QuoteReplyTopic: Oldest civilization in the world? Posted: 30-Jun-2006 at 04:21
Your notion that
middle eastern civilizations to be old, is not in tune with the latest
archelogical discoversies being made in the World.....
The ruins
discovered in the GULF of Cambay are dated to be 9500 years old. It is
found at the exact place of the Legendary Sri Krishna's capital city
DWARAk which was recorded in the Mahabarath to have submerged in the
sea..
Moreover there is not much of time difference between Indus and
Mesaptomia, both the civilization evoloved side by side and the
advances made by Indus valley stand out as ahead of their times visit the site and update some current affairs about civilization http://www.grahamhancock.com/forum/BadrinaryanB1.php?p=1
Here's the problem with judging time using the "yuga cycle". There is simply nothing to confirm it - no inscriptions, no other physical correlations, nothing. Virtually everything written, comes from a religious source; a source from a much more recent time. I've read, where the date of Rama was said to be as early as 7,000 BC, yet when placed in the context of the Puranas, the implication is that he reigned for hundreds of years, along with each of his successors. This is obviously unnatural, and thus must be rejected as historical. If varma insists on this perception of history, let it be understood by all that it is in context of his own faith and not to sober history.
Even if we the Indian mythology and its tmelines as as just fictio what
about the archeology that suggest the existence of even more older
civilisation a synopsis of Indus and much more older civilisation
By 4000 BC, a pre-Harappan culture emerged, with trade networks including lapis lazuli and other raw materials. Villagers domesticated numerous other crops, including peas, sesame seed, dates, and cotton, plus a wide range of domestic animals, including the water buffalo which still remains essential to intensive agricultural production throughout Asia today. There is also evidence of sea-going craft. Archaeologists have discovered a massive, dredged canal and docking facility at the coastal city of Lothal, India,
perhaps the world's oldest sea-faring harbor. Judging from the
dispersal of artifacts the trade networks integrated portions of Afghanistan, the Persian coast, northern and central India, Mesopotamia (see Meluhha) and Ancient Egypt (see Silk Road).
The Indus Valley Civilization boasts the earliest known accounts of urban planning. Major cities included Lothal (2400 BC), Harappa (3300 BC), and Mohenjo-Daro (2500 BC) As seen in Harappa, Mohenjo-daro and (recently discovered) Rakhigarhi, India, their urban planning included the world's first urban sanitation
systems. Evidence suggests efficient municipal governments. Streets
were laid out in perfect grid patterns comparable to modern New York City. Houses were protected from noise, odors and thieves. The sewage and drainage systems developed and used in cities throughout the Indus Valley were far more advanced than that of contemporary urban sites in Mesopotamia and Egypt and also more advanced than that of any other Bronze Age or even Iron Age civilization. For an unknown reason, the Harappan civilization came to an end at around 1700 BC.
Some
historians, however, believe in an ancient civilization in present-day
Gujarat known as the Sorath civilization, dating back to 3700 BC. This
view is starting to gain credence among historians, but has not yet
been verified. This civilization was completely different from the
Harappan civilization, with 90% different pottery, different crops, and
a rural rather that urban aspect.
Another earlier claim was
presented by oceanographical researchers of an Indian institution
called NIOT in the Gulf of Cambay which consists in possible underwater
structures resembling Harappan ones but dated about 7000 BC.
You can have trade, medicine, a certain level of sophisitication and so on, all without being a "civilization". You need to have cities to be a civilization. The oldest cities in the Indus are 4th millenium BC, which is very old - much older than most of the world - but not the oldest. Susa is definitively dated to 4000 BC, predating any cities in the Indus (though whether it falls in the Elamite or Mesopotamian sphere is entirely debatable).
Edgewater, As u said Susais
much older than Indus, but what about the findings in DWARAKA(GULF of
Cambay ) of the Gujarat coast.
The findings are dated some
9500 years ago and it is just not a settlement, it is a fortefied
city.....
Edgewater, As u said Susais
much older than Indus, but what about the findings in DWARAKA(GULF of
Cambay ) of the Gujarat coast.
The findings are dated some
9500 years ago and it is just not a settlement, it is a fortefied
city.....
Dubious may be for
those who are limited in theior frame of mind that civilization started
4000 Years ago
The above given site
mentions that the announcement of the finding was made hastily, but it
doent change anything the findings lie there for you to see and the
carbon dating of the various finds are well documneted and you know
before u I dont know how can u call it dubious by just reading
something and ignoring the painful research that has gone into it. For
all the excavation info and the datings of the individual finds u ca
have a look at it just saying dubious will place u in bankrupted
intellectuals and doesnt dissaprove anything about the find..
It is well accepted in all archeological journals and
archeologists about the date of the find, it is people like you with a
bigoted view of history http://www.grahamhancock.com/forum/BadrinaryanB1.php?p=1
Visit the above site and better brush up your knowledge. Now if u think that these
findings I would questing the reasons for they being dubious You must
not that the findings were dated not in India alone, the OXFORD
UNiversity and Institute of Earth Sciences ,Hannover Germany. It must
be that even those prestigious institutes are fooling and engaging in
dubious research I guess according to u http://www.atributetohinduism.com/Dwaraka.htm
Incidently, I do agree with edgewaters "DUBIOUS". You cannot date a civilization by a piece of wood. Far too many questions as to its context. Questionable methodology.
Dubious may be for those who are limited in theior frame of mind that civilization started 4000 Years ago The above given site mentions that the announcement of the finding was made hastily, but it doent change anything the findings lie there for you to see and the carbon dating of the various finds are well documneted and you know before u I dont know how can u call it dubious by just reading something and ignoring the painful research that has gone into it. For all the excavation info and the datings of the individual finds u ca have a look at it just saying dubious will place u in bankrupted intellectuals and doesnt dissaprove anything about the find.. It is well accepted in all archeological journals and archeologists about the date of the find, it is people like you with a bigoted view of history http://www.grahamhancock.com/forum/BadrinaryanB1.php?p=1
Visit the above site and better brush up your knowledge. Now if u think that these findings I would questing the reasons for they being dubious You must not that the findings were dated not in India alone, the OXFORD UNiversity and Institute of Earth Sciences ,Hannover Germany. It must be that even those prestigious institutes are fooling and engaging in dubious research I guess according to u http://www.atributetohinduism.com/Dwaraka.htm
Look, Graham Hancock has virtually no credibility among established historians, so I would be very careful in accepting anything on his site or sponsored by him as facts.
As for Indian history in general, there's no doubt that Indian civilization is one of the oldest in the world. Whether it is older than the civilizations in the Fertile Crescent however is very much a matter of dispute and dubious at best. I have noticed that a lot of hindus tend to adhere to the theory that India has the oldest civilization in the world and what's more, that Indian civilization can be considered a mother civilization with radiating power throughout the world. This view is supported by dubious methodology in archeology and by oral records, neither of which can easily convince professional historians.
What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte
Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi
Who were the Sumeians though? who were their ancestors?
There are many speculations into this, the strongest connection is to todays Kuwaiti's, however, a connection is also drawn to Hungarians and Turkic peoples. The link is said to be linguistic and religious, what is amazing is that Tengrism and Sumerian religion are very similar.
More investigations into this will ultimately discover the explanations behind this.
Stonehenge is the oldest civillisation in the world
Hey, what about ChatalHoyuk, Jericho? they're pretty old.
What is the longest surviving civillisation/culture however? I'd say Chinease, you could say that the Mongol period meant it didn't remain fully Chinease surviving but then again, the people who made China where Mongoloid from Northern China, the Southern Chinease were invaded and assimilated into being Chinease.
Itallians also could be one of the oldest surviving civillisations, they havnt been occupied since Roman times.
The Japanease?
The Turks, the Turks of Turkey havnt been ruled over for over a thousand years if we take into account the Selcuk Turk Empire and that its how they entered today's Turkey.
