Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The Battle of Marathon

 Post Reply Post Reply
Author
History Student View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 26-Mar-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote History Student Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The Battle of Marathon
    Posted: 26-Mar-2007 at 13:31
I am currently doing a Research Paper in my high school class and i need to interview a qualified historian on the strategies and battle tactics of the Battle of Marathon Smile
Back to Top
Adalwolf View Drop Down
Chieftain
Chieftain
Avatar

Joined: 08-Sep-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1230
  Quote Adalwolf Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Mar-2007 at 14:18
Perhaps you could do an email interview? I had to do that several times in high school. 
Concrete is heavy; iron is hard--but the grass will prevail.
     Edward Abbey
Back to Top
History Student View Drop Down
Immortal Guard
Immortal Guard
Avatar

Joined: 26-Mar-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 0
  Quote History Student Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Apr-2007 at 21:02
Yeah...that's what i had in mind. I just dont know who to interview... :'(
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 09-Apr-2007 at 01:34
Well I am not a qualified student, but do not fail to mention the political effects of the result. Arguements over what part of the army did the Athenians actually face or numbers is irrelevent to the fact that marathon being an Athenian victory over the mighty Persians was thus responsible for the beginning of the rise in Athenian preeminence.
Back to Top
Darius of Parsa View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
King of Kings

Joined: 03-Oct-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 599
  Quote Darius of Parsa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Oct-2007 at 06:03
The revolting Greeks burned the city of Sardis to the ground, and the Persians wanted to do the same to Athens. The Persians landed near the Athenian capitol of Athens (about 20 miles or so) using a water-based route across the Agean sea. The Greeks assembled and took any willing soilder or citizen to fight the battle. They created a thin line of men across the landscape to match that of the Persian army (Persians outnumbered the Athenians) The Persians had a heavy centre and when they engadged the centre of the Greek army was decimated. The flanks of the Greek army and what remained of the centre enclosed around the Persians. The Persians then were frightened and paniked. They ran back to their ships and tried to sail away, and the greeks followed them. They killed every Persian of the shore that didnt make it onto the ship. (Triremes and Biremes were used) The Greeks captured a few Persian vessals and took the crown of victory
Back to Top
dexippus View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun


Joined: 17-Feb-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 205
  Quote dexippus Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Oct-2007 at 10:14
Originally posted by History Student

I am currently doing a Research Paper in my high school class and i need to interview a qualified historian on the strategies and battle tactics of the Battle of Marathon Smile
 
1) Lets be honest, nobody on this forum, myself included, qualifies as a "historian."
 
2) Our best description of the Battle of Marathon comes from the "father of history" Herodatus, who wrote a 9 book "inquiry ('istorie) into the causes of the Persian wars. Reading his description of the Battle of Marathon might be a good place to start before you let us "qualified historians" qualify you to death.
 
3) That being said, you should be skeptical of the historian Herodatus' account. He claims the Athenians ran a full mile in their armor, a feat that would have in reality exhausted the Athenian hoplites, leaving them in no condition to fight a battle. Herodatus' battle narratives in general are not terribly percise, and thus it might not even be prudent to try to deduce too keen a notion of tactics from his description. But on the whole his account seems pretty good: for example he gives 192 as the number of the Athenian dead, a figure that is intriguingly confirmed by the number of horseman on the Parthenon, who likely represent the Marathon dead.
 
 


Edited by dexippus - 04-Oct-2007 at 19:04
Back to Top
Knights View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3224
  Quote Knights Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Oct-2007 at 10:19
Originally posted by dexippus

1) Lets be honest, nobody on this forum, myself included, qualifies as a "historian."

In fact, we have quite a number of "professional/qualified" historians here at AE (no, I'm not one). Aelfgifu, Reginmund, Dawn and numerous others have diplomas, graduates, post grads.etc in different areas of history. I should probably let them speak for themselves though.
Back to Top
Yiannis View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2329
  Quote Yiannis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Oct-2007 at 11:24
Originally posted by dexippus

for example he gives 192 as the number of the Persian dead, a figure that is intriguingly confirmed by the number of horseman on the Parthenon, who likely represent the Marathon dead. 
 
Actually the Athenian dead were 192. Persians were  (according to Herodotus) 6,400.
 
