Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
gcle2003
King
Suspended
Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Atheist bus adverts could lead to watchdog ruling Posted: 13-Jan-2009 at 15:56 |
If it's a 'nice little upper' of course it serves a purpose: it cheers people up. Lots of people have found the whole thing amusing, which can only be good, unless you prefer people to be unhappy.
And if anything I was saying the key difference is not in meaning, but in effect. Effect is usually more important than meaning in advertising.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jan-2009 at 11:57 |
Personally I would disagree. An ad saying "don't worry", while a nice little upper, doesn't really serve any purpose. So what you're really saying is that the key difference is meaning. One, depending on your views, may have one. The other really lacks an objective or real meaning.
I do agree with eaglecap though, it is within their rights to say what they do, good taste or not.
|
|
gcle2003
King
Suspended
Joined: 06-Dec-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 7035
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jan-2009 at 10:59 |
Everybody seems to be overlooking the fact that these ads say 'Don't worry' whereas they are countering ads that say 'Be fearful'.
That seems to me to be rather more important than any message about the existence or otherwise of God.
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jan-2009 at 04:00 |
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim
Originally posted by CXI
I don't think the analogy with "drinking for sobriety" is a valid one,
but I do think the "fighting for freedom" is a valid one. For years now
non-evanglical people have done the opposite of the evangelicals:
nothing. Has it worked? No. If anything, zero response has emboldened
these evangelical groups to escalate their advertisements to the point
of publicly threatening commuters with becoming hell bound. |
It just occurred to me that the portion of the human brain that thought up these advertisements is exactly the same portion of the human brain that prompts Hamas to shoot rockets at Israel. Quite a different situation of course, but the reaction is analogous.
|
I agree with your analysis. The part of the brain you are looking for here is the amygdala, which is responsible for the fight/flight response an organism makes when it encounters a threat.
|
|
Omar al Hashim
King
Suspended
Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 13-Jan-2009 at 00:49 |
Originally posted by CXI
I don't think the analogy with "drinking for sobriety" is a valid one,
but I do think the "fighting for freedom" is a valid one. For years now
non-evanglical people have done the opposite of the evangelicals:
nothing. Has it worked? No. If anything, zero response has emboldened
these evangelical groups to escalate their advertisements to the point
of publicly threatening commuters with becoming hell bound. |
It just occurred to me that the portion of the human brain that thought up these advertisements is exactly the same portion of the human brain that prompts Hamas to shoot rockets at Israel. Quite a different situation of course, but the reaction is analogous.
|
|
eaglecap
Tsar
Retired AE Moderator
Joined: 15-Feb-2005
Location: ArizonaUSA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3959
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2009 at 20:23 |
Originally posted by Zagros
on god's existence."There's probably no god, now stop worrying and enjoy your life." will be plastered on busses across the country (originally it was only meant for London but generous donations from members of the public have turned it national).Technically, the slogan is an agnostic statement since it isn't definitive. Funny, if slightly pointless. Though I object to the religious fanatics who find it offensive since no one complains when they plaster their pointless AND unfunny slogans hither and thither or try to bnrainwash or emotionally blackmail you into their respective cults.More: http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/newstopics/religion/4177717/Atheist-bus-adverts-could-lead-to-watchdog-ruling-on-Gods-existence.html
|
I do not know about England but here in the USA that is called free speech and while I don't agree with these atheist it is their right to speak freely. I would suggest that any religious person who would get offended by this is insecure in his/her faith, whatever that would be.
I would defend the athiest to speak freely like I would Christians in the USA. or any group!!
Edited by eaglecap - 12-Jan-2009 at 20:25
|
Λοιπόν, αδελφοί και οι συμπολίτες και οι στρατιώτες, να θυμάστε αυτό ώστε μνημόσυνο σας, φήμη και ελευθερία σας θα ε
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 12-Jan-2009 at 05:06 |
Originally posted by Zaitsev
Yet this message isn't exactly going to stop them, especially if it DOES result in some negative press for Atheists. More likely it will result in a step up in Christian advertisements, which I also do not want to see as they're typically from far-right-wing evangelicals.
Regarding my previous analogy, are not Atheists producing annoying signs to counter annoying signs? Which in many ways is making them what they are complaining about, hence my reference to sayings such as 'drinking for sobriety' and the like.
|
I see your point, however, I still think the atheist advertisements in this case are both logical and pragmatic. It is possible the evangelicals will try to make more advertisements. But their organisation has finite financial resources, and can only drain their supporters of so much money. Additional financial strain is going to unbalance their organisation. It is more likely that the scale of the atheist advertisements will give them an idea of just how widely the general public in the UK is opposed to evangelical advertising. To continue to pour money into such a demographic would result in a poor return on investment (lots of money invested for minimal conversion numbers). It seems more likely that they would instead either invest their advertising money in other areas e.g. charity works, or simply reorient their unsolicited preaching to a new country. I don't think the analogy with "drinking for sobriety" is a valid one, but I do think the "fighting for freedom" is a valid one. For years now non-evanglical people have done the opposite of the evangelicals: nothing. Has it worked? No. If anything, zero response has emboldened these evangelical groups to escalate their advertisements to the point of publicly threatening commuters with becoming hell bound. When an army invades a nation, it will probably conquer it if it meets no opposition. Having met no substantial opposition, evangelical groups continue to expand their operations in both scope an intensity. When the invaded nation develops the willpower to create a well designed defence force, it can repulse the invader. When the general public develops the willpower to intelligently show their displeasure at unsolicited and threatening public advertisements, they too can stimulate the retreat of the organisations making those statements.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 11:21 |
Yet this message isn't exactly going to stop them, especially if it DOES result in some negative press for Atheists. More likely it will result in a step up in Christian advertisements, which I also do not want to see as they're typically from far-right-wing evangelicals.
