Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
vulkan02
Arch Duke
Termythinator
Joined: 27-Apr-2005
Location: U$A
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1835
|
Topic: worst empire in the world Posted: 22-May-2005 at 17:57 |
Consider destruction of people, culture, environment, economy and
other factors that you think have been negatively influenced. Comment
your choice please. In my case i think it is a close call between the
British and the Russian Empire. The American Empire is the largest
contributor in the destruction of environment, globalising the economy,
producing a single culture that is loved/hated in most of the world. So
i guess the American Empire can be the worst and the best depending
from what perspective you view it.
|
The beginning of a revolution is in reality the end of a belief - Le Bon
Destroy first and construction will look after itself - Mao
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Posted: 22-May-2005 at 18:17 |
Originally posted by vulkan02
The American Empire is the largest contributor in the destruction of environment, globalising the economy, producing a single culture that is loved/hated in most of the world. So i guess the American Empire can be the worst and the best depending from what perspective you view it. |
I wouldn't call America an empire, an empire by defination occupies conquered territories.
The worst empire ever must be the Nazi closely followed by the Roman, China at most points in history and Genghis Khan.
|
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Posted: 22-May-2005 at 18:50 |
*sighs* you might as well just change the post to: "say the name of the country you have the biggest personal grudge against and then write emotionally driven comments which will provoke a backlash".
|
|
drgonzaga
Colonel
banned
Joined: 15-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 612
|
Posted: 22-May-2005 at 20:38 |
Macedonian Empire!?! Yikes, it has to win hands dpwn as the 'worst' for the simple reason of its 'brevity'! Alexander simply 'took' over the machinery of the 'empire' formulated by Kyros and his Achaeminid successors. Then, on his death the whole scheme disintegrated.
Now, as for the presence of the old USSR as well as the United States of America, such claims are balderdash if you wish to employ correct terminology. The Russian Empire [which did call itself by that name] ceased in October [Julian Calendar] 1917! America is a geographic term, nothing more. Then there is the 'Mongol' empire, which with the exception of its emergence as a Chinese Dynasty [Yuan] never emerged as a political unit beyond the life Timuchin [Ginghis Khan] and thus parallels the expereince of another 'warrior' Alexander.
By the way, true 'empires' seldom destroy 'culture' but create new 'amalgams' from old 'metals'.
What I find a bit humorous is the absence of the first 'modern' imperial state [together with a fixed economic impetus], that of the Spanish Habsburgs. Now, if you want a 'world' empire that satisfies all criteria from the Mediterranean trough the Gulf of Ormuz to the China Sea, and has staying power for more than two centuries, what better than the system fashioned under the motto Ne Plus Ultra!
|
|
vulkan02
Arch Duke
Termythinator
Joined: 27-Apr-2005
Location: U$A
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1835
|
Posted: 22-May-2005 at 22:20 |
Originally posted by Paul
Originally posted by vulkan02
The American Empire is the
largest contributor in the destruction of environment, globalising the
economy, producing a single culture that is loved/hated in most of the
world. So i guess the American Empire can be the worst and the best
depending from what perspective you view it. |
I wouldn't call America an empire, an empire by defination occupies conquered territories.
The worst empire ever must be the Nazi closely followed by the Roman, China at most points in history and Genghis Khan. |
Nazi Germany never was an empire because they lost while trying to
expand, i know some of these do not call themselves empires... such as
America but hey... everyone knows that culturally, economically and to
a large degree militarily America has the upper hand. I simply listed
the "empires" that dominated their known world in one of these aspects
or more than one.
|
The beginning of a revolution is in reality the end of a belief - Le Bon
Destroy first and construction will look after itself - Mao
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 01:19 |
[/QUOTE]
Nazi Germany never was an empire because they lost while trying to expand, i know some of these do not call themselves empires... such as America but hey... everyone knows that culturally, economically and to a large degree militarily America has the upper hand. I simply listed the "empires" that dominated their known world in one of these aspects or more than one. [/QUOTE]
I would agree with that. I think that an society has to sustain a certain level of domination and complexity for a prolonged period of time to be called an empire. Nazi Germany, i think, would rather be described as a failed attempt at an empire then ever actually being one.
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 02:56 |
I think imperialism is a mentality, however short the empire lasted the nazis had the same spirit as the Romans or Mongols. Either way empire or aspiring empire, genocide mixed with methods of industrial mass production to my mind make them the worst in actuality. You could argue the Romans or Mongols would have been worse had they the same tecnology available.
United States on a rethink could be considered an empire, you would just have to consider all areas outside the 13 colonies as occupied territories and the people who live in the 13 colonies as Americans and those from outside as colonials.
