Notice: This is the official website of the All Empires History Community (Reg. 10 Feb 2002)

  FAQ FAQ  Forum Search   Register Register  Login Login

was roman empire bigger than han

 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12
Author
pekau View Drop Down
Caliph
Caliph
Avatar
Atlantean Prophet

Joined: 08-Oct-2006
Location: Korea, South
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 3335
  Quote pekau Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Topic: was roman empire bigger than han
    Posted: 25-Apr-2007 at 19:54

Getting little off-topic, kurt.Wink

     
   
Join us.
Back to Top
Decebal View Drop Down
Arch Duke
Arch Duke
Avatar
Digital Prometheus

Joined: 20-May-2005
Location: Canada
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 1791
  Quote Decebal Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 26-Apr-2007 at 16:52
If one compares a map of modern China with Han China, you'll see that Han China is about half of the modern country, as it did not include Tibet, Manchuria, large parts of Xinjiang and Yunnan and Inner Mongolia. That would mean around 4.5 - 5 million square kilometers. The Roman empire at its greatest extent was a little over 5 million square kilometers. As for the population, as some forumers already stated, their populations were between 45 million and 60 million for both. All in all, they were roughly equivalent.
What is history but a fable agreed upon?
Napoleon Bonaparte

Even if you are a minority of one, the truth is the truth.- Mohandas Gandhi

Back to Top
MengTzu View Drop Down
General
General

Retired Moderator

Joined: 11-Aug-2004
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 957
  Quote MengTzu Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 03-May-2007 at 17:54
Originally posted by poirot

Originally posted by Preobrazhenskoe

Han China was to the East like Rome was to the Mediterranean West. Plain and simple. There's just so many parallels between the two that it's comical...well, at least to someone who studies history.
 
Eric
 
Like..........
 
How both empires constantly engaged war with nomadic peoples.
 
How both empires' fortunes plummetted around the year A.D. 180 (both because of a plague)
 
How nomadic peoples later invaded the seat of each empire and built their own empires, taking on the culture and name of each respective empire.
 
 
 
 
Also notable is the paralell development of Christianity in Europe and Buddhism in China.  Although Buddhism was founed centuries before Christianity, it didn't spread to China until later, so its development in China coincided with Christianity's development in Europe.
 
Christianity was introduced into the Roman empire around the 1st century, and the first well recognized, recorded introduction of Buddhism into China was also in the first century.  A key difference, though, is the reaction: the Christians were severely persecuted.  The Buddhists were criticized by the Ru ("Confucians"), but already had some popularity even in the capital city.
 
Both religions rose swiftly after the demise of both empires.  Christianity was legalized around by Constantine, who also moved out of Western Roman Empire, basically marking the end of the old regime (Eastern Roman Empire continued to exist for many centuries.)  Buddhism saw a sudden surge of popularity after the fall of the Han dynasty


Edited by MengTzu - 03-May-2007 at 17:57


(Credit to Cwyr and Gubookjanggoon for first using the sloganizer.)
Back to Top
Intranetusa View Drop Down
Janissary
Janissary


Joined: 08-May-2007
Location: United States
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 28
  Quote Intranetusa Quote  Post ReplyReply Direct Link To This Post Posted: 08-May-2007 at 23:00
^ Buddhism gained popularity mostly during the Tang, when the Mahayana sect was introduced from India by Bodahiarma...where it combined with Daoism to form Zen-Chan Buddhism
Back to Top
 Post Reply Post Reply Page  <12

Forum Jump Forum Permissions View Drop Down

Bulletin Board Software by Web Wiz Forums® version 9.56a [Free Express Edition]
Copyright ©2001-2009 Web Wiz

This page was generated in 0.063 seconds.