Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
Aydin
Baron
Suspended
Joined: 13-Aug-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 481
|
Quote Reply
Topic: Ancient Aryans in Yerevan (Armenia) Posted: 20-Mar-2006 at 12:22 |
Republic of Armenia is doing a great job for the archealogy of the ancient Iranian/Aryan civilizations.
http://www.armenianhistory.info/origins.htm
|
|
Iranian41ife
Arch Duke
Joined: 24-Dec-2005
Location: Tajikista
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Mar-2006 at 12:24 |
can you please post the sections?
|
"If they attack Iran, of course I will fight. But I will be fighting to defend Iran... my land. I will not be fighting for the government and the nuclear cause." ~ Hamid, veteran of the Iran Iraq War
|
|
Sharrukin
Chieftain
Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 20-Mar-2006 at 17:57 |
There is nothing said about Aryan origins.
|
|
YusakuJon3
Shogun
Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 223
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Mar-2006 at 08:26 |
It seems like the Armenians had more to do with the ancient
Mesopotamians, Iranians and Romans than to do with the prehistoric
Aryan migrations. There might've been some indirect influence by
the Aryans through the proximity of the migration routes, but it sounds
more like early Christendom had the greater influence on Armenian
history in the legends of their early conversion in the wake of Jesus's
crucifixion and ascent. I'm actually curious to see if there's
more on the pre-Christian history of the area such as the origins of
that ancient kingdom of Uartu which was a neighboring power to that of
the Hittites and Assyrians.
|
"There you go again!"
-- President Ronald W. Reagan (directed towards reporters at a White House press conference, mid-1980s)
|
|
PrznKonectoid
Pretorian
Joined: 27-Oct-2005
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 186
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Mar-2006 at 20:02 |
Originally posted by YusakuJon3
It seems like the Armenians had more to do with the ancient Mesopotamians, Iranians and Romans than to do with the prehistoric Aryan migrations. There might've been some indirect influence by the Aryans through the proximity of the migration routes, but it sounds more like early Christendom had the greater influence on Armenian history in the legends of their early conversion in the wake of Jesus's crucifixion and ascent. I'm actually curious to see if there's more on the pre-Christian history of the area such as the origins of that ancient kingdom of Uartu which was a neighboring power to that of the Hittites and Assyrians. |
the ancient Iranians were Aryans
|
|
|
mamikon
Sultan
Joined: 16-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2200
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Mar-2006 at 22:01 |
I think Aryan includes all of the civilizations in the near East, not just Iran/Persia. I have read somewhere that Assyrians were also Aryans, as well as the Medes and the Urartians.
|
|
Iranian41ife
Arch Duke
Joined: 24-Dec-2005
Location: Tajikista
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Mar-2006 at 22:23 |
medes are aryans, assyrians are not, and i dont know about the urartians.
aryans are the people who belong to the indo iranian group.
|
"If they attack Iran, of course I will fight. But I will be fighting to defend Iran... my land. I will not be fighting for the government and the nuclear cause." ~ Hamid, veteran of the Iran Iraq War
|
|
mamikon
Sultan
Joined: 16-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2200
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Mar-2006 at 22:43 |
you mean Indo-European?
|
|
Iranian41ife
Arch Duke
Joined: 24-Dec-2005
Location: Tajikista
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1832
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Mar-2006 at 22:59 |
indo european and indo iranian are the same thing. they are two different names for the same group.
people now use indo iranian more.
|
"If they attack Iran, of course I will fight. But I will be fighting to defend Iran... my land. I will not be fighting for the government and the nuclear cause." ~ Hamid, veteran of the Iran Iraq War
|
|
mamikon
Sultan
Joined: 16-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2200
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Mar-2006 at 23:11 |
I think the Indo-Iranian group is a subgroup of Indo-European, and refers primarily to Iranian languages, like Ossetian and such...
|
|
Sharrukin
Chieftain
Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Mar-2006 at 00:40 |
Indo-Iranian and Indo-European are not the same. Indo-Iranian is a sub-group within Indo-European. Indo-European encompasses all related languages divided up into more than 10-odd subfamilies. Four/five of these subfamilies are not extinct, namely Illyrian, Thracian, "Central Balkanic", Anatolian, and Tocharian. The ones that remain are Celtic, Germanic, Romance, Balto-Slavic, Albanian (we don't know whether to see an Illyrian or Thracian [Dacian] background), Greek, Armenian, and Indo-Iranian.
I think Aryan includes all of the civilizations in the near East, not just Iran/Persia. I have read somewhere that Assyrians were also Aryans, as well as the Medes and the Urartians. |
The Assyrians were Semitic-speaking and the Urartians were Hurrian-speaking peoples. "Aryan" really historically only meant those peoples which actually used the name to describe themselves, and these peoples were all Indo-Iranic speaking peoples such as the Medes, Persians, Avestans (East Iranians), and northern Indians, although the Indians used it in a more or less religious sense. Armenians, speaking a language not in the Indo-Iranian subfamily, fall outside its historic use.
|
|
ramin
General
Joined: 16-Feb-2005
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 921
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Mar-2006 at 01:41 |
+ the terms Indo-Iranian and Indo-european are ONLY linguistic terms
|
"I won't laugh if a philosophy halves the moon"
|
|
ArmenianSurvival
Chieftain
Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1460
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Mar-2006 at 15:22 |
Originally posted by Sharrukin
"Aryan" really historically only meant those peoples which actually
used the name to describe themselves, and these peoples were all
Indo-Iranic speaking peoples such as the Medes, Persians, Avestans
(East Iranians), and northern Indians, although the Indians used it in
a more or less religious sense. Armenians, speaking a language not in
the Indo-Iranian subfamily, fall outside its historic use. |
You're right about their language. As for their
culture, I've been to a museum in Armenia which shows a heavy Aryan
influence on ancient Armenian culture. Many artifacts such as head
sculptures were decorated with many swastikas. I consider ancient
Armenians as being part of an Aryan culture, or at least bearing many
resemblences to them due to influence. Maybe you can expand on this
issue.
Originally posted by YusakuJon3
There might've been some indirect influence by
the Aryans through the proximity of the migration routes, but it sounds
more like early Christendom had the greater influence on Armenian
history in the legends of their early conversion in the wake of Jesus's
crucifixion and ascent. |
Once the Armenians accepted Christianity
around 301, it became the dominant religion in no time. Before the
birth of Jesus, however, there were many religions which were dominant
in the area. The Urartians had their own pantheon (it bore much
resemblence to the pantheons in other countries at the time, maybe
Sharrukin can expand), but the chief god in the Urartian pantheon was
named Khaldi, and the Urartians even built a city as their designated
religious center at Musasir (near Lake Urmia).
When the Persians took over in 550 B.C., many
aspects of their religion were introduced to Armenia. The chief god in
the Armenian pantheon at this time was Aramazd, which was the Armenian
version of the Persian Ahura Mazda. The Armenian god Vahagn (god of wind and
weather) was derived from the Persian god Verethragna. Mihr (the
Armenian sun god) is similar to the Persian god Mithra. Elements of
Greek religions were even present, as the Armenians had gods equivilent
to those in the Greek pantheon, such as Anahit (Aphrodite), and they
even built their temples in the Greek style in the 4th century B.C. until
even after Christ was born. The only Pagan Greek-style temple that still stands in Armenia was built in the first century A.D.
Before the Urartians, who knows how many
religions were present in the region. Skeletal remains and stone tools
found in ancient Armenia have been dated between 1 to 2 million years
old. This region is very underrated in terms of its early history.
Edited by ArmenianSurvival
|
Mass Murderers Agree: Gun Control Works!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Van_Resistance
Քիչ ենք բայց Հայ ենք։
|
|
Sharrukin
Chieftain
Joined: 04-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1314
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Mar-2006 at 04:50 |
You're right about their language. As for their culture, I've been to a museum in Armenia which shows a heavy Aryan influence on ancient Armenian culture. Many artifacts such as head sculptures were decorated with many swastikas. I consider ancient Armenians as being part of an Aryan culture, or at least bearing many resemblences to them due to influence. Maybe you can expand on this issue. |
Yes, ancient Armenian culture was influenced by the Aryans. Even certain dynasties were of Iranian (Aryan) origin. However, it must be recognized that sometime in the ancient past there was a "split" between the Armenians, the Indo-Iranians, the Phrygians, and the Greeks, which took them to different regions to develop their uniqueness. The "Aryan" substrate within the Armenian culture was a secondary development which developed in historical times, perhaps as early as the Medes, which invested Transcaucasia by about 590 BC when they first encountered the Lydians in central Anatolia. The "Aryanizing" influence from Iran continued with the Persians. It must thus be recognized for all concerned that however "Aryanization" took place, it was by adoption, rather than original culture.
|
|