Pakistans Stolen History

• The word "India" was given to the subcontinent by the Greeks. The word "Libya" was given to Africa by the Greeks.
• The name "India" was taken by the Indians to refer to a country. The name "Libya" was taken by the Libyans to refer to a country.

I thank all of you for provoking me with all appreciation of �crap�, �cheap or shoddy material� and all of you agreeing with each other.

The story of �Pakistan� has been contemporaneous event with lot of material evidences available everywhere.

Rehmat Ali Chowdahry and his three Cambridge students coined the word �PAKISTAN� as follows:

P = Punjab

A = Afghanistan

Ki = Kashmir

S =  Sind

Tan = Baluchistan

But, you know what �Pakistan�, �Pakistanis� have. Based on the name, can Pakistanis claim Afghanistan? Let us not forget the happenings of early 1930s, which took place just 75 years back. I used to discuss with the matter with those came from Lahore. So everyone would have access to documents for authenticity.

The �Transfer of Power� and other �Pakistani� documents prove that �Pakistanis� demanded �Pakistan� India not from anything else.  The correspondence of Jinnah with Gandhi, Nehru, Patel, Bose at one side and Periyar, Ambedkar and others at other side reveal more facts than what are generally discussed and debated.

Department of Archaeology and Museums, Ministry of Culture, Sports and Tourism, Government of Pakistan, Karachi has been bringing out �Pakistan Archeology� regularly. Kindly go through to find out the facts.

If Indian history has to broken down into more detailed sub-categories, so also Pakistan�s history. The population figures give different picture (before partition):

NWF Provinces � Non-Muslims = 9.05

If Cantonment, Muncipality, Notified are wise figures are taken, in certain cases, Bannu (M) recorded 74.4%, Risalpur = 61.1% and so on.

Sind = 29.3%

Kindly go through the documents, as I do not want to repeat or tell known / recorded facts.

Similarly, the story of Indian and Pakistan flags are to be read separately to understand the colours and the logic / history etc., behind. The present flags are retained for the present entities (Anujkhamar could bring out more details, as he rebuked it as �stupid�).

I tried to avoid the �racial� interpretation, but all of you again and again delve upon �Aryans� and �Dravidians� (Sparta has gone to the extent of recording �Pakistanis are not full blooded Aryans. Where do you get that? They are part Aryans�. Then, he implies what? Pakistanis are partly �aryans� and partly �what�? TeleInduz asserts that there is absolutely ZERO proof that the ethnicity of the IV was Dravidian� adding that the Brahuis  are genetically Aryans. Asko Parpola would not leave).

If �Pakistanis� call themselves as �Aryans�, then, �Dravidians� would be pitted against. Asko Parpola, Iravatham Mahadevan and others try to decipher IVC script in �Dravidian� language -Tamil! Is there any Pakistani-European language group, Pakistanni-Aryan language etc., accordingly?Would you correct them by telling that IVC people were �Aryans� and we are also Aryans and you should decipher in �Aryans language�? (Tariq Rahman has done something).

As you have been so emotional, attached and agitated too to IVC, the Tamils here also assert like that. I have already mentioned about the �Aryan-Dravidian� implication. This only harm and hamper the deciphering IVC script. In spite of bi-lingual script inscriptions, one group want to read in Tamil/Dravidian language and another Sanskrit/Aryan and thus, they do not meet and the �undecipherment� continues and Stevefarmer like people dub �Harappans �illiterate�!

Dear friends, what is your stand here?

The entire discussion is on "Pakistan".

I note that you do not answer the specific querries, but go on sidetrack or deviate from the subject matter.

When facts are to be dealt with, we have to do so.

Otherwise, there is no meaning in such discussion or debate.