Which is the strongest muslim country at

 

If i may also point out that Afridis served in great numbers in the british army and in lot of cases against fellow pashtuns. Similarly when the sikhs were used so were other outfits for fighting the afridis. In fact proportioally more muslims served in the british army than hindus.

 

 

If u really feel that way then there should come a point that u stop countering such arguments and be the wiser person. 

 

I think the main difference between the punjabi and pathan has been the readiness for a fight and not because of lack of fighting spirit on part of the Punjabis(land of the five rivers). In punjabi society where there had been an abundance of land and produce the main preoccupation had been in farming. There had not been a centralised institute for gathering forces to face an external threat(until the sikhs), unlike with the pathan tribes where a tribal head's call to arms was usually sufficient. And because of the incessant infighting between the tribes and and subtribes over a millennia had led the pushtuns to be more conditioned for fighting. Also the pathan has been always more independent in nature than the punjabi, because of tiers of farming peasantry and role definitions in punjab. Then there is the geography and harsher environment which had made a hardier person of the pathans, Whereas the conditions for the Punjabis had been more idyllic. I would further add that it is also more difficult to defend on the plains of the punjab than the highlands.