Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

Topic ClosedAnti-Semitism still in the West?

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>
Author
Ponce de Leon View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Lonce De Peon

Joined: 11-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2967
Direct Link To This Post Topic: Anti-Semitism still in the West?
    Posted: 23-Apr-2006 at 14:30
In Europe, there is a surprising trend of Anti-semitism showing, especially in France where they seem to tolerate no religions now. I am ashamed how such leaders in the world can be so negative on such an old topic
Back to Top
TheDiplomat View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 09-Aug-2004
Location: Turkey
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1988
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Apr-2006 at 14:37

Unfortunately anti-semiteism will not fade away...People always look for scapegoats,and The Jews are the best handy-scapegoats for many.

In the 19.century the leader leader of German SPD(BEBEL) defined anti-semitism very well I think as follws: ''Anti-Semitism is the socialism of dumbs''.



Edited by TheDiplomat
ARDA:The best Turkish diplomat ever!

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Apr-2006 at 16:08
I agree, anti-semitism will never go away, but in fairness it is greatly reduced compared to say the 1930's where it was rife all over europe. What i don't understand however is the existence of inherently racist political groups for example the BNP in the UK, surely any government with its mind set on equality would work to outlaw such parties.

I think possibly one of the reasons why Jews are so often targeted is down to their success in business, it is a fact that the jewish tradition is most definitely apt in the business world. This has often been the cause of much jealousy.

Another factor is perhaps the issue that Jews have constantly been on the move, right from the very begining of the Jewish tradition before they found Israel they wondered for years. As a result often ending up in hostile lands, such movement and constant emmigration has continued right into the modern day. Even Israel the Jewish homeland is unfortunately and depressingly hostile.
Back to Top
Komnenos View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Administrator

Joined: 20-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4361
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Apr-2006 at 18:42
Here is the thread on Anti-Semitism in Europe, still existing strongly, amongst other reasons because Europeans seem to be unable to differentiate between the Jewish community and the State of Israel.


http://www.allempires.com/forum/forum_posts.asp?TID=4941&KW= anti%2Dsemitism
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Apr-2006 at 19:11
Let's not mix anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism. In fact, most anti-Zionists are anti-racist and most anti-Semitic (anti-Hebrew) are pro Israel (as that would help Jews to remain out of Europe for the most part).

Another thing is rejection of religion: I agree with that. Civil life must happen without religion. Religion is just a private matter and should not affect science or social organization.

And then we have the new anti-Semitism which is actually anti-Arabism or anti-Islamism and that is, of course, strongly participated by the Hebrew nation, both in Israel and outside it.

I think it's not good that we keep using a confuse and tricky term as "anti-Semitism". Unless we are talking about a phobia specifically directed to Arabs and Jews alike, the term is wrongly used. Normally racist people anyhow are rather indiscriminate and dislike foreigners more or less equally. I think the term racism must be used preferably to anti-Semitism when meaning that: racism or xenophobia. I think also that anti-Zionism can't and shouldn't be mixed with the former: I believe that is a Zionist propaganda item: to mix racism and anti-Zionist attitudes. Yet, few people (if any) have both attitudes simultaneously.

Being anti-Zionist can get you in conflict with some Jews, but not all. As we know, there's a sigificative group among ethnic Jews, both secular and religious, that abhor Israel and all what it means: basically making Neonazis out of Hebrews.

Beaing anti-religious is less likely to get you in conflict with anyone, if any with Muslims or Christians, who have less discrete religious practices and may class more easliy with the common secular people.

So let's not mix things: where is that anti-Semitism understood as anti-Hebrew ideology? Or are you mixing apples and oranges out of interest?

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Ponce de Leon View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Lonce De Peon

Joined: 11-Jan-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2967
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Apr-2006 at 19:16
This is how I understand it Maju. Here in the North East of the US (where a lot of jews live) it is understood that anti-semitism is a term used as being against jews and racist against jews. And someone who is anti-semetic is someone who is racist towards jews. Looking at your perpesction on this issue, there is a more complicative way of defining anti-semitism. Call me a basic person, but anti-semitism is anti-jew in mine, and a lot of other peoples definition
Back to Top
Lord Ranulf View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 28-Mar-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 309
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 23-Apr-2006 at 23:47

France was not alone:

x

ADL Survey in 12 European Countries Finds Anti-Semitic Attitudes Still Strongly Held

New York, NY, June 7, 2005 Despite good faith efforts by government and the international community to counteract the anti-Semitism plaguing Europe, millions of Europeans continue to believe the classical anti-Semitic canards that have dogged Jews through the centuries, according to a new poll released by the Anti-Defamation League (ADL) today.  A survey of 12 European countries revealed that a plurality of Europeans believe Jews are not loyal to their country and that they have too much power in business and finance.  The opinion survey of 6,000 adults 500 in each of the 12 European countries found either minimal decline, no change or, in some cases, an increase in negative attitudes toward Jews from its 2004 findings.

