Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

What if Genghis Khan fought Alexander

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>
Author
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: What if Genghis Khan fought Alexander
    Posted: 05-Jan-2005 at 18:23
the only threat the greeks could possibly pose to the mongols even if their tech was updated would be impal;ing a cavalry cvharge, however they would still be helpless against the mounted archer and would suffer a fate simialr to the romans at Carrhae.
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
hansioux View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Aug-2004
Location: Taiwan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 537
  Quote hansioux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 05-Jan-2005 at 19:54

Originally posted by Tobodai

the only threat the greeks could possibly pose to the mongols even if their tech was updated would be impal;ing a cavalry cvharge, however they would still be helpless against the mounted archer and would suffer a fate simialr to the romans at Carrhae.

What if ... the Mongols fought the Huns?

Begging plea of the weak can only receive disrespect, violence and oppression as bestowments. Blood and sweat of the weak can only receive insult, blame and abuse as rewards.

Lai Ho, Formosan Poet
Back to Top
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jan-2005 at 01:12
then I bet it would be up to the commanders of each sides ability, as the armies would largely be the same
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
hansioux View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Aug-2004
Location: Taiwan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 537
  Quote hansioux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jan-2005 at 04:31

I wonder how the Huns and the Mongols are different.  Even though the two army were largely the same.  Especially both were excellent in all the same areas.  However there must be tech advances and tatics that made them different.

I think for one thing, the Mongols are a lot better at siege warfare.  But that would be useless against the Huns... haha.

hmm.... this is actually a topic worth discussing.



Edited by hansioux
Begging plea of the weak can only receive disrespect, violence and oppression as bestowments. Blood and sweat of the weak can only receive insult, blame and abuse as rewards.

Lai Ho, Formosan Poet
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jan-2005 at 13:35
the Mongols had more powerful bows than the Huns and of course a better armour at that time. btu int he end, form a technological pov, the heavy cavalry would have descided the day.
Back to Top
hansioux View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Aug-2004
Location: Taiwan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 537
  Quote hansioux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jan-2005 at 18:01
Acutally, I don't recall the Mogols using a lot of armour.  I might be mistaken.
Begging plea of the weak can only receive disrespect, violence and oppression as bestowments. Blood and sweat of the weak can only receive insult, blame and abuse as rewards.

Lai Ho, Formosan Poet
Back to Top
Gubook Janggoon View Drop Down
Sultan
Sultan
Avatar
Retired Global Moderator

Joined: 08-Aug-2004
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2187
  Quote Gubook Janggoon Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jan-2005 at 18:25
Silk shirts no?
Back to Top
hansioux View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Aug-2004
Location: Taiwan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 537
  Quote hansioux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jan-2005 at 19:19
They are nomads, they were the first ones to wear pants.....
Begging plea of the weak can only receive disrespect, violence and oppression as bestowments. Blood and sweat of the weak can only receive insult, blame and abuse as rewards.

Lai Ho, Formosan Poet
Back to Top
Tobodai View Drop Down
Tsar
Tsar
Avatar
Retired AE Moderator

Joined: 03-Aug-2004
Location: Antarctica
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4310
  Quote Tobodai Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jan-2005 at 19:24
did the Huns have the stirrup yet?
"the people are nothing but a great beast...
I have learned to hold popular opinion of no value."
-Alexander Hamilton
Back to Top
Murph View Drop Down
Consul
Consul
Avatar

Joined: 28-Nov-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 319
  Quote Murph Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 06-Jan-2005 at 19:28
one thing's for sure....

anyone to surrender and become a POW during a mongol-hun war is an idiot
Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 07-Jan-2005 at 14:21
the sarmatians it is assuemd had wood-framed stirrups, so the Huns prolly too.
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Jan-2005 at 17:07

There were huge technological advances in terms of military equipment between the days of Alexander and that of Ghengis Khan.  Here are some of these advancements.

 

Calvary Technology: 

Superior Horses:  Macedonians used an early breed of European horses, basically these horses had just been through enough generations of selective breeding to allow a human to ride on top of it for sustained periods of time.  The mongols used a hybrid horse breed of the Parthian and central asian stocks, which would've been slightly smaller, significantly faster, and more maneuverable than the early European stock.  Assuming a chase scenario, a Macedonian calvery unit would not be able to gallop faster than a Mongol calvery unit simply due to superior breeding of the mongol horse.

