northern and southern Europe

 

Perhaps so, as long as that birth rate is relatively high enough to replace the population, then it is healthy in my opinion. However, when you have a birthrate that is lower than the death rate, you run risk at having a much lover population in two generations, you would end up with a larger portion of the populace being retiree's.

 

The Nordic peoples NEED to believe thier are superior than Southern Europeans. They have no great Empire of to point to, that they can claim without question was thiers. There was  Aristotle who  wrote about the fair skin savages of the north. Aristotle was against interbreding Greeks with any of these peoples he considered inferior in every way. Romans also were not Nordic, they had white features bone structure, Head Size and demensions, but they aer not blond haired and blue eyed for the most part. The prejudice agianst the Nordics still exist today for many Southern Europeans. Wether you are Spanish, italian, Greek or other S.E. types the chances that you have heredity going back to Rome and or Greece is higher than any Celtic or German. Its funny how  pro Nordic America uses exclusivly Southern Europeans Architecure in most of all its  Buildings. Wether it be Spanish Style as in California, or Roman and Greek (almost all Washington D.C., Capital Building , White House etc.) and claim that these groups are inferior to them either presently or ancestrally.