The oldest surviving Civillisations alive today would be,
Itallian -
Turkish of Turkey
These two surviving nations civillisations have never been conquered, ie the people living their today as Itallians in Itally and Turks in Turkey have never been ruled or occupied by anyone else.
Very interesting.
Edited by Bulldog - 11-Jul-2006 at 15:06
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
The oldest surviving Civillisations alive today would be,
Itallian -
Turkish of Turkey
there is Greece, Armenia, Egypt, Iran (Persia), Israel, China, India + Pakistan
(assumingly the indus valley civilizations were progenitors of both
countries)...unless you think old is 1000 A.D.
Moreover, "Italy" was only a geographical term until modern times. And
the current Italians are a mix of the Romans and
germanic tribes, Greeks, Africans, ostrogoths, visigoths (and any other
goths you can think off) and etc...while Turkey (Anatolia) of
1000 AD you speak off was full of "non-Turk" people like Armenians,
Greeks, Kurds, Arabs, Georgians, Persians, Romans and of course the
newcomers
(Turks)... it doesnt take one day to "Turkify" all those people...
If we adopt the "Out of Africa" theory of the evolution of man, then shldn't the Africans be the oldest people, and potentially the oldest civilization? I said potentially 'cause I haven't read anything about any African ancient cities, but who knows....
there is Greece, Armenia, Egypt, Iran (Persia), Israel, China, India + Pakistan (assumingly the indus valley civilizations were progenitors of both countries)...unless you think old is 1000 A.D.
Your missing the point, I clearly stated civillisations which still exist today, the ancient Hellenic city states do not have a continious unbroken lineage to modern day people of Greece as they stop rulling the area thousands of years ago. The Roman invasion, then the conversion to Christianity and a whole new Roman then Roman-Byzantine civillisation, followed by on top of that Turkic civillisation, has all added to modern day Greece. The ancient city state civillisation is not alive today, its a part of history, there are obviously still connections not all was lost but it cannot be called the same.
The same can be applied to Ancient Egyption civillisation, Persia, India, Armenia etc
Israel is an intersting one as Jewih civillisation has managed to perserve its unique identity and return to the areas it began from.
China also to a large extent kept its civillisation from after the Mongol conquest although there was a brief Japanease invasion.
I was referring to civillisations existing today, ie people who managed to stay in control of their lands and not be occupied and put under a different civillisation to their own.
Itallian
Chinease (to a large extent)
Turkish of Turkey
Fit this category.
Moreover, "Italy" was only a geographical term until modern times. And the current Italians are a mix of the Romans and germanic tribes, Greeks, Africans, ostrogoths, visigoths (and any other goths you can think off) and etc...while Turkey (Anatolia) of 1000 AD you speak off was full of "non-Turk" people like Armenians, Greeks, Kurds, Arabs, Georgians, Persians, Romans and of course the newcomers (Turks)... it doesnt take one day to "Turkify" all those people...
There is no such thing as the "pure race", I'm simply referring to nations, it doesn't matter what races of people exist within a nation, race doesn't make a nation, language, identity, common history, common culture, to a certain religion etc etc
All these are things that Itallians have in common, it doesn't matter that there may be different races among them, that's not important, for someone to think its of any value it just bring "racism" into the equation.
The same applies to Turks of Turkey, also I stated that the Turks of Turkey always claim their historical heritage which goes back to the Selcuk Empire prior to that the Karakhanids, Uygurs etc The Turks in Turkey trace a direct unconquered identity, they have never been conquered by non-Turkic civillisation.
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
"Your missing the point, I clearly stated civillisations which still
exist today, the ancient Hellenic city states do not have a continious
unbroken lineage to modern day people of Greece as they stop rulling
the area thousands of years ago. The Roman invasion, then the
conversion to Christianity and a whole new Roman then Roman-Byzantine
civillisation, followed by on top of that Turkic civillisation, has all
added to modern day Greece. The ancient city state civillisation is not
alive today, its a part of history, there are obviously still
connections not all was lost but it cannot be called the same."'
