QuoteReplyTopic: Brits/Beijing Closing Ceremony??? Posted: 29-Aug-2008 at 20:44
Originally posted by Sparten
Originally posted by beorna
Yes, it's business. But where's the spirit of Olympia gone to? What's Olympia without the spirit of it. Just a bloated, puffed up world cup.
Lovely Olympic spirit then. Saying that a country dose not "deserve" the games.
So if you want, then let's name it government, ok? I don't agree with our Polish mate, I don't think they are communists. They are old, greedy ........ ! If you want you can ask me about Sotchi, but I am sure you know what I would say about it. Of course you could say something bad about the British government too, I don't agree with their participation in the Iraqi war, but for me this is a great difference. Maybe you have a different opinion. I don't think they should give the games to undemocratic governments which misuse them for the conservation of their power. Who's the next who's allowed do get the Olympics, Mugabe or those militairs of Birma or Lukashenko? I don't critisize China to ask for the Olympics, I critisize Rogge and the IOC to give it to them, I critisize politicians who are cowards and those who say China has open itself. Well, I hope they do, but I don't think so. After 1936 life wasn't better in Germany than before, I am sure you know! I am looking forward to Olympic games in Beijing, maybe 2052, then I am 83 if I am still alife, in a free and democratic China. And perhaps that far day there will be people in duty who consequently fight doping. Unfortunately I guess gen-doping will be famous then.
If Zimbabwe and belarus give out bids which are deemed to offer the best by the Olympic Committee then yes they certainly should host it. Its unlikely that they could give out such bids but they should be allowed to do bid if they want.
You seem to have a very narrow and strange view of what is "free". Apparently only nations who follow a certain form of government are free.
If Zimbabwe and belarus give out bids which are deemed to offer the best by the Olympic Committee then yes they certainly should host it. Its unlikely that they could give out such bids but they should be allowed to do bid if they want.
You seem to have a very narrow and strange view of what is "free". Apparently only nations who follow a certain form of government are free.
It's not the states who host the games - its the cities, well at least in theory .
You seem to have a very narrow and strange view of what is "free".
Is it me who does? If you say what you like to, then you're free. If you can go to, where you want to, then you're free, if you can do what you want to, then you're free. If you can believe what you want to, then you're free.
I can't see anything strange in it, but perhaps you can show me.
You seem to have a very narrow and strange view of what is "free". Apparently only nations who follow a certain form of government are free.
freedom is not a matter of definition. it is true that there are different levels of freedom but there is a quite distinct difference between free and unfree.
I was not overly impressed with the british display during the closing ceremonies, ecstasy turning to horror; watching Jimmy Page perform, but having to listen to some pop "star" I've never heard of sing along. The double decker bus was a great idea, but the actors walking up a stairway to nowhere, (now that could have had potential to seque into a certain rock song, but 'twas not to be) .......... It was amusing to see the london mayor up there looking casual and somewhat nervous, I rather liked that to be honest, made him seem less like a crotchety, uptight suit; (which is the impression I get from most of these officials involved with the olympics) he showed some emotion.
.....Now that would have been superb if 'Stairway to Heaven' was given a good airing Justinian!!!!!..... with rumours abound that Pagey, John Paul Jones plus 'a drummer' are back in the recording studio, and if Percy Plant hops back on board, then 2012 could see an (almost) full-blown reuinion gig by Led Zeppelin to open the games!!!!...mind you, by then i a sure that the band will have to be carried out on stage to play.....
..i have to agree with you about bumbling Boris, he is less uptight and more casual, and i do like that.....however, the stifling and crippling polictical correctness currently breeding out of control in Britain will ensure that Boris will put his foot in his mouth on the odd occasion, and good for him too....i also wonder how much of a 'physical' spectacle Britain will be allowed to show given the current reign of the 'health and safety' overlords???....you would not believe the kind of sanctioned stupidity that is enforced nowadays by these closeted, narrow-minded, blinkered local council officials........
..still, enough moaning, i will be looking forward to Boris and his cabaret act sometime in the near future.....
..thanks for your post......AoO...
One can dream right? So political correctness is pretty tight in the UK? Thats too bad, thankfully its still managable here across the pond. (though only barely)
"War is a cowardly escape from the problems of peace."--Thomas Mann
So if you want, then let's name it government, ok? I don't agree
with our Polish mate, I don't think they are communists. They are old,
greedy ........ ! If you want you can ask me about Sotchi, but I am
sure you know what I would say about it. Of course you could say
something bad about the British government too, I don't agree with
their participation in the Iraqi war, but for me this is a great
difference. Maybe you have a different opinion. I don't think they
should give the games to undemocratic governments which misuse them for
the conservation of their power. Who's the next who's allowed do get
the Olympics, Mugabe or those militairs of Birma or Lukashenko? I don't
critisize China to ask for the Olympics, I critisize Rogge and the IOC
to give it to them, I critisize politicians who are cowards and those
who say China has open itself. Well, I hope they do, but I don't think
so. After 1936 life wasn't better in Germany than before, I am sure you
know! I am looking forward to Olympic games in Beijing, maybe 2052,
then I am 83 if I am still alife, in a free and democratic China. And
perhaps that far day there will be people in duty who consequently
fight doping. Unfortunately I guess gen-doping will be famous then.
Mate you should look after your own backyard before you pick on China's. I could stand here and list a whole list of grievances and human-rights abuses from Germany as well, but I know that you won't agree with them, and nor will you consider them to be human rights abuses. I could stand here and say the same about China too, but a Chinese man probably won't agree, or consider them abuses. Honestly, China did a fantastic job in the Olympics, and the Communist party has done a fantastic job in China. Just think about what China was like 60 years ago and what it is like today.
Quite frankly I don't agree with half of the so-called human rights that seem to be invented out of nowhere. Democracy doesn't mean rubbish if it isn't supported by other services, services that the PRC is providing and improving upon. If the chinese people feel there is a need for greater social mobility then you can bet democracy will emerge in the future. On the other hand, if the Communist party is providing the social mobility already, then there is not need or benefit to be gained from your style of democracy.
Personally I would much rather live in China than Germany. Even if I were to rate this on a pure human rights perspective - which country do I think would give me the better deal, and which would I feel safer in, I am still going to China before Germany.
Mate you should look after your own backyard before you pick on China's. I could stand here and list a whole list of grievances and human-rights abuses from Germany as well, but I know that you won't agree with them, and nor will you consider them to be human rights abuses.
Let me have a part to your informations.
Originally posted by Omar al Hashim
Personally I would much rather live in China than Germany. Even if I were to rate this on a pure human rights perspective - which country do I think would give me the better deal, and which would I feel safer in, I am still going to China before Germany.
Actually i can count some countries i would prefer to live, but Omar to compare the situation of human rights in China and germany and come to your result, is, with all respect, the greatest moronism i have read here at the last 12 months or more.
Omar, please excuse, but either it was an excellent joke or it wasn't, than i would propose that you have to attend to this matter a bit more and set off your rose-red (here yellow-red) spectacles.
Where are those snowy-highlands? On the moon? You're right, there were injuries mentioned in a human rights report. With some I go ahead, with others not. But they are discussed in Germany, here are so many movements that deal with those problems, nobody is arrested for the report, nobody tortured or killed. Do you want to tell me that's the way it is in China. I heard they had a bureau of comlaints opened in Beijing, all citizens that went it to tell their complaints were arrested immediately. Well done, wasn't it?
China is safe? Well it depends on what you like to see. I visit Egypt a couple of years ago, at every corner there were army or police, with automatic weapons, MP's or MG's. When we went to Cairo and Luxor we went in a convoy, escorted by the army. Well, Egypt is so safe. I call a country safe, when I can't see police or army patrolling in the streets. Perhaps you think about it. You mix the quiet of a cemetery with devotional peace.
The communist party has done a good job? You're joking. Oh, no, you're right. Hitler wasn't so bad too. He made the Autobahn (motorway), he invented "mother's day". Jews? Which Jew's? What war? Come on only 55 Millions dead, that peanut's, but the Autobahn, the Volkswagen, that's great.
You heard....... they had a bureau........ you heard of human rights abuses. You heard what other people claimed was done or said by others. There a word for it..... its called hearsay.
Reason why thats not applicable in court.
You dislike China; as is your right, at least let it be based on a rational emperical observation.
Originally posted by berona
Hitler wasn't so bad too. He made the Autobahn (motorway), he invented "mother's day". Jews? Which Jew's? What war? Come on only 55 Millions dead, that peanut's, but the Autobahn, the Volkswagen, that's great.
Reductio ad Hitlerum. A lovely tactic. What did the woman say? That don't impress me much.
FYI, the "evil commies" who were responsible for the great leap forward and the cultural revolution; two things which caused China more harm than the Mongols ever did are long gone; the present crop which is responsible for China's economic miricle, starting for Deng Xiaoping are about as communist as Adolf Hitler (since you love Hitlerite examples here is another one) was Irish. But no, to you "they all look alike", Chinese, must be evil communists.
You're right. The communists led China into the modern era. The age of the chineses emperors wasn't lovely for a great mass of people. I am convinced they changed the emporor against a red emperor, like the Russians changed the Zar against a red Zar. Look what Stalin has done. He brought Russia into the modern time too like Mao and friends. I am sure you believe everything was good in Russia under Stalin and that he was a honorable man. His glory is fading away since the 50th. And Mao's star is declining too. Perhaps you notice it.
Actually i can count some countries i would prefer to live, but Omar to compare the situation of human rights in China and germany and come to your result, is, with all respect, the greatest moronism i have read here at the last 12 months or more. Omar, please excuse, but either it was an excellent joke or it wasn't, than i would propose that you have to attend to this matter a bit more and set off your rose-red (here yellow-red) spectacles.
Don't worry Ulrich, I am not saying that Germany has any disabilities that are greater than any other, I am just saying that Germany is not better than China, only different.
From everything I have heard & read, Germany treats its minorities like crap. Foriegners are not really welcome. In China it is the opposite. I would much rather live in a place that respects my values, and has an authoritarian government, than a place that uses its concept of human rights to crush the morale of as many people as it can.
The German government should repeal its anti-terror laws and give citizenship to people who's parents and themselves were born in Germany before it has any right to attack other countries human rights.
Originally posted by beorna
China is safe? Well it depends on what you like to see. I visit Egypt a couple of years ago, at every corner there were army or police, with automatic weapons, MP's or MG's. When we went to Cairo and Luxor we went in a convoy, escorted by the army. Well, Egypt is so safe. I call a country safe, when I can't see police or army patrolling in the streets. Perhaps you think about it. You mix the quiet of a cemetery with devotional peace.
Obviously you have never been to China. China is safe. You don't see an worrying or unnecessary amount of soliders or police. You can walk the streets without fear or favour - unless you fear seeing the belly of a beijing man
I don't see what Egypt has to do with China. Making a ridiculous comparison and then saying how bad the comparison is does not make an argument.
OK, all is western propaganda against China.
First true word you said.
I'll say it again. The Chinese Communist party has done a damn good job, and I would much rather live there than Germany.
I'll say it again. The Chinese Communist party has done a damn good job, and I would much rather live there than Germany.
Ok guys I think it's time I as a Chinese have to step in. I used to be a staunch anti-communist when I was younger. My family suffered under their rule during the 50's and 60's. My grandfather hated them, my father hated them, I hated them. Around 2001, someone gave us a a calender for the new year, and it was the portrait of Mao on the first page. As soon as my grandmother saw it she started swearing. And she never swears.
But in the past ten years, my dad's views have changed, judging from some of the converstations we've had, and so have mine. The CCP from Deng Xiaping onwards is completely different from what it used to be. Surely it can't be that different, a typical Westerner would say, when you have the Tiananmen Square incident and the situation in Tibet. But that's only because they only care about human rights and freedom and their obsession with their concept of democracy. From what I've read in the majority of the posts here, nobody seems to care about the amazing progress China made in the past 30 years of economic reform, where the living standards of the average Chinese people have increased so dramatically, that every time I visit China, I am surprised by what I see. And all this is possible because of the vision and perseverance of Deng Xiaoping and his successors. Give the CCP some credit where it's due. My dad can, I can, and so can you. I'm sure the CCP would've redeemed itself in my grandfather's eyes too, if he'd been alive today. Shame he can't see the Motherland of today.
And I reiterate what Omar said, the CCP has done a damn good job over the past 30 years.
Don't worry Ulrich, I am not saying that Germany has any disabilities that are greater than any other, I am just saying that Germany is not better than China, only different.
From everything I have heard & read, Germany treats its minorities like crap. Foriegners are not really welcome. In China it is the opposite. I would much rather live in a place that respects my values, and has an authoritarian government, than a place that uses its concept of human rights to crush the morale of as many people as it can.
Where did you hear or read this informations. From a british propaganda broadcast during WWII ? And if this are anew informations, who bandied it about?
As much as i know, there are no executions in Germany, no oppresive resettlement but free access to all media for everyone, no tanks that end a demonstration of disaffected people.
Did you watch World Cup 2006? Did we kill our guests? Of course there are incidents with Nazis. And every incident is one too much. But how much. I fear there are more kids been killed in traffic or murdered every year than there are incidents with foreigners or immigrants. If you get some numbers, you must know, that if a Russian attacks a Turk, or a Muslim a Jew in Germany it is an rassistic incident.
If you have problems with germans or Germany or with German politics I like to talk to you about it, but that's the difference, I see problems and like to talk about it and you?.
Babyblue, I think nobody disagrees that China is in a change. But not every change is a good one. Of course there is a economical wonder. But with what results for a broad mass of people? The chinese economical behavior is not those of communists but of neo-capitalists. There are a lot losers. Of course every economical system has its, but I think China has to do a lot in the future to stop this development. And if you believe I just critsize just China or Russia, no, the developement in Germany in the moment isn't good yet, as well. I critisize it too. But not to notice the political situation in China, all those points according to human rights, is for me hard to understand.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot create polls in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum