Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

The modern Pakistani military

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Hellios View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar

Joined: 25-Sep-2006
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1933
  Quote Hellios Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: The modern Pakistani military
    Posted: 16-Feb-2007 at 00:06
Pakistan's Al-Khalid MBT is based on the Chinese Type-90 but the Al-Khalid is (supposedly) better.
It has a 125 mm smooth-bore gun, a 12.7 mm MG & another MG (coaxial).
Laser targeting & decent sensors.
 
Al-Khalid MBT:
 
Commander's station:
 


Edited by Hellios - 12-Mar-2007 at 10:31
Back to Top
pekau View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Atlantean Prophet

Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
  Quote pekau Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Feb-2007 at 02:13
Neat. So Pakistan's upgrading their troops. That would just tick the Indian armies...
     
   
Join us.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Feb-2007 at 07:56
The 125 MM gun it is supposedly able to destroy any modern tank at normal battle ranges.
 
BTW its only "Khalid". No "Al" anymore. Though popularly it is known as Al Khaid still.
 
Back to Top
Zagros View Drop Down
Emperor
Emperor

Suspended

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 8792
  Quote Zagros Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Feb-2007 at 08:31
Nice low profile.
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Feb-2007 at 10:03
whats different about that 125mm gun, than the one on the russian tanks?
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Feb-2007 at 10:09

Calibre. Its longer IIRC. Also has a better AP ability. Which of course redices reduces its ability on HESH rounds.

Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Feb-2007 at 10:17
thanks sparten,

oh one more thing is that on the Chinese tank as well?
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Feb-2007 at 13:45
No idea.
Back to Top
Cryptic View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 05-Jul-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1962
  Quote Cryptic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 16-Feb-2007 at 14:41
Originally posted by Sparten

Calibre. Its longer IIRC. Also has a better AP ability. Which of course redices reduces its ability on HESH rounds.
 
What does the term IIRC mean?
Originally posted by Zagros

Nice low profile.
But at the expense of a seperate armoured ammunition storage area and a fourth crewman.  Still, it looks like a good tank


Edited by Cryptic - 16-Feb-2007 at 14:45
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Feb-2007 at 01:13
^^
IIRC :If I Recall Correctly.
 
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Feb-2007 at 08:40
Originally posted by Sparten

No idea.
just looked into it, the PLA are going with a more 'advanced' design, the Type 99,
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Feb-2007 at 10:36

Khalid has been in service for 7 years now. Tye TYpe-99 is in the devlopment stage.

 
Guides Cav, Probyn's Horse, 9 Horse, 18 Horse, 31 cav are just some of the ACR's which deploy the above.
 
I beleive we have something like 500 plus in service.
 
Back to Top
Leonidas View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar

Joined: 01-Oct-2005
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4613
  Quote Leonidas Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 17-Feb-2007 at 20:51
how do you think, they match up with the Russian T-90?

 they look quite comparable.
Back to Top
Cryptic View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 05-Jul-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1962
  Quote Cryptic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Feb-2007 at 19:57
Originally posted by pekau

Neat. So Pakistan's upgrading their troops. That would just tick the Indian armies...
 
As a side note, it looks like it has reactive armour to defeat HEAT war heads.
 
(reference to your thread on armour and HEAT)


Edited by Cryptic - 18-Feb-2007 at 19:58
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 18-Feb-2007 at 23:46
Leonidas,
Well its hard to say. I am no expert but yes they do look pretty comparable. But I suspect the AK has an advantage due to its optics and gun.
 
The T-90 is afterall an upgrade of the old T-72.
Back to Top
aghart View Drop Down
Shogun
Shogun
Avatar

Joined: 05-Sep-2005
Location: United Kingdom
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 232
  Quote aghart Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Feb-2007 at 14:25
Why are Pakistan and other developing countries wasting their valuable assets producing their own major Weapons Systems like MBT's.  There is no way they will be able to export enough to make money out of it.  They would be able to purchase superior western or Russian vehicles at a much lower price.
 
As usual I suspect it is down to "pride". Look at us we are one of the "big boys" we can build our own tanks!.  Fine except I suspect the millions of Pakistani's living in poverty without the basic needs that we in the west take for granted are not exactly smiling as they go to bed at night knowing that they can have pride in their tank production facilities.
 
When I was a Tank Commander the UK had a tank fleet of over 600. Now it has about 300 Challanger II vehicles. I have no doubt that the next MBT for the UK will be joint effort with probably Germany and possibly Belgian, Dutch and maybe Spanish involvement. It is simply not financially viable to produce MBT's in small numbers simply for your own armed forces.
 
France of course will be an exception, like Pakistan and other countries, "pride" will overcome commonsense and financial logic.


Edited by aghart - 19-Feb-2007 at 17:06
Former Tank Commander (Chieftain)& remember, Change is inevitable!!! except from vending machines
Back to Top
Laelius View Drop Down
Consul
Consul


Joined: 22-Oct-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 354
  Quote Laelius Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Feb-2007 at 17:05
Why are Pakistan and other deveoping countries wasting their valuable assets producing their own major Weapons Systems like MBT's.  There is no way they will be able to export enough to make money out of it.  They would be able to purchase superior western or Russian vehicles at a much lower price.
 
Perhaps because purchassing superior weapons systems from other countries doesn't produce domestic benefits.  Think about it, money moves through an economy in a circular fashion and so if Country A invests in it its own arms industry it can create high paying manufacturing, finance, and engineering jobs for its own populace, who will then reinvest their salary in the private sector.  I would argue that its absolutely crazy for a nation like Pakistan to rely soley on foreign imported weapon systems. 
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Feb-2007 at 17:14
I would argue that Pakistan is wasting money developing an MBT that could be purchased.  MBTs are primarily offensive weapons systems.  Also, they can only be relied upon as an offensive weapons system if air superiority can be achieved. 
 
Pakistan can only hope to oppose India defensively.  Anti-armor weapons systems and countermeasures are its best hope in any confrontation with India, its only conceivable conventional adversary.  Who else would Pakistan deploy MBTs against?
 
 
Back to Top
Cryptic View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke

Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 05-Jul-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1962
  Quote Cryptic Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Feb-2007 at 19:01
Originally posted by pikeshot1600

 
Pakistan can only hope to oppose India defensively.  Anti-armor weapons systems and countermeasures are its best hope in any confrontation with India, its only conceivable conventional adversary.   
 
I  disagree,
 
The best weapon against a heavy tank is another heavy tank.  And the best weapon against a heavy armoured brigade on the rampage in tank friendy terrain is another heavy armoured brigade.
 
Hi-Tech Anti tank missiles etc. can only stop heavy tanks if they are used with air supereority or on terrain that is not tank friendly.   In many cases, Pakistan would be fighting on tank friendly terrain and with out air supereority.   
Back to Top
pikeshot1600 View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar


Joined: 22-Jan-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4221
  Quote pikeshot1600 Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 19-Feb-2007 at 19:27
Originally posted by Cryptic

Originally posted by pikeshot1600

 
Pakistan can only hope to oppose India defensively.  Anti-armor weapons systems and countermeasures are its best hope in any confrontation with India, its only conceivable conventional adversary.   
 
I  disagree,
 
The best weapon against a heavy tank is another heavy tank.  And the best weapon against a heavy armoured brigade on the rampage in tank friendy terrain is another heavy armoured brigade.
 
Hi-Tech Anti tank missiles etc. can only stop heavy tanks if they are used with air supereority or on terrain that is not tank friendly.   In many cases, Pakistan would be fighting on tank friendly terrain and with out air supereority.   
 
In turn, I disagree.  The best weapon against tanks is air superiority.  Perhaps not in the 1940s, but certainly now.  Modern airborne anti-tank weaponry is absolutely devastating.  Without command of the air, tanks in open country are death traps.
 
 
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.079 seconds.