Edited by Paul
|
|
|
Exarchus
General
Joined: 18-Jan-2005
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 04:07 |
What about the Incas? Sacrifying prisoneers alive to their god.
Edited by Exarchus
|
Vae victis!
|
|
Alparslan
Colonel
Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 517
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 04:18 |
Were French prisoners butchered by giotine while they were sleeping in squares?
That was the biggest public entertainment in France.
|
|
Exarchus
General
Joined: 18-Jan-2005
Location: France
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 760
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 04:40 |
Originally posted by Alparslan
Were French prisoners butchered by giotine while they were sleeping in squares?
That was the biggest public entertainment in France.
|
If you want to write something, at least do it in correct English because I don't get your post.
|
Vae victis!
|
|
Yiannis
Sultan
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2329
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 04:48 |
Originally posted by Alparslan
Were French prisoners butchered by giotine while they were sleeping in squares?
That was the biggest public entertainment in France. |
Excecutions were a specticle in all countries who performed them. It was a sample of the power of the state. Guilotine was deemed to be a very humane way to execute a person. Of course in the period of terrorism, during the paris Commune, many innocent people were executed.
I believe in the Ottoman Empire, the official way of excecution was to impale people. Usually the family of the impaled would bribe the executioner, so that he'd slit the poor bastard's throat, once the crowd was bored and gone. An impaled person could stay alive for hours, or even days in terrible pain and agony.
|
The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle, Politics
Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
|
|
Komnenos
Tsar
Retired AE Administrator
Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 07:14 |
Originally posted by Yiannis
Guilotine was deemed to be a very humane way to execute a person. Of course in the period of terrorism, during the paris Commune, many innocent people were executed.
|
Just to avoid confusion: The term "Paris Commune" is now almost exclusively used for the worker's rule in Paris from March to May 1871 after the end of the Franco-Prussian war. It was the first ever seizure of power by socialist/anarchist organisations and individuals and was brutally opressed by the official French government with German help.
It was a shortlived experiment of Socialism in action and distinguished itself by introducing a number of social reforms, active democracy,... and the absence of internal opression and terror during it's duration.
Edited by Komnenos
|
[IMG]http://i71.photobucket.com/albums/i137/komnenos/crosses1.jpg">
|
|
Paul
General
AE Immoderator
Joined: 21-Aug-2004
Location: Hyperborea
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 952
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 07:55 |
Originally posted by Komnenos
Originally posted by Yiannis
Guilotine was deemed to be a very humane way to execute a person. Of course in the period of terrorism, during the paris Commune, many innocent people were executed.
|
Just to avoid confusion: The term "Paris Commune" is now almost exclusively used for the worker's rule in Paris from March to May 1871 after the end of the Franco-Prussian war. It was the first ever seizure of power by socialist/anarchist organisations and individuals and was brutally opressed by the official French government with German help. It was a shortlived experiment of Socialism in action and distinguished itself by introducing a number of social reforms, active democracy,... and the absence of internal opression and terror during it's duration.
|
The first ever seizure of power in France or Europe? Anarchist communes predate the Paris commune by over 200 years in England.
|
|
|
Frederick Roger
Colonel
Joined: 09-Jan-2005
Location: Portugal
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 658
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 09:12 |
Where is the Spanish Empire?
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 10:30 |
And the Byzanthine Empire, Portugese Empire, etc. (others option)?
|
|
Frederick Roger
Colonel
Joined: 09-Jan-2005
Location: Portugal
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 658
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 10:39 |
I resent that Portuguese empire sugestion, it was hardly destructive (although it foiled some Ottoman plans...)
Edited by Frederick Roger
|
|
Janissary
Joined: 06-Feb-2005
Location: Sweden
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 10:45 |
I would say the Russian empire is the worst in history.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 13:50 |
Originally posted by Frederick Roger
I resent that Portuguese empire sugestion, it was hardly destructive (although it foiled some Ottoman plans...) |
No, dont get me wrong and become defensive. These were just examples for the new poll option of "other". And these were the first empires that I remembered...
|
|
Spartakus
Tsar
terörist
Joined: 22-Nov-2004
Location: Greece/Hellas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4489
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 14:40 |
Nazi empire.
|
"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)
|
|
Reginmund
Arch Duke
Joined: 08-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1943
|
Posted: 23-May-2005 at 16:03 |
I see neither the Roman nor the Persian empire has got a single vote, perhaps rightly so.
My vote goes to the Russian empire, I've heard a few horror stories from Poles who once lived under that regime.
|
|