Regarding my previous analogy, are not Atheists producing annoying signs to counter annoying signs? Which in many ways is making them what they are complaining about, hence my reference to sayings such as 'drinking for sobriety' and the like.
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 10:59 |
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim
Well its just going to make atheists look as bad as Christians, unless you get it (which 40-60% probably won't). Although I do respect the style of the protest.
|
The 40-60% who don't get it will just forget about it soon enough. If they aren't in tune enough to figure out the meaning of the protest, they aren't likely to remember in a few weeks anyway. Any negative press for atheists will be minor and short lived. The targets of the protest, the evangelicals, will take note - and I dare say the more intelligent among them will understand the message (not the one on the bus, the one that made them put the ads on the bus).
|
|
Omar al Hashim
King
Suspended
Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 10:45 |
Well its just going to make atheists look as bad as Christians, unless you get it (which 40-60% probably won't). Although I do respect the style of the protest.
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 10:14 |
Originally posted by Zaitsev
Isn't that sort of protest akin to 'fighting for peace' or other commonly quoted examples though?
|
Not that I can see. Would you care to substantiate how that perspective is true?
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 09:58 |
Isn't that sort of protest akin to 'fighting for peace' or other commonly quoted examples though?
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 08:33 |
I think the point of the atheist advertisements is being missed by just about everyone here. The point is not to influence people to join a certain faith (or abandon one). The point is it is a form of protest. Because for once the evangelicals are on the receiving end of their own style of propaganda.
And as a form of protest it has worked beautifully. It has created headlines around the world, and the financial donations for it have been so vast that the project has expanded far beyond its initial modest aims and are now running the advertisements for an extended period, nationwide. This should give the evangelicals some idea of just how sick and tired the general public is of their unsolicited preaching, and that they are willing to put their money where their mouth is to prove it. Indeed, it is a very civilised way of sending a message of protest to predatory evangelical groups, and the huge backing it has garnered only adds to the triumph of this protest.
|
|
Omar al Hashim
King
Suspended
Joined: 05-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5697
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 07:55 |
Firstly I should point out that this is religious fundamentalism, from an atheist perspective. It is as has been pointed out exactly the same as the "Join Jesus" type billboards. Personally I would like to see both Christian and Atheist advertisements banned. All they do is demean the religion they are supposed to be representing. But if one is allowed the other has to be. On a related link to the above, the same type of adverts have been blocked in Australia. Not surprising, given our current & historical track record on Freedom of Speech (Suppress it! Only conservatism allowed in Australia ) http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/australiaandthepacific/australia/4159715/Atheist-bus-Sleep-in-on-Sunday-morning-adverts-banned.html
Edited by Omar al Hashim - 10-Jan-2009 at 07:55
|
|
JanusRook
Sultan
Ad Maiorem Dei Gloriam
Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2419
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 06:22 |
Advertisement is useless. I just wonder when companies that promote products through adds will figure it out that. |
Actually advertisements for products do work if a product is searching for brand recognition. However once a market is saturated it does no good to continuously advertise, I'm looking at Coke, McDonald's, CNN. But if I have a brand of Cola called Janus Cola, I'll have to get some advertisement out for people to get to know my product.
|
Economic Communist, Political Progressive, Social Conservative.
Unless otherwise noted source is wiki.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 06:17 |
While most religious ads are definitely a touch intrusive, I still do have to condemn the Atheist advertisements as both immature and intentionally provocative.
|
|
Suren
Arch Duke
Chieftain
Joined: 10-Feb-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1673
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 06:02 |
viva la atheists!
|
Anfører
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 04:32 |
It seems silly from both sides in my opinion on the matter. The belief in one particular and the disbelief in all are both trespassing in the public sphere. Such adverts should remain private, within the individual sphere, and should not be allowed to create useless debate between two set opinions on a relative truth or untruth.
|
|
Constantine XI
Suspended
Suspended
Joined: 01-May-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5711
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 04:19 |
Originally posted by Zaitsev
That's the primary problem I see with the issue. Religious groups advertise, futilely, because they believe themselves to be right and wish to 'save' others. Atheist advertisements serve no purpose because, if there is no God, then it doesn't matter what we believe. Hence Atheist/Agnostic advertisements can only serve the purpose of antagonising religious groups as a sort of 'pay-back' for their advertisements. |
This is true. And in the process perhaps this will discourage religious groups from putting up advertisements which tell people they will burn forever unless they believe such-and-such. Which is a worthwhile objective, no one likes to be confronted with personally unpleasant messages as they board public transport.
|
|
Guests
Guest
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 10-Jan-2009 at 02:13 |
That's the primary problem I see with the issue. Religious groups advertise, futilely, because they believe themselves to be right and wish to 'save' others. Atheist advertisements serve no purpose because, if there is no God, then it doesn't matter what we believe. Hence Atheist/Agnostic advertisements can only serve the purpose of antagonising religious groups as a sort of 'pay-back' for their advertisements.
|
|