Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Firearms

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
Bryan View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 240
  Quote Bryan Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: Firearms
    Posted: 14-Sep-2004 at 23:43
The M1 Garand has always been a favorite of mine as well...
Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 15-Sep-2004 at 01:22

 

source: http://www.world.guns.ru/assault/as12-e.htm

 

Heckler & Koch G3 rifle (Germany)


Earliest variant of G3 rifle with flip-up rear sight and metallic ventilated handguards


G3A3 with drum type rear sight, plastic ventilated handguards and fixed stock


G3A3 with attached bayonet and plain plastic handguards of more modern appearance


G3A4 - retractable butt version of the G3


G3KA4 - the shortest G3 variant with retractable buttstock and most modern integral pistol grip / trigger unit made entirely of plastic

Click here to see exploded view of the G3 (50 Kb JPEG)
Click here to see cut-out view of the G3 (50 Kb JPEG) 
Click here to see cut-out view of the G3 blowback action (35 Kb JPEG)


Click here to see airsoft copies of this gun
available at the online shop

Caliber: 7.62mm NATO (.308 win)
Action: Roller-delayed blowback
Weight: 4.5kg
Overall length: 1023 mm
Barrel length: 450 mm (315 mm on G3KA4 model)
Magazine capacity: 20 rounds

 During the early- to mid-1950s West Germany, like the other NATO countries,  faced the need for rearming its army for the newest common 7.62x51mm NATO caliber small arms. Initially Germans preferred the Belgian FN FAL rifle, and adopted it circa 1956 under the designation of G1. Due to obvious reasons Germany wanted to manufacture its military rifles, and attempted to buy a manufacturing license for FAL, but Belgium rejected the deal. So, Germany turned to the another design, available from Spanish company CETME, and known as the CETME mod. A rifle. Germany bought the manufacturing license for CETME rifle and transferred it to the Heckler und Koch (HK) company, located in Oberndorf. HK slightly modified the CETME design, and in 1959 the Bundeswehr (W.Germany Army) finally adopted the CETME / Heckler - Koch rifle as G3 (Gewehr 3 - Rifle, [model] 3). Since that time and until the 1995 the G3 in various modifications served as a general issue shoulder weapon not only for German Armed forces, but also for many other countries. Those include Greece, Iran, Mexico, Norway, Pakistan, Portugal, Sweden, Turkey and many other countries. Total of more than 50 countries during the last 40 years issued the G3 to its forces. The G3 was or still is manufactured in countries like the Greece, Pakistan, Iran, Turkey, Portugal and others. The key reason of high popularity of the G3 is that it is much simpler and cheaper to manufacture, than its major contemporary rivals - Belgian FN FAL and US M14. To the best of my knowledge, the HK itself continued to produce and offer the G3 until the year 2000 or 2001, when it finally disappeared from HK catalogs and web-sites. However, the HK still manufactures a wide variety of firearms, based on the G3 design but of different purposes and calibers, like 9mm MP-5 submachine guns, 5.56mm HK 33 assault rifles, 5.56mm and 7.62mm HK 23 and HK 21 machine guns, PSG1 sniper rifles etc. In general, the HK G3 rifle can be described as one of the best 7.62mm NATO battle / assault rifles - reliable, versatile, controllable, non-expensive and, finally, very popular. For the civilian markets, HK produced the semi-automatic only versions of the G3, initially known as HK 41 and later - as HK 91.

The G3 rifle is a selective fire, magazine fed rifle, built using delayed blowback action, developed by German engineers at Mauser Werke late in the 2nd World War and refined in Spain, at the CETME company. Initial models of the G3 rifle were quite similar to CETME rifles, and even had "CETME" markings on the receivers (until 1961 or so). The roller-delayed blowback action is described under the CETME Rifles, so I will not repeat it here. The G3 is built using as many stamped parts as possible. The receiver is stamped from sheet steel. The trigger unit housing along with pistol handle frame, also are stamped from steel and hinged to the receiver using the cross-pin in the front of the trigger unit, just behind the magazine housing. Earliest G3 rifles also featured stamped handguards and CETME-type flip-up rear diopter sights. In the mid-1960s the initial design was upgraded to the G3A3 and G3A4 configurations. These rifles had ventilated plastic handguards and a drum-type rear diopter sights, marked from 100 to 400 meters. The G3A3 was a fixed butt version, with buttstock made from plastic, and the G3A4 was a telescope butt version, with retractable metallic buttstock with rubber buttplate. Late German production G3A3 and G3A4 models were built using new trigger units, integral with restyled pistol grip and triggerguard, made from plastic. The shortest version of the G3 was the G3KA4, similar to G3A4 but with shortened barrel. Every G3 rifle can be equipped with detachable bipods, claw-type detachable scope mounts. Long-barreled versions can be fitted with bayonet or used to launch rifle grenades from the barrel. Folding cocking handle is located on the special tube above the barrel, at the left side, and does not reciprocate when gun is fired. The safety / fire selector is located above the triggerguard on the left side of the trigger group housing and usually is marked "S - E - F" (Safe - Single shots - Full auto). Latest models could have selectors marked with colored icons.

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Sep-2004 at 12:18

 

source: http://www.sovietarmy.com/small_arms/ak-47.html

< = src="http://banners.guns.ru/cgi-bin/ban?user=main&pool=4 &ban=3"> guns.ru banner exchangegunsbanner exchange

AK- 47 Assault Rifle


The weapon was developed for motorized infantry, adopted for service with the Soviet Army in 1949 and designated the AK-47. It was not provided with a bayonet.
Characteristics
Caliber, mm 7.62
Cartridge 7.62x39
Sighting radius, mm 378
Length, overal, mm 870
Barrel Length, mm 415
Magazine capacity, rds 30
Sighting range, m 800
Weight w/empty magazine, g 4300
Weight w/loaded magazine, g 4876
Rate of fire, rds/min 600
Muzzle velocity, m/s 700
Killing range, m 1500
Rifling Grooves 4
Rifled Bore, mm 378
| |

 

 

This webiste will take you to an operating manual.

http://www.fortunecity.com/olympia/wagner/137/ak02.html

Description:

The original AK was also known as the AK-47. It was a gas-operated, selective-fire weapon. Like all 7.62-mm Kalashnikov assault rifles, it fired the Soviet 7.62 x 39-mm M1943 round and used a standard 30-round curved box magazine. The AK came in two versions: one with a fixed wooden stock, and another, the AKS, with a folding metal stock issued primarily to parachutist and armor troops. Except for the differences in the stock and the lack of a tool kit with the AKS, the two version were identical. The early AKs had no bayonet, but the version with the fixed wooden stock later mounted a detachable knife bayonet.

The improved model, known as the AKM, is easier to produce and operate. It weighs about one kilogram less than the AK. The reduced weight results from using thinner, stamped sheetmetal parts rather than machined, forged steel; laminated wood rather than solid wood in the handguard, forearm, pistol grip, and buttstock; and new lightweight aluminium and plastic magazines. Other improvements include a straighter stock for better control; an improved gas cylinder; a rate-of-fire control alongside the trigger; a rear sight graduated to 1,000 meters rather than 800 meters; and a greatly improved, detachable bayonet.

The AKM also has a folding-stock version, designated AKMS, intended for use by riflemen in armored infantry combat vechicles such as the BMP. Except for its T-shaped, stamped-metal, folding buttstock, the AKMS is identical to the AKM. The folding-stock model can reduce its length from 868 to 699 millimeters.

Capabilities:

All 7.62-mm Kalashnikov assault rifles fire in either semiautomatic or automatic mode and have an effective range of about 300 meters. At full cyclic rate, they can fire about 600 rounds per minute (upto 640 rounds per minute for the AKM), with a practical rate of about 100 rounds per minute fully automatic or 40 rounds per minute semiautomatic. Both the AK and AKM can mount a grenade launcher. Both can have passive image intensifier night sights. Both can function normally after total immersion in mud and water. The fully chromed barrel ensures effective operation even at very low temperatures. The muzzle of either weapon fits into the swiveling firing points of the BMP. Thus, the infantryman can fire the weapon while the vechicle is moving.

Limitations:

The most serious drawback to the AK and AKM is the low muzzle velocity (710 meters per second) of the relatively heavy 7.62-mm round. This results in a looping trajectory that requires a clumsy adjustment for accuracy at ranges beyond 300 meters. The barrel overheats quickly when the weapon fires for extended periods, making the weapon hard to handle and occasionally causing a round to explode prematurely in the chamber. The exposed gas cylinder is easily dented, sometimes causing the weapon to malfunction.

Remarks:

Although they designed it in 1947 and thus referred to it as the AK-47, the Soviets actually adopted the AK in 1949. The AK entered service in 1951. It was the basic individual infantry weapon of the Soviet Army until the introduction of the AKM. The Soviets developed the AKM in 1959. It entered service in 1961. All 7.62-mm Kalashnikov assualt rifles are very dependable weapons. They produce a high volume of fire and are simple to maintain. However, the new 5.45-mm assault rife AK-74 is replacing the 7.62-mm weapons.



Edited by Jalisco Lancer
Back to Top
Abyssmal Fiend View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 18-Aug-2004
Location: Germany
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 233
  Quote Abyssmal Fiend Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Sep-2004 at 13:47
Wow, a killing range of 1500m? That's incredible. I expected more around 1200 or 1300...

Di! Ecce hora! Uxor mea me necabit!
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Sep-2004 at 16:24
Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Sep-2004 at 17:13

 

source: http://www.world.guns.ru/rifle/rfl06-e.htm

Tokarev SVT-38 SVT-40 (USSR - Russia)


SVT-38 (image by Kristopher Gasior from www.CollectibleFirearms.com)


SVT-38, close-up view on the receiver (image by Kristopher Gasior from www.CollectibleFirearms.com)


SVT-40, right side


SVT-40, left side


SVT-40, close-up view on the receiver


SVT-40, sniper version with see-through scope mount and WW2 period standard issue "PU" scope


SVT-40, drawing of the muzzle attachment with the gas chamber and regulator, front sight assembly and muzzle brake

data for SVT-40
Caliber: 7.62x54 mm R
Action: Gas operated, tilting bolt
Overall length: 1226 mm
Barrel length: 625 mm
Weight: 3.85 kg
Feeding: 10 rounds in detachable box magazine

ATTENTION here's the Instruction manual (in English, Adobe PDF format) for SVT-40 rifle (issued by the US Ordnance corps in 1954).