The survey, Attitudes Toward Jews in Twelve European Countries, was released to coincide with the Conference on Anti-Semitism and on Other Forms of Intolerance sponsored by the Organization for Security and Cooperation in Europe (OSCE), in Cordoba, Spain June 8-9. The countries surveyed were: Austria, Belgium, Denmark, France, Italy, Germany, The Netherlands, Spain, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and for the first time, Hungary and Poland.

Respondents across the continent were asked a series of indicator questions representing the most pernicious notions of anti-Semitism and whether or not they thought the following four statements were "probably true" or "probably false."

 Jews are more loyal to Israel than to this country.
 Jews have too much power in the business world.
 Jews have too much power in international financial markets.
 Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust

Respondents were also asked whether they agree or disagree with the following statement:
 The Jews are responsible for the death of Christ

Finally, respondents were asked:
If their opinion of Jews was influenced by actions taken by the State of Israel and whether they believed the violence directed against European Jews was a result of anti-Jewish feelings or anti-Israel sentiment.

Findings Summary   

continues@ http://www.adl.org/PresRele/ASInt_13/4726_13.htm

Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 00:22
Originally posted by Ponce de Leon

This is how I understand it Maju. Here in the North East of the US (where a lot of jews live) it is understood that anti-semitism is a term used as being against jews and racist against jews. And someone who is anti-semetic is someone who is racist towards jews. Looking at your perpesction on this issue, there is a more complicative way of defining anti-semitism. Call me a basic person, but anti-semitism is anti-jew in mine, and a lot of other peoples definition


I don't accept that definition: I prefer to say anti-Jewish when one is specifically against Hebrews. Arabs are also Semites and therefore they can't be anti-Semitic unless they adopt an auto-destructive attitude.

Again it is very important to take apart racism from anti-Zionism. Anti-Zionism is a very legitimate political attitude and in fact it is normally anti-racist, as it advocates a non-ethnic Palestinian unified state as alternative.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 00:49

 Jews are more loyal to Israel than to this country.
 Jews have too much power in the business world.
 Jews have too much power in international financial markets.
 Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust

Respondents were also asked whether they agree or disagree with the following statement:
 The Jews are responsible for the death of Christ

Finally, respondents were asked:
If their opinion of Jews was influenced by actions taken by the State of Israel and whether they believed the violence directed against European Jews was a result of anti-Jewish feelings or anti-Israel sentiment.



Actually these questions are tricky. We do know that many Jews have such strong ethnical loyalty that projects towards Israel. We also know that Jews are disproportionatley present in bussiness (at least when compared with any other minority) and that most of them tend to act partly according to ethnic lines of loyalty prmarily. That's no mistery and it's not anti-Semitism (or rather anti-Hebraism). And definitively, most Jews, talk too much about the Holocaust, ignoring the many non-Jews that were also massacred and (what makes it specially pathetic) they use it as argument to defend the aberration of Israel.

I really don't understand the obsession with the concept anti-Semitism (understood as anti-Hebraism). I have never heard the equivalent term "anti-Romaism" or "anti-Gypsism". As always, when we compare Jews with other simmilar minorities like the Roma, Jews are obviously much more favored in every sense: they even have a special term for the possible xenophobia felt for their particular ethnicity.

I think that, considering their interest in remaining a separated community, Jews have generally been rather well integrated in Europe. I dont say that they didn't have problems or were persecuted but these were often worse for other minorities such as Muslims or Roma or Pagans. In fact their genetic relation to Christianity rather protected them. No equivalent community would have survived so many centuries without the special protaction that Christianity felt obligued for the ethnicity and native faith of Jesus. Would they have been Pagans or Isians or Mithraists... you know.

I do think that there's an attitude of victimization by some Jewish circles/peoples and also by some non-Jewish. I don't think this is fully justified, despite the Holocaust and I can only understand it because of the brainwashing influence of Christianity, which is after all a Judaist sect.