So if they (Greeks) ruled Greece for a couple of hundred years and for
the next thousand years another empire ruled Greece, Greek civilization
somehow ceases to exist? you cant be serious...is this your definition
of "civilization"?
Originally posted by bulldog
I was referring to civillisations existing today, ie people who managed
to stay in control of their lands and not be occupied and put under a
different civillisation to their own.
the land now known as Israel has been governed by foreign powers for how long?
Originally posted by bulldog
There is no such thing as the "pure race", I'm simply referring to
nations, it doesn't matter what races of people exist within a nation,
race doesn't make a nation, language, identity, common history, common
culture, to a certain religion etc etc
All these are things that Itallians have in common, it doesn't
matter that there may be different races among them, that's not
important, for someone to think its of any value it just bring "racism"
into the equation.
..Italy reunified in 1860s. During this time it has been reported that
about 90% of the populace did not know the National language...
using your own definition, how does "Turkish of Turkey" (whatever that means) qualify?
how do you come up with those abstract definitions and pick
"civilizations" to fit these definitions out of thin air...I bet you
didnt even know that Italy as a nation has only been alive for a mere
150 years or so.
So if they (Greeks) ruled Greece for a couple of hundred years and for the next thousand years another empire ruled Greece, Greek civilization somehow ceases to exist? you cant be serious...is this your definition of "civilization"?
It wouldn;t necessarily "cease" to exist but it would be diluted and slowly disintegrated and changed to a point its unrecognisable to what existed before by the dominant civillisation of the ruling powers. The previous civillisation would not be living in the next thousand years, only traces of it and the history would remain.
the land now known as Israel has been governed by foreign powers for how long?
It doesn't matter, Jews preserved their language, religion and customs thanks to the religion which preserved their civillisation to a large extent.
..Italy reunified in 1860s. During this time it has been reported that about 90% of the populace did not know the National language...
The part about the language is ridiculous, you wouldn't be able to back that up would you?
Italy as a nation has only been alive for a mere 150 years or so.
Itally traces its historical nation lineage back to the Romans, since the time of the Romans no non-Roman has totally conquered and ruled the people. As the people were never conquered they kept their civillisation, language, culture etc and evolved into today's Itally via themselves.
So it doesn't matter wether the actuall country Itally has only been alive for 150 years, the people that formed it were in existance before then and had never been totally ruled over since the times of their national ancestors the Romans.
What we do for ourselves dies with us. What we do for others and the world remains and is immortal.
Albert Pine
It wouldn;t necessarily "cease" to exist but it would be diluted and
slowly disintegrated and changed to a point its unrecognisable to what
existed before by the dominant civillisation of the ruling powers. The
previous civillisation would not be living in the next thousand years,
only traces of it and the history would remain.
and you lived through these years to witness this? why dont you ask
Greek members here if they think their current civilization if a
phantom of what it was three millenia ago (as you claim)...obviously
nothing is
static, and "civilizations" do evolve over time, but you cant say that
just because they did not have self rule, they lost their civilization.
Armenia has been under a muslim rule for a close thousand years and
guess what I am still Christian...and the Armenian Church more or less
still carries the traditions it had aquired at the time of its
creation..
Originally posted by bulldog
It doesn't matter, Jews preserved their language, religion and customs
thanks to the religion which preserved their civillisation to a large
extent.
What makes you think Greeks and Armenians didnt? Just because today you
dont see half-naked Greeks running around in Athens yelling "Toga! Toga!"
doesnt mean they have lost their civilization.
Originally posted by bulldog
The part about the language is ridiculous, you wouldn't be able to back that up would you?
as a matter of fact I would; read Barricades and Borders, (plus my European History professor said so )
Originally posted by bulldog
Itally traces its historical nation lineage back to the Romans
Greece traces its historical nation lineage back to the Etruscans.
Originally posted by bulldog
, since
the time of the Romans no non-Roman has totally conquered and ruled the
people.
no one did? I dont see "Roman Empire" on today's world map, do you?
Originally posted by bulldog
As the people were never conquered they kept their
civillisation, language, culture etc and evolved into today's Itally
via themselves
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum