9/11 - The Ultimate Con

This is a nice peice of propaganda that has been pretty much debunked. I also have an issue with your use of the word "accident." What happened on 9/11/2001 was no accident. It was an intentional act, this is the direct opposite of an accident. The word accident implies that there is nobody to blame, there are indeed people to blame for these acts. Furthermore the "holocaust" that you speak of is not against muslims. It is against people who have corrupted an otherwise peaceful religion into a violent fundamentalist fascist way of keeping power. The Bush Admin is not trying to rid the world of Muslims, believing that the goal of the Bush Admin is to rid the world of Muslims is just buying into propaganda. How many countries in the world have a Muslim majority? There are about 15 that I can think of off the top of my head and the US is not making war on them. So where is this "holocaust" taking place?

There are some threads already on this site that deal with this subject or a subject very near to it.

A nonsensical theory.

Originally posted by Feanor King John - How many countries in the world have a Muslim majority? There are about 15 that I can think of off the top of my head and the US is not making war on them. So where is this "holocaust" taking place? It's not that easy man. You should give Mr. Bush a little more time. Soon enough, this world will be rid of filthy Muslim scum.

Are you serious? How much more time? He only has a little over a year left in office and I really don't think that he is going to be able to carry out this campaign of ridding the world of - as you put it - "filthy Muslim scum." Still nobody has shown where this holocaust is taking place. If there is a holocaust against Muslims being waged by the Bush Admin wouldn't it be logical to see this holocaust in the US as well as Afganistan and Iraq. This argument of a Muslim holocaust is an irrational argument that has no basis in reality. There is no holocaust happening in the US or other parts of the world. What is happening is the US is a war in two countries who happen to have a Muslim majority. To say that the US went to war with them because they are Muslim nations is absolutely absurd. If that was the case wouldn't it stand to reason that the US would go to war with: Morraco, Libya, Algeria, Sudan, Egypt, Jordan, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Lebanon, Turkey, Qutar, Oman, U.A.E, Pakistan, Indonesia, et al.? In fact the fact that most of these Muslim nations are allies to the US I think shows the lack of existence of a Muslim Holocaust. If the US were trying to rid the world of Muslims wouldn't it stand to reason that they would go to war with all these nations and wipe them off the face of the map. Again I say it is preposterous to argue that America led by the Bush Administration is engaging in a Muslim Holocaust.

What futile propaganda attempt? You didn't even quote the section where I mentioned propaganda.

Hello to you all

I'll acknowledge there seem to be rather big holes in the official story. However, the conspiracry theories I have heard have generally been such utter nonsense that they're making it easier for the official story to stand up to scrutiny.

Originally posted by Tyranos The Demolition Explosive charges being a factor is the most plausible, as to aiding in bringing down the Towers. In fact  many experts and newscasters were saying it wasn't only the planes, but also demolition bombs.

Edited by Northman - 07-Oct-2007 at 10:59

Well by seeing all your replies, I guess I will have to agree with dear Al Jassas that maybe me too am reading Conspiracy theories alot and that could be a cause making my mind set all against the west policies, or maybe the west is being so optimistic about anything that they hear from their media.

Originally posted by Zaitsev a) There is absolutely no chance in hell that the passport would have survived.

Edited by Constantine XI - 10-Oct-2007 at 07:41

Originally posted by Zaitsev Originally posted by Constantine XI Um, check the airport records and match it with that of passengers who boarded the doomed planes. Pretty simple. That would only prove he was on the plane. They could only assume he was the hijacker if they already knew he was a terrorist.    Originally posted by Constantine XI Yea how stupid can the guy get! Doesn't he know that he could go to jail if they find his passport after he commits a suicide hijacking. Geez, some people are so stupid...... Yes, I agree you most likely would. However, if you're a known terrorist (as would be necessary for part B) then taking your real passport would be a bad idea. So for the situation to work either they knew he was a terrorist and let him on the plane anyway, or they didn't know he was a terrorist and manufactured the whole thing, which is far more likely.