I still don't think that I am anti-Hebrew. That I don't like Sharon or Mjica-Herzog doesn't make me that. There are many Jews that I like too, starting with Karl Marx.

I am anti-Abrahamanic instead: I do think that the Abrahamanic religions that root in Judaism are an aberration and should be replaced by something more perfect, less Patriarchal and less greedy. We need a spirituality that is with Nature, not against it.

NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
Lord Ranulf View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 28-Mar-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 309
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 09:32
Originally posted by Maju


 Jews are more loyal to Israel than to this country.
 Jews have too much power in the business world.
 Jews have too much power in international financial markets.
 Jews still talk too much about what happened to them in the Holocaust

Respondents were also asked whether they agree or disagree with the following statement:
 The Jews are responsible for the death of Christ

Finally, respondents were asked:
If their opinion of Jews was influenced by actions taken by the State of Israel and whether they believed the violence directed against European Jews was a result of anti-Jewish feelings or anti-Israel sentiment.



Actually these questions are tricky.

...yes that might be an observation....but then went aren't poll questions designed to elicate a response...sometimes favorably to the poller.

And definitively, most Jews, talk too much about the Holocaust, ignoring the many non-Jews that were also massacred and (what makes it specially pathetic) they use it as argument to defend the aberration of Israel.

....I disagree as most Jewish people I associate with are well aware of the other minorities who were murdered and mourn keenly....I would counter that your point is a sterotypical and inflammatorly counter to the victims (Jewish) themselves.

I really don't understand the obsession with the concept anti-Semitism (understood as anti-Hebraism).

.....One can not unless one suffers the prejudice/genocide associated with the same.

 

I have never heard the equivalent term "anti-Romaism" or "anti-Gypsism".

Then obviously you are neither paying attention to the vernacular vogue or you are ignoring it..as the term: anti-american, for example, is in vogue throughout the world and thats just one example of language use citing an opposition to anything....people , places, things, or events.

 As always, when we compare Jews with other simmilar minorities like the Roma, Jews are obviously much more favored in every sense: they even have a special term for the possible xenophobia felt for their particular ethnicity.

...personal rhetoric......as I for example can not be part of your 'we'.

I think that, considering their interest in remaining a separated community,

...rhetoric and false..... Jewish ethnic and heritage based people in America for example are just that...Americans ....and they are neither seperated nor segregated in any major fashion other then certain extremely conservative religious elements within the body politic...which is their perogative...under the US Constitution.

  In fact their genetic relation to Christianity rather protected them.

 .....Not true as well.... until the later stages of the 19th/20th century... and then only slightly as the nation of Germany for example prior to the Nazi's was a 'christain' nation in theory, thought and practice. European and in particular Russian pogroms were legendary and these ostensibly were 'christain' nations.  The murder...rapine and loss of property has been ongoing for centuries.


I do think that there's an attitude of victimization by some Jewish circles/peoples and also by some non-Jewish. I don't think this is fully justified, despite the Holocaust

 ....this is pure rhetoric and not an attempt to rationaly understand the issue..GENOCIDE was perpetrated against them....what more reason does one need...or ask the ghosts of dead Cambodians if you cant accept the comparision with the Jews of Europe.

and I can only understand it because of the brainwashing influence of Christianity, which is after all a Judaist sect.

....a thoughtless and tasteless comment....as I am a Christain and neither have been brainwashed nor attempt to ridicule/insult any other spiritual associations a person might profess belief in.

I still don't think that I am anti-Hebrew.

...I do....better to just admit and defend your position then attempt obsfucation.



I am anti-Abrahamanic instead: I do think that the Abrahamanic religions that root in Judaism are an aberration and should be replaced by something more perfect, less Patriarchal and less greedy. We need a spirituality that is with Nature, not against it.

....This would of course include one of the other of the world's great religions as well...ie. Islam.  there is no perfection possible within religion to include nature worship as a result of the natural violence of the same and the violence of religion's daughter...nationalism..so wish all you like and then return to live in reality.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 13:26
Lord Ranulf,

A highley comendable response to Maju's post. I have to say i agree with you on nearly all your points. I myself as a minority religion almost anywhere in the world hugely appreciate the strength and conciseness of your argument.

well done
Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 13:38
I don't really like the term anti-Semitism either. I'd be very surprised if the so-called 'anti-Semites' in my country are actually against all Semetic peoples. This type of xenophobia seems especially directed towards Jews.