This file is packed by WinZip and is about 500 Kb in size
Right click this link and then select "Save target as" in the popup menu

TIP: If you do not have free Adobe Acrobat reader, get it here
TIP: If you need the WinZip utility, get it here

The SVT-38 (Samozaryadnaya Vintovka Tokareva - Tokarev Self-loading rifle) was originally adopted in the 1938 after more than 20 years of the research and development, done by famous Russian arms designer Fedor Tokarev. It was not a first Soviet semi-automatic rifle - there were the select-fire 'Avtomat' of 1916 by Fedorov and also select-fire AVS-36 of 1936 by Simonov. 'Avtomat' was chambered for Japanese 6.5mm Arisaka round and was declared obsolete, and the AVS-36 showed some design deficiencies, so new rifle was adopted. After initial trials, it was updated and re-adopted in 1940 as a SVT-40. This rifle was made in relatively large numbers (more than 1 million made prior to 1945), and was originally issued as a standard infantry rifle, replacing the obsolete Mosin-Nagant M1891/30 bolt action rifles. Few SVT-40 were also manufactured in the sniper variant, equipped with scope mounts and telescopic sights, but accuracy was not sufficient, so only about 50 000 sniper SVT-40 were manufactured, and these were supplemented by the Mosin-Nagant sniper rifles. The SVT-40 had a somewhat controversial reputation. It was highly regarded by the enemies (Finns and Germans) and it was a very sought-after war trophy, re-issued to both German and Finnish troops. On the other hand, it was often considered unreliable and over-complicated by the Soviet troops (when comparing with old Mosin-Nagant rifles), but it was more to the poor training and maintenance, than to the rifle itself. Some better trained and educated Soviet troops, such as Sea Infantry (Marines, which always were some kind of elite in the Soviet army) used the SVT-40 with great deal of success. After the end of the World War 2, most SVT-40 were quickly withdrawn from service and put into reserve stocks. Some rifles were later sold on domestic civilian market for hunters as a military surplus. Other than basic versions, there also were developed a shorter carbine SKT-40, and a select-fire AVT-40, but both seen very little service. Overall, the SVT-40 was in general no worse than American M1 Garand (and have some advantages over it, especially in the reloading procedures), and obviously better than earlier German Gew.41 semi-automatic rifles. It was the matter of training and education, and quality of the service of in the Soviet troops, that lead to the low popularity (in general) of this basically good rifle.

SVT-40 is a gas operated, magazine fed self-loading rifle. It uses a short piston stroke gas action, located above the barrel. The interesting feature of the SVT is that the gas block, along with front sight base and a muzzle brake, were produced as a single barrel extension unit. This greatly simplified the manufacture of the barrel, but the barrel extension itself unit was quite complicated to make. Gas chamber has 5 positions gas regulator to ajust the system for any conditions. The gas piston has its own return string and moved back for about 36 mm (1.5 inch) when gun was fired. It gave a quick and powerful stroke to the bolt carrier, which carried the bolt under it. Barrel locking was achieved by the rear part of the bolt, that tilted down to lock into the reinforced steel insert in the floor of the receiver. Charging handle was permanently attached to the right side of the bolt carrier. Detachable box magazine was made from sheet steel and hold 10 cartridges. SVT could be reloaded either by replacing the magazine or by using 5-round stripper clips of the Mosin-Nagant. Stripper clip guides were machined into the receiver top cover. Bolt system incorporated a bolt catch, that held the bolt group back when magazine was empty, to facilitate faster reloading, especially when using stripper clips.

Both SVT-38 and SVT-40 were hammer-fired, with safety switch located behind the trigger. When engaged, safety locked the trigger. On the rare AVT-40 select-fire rifles, safety had an additional setting for full-auto fire mode.

The SVT-38 featured a two-piece wooden stock with separate upper handguard with small steel insert at the forward end. SVT-40 had an one-piece wooden stock with shorter forend and separate upper handguard. Front part of the stock was replaced by the sheet steel cover with cooling ports. Cleaning rod, originally stored in the groove at the right side of the stock at the SVT-38, was relocated under the barrel on the SVT-40.

Sights of the SVT consisted of the post type front sight, mounted on the sight base with circular front sight guard, and a tangent type open rear sights, mounted on the rear part of the barrel. Sniper versions were equipped with special detachable, see-through scope mounts at the rear of the receiver, so the scope was offset to the rear, allowing to use a clip-charging facility.

SVT-38 was equipped with detachable, knife-bayonet. SVT-40 was issued with similar bayonet, but with blade shortened to save weight. Unlike the Mosin-Nagant, the bayonets were routinely carried in sheaths, and attached to the rifle only when required.

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Sep-2004 at 12:15

 

source:http://jeanplam.www3.50megs.com/4956.html

http://www.world.guns.ru/rifle/rfl10-e.htm

 

MAS 49/56 RIFLE
CAL. 7.5x54 MM

The MAS-49 rifle, developed by the French state arms factory Manufacture Nationale d'Armes de St-Etienne (MAS), was a logical development of many earlier prototypes, based on the direct gas impingement system, developed by the French designer Rossignol early in the XX century. The same (or very similar) gas system was later used in Swedish Ljungman AG-42 rifle and in Eugene Stoner AR-15 / M16 rifles. France was a major player in the field of automatic rifles since the very beginning, but due to deep secrecy less is commonly known about French developments in this field. In any way, after the end of the 2nd World war the liberated France found itself in the need of rearming its infantry with semi-automatic rifle. Starting with Rossignol's gas system and some prototypes built during the 1920s and 1930s, MAS developed a semi-automatic rifle which was produced in very limited numbers in 1944 as MAS-44. It was later improved to accept new, detachable magazines and modified to be able to launch rifle grenades, and then became the MAS-49, or "Fusil Automatique MAS Modele 1949".  MAS-1949 (as it was stamped on the receiver), seen heavy combat use in the French Indo-China and Algeria and proved itself accurate and reliable. In 1956, an improved pattern rifle was adopted by Armee de Terre (French Army) as a MAS-1949/56. The MAS-49/56 was lightened, had shorter barrel and forend, different grenade launcher sights and was able to be fitted with spike-shaped bayonet, while MAS-1949 could not be equipped with bayonet. MAS-49/56 served as a first-line weapon with French army until 1979, when it was replaced by the 5.56mm FAMAS assault rifle. The MAS-49 was exported in small numbers to Syria in 1950s, and still can be found in some ex-France territories around the world.

MAS-1949 is a gas operated, semi-automatic, magazine fed rifle. It uses a direct gas impingement system with no gas piston. Instead of the gas piston, the powder gases are fed from the barrel through the gas tube directly to the front face of the bolt carrier. The bolt carrier operates the tilting bolt, which is cammed down to lock into the slot in the receiver floor. The dual stack, box magazine is detachable and rifle can be reloaded with replacement magazines, but it also featured a stripper clips guides, machined into the front of the bolt carrier, so magazine could be reloaded by using two 5-round stripper clips without removal from the rifle. MAS-1949 has a bolt catch, which is engaged by the magazine follower as soon as the last round from magazine is fired. The gas system has a gas cutoff device, which is required to fire the rifle grenades from the muzzle. Special grenade sights are located at the left side of the rifle stock. Standard open sights had a hooded front sight on the front stock band and an aperture (diopter) rear sight on the receiver, which is adjustable for range from 200 to 1200 meters and for windage. All MAS-1949 rifles featured a side rail at the left side of the receiver that allows the telescopic sights to be mounted on every rifle. The safety switch in the form of the cross-bolt push-button is located at the right side of the rifle, at the front of the triggerguard. The large plastic charging handle is attached to the bolt carrier at the right side. Magazine catch built on the side of the detachable box magazine, instead of being mounted on the rifle itself, which is more usual practice. MAS-1949 has no provisions for bayonet mount, but has a stacking hook at the muzzle.

The MAS-1949/56 has shorter barrel and shorter handguards to save weight and made weapon more maneuverable. The grenade launching sights were moved to the barrel, and the gas cutoff switch is mounted at the front of the handguards above the barrel and cannot be engaged when grenade sight is lowered out of use. The barrel is equipped with combination muzzle brake / grenade launching device. Like the MAS-1949, all MAS-1949/56 rifles have the scope rails on the left side of the receiver, and thus could be used as a designated marksmen rifles at the distances up to 600 meters or so. The standard optical sight was APX L Modele 1953 telescope with 3.85X magnification.


Caliber: 7.5x54 mm
System of operation: Semi-Auto
Length overall: 40.25 inches
Barrel length: 22.85 inches
Feed device: 10 shot Box magazine
Sight:Front: Blade type with protecting ears
Sight:Rear: Tangent-Leaf sight
Weight: 8.55 lb
Muzzle velocity: 2750 f.p.s.



MAS 49/56 Rifle.



Close-up of action.



Top view of the bolt.



Top view of the bolt in the open position.



Mas receiver markings.



Close-up of the magazine well.



Close-up of the magazine.



Close-up of the buttstock.



A view of the buttstock swivel bar.



A scope base was machined on all MAS 49/56 receivers.



Close-up of the sling swivel ring.



Close-up of the front sight.



Close-up of the grenade launching sight.



Another view of the grenade launching sight.



Another view of the grenade launching sight.


Close-up of the Mas-49 rifle bayonet, the standard French Infantry model had no provision to fix a bayonet.

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Sep-2004 at 10:23

 

Arisaka Rifle

sources: http://www.radix.net/~bbrown/japanese_markings.html

Manual to assemble and disassemble an Ariaska Rifle

http://www.surplusrifle.com/arisaka/rifledisassembly/pdf/ari saka.pdf

http://www.gunsworld.com/gun_bar/Arisaka_38th_Year_Rifle.htm

ARISAKA 38th YEAR RIFLE
Country Of Origin: Japan
Designation: Bolt Action Rifle
Cartridge: 6.5 x 5OSR Japanese Service
Production Date: 1907-1944
Weapon Dimensions:
Length: 1.275 m
Barrel: 799 mm
Weight: 4.12 kg
Rifling: 4 or 6 grooves, rh
Mag Capacity: 5 rounds

 

 

 

A chrysanthemum with 16 petals (the symbol of the Japanese Emperor) was usually stamped on the receiver of rifles manufactured for the Imperial Japanese Army, indicating that the rifle belonged to the Emperor. The chrysanthemum resembles this:

The chrysanthemum was at least partially ground off on rifles which were surrendered after the war, apparently as a face-saving gesture. Rifles captured in the field, however, normally have the chrysanthemum symbol intact. The Type designation was stamped into the top of the receiver using the character shiki for "type" and Japanese numerals. The shiki character and the characters for the Japanese numerals are shown in the following table.

Japanese Characters Used on Arisaka Rifles
Character Meaning
Type
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

A small number of Type 38 and Type 99 rifles had two concentric circles on the receiver in place of the chrysanthemum. The purpose of these specially-marked rifles is not known, although it is speculated that they were issued to paramilitary forces such as the Kempei Tai (Japanese Secret Police), other military police, and guards at prisons, embassies, and other civil instillations. Some concentric circle rifles were remarked standard issue Type 38 and Type 99 rifles that had the chrysanthemum completely or partially removed and replaced with the concentric circle marking. These rifles were serialized separately from regular production pieces. Other rifles apparently were originally manufactured and marked with concentric circles, which looks something like this:


Arsenal Marks

Each Japanese rifle was marked with the symbol of either the arsenal of manufacture or the arsenal that supervised the manufacturing subcontractor. This mark can be found on the left side of the receiver at the end of the rifle serial number. Rifles manufactured by a commercial subcontractor bear the subcontractor's mark to the right of the supervising arsenal's mark. These marks are shown in the following table.

Japanese Rifle Manufacturers
Symbol Arsenal/Subcontractor Period of Operation
Koishikawa Arsenal (Tokyo) 1870-1935
Kokura Arsenal 1935-1945
Nagoya Arsenal 1923-1945
Jinsen Arsenal (Korea) 1923-1945
Mukden Arsenal (Manchuria) 1931-1945
Toyo Kogyo 1939-1945
Tokyo Juki Kogyo 1940-1945
Tokyo Juki Kogyo 1940-1945
Howa Jyuko 1940-1945
Izawa Jyuko 1940-1945

At various times, rifles were removed from military service and sold to other countries or transferred to Japanese schools as training weapons. Normally, the chrysanthemum on these rifles was overstamped with the Koishikawa (Tokyo) / Kokura Arsenal symbol or a ring of small circles to indicate that the rifle no longer belonged to the Imperial Japanese Army. Rifles given to schools often have an additional character stamped on the top of the receiver between the chrysanthemum and the type designation characters. Most of these "school-marked" rifles also have two or three zeros preceeding the serial number. The "school" mark looks something like this:


Serial Numbers

All Japanese military rifles had serial numbers except extremely rare prototypes, other pre-production guns, and occasional rifles assembled very late in World War II. The serial number was stamped on the left side of the receiver, followed by the arsenal symbol. Initially, rifles make in Japanese arsenals were numbered consecutively within each Type designation. In 1933 this scheme was replaced by a system in which rifles were numbered in blocks, or series, of 99,999 each [actually 100,000, according to Honeycutt, running from serial numbers 0 through 99,999]. Each series was identified by a small Japanese character (kana) placed within a circle to the left of the serial number. Specific blocks of kana were assigned to each arsenal or manufacturer to use for a specific rifle type. The series markings are illustrated in the following table.

Series Markings
Series Number Series Mark   Series Number Series Mark
1   24
2   25
3   26
4   27
5   28
6   29
7   30
8   31
9   32
10   33
11   34
12   35
20   37
21   40
22   45
23      
 
Link for Arisaka Rifle photos:
http://www.armchairgunshow.com/otsWBjp_arisaka.htm
Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 27-Sep-2004 at 17:46

 

source:http://www.remtek.com/arms/imi/galil/galil.htm

ISRAEL'S DEADLY DESERT FIGHTER

SOF's Kokalis Evaluates Galili's AK
by Peter G. Kokalis

The Galil rifle is a phoenix, risen from the ashes; a result of lessons learned by Israeli desert fighters in the 1967 Six-Day War. Very much the progeny of my friend, Israel Galili, chief weapons designer for IMI (Israeli Military Industries), and Yaacov Lior, the Galil is a somewhat successful attempt at Candide's "best of all possible worlds."

Dissatisfied with the 7.62mm NATO FN FAL with which the Israeli Army was largely equipped, as it has always been a poor performer in high sand and dust environments, Galili went directly into the field to investigate the problem (see "Weapons Wizard Israel Galili," SOF, March '82). He was told by everyone that the Kalashnikov was the "tiger of the desert."

Taking what he needed from the AK-47, Galili placed his rifle in competition with the M16A1, the Stoner 63, the AK-47, the HK 33 and a design by Uziel Gal. The test's greatest emphasis revolved around performance under arid-region conditions. The Galil emerged as the clear winner and won the Israeli Defense Award. It was officially adopted by the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) in 1972. More than a decade later, it is now finally available through Magnum Research, Inc. (Dept. SOF, 2825 Anthony Lane South, Minneapolis, MN 55418), its exclusive importer, in BATF-approved semiautomatic versions. The selective-fire versions are available to law-enforcement agencies and qualified Class 3 dealers. Although also produced in caliber 7.62mm NATO to increase its sales on the world market, the Galil rifle as issued to the IDF is chambered for the 5.56mm NATO M193 ball ammunition.

The Galil's Kalashnikov heritage is apparent, even at first glance. Not so evident are its differences. It fires from the closed-bolt position and is gas-operated without an adjustable regulator. The change in caliber, from 7.62x39mm ComBloc to 5.56mm NATO, required numerous alterations. The AK-47's 4.2mm gas hole was reduced in diameter to 1.8mm. The Galil's most immediate predecessor was the Finnish Valmet M62 rifle and, in fact, early Galil prototypes were fabricated using M62 receivers made in Helsinki. However, as the 52,000 cup SAAMI (Sporting Arms and Ammunition Manufacturers' Institute) pressure limit specified for the 5.56mm NATO round is far greater than that developed by the 7.62x39mm ComBloc cartridge, Galili abandoned the pinned and riveted, stamped sheet-metal receiver of the Valmet M62/M76 series and went to a heavy milled forging.

In addition, the Galil does not utilize the usual Kalashnikov barrel-extension unit for lock-up of the bolt. The bolt lugs lock into recesses milled into the receiver body itself. Thus, heat dispersion occurs more rapidly, the cartridge remains cooler and the possibility of a cook-off, even under the most intensive full-auto conditions, is minimized.

While the method of operation is identical to the Kalashnikov, Soviet AK-47 parts most certainly cannot be used in the Galil, contrary to the statements of others. When the trigger is pulled, the hammer drives the firing pin forward to ignite the primer. Kalashnikovs have inertia firing pins without a spring. The initial lot of Galils brought into this country also had no firing pin springs. Military primers have hard cups, not easily touched off. American commercial ammunition, Winchester in particular, has relatively soft primer cups. The Winchester ammo caused several slam-fires and all Galils offered for sale in the United States have now been fitted with strong firing pin springs. If yours does not, have it retrofitted before firing commercial ammunition.

After ignition of the primer, a portion of the propellent gases migrate into the 1.8mm vent, drilled at a 30-degree angle into the gas block which is pinned to the barrel. The gas enters the cylinder (to which a small spring has been attached to secure its retention during reassembly) and drives the piston rearward. The piston is hard-chrome-plated for ease of maintenance. It is also notched to provide a reduced bearing surface and permit excess gas blow-by. The bolt carrier is attached to the piston. After a short amount of free travel, during which time the gas pressure drops to a safe level, the cam slot engages the boit's cam pin and the bolt is rotated and unlocked as the carrier moves rearward.

Primary extraction occurs as the bolt is rotated and thus the massive Kalashnikov-type extractor claw is not required. Empty-case ejection is typically violent. The cases are severely dented by the ejector and thrown to the right and front by as much as 40 feet (a defect with regard to position disclosure). At this time, the recoil spring is compressed and its return energy drives the carrier forward to strip a round from the magazine and chamber it.

The Galil's hammer spring is made of multi-strand cable. The trigger and sear springs are conventional coil types. Like other Kalashnikov-system rifles, the trigger mechanism is that first used in the U.S. M1 Garand rifle.

The Galil's right-side selector lever is the same stamped, sheet-metal bar common to all Kalashnikovs. South African troops often wrap nylon line around this selector bar to quiet the sound of its manipulation. It can also be slightly bent to draw it away from the receiver notches. The top position, marked "S," is safe, where the trigger is locked and the bolt can be retracted only far enough to inspect for a chambered round in this position.

The Galil also features a selector switch on the receiver's left side, intended to be manipulated by the thumb of the trigger hand. On the semiauto version, through use of a two-piece hinged bar inside the receiver, the rearmost position of this selector is safe and pushing forward with the thumb will place the weapon in the firing mode, marked "F." This is as it should be. However, on the selective-fire model the rearmost position is "R" (British terminology for Repetition, or semiauto), the middle position is "A" (full auto) and the forward position is safe. Thus, to come off safe, using the left-side selector, one must pull rearward with the thumb, a most unnatural and awkward maneuver, especially under stress.

On the selective-fire Galil, two sears control the firing mechanism, the trigger sear and a safety sear. In full-auto fire the trigger sear is held back and only the first round of the burst is fired off this rear sear. Subsequently, the bolt carrier moves rearward and rolls the hammer over. The safety sear continues to hold the hammer back until the bolt carrier is fully forward again, at which time it trips the safety sear and the hammer rotates to fire another round. Thus, after the first round the trigger sear is deactivated entirely from control on the hammer. Releasing the trigger will catch the hammer on the trigger sear once more. In semiautomatic fire, no pressure is placed on the trigger sear, which is free to catch the hammer each time it is rolled back by the bolt carrier.

The entire safety sear assembly (sear, spring, cross pin and trip lever) is absent from the semiautomatic-only version of the Galil. In addition, certain receiver mill cuts have not been made, the hammer spring pin protrudes from the right side of the receiver to stop further downward travel of the selector lever and the bolt carrier has been altered to prevent full-auto fire. Unauthorized attempts to convert this rifle to selective fire would be most difficult and quite dangerous.

There are three basic configurations of the Galil, all available in calibers 5.56mm NATO or 7.62mm NATO: The ARM is equipped with a bipod, wooden handguard and carrying handle. It is intended for use as an assault rifle and squad automatic weapon. The AR is equipped with a high-impact-plastic handguard without a bipod or carrying handle. The barrel length of both, in caliber 5.56mm NATO, is 18.5 inches with the flash suppressor (and 21.0 inches for the 7.62mm NATO models). Both are available in semiauto-only and selective-fire versions. The SAR is a short-barreled version of the AR model. It has a barrel length of only 13.5 inches in 5.56mm (15.8 inches in the 7.62mm version) and, as a consequence, is available in the United States as a selective-fire weapon only. Its gas tube and piston are 1 1/8 inches shorter than the other models. The 5.56mm NATO Galils all have six-groove barrels with a right-hand 1:12-inch twist for the M193 ball projectile. All three are normally issued with a folding stock, although a wooden buttstock is an available option.

At first glance, the folding stock appears to be that of the FN FAL. It is not. The FAL stock is constructed of tubular aluminum. The Galil folding stock is fabricated from tubular steel - stronger, but heavier. More important, the Galil stock has no button latch to confound the operator in opening or closing, no small consideration during high-stress situations.

The ARM's carrying handle is almost identical to the Belgian FAL'S. Located to the rear of the wooden handguard, it is not positioned over the rifle's center of mass. The wooden handguard remains somewhat cooler during sustained full-auto fire than the black plastic handguard. The squared-away shape of the wooden handguard is not entirely comfortable, but necessary to store the bipod. Both the plastic and wooden handguards are attached permanently to the barrel and cannot be removed.

The Galil bipod is a sturdy, rigid affair, certified so by my memory of Israel Galili jumping wildly and theatrically on top of the rifle with its two steel legs extended. When stored in the handguard, the bipod serves as a feed chute to speed insertion of the magazines. The bipod can be used as a wire cutter and to open beer bottles also.

The Galil's gray-plastic pistol grip is one of the very best ever put on an assault rifle and seems to be taken from the Hungarian AKM/AMD-65 series. Of more than adequate length, with a sharp bottom flare to prevent the hand from slipping, the grip has been mounted to the receiver at precisely the correct grip-to-frame angle. Somehow, it just feels right.

Gaili offers tough, all-steel magazines in three capacities: The 12-round magazine, color-coded with whith stripes, is blocked to accept only ballistite (blank) cartridges for launching rifle grenades. The standard magazine has a capacity of 35 rounds. A large capacity 50-round is also available. Difficult to load by hand, it is intended for use primarily in the squad automatic role. However, like all bottom-fed magazines of this length, it will "monopod" the weapon when fired with the bipod in the prone position.

An optional magazine adapter allows the use of 20- and 30-round M16 magazines. Unfortunately, the magazine wells of the semiautomatic and selective-fire Galils are of different dimensions and the adapter supplied by IMI can be fitted only to the semiautomatic version. Why this is so I do not know. However, the adapter is well-designed and the magazines can be inserted and released with no greater difficulty than in the M16. Valmet 5.56mm NATO magazines will likewise fit into the semiautomatic Galil, but cannot be used in the selective-fire rifle. South African R4 magazines are identical to their Israeli counterparts and can be inserted into all versions of the Galil. The magazine-release latch is of the flapper type, similar to the Kalashnikov.

The retracting handle is attached to the bolt carrier and bent upright to allow cocking with either hand, providing a useful feature.

The flash suppressor has six ports and is almost identical to the M16 "birdcage" muzzle device. Those who still dream of charging up San Juan Hill will be pleased to note that the Galil accepts the readily available M7 bayonet issued for the M16.

The rear end of the Galil's recoil-spring guide rod, which serves as a retainer for the sheet-metal receiver cover, has been extended to ease disassembly and lock the cover more securely to the receiver body. This is especially important as the rear sight has been mounted on the receiver cover. While no less secure than its attachment to the gas cylinder on the Valmet M71, it does not provide the rigidity offered by the receiver-mounted rear sight of ComBloc Kalashnikovs. The trade-off is a longer sight radius.

Reassembly of the receiver cover on all Kalashnikov-type weapons is simplified if you first place the recoil-spring guide rod slightly below its notch in the receiver onto the rear interior wall of the receiver. Then set the receiver cover in place. Jack the retracting handle smartly to the rear and the guide rod will pop into its notch and the square-cut hole in the receiver cover.

Standard Kalashnikov disassembly and reassembly procedures apply to the Galil. But, a small, though important, correction to the preventive maintenance instructions given in the IMI operator's manual is required. After cleaning, we are instructed to lubricate the gas cylinder and piston. I say no to that. Keep lubricants of all types away from the piston and the interior of the gas system. The intense heat generated in this area of a gas-operated weapon will cause lubricants to bake and varnish these parts.

The rear sight is a flip-up peep type with 300- and 500-meter apertures adjustable for elevation only. The front-post sight is adjustable for elevation and windage zero. Elevation adjustments are by means of the UZI front-sight tool. Windage adjustment is achieved by loosening and tightening the two opposing screws which move the entire front-sight assembly in its dovetail on to the gas block. The diameter of the front-sight hood is such that it forms an additional aiming circle just within the rear aperture to further assist sight alignment and speed target acquisition.

Taking another cue from the Valmet, the Galil is equipped with tritium (betalight) night sights set for 100 meters. To use, at dusk or night, the front betalight is folded up to expose a vertical bar, which is aligned between the two rear luminous dots. When the rear tritium sight is flipped up for use, the rear peep sights must be placed in an offset position midway between the two apertures.

The left side of the receiver is dovetailed for a scope side-mount. Mounting a scope on the receiver body usually results in maximum stability. But the IMI side-mount has exhibited a decided tendency to lose zero after take-down and remounting. As a consequence, Magnum Research, Inc. plans to market a Weaver-type base attached to the sheet-metal receiver cover (usually the worst place to mount a scope). The initial units will be equipped with the excellent Leatherwood ART II scope (see "State-of-the-ART Scope," SOF, May '82).

The Galil issue sling is admirable. Constructed of heavy, wide, black webbing with sturdy steel hooks at each end that rotate 360 degrees, it is easily the best assault rifle sling I have ever seen. Designers in the past have often neglected this piece of equipment, yet it is important to those in the field. After phosphating (Parkerizing), all exterior metal surfaces on the rifle (except for the barrel, gas block and front sight) are finished with semi-gloss black enamel.

An interesting after-market accessory has already surfaced for the Galil. Produced by J.F.S., Inc, (Dept. SOF, 515 Gordon, P.O. Box 1892, Klamath Falls, OR 97601), the Redi-Mag fast-action speed loader attaches in minutes to the left side of the receiver next to the magazine well. The Redi.-Mag holds one spare magazine. By means of a connecting catch bar, its operation is synchronized with the rifle's magazine-release latch. To manipulate the Redi-Mag, drop the muzzle about 10 to 15 degrees and, with the left thumb, press the catch bar forward while grasping the spare magazine with the left hand. While rocking the loaded magazine out of the Redi-Mag, the empty magazine will fall to the ground. Insert the new magazine and you're back in business.

I have fired several thousand rounds through both the ARM and SAR in the off-hand, kneeling, hip-assault and prone positions, and can report no stoppages of any kind. Of course, I neither threw them in the mud nor rolled over them with a truck, as such tests have already been completed under controlled and repeatable laboratory conditions by IMI. And properly so, as such tawdry, unscientific displays demonstrate nothing but the vaudevillian inclinations of the popular gun press.

The five-inch differential in barrel lengths between the ARM and SAR did provide an excuse to chronograph their respective muzzle velocities. PMC (Pusan Arsenal, Korea) M193 ball ammunition was used throughout this portion of the test and evaluation. The 18.5-inch barrel of the ARM generated an average of 3,087 fps. The stubby 13.5-inch barrel of the SAR dropped the average velocity by only 183 fps. to 2,904 fps. The extreme spread and standard deviation were significantly lower for the SAR. But, the accuracy potential of both rifles was quite high, even with trigger pulls no better than the average Kalashnikov.

In addition to high marks for hit probability and target acquisition, the SAR exhibited phenomenal controllability in the full-auto mode. The cyclic rate is 650 rpm. Muzzle rise is barely perceptible with two- and three-round bursts. In fact, firing in the off-hand position, at 30 meters an entire and continuous 50-round burst can be contained within a standard military silhouette target! Felt recoil was virtually nonexistent with both rifles. But, a heavy price must be paid for all these attributes.

All of the above operating characteristics are a function of the weapon's weight. At almost 9.5 pounds, empty, with bipod and carrying handle, the ARM is quite heavy in comparison with other state-of-the-art assault rifles. The M16 and AKM weigh only 7.0 pounds apiece. The Galil is only a quarter-pound shy of the U.S. M14. So what, you say? The South African troops who must constantly drag this beast through the bush have real cause for complaint. And reports to me indicate that their moaning and groaning have reached a discordant crescendo.

The Galil's weight is principally a consequence of the designer's attempt to create a weapon system which could serve the roles of submachine gun, infantry rifle and light machine gun. To date no other short-barreled assault rifle comes closer to stealing the submachine gun's final fading thunder than the SAR. With its stock folded, it measures only 24.5 inches in length. Most modern submachine guns fall somewhere between the 16.4-inch Beretta M12S and the 19.3-inch HK MP5A3. Presenting a package in size close to the SMG, the SAR chambers a cartridge far more potent at much greater ranges than the 9mm Parabellum.