Iron Horse Shoes:  The Macedonians didn't posses the technology to create Iron horse shoes.  They instead made leather shoes for the their horses.  The leather shoes seriously reduced the amount of distance that a horse could cover before it's hooves were worn away.  Thus, a mongol horse's effective life span would've been 2 to 3 times that of a Macedonian horse.

Stirr-up:  The Macedonian calvery didn't have stirr-ups, thus their calvary units weren't capable of sustained charges with lances.  The calvary would have to charge up to an enemy, slowdown, and then engage the enemy.  The Mongol heavy calvary, otoh, could charge into their enemies at full gallop by leaning into the stirr-up.  Another benefit of the stirr-up would've been the far superior control of a horse's speed. 

 

Armor Technology:

composite body armor:  The Macedonians were limited to cast bronze plate body armor, and leather armor overlaid with bronze for their shields.  The Mongols used composite body armor: an outer layer of leather armor to deflect blunt attacks(stones, mace...etc), an intermediate layer of steel chain mail armor to stop arrows and slashing attacks, and finally an interior layer of silk to wrap around any projectile that pierces the other two layers in order to prevent infection.

 

Skirmish weapons Technology:

Composite Recurve Bows:  These bows have a maximum range of 400-500 yards.  Alexander's army had slings(range: 100 yds) and early composite bows whose maximum range would not have exceeded 200 yards.

Steel(armor piercing) Arrows:  Arrows with elongated steel warheads can punch through thin steel plate and chain mail armor.  The bronze and leather armor of Alexander's time would've been no match for these projectiles.  Thus the Phalanx formation would not be an effective deterrent to mongol arrows.

 

Artillery Technology:

Rockets:  Gun powder propelled arrows and explosive packages have a maximum range exceeding 1000 yards.  Alexander's most effective range artillery weapons was the ballista, which had a maximum range of 300 yards. 

Primitive Cannon:  Used by the Mongols to fire stone projectiles against stone fortifications.  In Alexander's time, most fortifications were made of wood or mud-brick.  So if this was a siege battle, a single volly of mongol artillery fire would have broken through any fortification that Alexander's engineers could've built.

 

Melee Weapons technology: 

Steel Scimitars:  Will cut through bronze pikes, swords and plate body armor.

Steel Tipped Lances:  When used in combination with a calvary charge, the lances will punch through bronze/leather shields and bronze body armor.    

 

Command and Control Technology:

Signals network:  Can deliver early warning of an advancing army through a series of fire signal posts. 

Encrypted messages:  pass military information/orders through ordinary looking letters, musical tones, signals.

Courier network:  Every mongol army has a network of calvery units that ride around this army in layered concentric circles, the couriers communicate the messages of the army commander's via specific trumpet calls that gets relayed from unit to unit across a span of distance to the network of another mongol army.  This way a mongol general could coordinate a multi-pronged attack over a wide front of hundreds of miles in near real time.  Alexander controlled his army via flags, which would've limited his real-time battle-field awareness to a several square miles.   

 

A war between the armies of Alexander and Ghengis Khan would be a huge blood bath for the Macedonians.  This is simply due to the overwhelming technological advantages held by the Mongols. 

 

 

Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Jan-2005 at 18:19

wow, that was a long post, very cool.  but i have found two inaccuracies:

Originally posted by xenophon2000

Calvary Technology: 

Iron Horse Shoes:  The Macedonians didn't posses the technology to create Iron horse shoes.  They instead made leather shoes for the their horses.  The leather shoes seriously reduced the amount of distance that a horse could cover before it's hooves were worn away.  Thus, a mongol horse's effective life span would've been 2 to 3 times that of a Macedonian horse.

Stirr-up:  The Macedonian calvery didn't have stirr-ups, thus their calvary units weren't capable of sustained charges with lances.  The calvary would have to charge up to an enemy, slowdown, and then engage the enemy.  The Mongol heavy calvary, otoh, could charge into their enemies at full gallop by leaning into the stirr-up.  Another benefit of the stirr-up would've been the far superior control of a horse's speed. 

1.Mongols used no horse shoes at all. that'S why they had such problems when fighting in rocky areas like the middle east.

2. it has recently been found out that stirrups have little effect for shock cavalry, in fact it does only significantly improve horse archery. the saddle is the most important part for shock cavalry.

Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Jan-2005 at 18:43

"1.Mongols used no horse shoes at all. that'S why they had such problems when fighting in rocky areas like the middle east."

Depends on which period and which horde.  The horde of Ghenghis Khan, after they destroyed the Jin of China, had adoped Chinese iron horse shoes.  One thing of note is that the Mongol army wasn't issued standardized equipment like other armies of the time. 

"2. it has recently been found out that stirrups have little effect for shock cavalry, in fact it does only significantly improve horse archery. the saddle is the most important part for shock cavalry."

I would like to see this study.  As far as I know, when two calvary units slammed into each other, they would knock eachother off the horses.  But with the stirrup, a calvery unit would be able to lean into the stirrups during the charge and leverage the mass of the entire horse and thus making it harder to unseat him.

Back to Top
Temujin View Drop Down
King
King
Avatar
Sirdar Bahadur

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: Eurasia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 5221
  Quote Temujin Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Jan-2005 at 18:52
Originally posted by xenophon2000

Depends on which period and which horde.  The horde of Ghenghis Khan, after they destroyed the Jin of China, had adoped Chinese iron horse shoes.  One thing of note is that the Mongol army wasn't issued standardized equipment like other armies of the time. 

interesting, didn't knew Chinese had them....

I would like to see this study.  As far as I know, when two calvary units slammed into each other, they would knock eachother off the horses.  But with the stirrup, a calvery unit would be able to lean into the stirrups during the charge and leverage the mass of the entire horse and thus making it harder to unseat him.

that's actually quite widely accepted today, there should be a few sites on the net. for example Roman cavalry who was basically shock cavalry had no stirrups butt he horned saddle, adn the horned saddle was what made the shock cavalry possible. Romans knew of the stuirrup sicne they met with Sarmatians, but didn't adopted it until the Avars brought Iron stirrups to europe. a reason why they haven'T adopted stirrups as up to know is that the Roman (in this case Byzantine) army had not much horse archers within it's ranks. they also adopted the wooden framed saddle form avars which improves the steadyness fo the horsemen on his horse significantly. this toy made the real cataphracts possible.



Edited by Temujin
Back to Top
hansioux View Drop Down
Colonel
Colonel
Avatar

Joined: 16-Aug-2004
Location: Taiwan
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 537
  Quote hansioux Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Jan-2005 at 19:35
I think Chinese had horse shoe since Han dynasty.  I don't have proof for that, but I do know by the Tang dynasty, horse shoe is standard for all horses, military or otherwise in China.  Probably due the fact that roads are paved in stones in China.
Begging plea of the weak can only receive disrespect, violence and oppression as bestowments. Blood and sweat of the weak can only receive insult, blame and abuse as rewards.

Lai Ho, Formosan Poet
Back to Top
Guests View Drop Down
Guest
Guest
  Quote Guests Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-Jan-2005 at 21:12
A pre-requiste of the iron horse-shoe is cheap and readily available supplies of iron.  This of course was possible by the latter Han Dynasty, but definitely not in Alexander's time.
Back to Top
Genghis View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar

Joined: 02-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2656
  Quote Genghis Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Jan-2005 at 17:04

If I'm not mistaken, didn't the Mongols win several battles against heavy infantry in hilly or other terrain that was not suited to cavalry?  In which case the Mongols would win, hands down.

I've always wondered what would have happened if the Mongols had tried to conquer Europe and India.

Member of IAEA
Back to Top
El_Bandito View Drop Down
Knight
Knight
Avatar

Joined: 03-Jan-2005
Location: Mongolia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 66
  Quote El_Bandito Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 10-Jan-2005 at 22:55
Mongols will give up on Europe since they will understand that Europe have nothing to offer them.  As for india, Babur(Who claimed to have bloodties to Chinggis) already conquered India.
I'm awake, I'm awake.
Back to Top
azimuth View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
SlaYer'S SlaYer

Joined: 12-Dec-2004
Location: Neutral Zone
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 2979
  Quote azimuth Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 11-Jan-2005 at 09:45

Babur is related to Timur lenk.

he was the founder of the Moghul Empire.

BTW there was an Islamic state in India before Babur and he fought them to make his own empire

i wonder why the mongols didnt go south to india

 

 

Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <1234>

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.047 seconds.