But, as it turned out, that wouldn't be the case.

Even at this first crisis meeting, Italian Prime Minister Matteo Renzi was rebuffed in his call for solidarity. British Prime Minister David Cameron refused immediately, a Polish representative rejected new obligations and both German Chancellor Angela Merkel and French President François Hollande were undecided and unwilling to make any strong statements. It was the same old European game, where public statements are meaningless and only closed-door agreements ultimately count.

....presented the plan, which essentially consisted of two elements. First, the European Commission recommended directly accepting 20,000 refugees from crisis-stricken regions in the coming two years, and using a quota system to distribute them across the 28 member states. Second, the burden on EU countries like Italy, Greece and Malta, on whose coasts most of the refugees land, was to be reduced. Some 40,000 people were to be "taken off their hands," also with the help of a fixed distribution scheme...

....But when rumors of a mandatory quota emerged, the first member states reacted with outrage. "The idea that somebody allows some refugees in their own country and then distributes them to other member states is mad and unfair," said Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orbán, whom Juncker only half-kiddingly calls the "dictator."

Representatives of Eastern and Central European countries, often referred to as "the new ones" among EU ambassadors, as well as those of a few Southern European countries, announced their refusal to accept any quota. The Polish delegation noted that solidarity can take many forms, and variations of this theme were then expressed for weeks to come. Hungary, Lithuania, Estonia, Slovakia, the Czech Republic, Spain and Romania used the same argument in voicing their objections to "imposed" solidarity.

The discussions were more open on the sidelines of the meetings, at evening receptions on cool Brussels terraces, where people spoke of the "shameless nationalism" of individual members and "poorly concealed racism." Western European representatives were critical of the Eastern Europeans for only wanting to accept "white, Catholic" refugees, while the Eastern Europeans accused their Western colleagues of moral conceit. One of the ambassadors, who attended all of the meetings and some of the receptions, says: "From today's perspective, the agenda was dead an hour after it was born."

Welcome to France - Muslims attack and beat French people in the bus:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D24bK9mqKo4&feature=player_embedded

And even in Australia:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WDGajZ17ayg

Wherever muslims comes, they bring with their violence with them.

Edited by Mosquito - 04-Jul-2015 at 19:22

Edited by TheAlaniDragonRising - 05-Jul-2015 at 06:21