As an assault rifle, the sturdy and reliable Galil is one of the very best. With a U.S. retail price of $1,499, whether or not it is worth the cost of almost three AR15s is a question only you can answer.

It is in the role of a squad automatic weapon that it falls short of the mark. By definition of its requirement for intensive sustained fire at the squad level, the ideal SAW should incorporate a quick-change barrel, adjustable gas regulator and belt-feed potential. The Galil has none of these features; the U.S. M249 has all of them. And, as I mentioned previously, the tendency of the 50-round magazine to "monopod" the weapon when fired off the bipod in the prone position seriously compromises the Galil's ability to effectively engage targets at any small degree of elevation above the operator.

In general, the Galil system is well-executed, and a fine example of the qualities one should look for in a modern assault rifle. It stands as testimony to the brilliance of Israel Galili as a military small-arms designer and is, without doubt, his crowning achievement to date. That it is not perfect is simply an axiom which has held since the invention of gunpowder and will lead to the continued evolution of military small arms. The Galil's important position in the history of such matters is secure.

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 29-Sep-2004 at 18:08

 

 

source:http://www.rt66.com/~korteng/SmallArms/m1carbin.htm

 

 

M1 Carbine

M1 and M1A1 .30 Caliber Carbines

Different View

M2 & M3 Carbines

Operation: M1, M1A1 Semiautomatic; M2, M3 Selective
Length: 35.65 in. (905 mm)
Weight unloaded: 5 lb 7 oz (2.48 kg)
Barrel: 18 in. 4 grooves, right hand twist
Magazine: 15 or 30 round detachable box
Muzzle: velocity 1990 fps, 967 ft-lbs.
Rate of Fire: M2 on full auto, 650-700rpm
300 yds: 1035 fps, 262 ft-lbs
Ammunition: 108 gr bullet, 13 gr charge, US Service M1
Effective Range: 300 yds
Rear Sites

The M1 Garand was the weapon of choice for infantry. The M1 Carbine, half the weight and with a less powerful cartridge, was the weapon of choice for support troops, and others not primarily involved in infantry combat. It was designed to meet combat needs less demanding than the M1 Rifle, but more than can be met by the M1911A1 pistol. It was more convenient to use than the M1, and less intrusive to their other duties, while still much more effective than hand guns.

Originally, the M1 was to be capable of selective fire control, but this was dropped. Because a demand arose for an automatic capability, the
M2 was developed, with a selective-fire switch added to the left side of the receiver, operating on the sear mechanism.

The US Carbine, Caliber .30in,
M3, or T3, was simply an M2 with suitable mountings prepared on the receiver to take various models of infra-red night-sighting devices. No open or conventional sights were provided, and the IR carbine mounted an M3 flash hider, a simpler design than that for the M1C Garand. The M3 carbine, (its development title was T3), was produced in limited numbers as a semi-prototype. Only about 2100 were manufactured compared to 5,510,000 M1 carbines, 150,000 M1A1 carbines and 570,000 M2 carbines.

The M1 and M2 Carbines were also much more powerful than the
Russian type burp guns used by the North Koreans and, later, the Chinese, having more than twice their muzzle energy.

In the infantry, the M2 Carbine was carried by Staff NCOs and officers. With its 30 round magazine, rapid fire and greater stopping power, it was an effective counter to the various submachine guns used by the Communists in the Korean War.

In intense cold, however, such as the Chosin battle, light weapons such as the carbine and air-cooled .30 calibre
light machine guns malfunctioned much more often than the M1 and the water-cooled heavies, with anti-freeze in their jackets. The Marines used alcohol based hair tonic as anti-freeze lubricants for all light weapons, with good success, but the carbine components were small and fragile, and repeatedly malfunctioned.

The Carbine continued to be used in Viet Nam, until replaced by the M16.

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 30-Sep-2004 at 13:11

 

 

M3A1 Grease Gun with 30 Round Magazine
M3A1 Grease Gun with 30 Round Magazine
The weapon's compact size makes it ideal for use inside tanks, and it remains an issue weapon even today


Operation Fully Automatic, Blowback
Caliber .45 (11.4 mm)
Muzzle velocity 280 mps (920 fps)
Ammunition .45 ACP, 230 gr bullet, 5 gr charge
Capacity 30-round detachable box magazine
Weight 8 lbs
Overall length 2ft 5.8in, stock extended
1ft 10.8in, stock retracted
Rate of fire 350-450 rpm
Effective range 50m (55yds)


Adoption of the M3/M3A1 relegated the Thompson submachine gun to "Limited Standard" or "Substitute Standard."
The widespread use of the Thompson was due mainly to the fact that it was the only allied submachine gun in mass production at the beginning of WWII. It had several weaknesses; e.g. weight and control. The Sten, for example, which was of stamped and welded metal construction and finished with a paint-like coating, scored higher than the Thompson when such things as simplicity, accuracy, weight and reliability were measured.

The .45 caliber M3/M3A1 are far easier to manufacture than the Thompson, and have a number of excellent design features in addition. The low cyclical rate of fire makes the gun easier to control than most submachine guns, not only the Thompson. The weapon's straight line of recoil thrust also adds substantially in controlling the gun in automatic fire. The gun's loose tolerances allow for reliable operation even if very dirty and, with its bolt and guide rod design make it more reliable than the Thompson under adverse conditions.

The M3/M3A1 is only capable of fully automatic operation; however, with its slow rate of fire, an experienced shooter can squeeze off single rounds.

M3A1 Grease Gun

The following additional information is courtesy of Bob Caulkins

"I carried a grease gun in Vietnam while I served with the First Marine Division (66-68). There are a several of neat things about the gun that don't appear in the description and I'd like to tell you about them. The gun had a built-in oiler in the base of the grip. After turning the gun over, the knob seen in the illustration is unscrewed revealing an oil reservoir and an oil applicator. The wire stock was a masterpiece of American ingenuity. It was a wrench for removing the barrel, the barrel had two grooves machined into it into which the wire stock was placed and then turned to loosen the barrel. One of the stock rods was threaded at the forward end to take a bore brush and drilled out to take a cleaning patch, and finally, there was a small "L" shaped piece of steel welded to the butt of the stock, as seen in the illustration, that functioned as a magazine loader. Trying to thumb load 30 rounds into the mag was a chore. This twenty-eight dollar, or so, piece of stamped, welded and machined metal was a beauty, on the several occasions when I needed it, it never failed me. "
Among the different types of submachine guns used by the Chinese Communist forces during the first year of the Korea War was their .45 cal Type 36 copy of the M3A1
The M3A1 is still in use in our armed forces today. Not a bad record for a gun that hasn't been manufactured for over 40 years!

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Oct-2004 at 00:56

 

 

The Uzi sub-machine gun continues to sell well, having proved its dependability and effectiveness. This lightweight IMI product now addresses three distinct markets: military, law-enforcement, and sporting. In the latter case, the Uzi is semiautomatic only, has a longer barrel and a fixed stock.

Click to enlarge



Models

Uzi SMG

Mini Uzi SMG

Micro Uzi SMG

Uzi Pistol

Ammunition

9mm Parabellum

Operation

Blowback, firing from open bolt position (OBP)

Blowback, firing from closed bolt position (CBP) or OBP

Blowback firing from CBP

Mode of firing

Semi- automatic, Automatic

Semi-automatic

Magazine capacity

20, 25, 32

Rifling

4 grooves, 1 turn in 254 mm

Twist 1 turn in: (mm)

254

Muzzle velocity (m/sec)

400

375

350

345

Rate of fire (rd./min.)

600

CB-1700, OB-950

1700

-

Weight (gr.)

W/o magazine

3500

2650

2000

1700

Empty magazine 25 rd.

200

Loaded magazine 25 rd.

500

Dimensions (mm)

Overall length

650

600

486

240

With stock folded

470

360

282

-

Barrel length

260

197

134

115

Sights

Front

Post

Rear

Aperture "L" flip type

Aperture

"U" notch

Sightline radius (mm)

310

230

180

 

The UZI came about during the 1950s in Israels primitive economy and arms industry.  Ironically, it emerged from this setting as one of the most robust submachine guns ever developed, due to a ruthless design contest and a bit of genius.

1930s PALESTINE

Israeli arms manufacturing began under disorganized and illegal conditions in secret underground workshops.  These homemade guns varied in quality and ingenuity, and most of their designs were bizarre.  For example, the Dubigun was an intimidating 12-gauge "carbine" having a six-round drum magazine, but it was often more dangerous to its operator than its target.

MID 1940s

The Israelis were making an unlicensed copy of the 9mm MK II Sten.   They had to build this gun from poor quality materials, and the barreltaken and rebored from old hunting rifleswas the only component made of steel.  The Sten clone left a lot to be desired in accuracy and reliability.

EARLY 1950s

Israel and its hostile neighbors were involved in a series of artillery strikes and nighttime border raids.  Although equipped with inferior artillery, the Israeli infantry was better trained at night fighting.  In this close-in and dirty type of warfare, the submachine gun proved to be the ideal weapon with its portability and high rate of fire.  Due to unreliable weapons, however, it soon became paramount that the nighttime Israeli paratroopers had something better to work with.  In short, the Israeli army was tired of submachine guns that blew up and always jammed at the wrong time.  After finding nothing on the market that met their requirements, they decided to build a submachine gun from scratch.  The new weapon had be compact, reliable and robust enough to take a lot of punishment, and accurate enough to dish it out.

A BITTER CONTEST

The Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) commissioned two local designers to independently develop weapons that would meet their needs, both named after their creators.  The first was a fairly traditional-looking gun designed by Major Chaim Kara, head of the IDFs Science Corps light weapons division.  The second gun was developed by a local youngster who was moving rapidly up through the ranks and who seemed to possess a genius for weapons designUziel Gal.  Both designs were further refined to meet the sophisticated demands of the IDF, especially the Kara.   In 1951, the rival guns were submitted to the army for competitive testing.

Both guns utilized a wrap-around bolt and blowback action, which reduces the overall weapon size to achieve compactness.  This type of bolt is common today, but was innovative in the 1950s.  The precision 9mm Kara had only eight main parts, making it easy to field strip.  However, since it was built to very fine tolerances, it was expensive to manufacture and could not tolerate Middle Eastern sand and dust without jamming.

Even in its crude initial version, the 9mm UZI was a gun of the next generation.  It was simple, robust and inexpensive to build, due to a large amount of stamped steel in its construction.  It also employed wider tolerances than the Kara, making it more suitable for operation in desert sands.  The UZI focused on functionality and elegance of design, rather than workmanship.  It was a compact weapon, initially equipped with a 30-round magazine, and later with either a 25- or 32-round magazine.

The UZI has become famous for an important ergonomic feature, the location of the magazine housing inside the pistol grip.  This was the result of Uziel Gals consideration of tired, fumbling soldiers trying to reload their magazines in the dark.  He reasoned that the quickest and most trouble-free way to insert a magazine would be to simply bring the two hands together, which can be done without much dexterity or focus (the "fist finds fist" principle).  The Karas later prototypes copied this feature, but it was insufficient to sway the contest.

The UZI had other advantages as well.  Unlike most submachine guns, it was almost impossible to accidentally misfire if mishandled or dropped, due to a substantial safety release on the back of the pistol grip that must be squeezed as the trigger is pulled in order to fire.  The gun also had a small number of parts, making it easy to strip and reassemble.  The limited recoil and climb even enabled it to be fired one-handed.

After twelve Karas and five UZIs were placed on rigorous trial in 1951, the UZI emerged as the winner because of its ability to tolerate dust and grit without jamming, as well as its ease and low cost of manufacture.

FURTHER DEVELOPMENT

From 1951 until 1955 some eighty preproduction UZIs were issued to selected units for field testing.  After further refinement, the UZI we know today emerged in 1955 and was put into service.  In the Suez War of 1956 the gun proved its reliability and began a long, successful career.  Further enhancements were added during service, such as a new folding metal stock that replaced the older fixed wooden stock in 1967.  The weapon was also licensed to be produced by FN, the renowned Belgian weapons company.

As time went on, the demand for an even more compact model increased, and in 1980 the Mini-UZI was adopted.  With all the power of the original, the rugged Mini was simply a smaller package (also having a folding metal stock), mainly used by covert special forces.  From there, the UZI continued its shrinking act and soon the UZI pistol (or Micro-UZI) emerged as a miniature lightweight version.  Also, in 1980 the semi-auto UZI was introduced.

The UZI probably reached its height of acceptance in the U.S. during the attempted assassination of President Reagan in 1981.  Secret Service agents used them in this incident to subdue the would-be assassin, John Hinckley Jr.

The UZI and its variants have been in service in at least 26 countries, and have been produced by seven manufacturers around the world.  Although replaced in military front-line service by more powerful assault rifles, the UZI remains in use by the police and soldiers in non-combat roles.  The guns merits will ensure its use for a long time to come.  The legendary Uziel Gal also remains on the scene (having also designed the Galil assault rifle) with his latest work reflected in the design of the Ruger MP9 subgun.

ss_uzi.jpg 56233 bytes

Secret Service agent armed with full-auto UZI ready for action seconds after attempted assassination of Pres. Reagan in 1981.

 

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Oct-2004 at 15:44

 

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/FG42

FG42

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

The Fallschirmjgergewehr 42 (FG42) was a fully-automatic rifle produced by Germany during World War II.

The Fallschirmjagergewehr 42, shown with magazine and detachable bayonet. Early versions included a bipod.

Like its counterpart, the Sturmgewehr 44, The FG42 was a revolutionary new weapon that might have influenced the outcome of World War II if it had been produced earlier and in sufficient numbers. With production never reaching five figures its effect was inconsequential, but it influenced many firearm designs for years to come.

Contents < =text/> // [hide]

Early Development

The Fallschirmjagergewehr 42 was first developed amidst the internal rivalries of the Third Reich. After the inception of the G41 and G43 semi-automatic rifles into use by the German army (Heer) and the Waffen SS, Hermann Gring (then the commander of all Luftwaffe forces) insisted that his Fallschirmjger (paratroopers) and base guards would be supplied with an even more advanced self-loading rifle. Requirements were strict - it had to be light enough for the individual paratrooper to carry with him on the drop. It also had to incorporate full automatic fire, and serve the role of a sniper rifle when needed. Engineers and scientists went to work, and soon developed the weapon. Six manufacturers were given contracts to produce the gun. The result was a beautiful, efficient, and unmistakeable weapon that was well-received by the paratroopers for which it was intended. Firing the standard-issue 7.92x57mm Mauser round, it packed a powerful punch. The FG42 had a 20-round side-mounted magazine that gave it its distinctive appearance. It also incorporated a revolutionary design feature that came as a mixed blessing to field troops. When it was fired in semi-automatic mode, it fired from a traditional closed-bolt position. When fired on full-auto, it fired from an open bolt. All FG42 rifles were also equipped with high-powered rifle scopes. Altogether, it was a good design for a rifle, and it was ready for issue at the front.

Field Testing

However promising the weapon was, it did have its drawbacks. The side-mounted magazine was common in many weapons of the era, but it was found to significantly unbalance the FG42. In addition, the recoil produced by the heavy rifle round when set to full-automatic fire was substantial. Furthermore, a large ball of flame was produced on each shot, so it would not serve well as any sort of a sniper rifle.

However, everyone agreed on the chief problem of the weapon. Steps had been made within Germany to cut back on weapon production times. Mass-production of weapons such as Karabiner 98k rifles, MP40 sub-machine guns, and MG42 heavy machine guns was in full swing. The FG42, with its finely machined parts, was far too costly to produce in quantity.

By the time the FG42 Mark II was developed, the war had significantly changed for the worse. Frequent allied bombing raids had crippled German industry, and the only weapons that could be produced were made out of second-rate materials and were subject to poor production methods. The FG42 was perfected too late to alter the course of the war. In all, only about 7000 of them were produced, and very few of them ever found their way into the hands of troops. But the ideas behind the FG42 were not so quick to die off.

Descendants of the FG42

Numerous features, including the in-line design, the pistol grip, and the gas-operated bolt selection process were studied extensively by Army engineers after the war. Ultimately, this resulted in weapons such as the American M60 machine gun. Numerous other examples exist, all attesting to the engineering genius of German arms manufacturers.

Statistics

  • Weapon Type: Assault Rifle
  • Country: Germany
  • Caliber: 7.92x57mm Mauser
  • Weight: 4.5 kg (9.92 lb)
  • Length: 94 cm (37 in)
  • Magazine Capacity: 20 rounds
  • Cyclic Rate: 750 rounds per minute
  • Muzzle Velocity: 762 m/s (2500 ft/s)
  • Effective Range: 550 meters (601.5 yards)
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Oct-2004 at 15:59
those are two of my all-time favourites!
Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Oct-2004 at 18:07

source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MG42

 

MG42

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Enlarge

The Maschinengewehr 1942, or MG42, is a German machine gun, first manufactured in 1942 as the successor to the MG34. During World War II, the MG42 had the fastest rate of fire of any weapon, at 1500 rounds per minute (up to 1800). At this rate it becomes impossible for the human ear to discern the sound of individual bullets being fired, and thus when in use the gun makes a sound described both as "ripping cloth" and "Hitler's Buzzsaw". The gun was sometimes called a "Spandau" after the suburb of Berlin where they were produced. During the war, over 400,000 were manufactured.

In the late 1930s the MG34 was arguably the best machine gun in the world at the time, but was expensive and time consuming to construct. In order to arm the increasingly large German army, an effort was started to build a simpler gun that could be built much faster. The winning design was offered by a newcommer to the contest, Metall-und-Lackierwarenfabrik Johannes Grossfuss AG, experts in pressed and punched steel parts. Their efforts resulted in a dramatic reduction in complexity it took 75 man-hours to complete the new gun as opposed to 150 for the MG34, and cost 250 RM as opposed to 327 RM.

The resulting MG39 remained largely similar to the earlier MG34, a deliberate decision made in order to maintain familiarity. The only major change from the gunner's perspective was dropping the drum-feed options, leaving it with belts only, and the further increase in the rate of fire. Although made of "cheap" parts, the prototypes also proved to be considerably more rugged and resistant to jamming than the somewhat temperamental MG34

Given the success of the prototype, it is somewhat mysterious that the gun did not enter production until 1942, thereby requiring a renaming to MG42. As soon as it was introduced it garnered intense demand by field units, a demand that German industry was never able to meet.

The MG42 weighed 11.6 kg in the light machine gun role with the bipod, lighter than the MG34 and easily portable. The bipod, the same one used on the MG34, could be mounted to the front or the center of the gun depending on where it was being used. In the role as a heavy machine gun it utilised a newly developed Lafette 42 tripod that weighed 20.5 kg on its own. The barrel was lighter than the MG34s and wore out more quickly, but could be replaced in seconds by an experienced gunner.

In 1944 the acute material shortages of the Third Reich led to a newer version, the MG45 (or MG42V), which used steel of lesser quality, reduced weight to only 9 kg, and yet further improved the maximum rate of fire. First tests were undertaken in June 1944, but development dragged on and eventually only ten were ever built. The MG42V had some influence in the postwar development of roller-delayed blowback, as in Heckler und Koch small arms.

Even today the MG42 is still regarded by many experts as the best machine gun ever. The MG42, with minor modifications, is still the primary heavy machine gun of the modern German army, now called the MG3. A number of other armies around the world have adopted versions of the original, and guns looking similar, or identical, to the MG42 remain in widespread service today. The US Army's M60 is based upon the FG-42 paratrooper rifle (Fallschirmjaegergewehr) and the belt feed machanism of the MG42.

