Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Subotei
Janissary
Joined: 25-Feb-2005
Location: Bhutan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
|
Quote Reply
Topic: formations Posted: 16-Apr-2005 at 22:58 |
anyone know of any formations for infantry or cavalry units.
for example the romans had the three line formation
|
Get inside the enemys thoughts capitalise on their fears.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Apr-2005 at 03:17 |
well most celtic -stock armies had warrior bands. I think
in ancient china there were really no standard formation, i read
somewhere that each general would train his men as he saw fit.
the japanese didnt have formations as the samurai fought
semi-indevidually. the greeks had their phalanxs and the
romans their legions.
btw isnt the 3 line formation wh at the Romans used in ther early armies? what did they use after that?
|
|
rider
Tsar
Suspended
Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4664
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Apr-2005 at 13:11 |
I know that Turks went into a half-moon shaped thing with their infantry, that is called in Estonian 'karree' but i cant translate it.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Apr-2005 at 05:50 |
Swedish cavalry of the line war period used slight wedge where every man had their knee in contact with other man's knee. Formation had horrible punch in charge. Size of the formation was usually few hundred men if my memory serves me right.
Spanish had their tercios that were squares formed of pikemen.
|
|
Yiannis
Sultan
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2329
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Apr-2005 at 06:16 |
Macedonian cavalry preffered wedge formations, Thessalians mostly used rhomboid ones.
|
The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle, Politics
Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
|
|
Capt. Lubber
Shogun
Joined: 27-Jan-2005
Location: Norway
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 238
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Apr-2005 at 09:47 |
The scottish had schiltrons, pikemen in circle
|
Loke, Attila, the grete conqueror,
Deyde in his sleep, with shame and dishonour,
Bleedinge ay at the nose in dronkenesse,
A captayin shoulde live in sobrenesse
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jun-2006 at 15:16 |
it seems that everyone has forgotten the phalanx. It was used mostly by the Greek states and was a major hindrance to Roman invaders. This formation was a box-like formation where the soldiers formed up with their shields protecting the soldier to their left with a dagger protruding from the right this generally gave the soldiers the ability to both attack and defend simultaneously
|
|
BigL
General
Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 817
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jun-2006 at 20:16 |
major hindrance to romans please give an example
|
|
tsar
Samurai
Suspended
Joined: 12-May-2006
Location: Bulgaria
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 132
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 16-Jun-2006 at 12:35 |
Shchiltrons, wedges , shield walls were all great formations
|
|
Giannis
Baron
Joined: 25-May-2006
Location: Greece
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 493
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 17-Jun-2006 at 07:31 |
Nobody, reffered to the most famous Roman formation, the Testudo, the first tank of history.
|
Give me a place to stand and I will move the world.
|
|
Sudaka
Housecarl
Joined: 14-Nov-2004
Location: Argentina
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 19-Jun-2006 at 22:04 |
In the battle of Cannaes, Hannibal use a mid circle. formation mixind Celts whit big and long sowrd and Hispanics whit short and handys falcata`s, in both side of them he put libian infantry armed in the greek ways, and after then cavalry in the wings.
|
Not yet mein friend, not yet
|
|
BigL
General
Joined: 30-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 817
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Jun-2006 at 01:08 |
Hispanics used Sheild walls with short swords?
|
|
Sudaka
Housecarl
Joined: 14-Nov-2004
Location: Argentina
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 31
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 18-Sep-2006 at 00:22 |
Im not sure but i dont think the small hispanic shield could be used to create a shield wall.
|
Not yet mein friend, not yet
|
|
RedBaron
Immortal Guard
Joined: 13-Oct-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Oct-2006 at 09:21 |
wedge, square
|
"the most dangerous moment comes with victory"
|
|
Emperor Barbarossa
Caliph
Joined: 15-Jul-2005
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2888
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Oct-2006 at 10:58 |
Originally posted by Giannis
Nobody, reffered to the most famous Roman formation, the Testudo, the first tank of history. |
The Roman testudo was illogical at times(when the enemy used composite bows) and this is seen especially at the Battle of Carrhae. The Scottish schiltron was a good formation against cavalry, but its weakness is the same as the testudo. Even worse for the schiltron, the Scots rarely wore more than leather armor, and longbows could be used pretty effectively against them because of the closely packed ranks. Speaking of the first tank, I believe the Assyrians first used a siege ram system that models a modern tank. However, the first tank(a mobile war wagon with gunopowder weapons and cannons) was developed by the Hussites in the 1420s. Anyways, another formation not mentioned here would be the Hussite Wagenburg, a large fortification of war wagons that was practically impervious to attack.
Edited by Emperor Barbarossa - 14-Oct-2006 at 11:04
|
|
|
Gavriel
Pretorian
Joined: 17-Jun-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 151
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Oct-2006 at 18:56 |
Rome used its Legionnaries in Maniple formations,each 80 man Century could move independably of the rest of the host or stick together to form a wall, making for very manuverable units. These units formed themselves into a 'saw' shaped line in Britain and annilated the British tribes with very few casualties to the Romans.The 'Celt' warriors were stuck in the teath of the 'Saw' unable to move because of the press of 'Celtic' warrior's behind them,all they could do was spit at the Romans then die! The maniples were allso very good for getting behind Phalanxes,once your behind a Phalanx,there finnished . The Saxon shield wall was a favoured formation,shields interlocked with warriors armed with Spear,Axe,Sword but most importantly, Saex.A shield wall with good warriors can hold all day,as long as the flanks are protected.But its very immobile,only really good for holding a postion until some one runs or there all dead. Another Saxon formation is the Hoggs head,the warriors form a arrow shaped shield wall and advance into the enemy rank,much like a Cavalry Wedge. Norman cavalry used Conrois,10-20 mounted men at arms (not everyone was a Knight) would form up Knee to Knee with each other,Lower lances and charge into the enemy infantry.After the initial blow the Lance would be dropped and the secondary weapon used (axe,sword,mace) to cause havoc in the ranks.The Conrois worked in waves so the onslaught was pretty consisitent. The English civil war saw the 'Push and Pike' tactic,two units of Pikemen with Musketters on each flank.The Musketeer's would fire a few volleys into the opposing Pikes then the main lines would meet.This is were the Push and Pike part comes in,each sides try's to push the other back until one runs or falls in on itself. Square and line Formations of the Redcoats.The soldiers could form into lines to pour consistent fire into the enemy whilst not taking too much cannon damage (brave buggers).The Squares were formed when Cavalry was too close,the soldiers form up into dense squares with Bayonets fixed.The Bayonets protect the men from the horses whilst the infantry can pour fire on them.
|
|
Hellios
Arch Duke
Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Oct-2006 at 20:52 |
Cavalry in there somewhere...
|
|
Emperor Barbarossa
Caliph
Joined: 15-Jul-2005
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2888
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Oct-2006 at 20:59 |
Originally posted by Gavriel
The Squares were formed when Cavalry was too close,the soldiers form up into dense squares with Bayonets fixed.The Bayonets protect the men from the horses whilst the infantry can pour fire on them.
|
Strangely, during the Battle of Balaclava, the 93rd Highlanders got into a thin line only two-men deep(instead of getting into a square formation), and they were able to fight off the 2,000 Russian Cavalry. Also, the square formation worked very good at Waterloo for the British.
Edited by Emperor Barbarossa - 15-Oct-2006 at 10:05
|
|
|
Gavriel
Pretorian
Joined: 17-Jun-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 151
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 14-Oct-2006 at 22:55 |
Was it three lines?i thought it was only two deep. The commander of the Highlanders must of wanted to hit the entire cavalry front rank in one go,the only way to do that was to streatch his line very thin.The convention would of been to form Square but that would be done as a defensive action,he obviously was attacking the Russians,brave those Highlanders.
|
|
Emperor Barbarossa
Caliph
Joined: 15-Jul-2005
Location: Pittsburgh, USA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2888
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 15-Oct-2006 at 10:05 |
Originally posted by Gavriel
Was it three lines?i thought it was only two deep. The commander of the Highlanders must of wanted to hit the entire cavalry front rank in one go,the only way to do that was to streatch his line very thin.The convention would of been to form Square but that would be done as a defensive action,he obviously was attacking the Russians,brave those Highlanders.
|
Yes, I did mean two lines deep. Also, the Highlanders did come out of the fortification onto the road. They were the last line of defense, since the British marine and Turkish soldiers fled at the site of the Russian cavalry.
|
|
|