There's a pattern I've noticed in Bosnia and Herzegovina that I think might be having an impact elsewhere as well. There are two main branches of Judaism in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which are very distinct and very separate.

The first is Sefardic Judaism, immigrants from Portugal and Spain who arrived here half a millenium ago. The second is Ashkenazi Judaism, German-speaking Jews who arrived during the Austro-Hungarian occupation. Now during the holocaust, virtually all Ashkenazi Jews were handed over to their deaths. Sefardic Jews survived in large numbers, usually by hiding a Muslims - servants, wives, daughters, in Muslim homes whose people knew very well the individuals were Jews.

From this it's safe to say that in Bosnia people didn't care for Ashkenazi Jews but felt some affection for Sephards. The reason, I think, is simple:

Sefards did not segregate themselves from the rest of society, nor were they segregated onto themselves by the society itself. They lived mixed among the people, intermarriage was common, they spoke the Bosnian language in addition to their native Ladino, and so on. The Ashkenazi, on the other hand, segregated themselves or were segregated by society, both most likely. They generally spoke only German and had very little interaction with anyone other the Austrian authorities.

A lack of knowledge almost always generates fear and from that hatred can grow very easily in certain situations.

I think the hatred for Jews is based in this, as it is for Gypsies and other segregated groups. The reason the hatred for Jews is especially strong is because they managed to achieve a normal standard of living. There were rich Jews, middle-class Jews, poor Jews. There were average, middle-class (majority) Muslim, Catholic, and Orthodox residents who were looking up at these despised Jews farther on the financial ladder than they were... and this breeds all sorts of negative feelings.

It was only a couple of years ago that two residences on Ferhadija (Sarajevo's most prestigious pedestrian street) were returned to pre-WWII Jewish owners - whereas homes for Jews in poorer neighborhoods like Vratnik and Kovaci were returned 60 years ago. The property of Ashkenazi Jews has never really been returned... that says to me the dynamic of the hatred was to bring the highest of the "rubbish" back down...

What do you all think?
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
Lord Ranulf View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 28-Mar-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 309
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 13:50

Originally posted by Eagle

Lord Ranulf,

A highley comendable response to Maju's post. I have to say i agree with you on nearly all your points. I myself as a minority religion almost anywhere in the world hugely appreciate the strength and conciseness of your argument.

well done

Thankyou..as prejudice is often based on fear and an inability to deal in humanistic terms.

Back to Top
Lord Ranulf View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 28-Mar-2006
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 309
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 13:58

Originally posted by Mila

I don't really like the term anti-Semitism either.

...Neither do I particularily as the use of term ....especially in terms of the 20th/21th century.... is more oftened then not beeen used by radical elements associated with terroist groups/genocidal maniacs who have politcal agendas more so then religious idealogical conflicts..although their obviously there as well.

There's a pattern I've noticed in Bosnia and Herzegovina that I think might be having an impact elsewhere as well. There are two main branches of Judaism in Bosnia and Herzegovina, which are very distinct and very separate.

The first is Sefardic Judaism, immigrants from Portugal and Spain who arrived here half a millenium ago. The second is Ashkenazi Judaism, German-speaking Jews who arrived during the Austro-Hungarian occupation. Now during the holocaust, virtually all Ashkenazi Jews were handed over to their deaths. Sefardic Jews survived in large numbers, usually by hiding a Muslims - servants, wives, daughters, in Muslim homes whose people knew very well the individuals were Jews.

...excellent and observent synopsis.

From this it's safe to say that in Bosnia people didn't care for Ashkenazi Jews but felt some affection for Sephards. The reason, I think, is simple:

Sefards did not segregate themselves from the rest of society, nor were they segregated onto themselves by the society itself. They lived mixed among the people, intermarriage was common, they spoke the Bosnian language in addition to their native Ladino, and so on. The Ashkenazi, on the other hand, segregated themselves or were segregated by society, both most likely. They generally spoke only German and had very little interaction with anyone other the Austrian authorities.

...again an excellent historicaly correct and reliable observation with my only comment being that persecution of the Ashkenazi was a major motivating factor in their isolationism.....

A lack of knowledge almost always generates fear and from that hatred can grow very easily in certain situations.

.....touche'

What do you all think?

.... I think you have displayed a remarkable understanding and demonstration to examine the issue from as un-biased and prejudical viewpoint as possible given your own unique life experience.........Well done.


Back to Top
Mila View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 17-Sep-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4030
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 14:20
Thank you.

It's just always seemed to me that in Bosnia, and possibly the rest of Europe...

Well, first let me make it clear I know the holocaust was genocide and would never suggest it wasn't.

But it seems to me the public support, the real... cheering on from the Bosnian public... was based more in eliticide, killing off the wealthy, the intellectuals, the influential, from among the Jewish population. The wider genocide itself seemed more... swept under the rug in public opinion. No one talked about, ignore the evil sort of response.

You look at the survivors testimonies and when they rounded up the upper-class Jews, people were silent and stayed indoors and there was no dramatic protest. But when they came for the general Jewish population, people came to their doors and threw out coats and bread and fruit and whatever they could for them to take. There was some even went with them! I remember reading in some testimonies about how there would be Muslim mothers in their upstairs windows screaming for their daughters in the crowd who had married Jews, and there'd be Jewish women running to their christian/Muslim lovers houses for a kiss goodbye and they'd end up leaving together, etc.

There was none of that for the earlier, first deportation.
[IMG]http://img272.imageshack.us/img272/9259/1xw2.jpg">
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 14:55
Mila,

I think this is a highely intellectual response to a very difficult to answer question. It is clear you have thought about it and looked at your surroundings for evidence. Well articulated.

On the same note I am inclined to agree with you. However, in the area I am currently living Leeds(in the UK). There is a large Jewish population, however the population is confined to a single district Alwoodley, the majority of synagogues are in alwoodley as are any onther specifically jewish bulidings. They have in essence built their own secular society within the city. This has lead to almost all of their socialising schooling and i would imagine business being done within a tight knit selective community. I have many friends from the area who are Jewish however there is always a distinction between me (a non jewish friend) and their Jewish social groups. I unlike the rest of the UK am all for immigration, but i am also for intergration.

What intrests me is to annalyse what has caused this particular Jewish community not to intergrate fully, i would also appreciate it if anyone else had other examples of similar circumstances. I believe it could easily be a combination of them forming and keeping their own society and society not wholly accepting them. I would love to work in a direction that ment there was no longer any social distinction between Jew and non-Jew, or in fact anyone, however this is wholly unrealistic. However i am made optimistic by the report you have given me off your findings in Bosnia and Hercegovina with regards to the Sefards. Perhaps the only remedy for the situation is time, and the growth of comfort with one anothers faith.
Back to Top
Spartakus View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
terörist

Joined: 22-Nov-2004
Location: Greece/Hellas
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4489
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 15:02

What?We love the Jews!(*brings Hitler*) .....Just kidding.

"There are worse crimes than burning books. One of them is not reading them. "
--- Joseph Alexandrovitch Brodsky, 1991, Russian-American poet, b. St. Petersburg and exiled 1972 (1940-1996)
Back to Top
Perseas View Drop Down
General
General
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 14-Jan-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 781
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 16:05

I believe some people confuse the growth of anti-Zionism with the growth of anti-Semitism. Many people are simply anti-Zionists.

Being an anti-Zionist does not mean being an anti-Semite. However from the other hand, there are always some masking their anti-Semitism into the disguise of anti-Zionism.

And some simply love to identify being a Jew with being a Zionist when the reality can be that even some Jews are in the same time anti-zionists.

The distinction is not always clear to everybody.



Edited by Perseas
A mathematician is a person who thinks that if there are supposed to be three people in a room, but five come out, then two more must enter the room in order for it to be empty.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 17:59
I think we are all making too much of a fuss on this topic on whether we call people anti-Semites, or anti-Zionists or anti-Hebrew or anti-anything else. The emphasis is not on the way we use the english language but essentially the emphasis is on discussing any form of racism against the Jewish community. I understand the need for clarity but if we all understand what one another are talking about and understand the connotaions of the words being used than the specific meaning is really an irrelevance. Rathar than confusing are selves with technicality is it not more important that we focus on the issues that the Jewish community have suffered and still are suffering and the effect this has on society as a whole?
Back to Top
Maju View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar

Joined: 14-Jul-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 6565
Direct Link To This Post Posted: 24-Apr-2006 at 18:10
Originally posted by Lord Ranulf

.....One can not unless one suffers the prejudice/genocide associated with the same.