The tomb of the Athenians still stands there: Lieux%20publics%20Administrations%20Τύμβος%20Μαραθώνα%20%28Marathonas%20tomb%29
 
Excavations have confirmed Herodotus story, the burned bones of approximatelly so many Athenians were found in the tomb as well as remains from the last supper that was hel in their honour. Usually Greeks would take the bodies to be buried at their city, still -as a sign of ultimate honour- they decided to bury these on the field of battle. Same has happened with the Platean dead.
 
When it comes to how long the Athenians run to engage the persians, the answer seems obvious to me. We know that the range of Persian arrows was 150-200 meters. The Athenians would have reached this limit at a relaxed pace, with the rythm of the flutes, and then they'd run the last 200 meters to engage the enemy - no small feat for someone carrying all this equipment and would have messed up their formation.
 
(Spartans would have their famous 3-paced rythm: 3 steps and a small pause and so on till the time they would start to run towards the enemy. That helped them keep their line in perfect formation and usually scared their opponents to the death)
 
The basis of a democratic state is liberty. Aristotle, Politics

Those that can give up essential liberty to obtain a temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety. Benjamin Franklin
Back to Top
Aster Thrax Eupator View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 18-Jul-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1929
  Quote Aster Thrax Eupator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Oct-2007 at 16:47
Well, look at it this way - Persian forces usually wicker shield and daggers. Greek forces, usually full throax hoplite armour, hoplon, sarrisa pike and short sword. When simply viewing their equipment it's hard to see how they couldn't have won!
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-Oct-2007 at 18:26
Sarissa wasn't used yet at the time of Marathon.
Back to Top
Knights View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3224
  Quote Knights Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Oct-2007 at 01:59
Exactly what I was thinking. Aster you're thinking of the Macedonian pikes - Sarissas. The standard Greek hoplite was equipped with an aspis (shield), and xiphos (sword) and a dorru (pike), plus armour. The Greeks as you said had vastly superior equipment on the whole, and it would have been daunting just looking at the shiny row of men. Pity numbers were not on their side - that was the thing the Greeks had to overcome.
Back to Top
Aster Thrax Eupator View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 18-Jul-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1929
  Quote Aster Thrax Eupator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Oct-2007 at 12:06
I thought that "Sarissa" was a work which applied to all Greek spears, not just those used by the Hellenistic Phalangites.
Back to Top
Knights View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
suspended

Joined: 23-Oct-2006
Location: AUSTRALIA
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3224
  Quote Knights Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Oct-2007 at 12:54
I always thought the sarissa was first developed by Phillip II. It was a much longer (and thus heavier) pike, rather than the shorter "Pre-Phillipian" dorru.
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Oct-2007 at 17:13
wasn't the Sarissa invented by the Athenian Iphicrates?

Edited by Temujin - 04-Oct-2007 at 17:13
Back to Top
conon394 View Drop Down
Pretorian
Pretorian
Avatar

Joined: 08-Dec-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 165
  Quote conon394 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 04-Oct-2007 at 21:53

Only if you believe in the Iphicrates myth, err reform.

Back to Top
Darius of Parsa View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar
King of Kings

Joined: 03-Oct-2007
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 599
  Quote Darius of Parsa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Oct-2007 at 06:31
The Sarrissa was invented by Macedonia durring the Philip II era to outlengthen and therefore outmanouver the other Greek city states. The spear was about 16 feet in length, about double the length of their sisters

Edited by Darius of Parsa - 05-Oct-2007 at 06:31
What is the officer problem?
Back to Top
Aster Thrax Eupator View Drop Down
Suspended
Suspended

Suspended

Joined: 18-Jul-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1929
  Quote Aster Thrax Eupator Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Oct-2007 at 09:51
Only if you believe in the Iphicrates myth, err reform
 
Iphicrates' maxim was mountain ambushes - the main forces that he reformed were peltasts and Endrioki (light hoplites). There is no way that the use of such large weapons could have been considered by him.
 
Also, Thuycidides mentions Iphicrates, and so do Xenophon, and as Athenian citizens (Thuycidies contempary to Iphicrates, Xenophon after the Peloponnesian war) they must have had some knowledge of the man and his remarkable reforms
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.121 seconds.