Statistics

  • Caliber: 7.92mm x 57mm
  • Load: continuous belt feed and drum
  • Action: Fully-Automatic (a good shot can give single fire), Air Cooled
  • Rate of Fire: 1500rpm (to 1800rpm without Recoil Booster (Rueckstossverstaerker) the fire is then not correct)
  • Weight: 25.5lbs
  • Changes parts: barrel in 5 to 8 seconds, barrel and lock in 25 to 28 seconds.
Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Oct-2004 at 18:10

source:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MG34

 

MG34

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

thumb
Enlarge
thumb

The Maschinengewehr 34, or MG34, was a German machine gun first issued in 1934, considered by many to be the first modern general-purpose machine gun. It was used as the primary infantry machine gun during the 1930s, and remained as the primary tank and aircraft defensive weapon. It was intended that it would be replaced in infantry service by the related MG42, but there were never enough of the new design to go around, and MG34s soldiered on in all roles until the end of World War II.

The MG34 was designed primarily by Heinrich Vollmer from Mauser Werke, based on the recently introduced Rheinmetall designed Solothurn 1930 (MG30) that was starting to enter service in Switzerland. The principle changes were to move the feed mechanism to a more convenient location on the left of the breech, and the addition of a shroud around the barrel. Changes to the operating mechanism improved the rate of fire to between 800 and 900 RPM.

The MG34 could use both magazine-fed and belt-fed 7.92mm ammunition. Belts were supplied in 50-round single strips or 250-round boxes. The drums held either 50 rounds in the standard version, or 75 in the "double drum" version. Early guns had to be modified to use the drums by replacing a part on the gun, but this modification was later supplied from the factory.

In the light machine gun role it was used with a bipod and weighed only 12.1 kg, considerably less than other machine guns of the era. In the medium machine gun role it could be mounted on one of two tripods, a smaller one weighing 6.75 kg, the larger 23.6 kg. The larger included a number of features making it useful for a number of roles. The legs could be extended to allow it to be used in the anti-aircraft role (and many were), and when lowered it could be placed to allow the gun to be fired "remotely" while it swept an arc in front of the mounting with fire, or aimed through a periscope attached to the tripod.

The new gun was accepted for service almost immediately and was generally liked by the troops. It was used to great effect by German soldiers assisting the fascists in the Spanish Civil War. At the time it was considerably more advanced than guns being used by other forces (with the exception of the MG30), both in terms of rate of fire, and in being easily man portable by a single gunner. However the MG34 was also very expensive, both in terms of construction and the raw materials needed (49 kg of steel) and it was unable to be built in the sorts of numbers required for the ever expanding German army. It also proved to be rather temperamental, jamming easily when dirty.

By the late 1930s an effort had started to simplify the MG34, leading to the MG42. The MG42's square barrel cover made it unsuitable for use in tank cupolas however, and the MG34 remained in production until the end of the war for this role.

The MG34 was also used as the basis of a new aircraft gun, the MG81. For this role the breech was slightly modified to allow feeds from either side, and in one version two guns were bolted together on a single trigger to form a weapon known as the MG81Z (for zwilling, twin in German). Production of the MG34 was never enough to satisfy any of its users, and while the MG81 was a huge improvement over the earlier MG30-based MG15 and MG17, those guns could be still found in use until the end of the war.

Statistics

  • Caliber: 7.92mm
  • Load: continuous belt feed / 75-round beltless saddle drum
  • Action: select fire, air cooled
  • Rate of Fire: 800-900rpm
  • Weight: 26.7 lbs
Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Oct-2004 at 01:43

 

source: http://www.firstworldwar.com/weaponry/machineguns.htm

 

Vickers machine gunWeapons of War: Machine Guns
Updated - Saturday, 3 May, 2003

The machine gun, which so came to dominate and even to personify the battlefields of World War One, was a fairly primitive device when general war began in August 1914.  Machine guns of all armies were largely of the heavy variety and decidedly ill-suited to portability for use by rapidly advancing infantry troops.  Each weighed somewhere in the 30kg-60kg range - often without their mountings, carriages and supplies.

The Machine Gun in 1914

The 1914 machine gun, usually positioned on a flat tripod, would require a gun crew of four to six operators.  In theory they could fire 400-600 small-calibre rounds per minute, a figure that was to more than double by the war's end, with rounds fed via a fabric belt or a metal strip.

The reality however was that these early machine guns would rapidly overheat and become inoperative without the aid of cooling mechanisms; they were consequently fired in short rather than sustained bursts.  Cooling generally took one of two forms: water cooled and, increasingly as the war developed, air cooled.  Water jackets would provided for the former (which held around one gallon of liquid) and air vents would be built into the machine gun for the latter.

Water cooled machine guns would still overheat relatively quickly (sometimes within two minutes), with the consequence that large supplies of water would need to be on hand in the heat of a battle - and, when these ran out, it was not unknown for a machine gun crew to solve the problem by urinating into the jacket.

Russian machine gun teamWhether air or water cooled, machine guns still jammed frequently, especially in hot conditions or when used by inexperienced operators.

Consequently machine guns would often be grouped together to maintain a constant defensive position.

Estimates of their equivalent, accurate, rifle firepower varied, with some estimating a single machine gun to be worth as many as 60-100 rifles: a more consensual figure is around 80, still an impressively high figure.

British Army Rejection

High enough indeed to make the British army's dismissal of the potential worth of the device in the early 1900s all the more difficult to understand.  Hiram Maxim, who designed the machine gun which bore his name in 1884, first offered use of the machine to Britain.  Although rapid-firing weapons, such as the 0.50-inch calibre Gatling Gun (invented in 1862), existed many years prior to Maxim's invention, all required some form of manual intervention, e.g. hand cranking.

Unfortunately for Maxim the British army high command could see no real use for the oil-cooled machine gun he demonstrated to them in 1885; other officers even regarded the weapon as an improper form of warfare.

Not so the German army which quickly produced a version of Maxim's invention (the Maschinengewehr 08) in large quantities at a Spandau arsenal; by the time war broke out in August 1914 the Germans had 12,000 at their disposal, a number which eventually ballooned to 100,000.

In contrast the British and French had access to a mere few hundred equivalents when war began.

Simple Design

British machine gunners in captured German second line trench at CambraiIn designing his machine gun, Hiram Maxim utilised a simple concept.

The gas produced by the explosion of powder in each machine gun cartridge created a recoil which served to continuously operate the machine gun mechanism.  No external power was needed.  His initial design, which was water cooled and belt fed, allowed for a theoretical rate of fire of up to 600 rounds per minute (half that number in practice).  It was heavy however, weighing in at 62kg.

German Enthusiasm

As already noted the Germans quickly grasped the potential importance of machine guns on the battlefield.  From the outset the German army demonstrated the value of the machine gun by creating separate machine gun companies to support infantry battalions.

The British however did not create their Machine Gun Corps until October 1915; until this time the few machine guns available were attached in sections to individual battalions.  A mere two guns were allocated to each infantry battalion in 1914.

Superiority of Defensive Warfare Technology

When established in fixed strong-points sited specifically to cover potential enemy attack routes, the machine gun proved a fearsome defensive weapon.  Enemy infantry assaults upon such positions invariably proved highly costly.

Belgian machine gunners setting up in beet field near LebbekeThe French in particular found to their cost that the technology of defensive warfare was more advanced than that of offensive warfare.  The French pre-war military blueprint, Plan XVII, was founded upon a fundamental assumption of an 'offensive spirit', one which envisaged a rapid war of movement.

Early commanders, such as Charles Lanrezac, were dismissed for apparent failures in their implementation of the offensive spirit.  Time was to vindicate Lanrezac's doubts.

The British similarly found to their repeated cost the futility of massed infantry attacks against well-entrenched defensive positions protected by machine gun cover.  The first day of the Somme Offensive amply illustrated this, although the lesson appeared to be lost to the British high command.  On the opening day of the offensive the British suffered a record number of single day casualties, 60,000, the great majority lost under withering machine gun fire.

The Machine Gun as an Offensive Weapon

Understandably most historical accounts of the First World War have tended to emphasise the defensive strengths of the machine gun.  Throughout the war efforts were made to produce an infantry assault version, such as the Lewis Light Machine Gun, although these efforts were generally unsatisfactory.

Although lighter at around 12kg they were still considered too heavy and bulky for rapidly advancing infantry.  Attempts to transport light machine guns by wheeled carriages or pack animals were ultimately unsuccessful: the infantry invariably outpaced such methods.

By 1918 however one-man portable machine guns (including the formidable Bergmann MP18 submachine gun) were put to some use (each weighing 9-14kg), although maintaining sufficient ammunition supplies remained a difficulty.

German machine gun trenchAlthough often not truly portable light machine guns were more readily transported on roads or flat ground by armoured cars.

As the war developed machine guns were adapted for use on tanks on broken ground, particularly on the Western Front (where the majority of machine guns were deployed).

Light machine guns were adopted too for incorporation into aircraft from 1915 onwards, for example the Vickers, particularly with the German adoption of interrupter equipment, which enabled the pilot to fire the gun through the aircraft's propeller blades.

In response to the increasing success of machine guns mounted on aircraft it was perhaps inevitable that machine guns should similarly be developed as anti-aircraft devices (in France and Italy), sometimes mounted on vehicles.  Similarly machine guns began to be added to warships as a useful addition to naval armaments.

For more information on specific models follow the links below:

Hiram Maxim, Inventor of Machine Gun
 
Benet-Mercie (Hotchkiss), French
Bergmann MB 15 nA, German
Bergmann MP18, German
Browning, U.S.
Browning Automatic Rifle (BAR), U.S.
Chauchat, French
Colt-Browning, U.S.
Fiat-Revelli, Italian
Hotchkiss, French
Lewis, U.S.
Madsen, Denmark
Marlin, U.S.
Maschinengewehr, Germany
Maxim, Germany
Parabellum, Germany
Pulemyot Maxima, Russia
Schwarzlose, Austria-Hungary
Spandau, Germany
St Etienne, France
Vickers, British
Villar Perosa, Italian

Photographs courtesy of Photos of the Great War website.

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Oct-2004 at 15:30

 

source: http://rds.yahoo.com/S=2766679/K=French+Mat+submachine+gun/v =2/SID=e/TID=H037_131/l=WS1/R=1/H=0/IPC=us/SHE=0/SIG=1374qg0 30/*-http%3A//www.wwiitechpubs.info/barrack/inf-francaise/in f-fr-smg-mas-1935/inf-fr-smg-mas-1935-br.html

Mitraillette MAS modle 38 Submachine Gun

Written by
Justin Riggir

hapes="_x0000_i1036">

Country of Origin:

France

Manufacturer:

Manufacture d'Armes de St. Etienne

Role:

Submachine Gun

Operated by:

France, Germany

In Service:

1939

Number Built:

Unknown

[ Top of Page | Feedback ]

Overview

The French submachine gun in service during World War II was the Mitraillette MAS modle 38 (MAS Model 38 Submachine Gun).  This weapon was developed as the MAS 38 - by which moniker it would continue to be known - by the Manufacture d'Armes de St. Etienne (MAS), and had evolved from the experimental MAS 35.

The unusual looking weapon has a peculiarly bent look to it because the receiver and butt diverge in alignment from the axis of the barrel by several degrees.  In order to make the weapon compact, MAS designed the bolt to recoil inside a tube contained within the butt.  As the butt had to drop to allow a natural aiming stance, the receiver also had to be realigned.  This meant that the bolt approached the breech at an angle and to let it close evenly on the cartridge, the face of the bolt was cut obliquely.  The safety catch was also unusual; to lock the bolt in either the forward or rear position, the trigger was pushed forward.

The French accepted the MAS 38 in 1938, but production did not begin until 1939.  The first batch was delivered to the Gardes mobiles (National Guard) rather than the army.

The MAS 38 was a sound design machined from solid metal, and had a reputation for accuracy.  It also had a reputation for ineffectiveness.  It chambered the 7.65-mm (0.301-in) longue (long) French Service Auto cartridge (developed for the mle 1935 pistol) which was only marginally capable as a combat round.  With time, the MAS 38 may have been reworked to accept harder-hitting ammunition.

Time, unfortunately, was not on the MAS 38s side.  The Germans took over the St. Etienne plant just as the gun was entering large-scale production for the French Army.  The Germans continued and supervised production for their own armed forces and supplied some to the Vichy French. In German service the weapon was known as 7.65 mm MP722(f).

French police forces continued to use the MAS 38 after the war until the MAT 49 submachine gun replaced it in the 1950s.

[ Top of Page | Feedback ]

Specifications

Caliber/cartridge

7.65-mm (0.301-in) longue

Type of feed

32-round box magazine

Overall length

623 mm (24.53 in)

Length of barrel

224 mm (8.82 in)

Weight

2.87 kg (6.33 lb)

Muzzle velocity

350 m/sec (1,148 ft/sec)

Rate of fire (cyclic)

600-700 rpm

Back to Top
Jalisco Lancer View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 07-Aug-2004
Location: Mexico
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2112
  Quote Jalisco Lancer Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Nov-2004 at 10:49

 

 

http://www.urban-armory.com/diagrams/spng1903.htmchemas-microsoft-comfficeffice" />>>

>

The chemas-microsoft-comfficemarttags" />t="on">Springfield 1903 rifle (more formally the t="on">United States Rifle, Caliber .30, Model 1903) was the rifle issued to United States troops during the First World War. It saw service throughout most of the first half of the twentieth century, but due to the slow bolt action operation of this rifle, it was replaced during World War II with the M1 Garand, which was of a preferred semi-automatic nature.>>

Contents < =text/> // [showhide] >>

1 History>>

2 Specifications>>

3 See also>>

4 References>>

[edit]>>

History>>

The rifle was developed due to observations of actions during the Spanish American War, in which Spanish troops were armed with German Mauser Model 93 rifles, which were deemed far superior to the U.S. Krag-Jrgensen rifles, in large part due to their durable internal magazines. Work began on creating a rifle comparable to the Mauser, and a prototype was produced in 1900, going into production in 1903, thus gaining its nomenclature.>>

By January 1905 over 80,000 of these rifles had been produced at the federally-owned Springfield Armory. However, President Theodore Roosevelt objected to the design of the bayonet used (a rod-type) as being too flimsy for combat. All the rifles to that point consequently had to be re-tooled for a knife-type bayonet, called the Model 1905.>>

The retooling gave an opportunity to incorporate improvements discovered during experimentation in the interim, most notably the use of German-style pointed ammunition. The American version of these rounds which were used in the t="on">lace wt="on">Springfieldlace> were designated "Cartridge, Ball, Caliber .30, Model of 1906"; this is the famous .30-'06 ammunition used in countless small arms to the present day. The rifle's sights were redone to compensate for the speed and trajectory of the new cartridges.>>

Additionally, tests revealed that the design was effective with a short, "cavalry-style" barrel of 24 inches in length, so the decision was made to issue shorter rifles to the infantry as well, an innovation during a time when long rifles for infantry were the norm.>>

As a whole, these changes led to a vastly efficient and deadly shoulder arm. Some dubbed it the "weapon of the silent death," since a person could be struck by its bullet before ever hearing the weapon's report.>>

By the time of t="on">lace wt="on">U.S.lace> entry into World War I, 843,239 of these rifles had been produced; however the demands of the war spurred the production of an additional 265,620. Similarities to the German Mauser were so numerous that the t="on">lace wt="on">U.S.lace> government was compelled, until World War I, to pay royalties to Mauserwerke. A settlement was reached after the armistice.>>

After the end of World War I, several thousand unserviceable t="on">Springfield rifles were collected from the field and re-assembled from their interchangeable parts, some at ordnance depots in France, others stateside.>>

World War II saw another jump in production of the t="on">lace wt="on">Springfieldlace>, with manufacturing taking place at the Rock Island Arsenal and by private manufacturer Remington Arms, in addition to the Springfield Armory. It was produced as the M1903A3, a variant of the 1903A1 simplified for mass-production. The most noticeable difference in this revision was the replacement of the collapsable rear sight mounted to the top stock, with a smaller, simpler rear sight mounted near the bolt assembly. Indentations on the sides of the lower stock were also omitted.>>

The rifle was used by the t="on">lace wt="on">U.S.lace> military only in the opening years of the war, however, before being phased out in favor of the M1 Garand. It remained in service for snipers (using the M1903A4) and grenadiers (using the M1 rifle grenade launcher). It should be noted that the M1903A4 could only be reloaded one bullet at a time, due to the scope preventing easy changing of the magazine.>>

Due to its balance, it is still popular with various military drill teams and color guards.>>

[edit]>>

Specifications>>

The Springfield rifle model 1903 was 1.0976 meters long and weighed 3.95 kilograms. A bayonet could be attached to the tip. The bayonet blade was 40.6cm long and weighed 0.45kg. During World War I the rifle fired the .30-caliber model 1906 cartridge. There were four standard types of cartridge:>>

  • Ball cartridge consisted of a brass case or shell, primer, a charge of smokeless powder, and the bullet. The bullet had a sharp point called a spitzer bullet, and was composed of a lead core and a jacket of cupro nickel, and weighed 150 grains. The bullet of this cartridge, when fired from the rifle, had an initial velocity of 823 meters per second. >>
  • Blank cartridge contained a paper cup instead of a bullet. It is dangerous up to 30 meters. >>
  • Guard cartridge had a smaller charge of powder than the ball cartridge, and five cannelures encircle the body of the shell at about the middle to distinguish it from ball catridges. It was intended for use on guard or in riot duty, and it gave good results up to 180 meters. The range of 90 meters required a sight elevation of 410 meters, and the range of 180 meters required an elevation of 590 meters. >>
  • Dummy Cartridge this was tin plated and the shell was provided with six longitudinal corrugations and three circular holes. The primer contains no percussion composition. It was intended for drill purposes to accustom the soldier to the operation of loading the rifle. >>

The rifle was sighted for 2,286 meters and had a point-blank range of 500 meters. The maximum range of the ball cartridge, when elevated at an angle of 45, was 4.47km.>>

The rifle was a clip loader and could fire at a rate of 20 shots per minute. Each clip contained 5 cartridges, and standard issue consisted of 12 clips carried in a cloth bandolier. When full the bandolier weighed about 1.76 kilograms. Bandoliers were packed 20 in a box, for a total of 1,200 rounds. The full box weighed 45 kilograms.>>

The following table gives the approximate maximum penetration in various materials.>>

Penetration of a Rifle Bullet.>>

Material>>

At 180 meters.>>

At 550 meters.>>

Commercial steel>>

0.76 cm>>

0.25 cm>>

One-inch broken stone, gravel>>

12.2 cm>>

10.9 cm>>

Hard coal between 1-inch boards>>

23 cm>>

18 cm>>

Brick masonry, cement>>

5.6 cm>>

3.0 cm>>

Brick masonry, lime>>

6.1 cm>>

3.0 cm>>

Sand, dry>>

23 cm>>

31 cm>>

Concrete, 1-3-5>>

7.6 cm>>

5.1 cm>>

Oak>>

69 cm>>

30 cm>>

Sand, wet>>

38 cm>>

33 cm>>

Pine>>

66 cm>>

30 cm>>

Earth, loam>>

51 cm>>

41 cm>>

Grease clay>>

152 cm>>

81 cm>>

For single shot, 150 rounds concentrated at one spot will break a 23cm wall of Brick masonry at 180 meters.>>

The smooth bore of the rifle is 7.62mm in diameter. It was then rifled 0.1mm deep, making the diameter from the bottom of one groove to the bottom of the opposite groove 7.82mm of the barrel.>>

The rifle included a leaf that could be used to adjust for range. When the leaf was set down, the battle sight appeared on top. This sight was set for 500 meters and was not adjustable. When the leaf was ranged it had four sights. The extreme range sight at the top of the sight was set for 2.60km and was seldom used.>>

The open sight at the upper edge of the drift sight was adjustable from 1.28km to 2.51km. The open sight at the bottom of the triangular opening in the drift sight could be adjusted from 90 meters to 2.24km. The scales for the various ranges were listed on the sides of the leaf. On the right front end of the base of the sight is the windage screw. This could be used to adjust the wind guage, and each graduation was termed a "point".>>

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.125 seconds.