Do you mean that there is people that specifically dislike Jews and not Africans, Hispanics, Arabs or Chinese... to put some examples. I'd say that racist people are generally indiscriminately racist.


I have never heard the equivalent term "anti-Romaism" or "anti-Gypsism".

Then obviously you are neither paying attention to the vernacular vogue or you are ignoring it..as the term: anti-american, for example, is in vogue throughout the world and thats just one example of language use citing an opposition to anything....people , places, things, or events.

The fact is that there's no such terms. In my vernacular language either: they are all refered as "racism". Sometimes a phraseis used, i.e. "prejudice against Gypsies" but there's no "anti-Gypsism" or any equivalent.

"Anti-American" is a US-coined phrase and it's not a form of racism, rather it means someone that is against US-policies. We don't use the term "anti-American"... unless there's a Gringo who introduces it.


 As always, when we compare Jews with other simmilar minorities like the Roma, Jews are obviously much more favored in every sense: they even have a special term for the possible xenophobia felt for their particular ethnicity.

...personal rhetoric......as I for example can not be part of your 'we'.

Do you mean that you cannot compare Jews with other minorities? Why?

I think that, considering their interest in remaining a separated community,

...rhetoric and false..... Jewish ethnic and heritage based people in America for example are just that...Americans ....and they are neither seperated nor segregated in any major fashion other then certain extremely conservative religious elements within the body politic...which is their perogative...under the US Constitution.

I never use the USA as reference (Europe instead). Still, even in the USA, there are Jewish neighbourhoods, while you don't find German or Scottish neighbourhoods.

When I said that they tried to remain as separate community, I'm not saying any nonsense. Else, they would have probably converted to the mainstream religion - as others (including many Jews) did.

Even the founder of Zionism thoght for some time that converting to Christianity would solve the issue of discrimination against Hebrews. Yet that wasn't anymore relevant in our time, when we define identity/ethnicity by other sometimes less flexible patterns.


  In fact their genetic relation to Christianity rather protected them.

 .....Not true as well.... until the later stages of the 19th/20th century... and then only slightly as the nation of Germany for example prior to the Nazi's was a 'christain' nation in theory, thought and practice. European and in particular Russian pogroms were legendary and these ostensibly were 'christain' nations.  The murder...rapine and loss of property has been ongoing for centuries.

Again you see only a local epysode. The fact that Jews had arrived to the 19th century as a separate ethnicity and religion, while Pagans instead were persecuted fiercely. If Jews would have ben worshippers of Shiva there would have been no Jew in Europe in the 19th century. Though they may have sychretized with Christianity, as the Roma did (they still call the cross "trident"!)

This doesn't mean that there were no persecutions but that, among religious minorities they had a special favorable status - else there would just be no Jews in either Christian or Muslim areas at all.

I do think that there's an attitude of victimization by some Jewish circles/peoples and also by some non-Jewish. I don't think this is fully justified, despite the Holocaust

 ....this is pure rhetoric and not an attempt to rationaly understand the issue..GENOCIDE was perpetrated against them....what more reason does one need...or ask the ghosts of dead Cambodians if you cant accept the comparision with the Jews of Europe.

I don't say there wasn't a genocide. Just that I think that when this is waved in the context of Palestine - it just makes no sense.

... and I can only understand it because of the brainwashing influence of Christianity, which is after all a Judaist sect.

....a thoughtless and tasteless comment....as I am a Christain and neither have been brainwashed nor attempt to ridicule/insult any other spiritual associations a person might profess belief in.

What I mean is that Christianity and Islam are Judaist proselitist sects and therefore they have a privileged position for their parent religion: Judaism. You may be tolerant now that you have been driven off the center of social reality but two centuries ago, you were not so tolerant.

As member of a group (non-Christians, non-Muslims and non-Jews) that has been severely persecuted for at least 1400 years, I think that Jews have been relatively privileged: they have only been persecuted now and then - not all the time as it happened to us.

This is not Jews' fault: it's Christians' and Muslims' fault actually.


I still don't think that I am anti-Hebrew.

...I do....better to just admit and defend your position then attempt obsfucation.

That's why I reject the very concept of anti-Semitism: it's just a catchall term to insult those people that have critic thought.

Why is it that you can only use the therm Jew or Hebrew in black and white: you either must be 100% pro-Israel and pro-Abraham and pro-JewsihLobby or 100% anti-Semitic. That's obviously not that way.


NO GOD, NO MASTER!
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  123>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.094 seconds.