The orgins of the Aryans?

Its actually a false theory. If there had been any such movement of Central Asian ppl to this sub-continent it would been well identified today. But the south asian-indian subconitent people are identified with their unique appearance worldover. If there had been any such movement then it would been visibly seen like the 'Mongals in Turkey'.

Even the dravidian theory is equally false. All the subcontinent people have their origin from indus civilization. The upper region had ppl of pale brown, the middle with brown and the lower region with more brownish. This too because of inhabitence of the people in the region for long time and this color impact is becuase of latitude of the regions to the sun ray.  People living down the equator are darker in color worldover be it chinese or native american indians.

For insisting the same, the group of afericanas whom travelled over the continents to australia some 20000 years before and stayed inbetween in certain pockets are till indentified with separate sects in south india and pakistan. Then how come such aryans were be left without any identification. But there is one possibility of such one small group been moved and mixed with local population whom are called Brahmins. Even in this case, the central asian content in this population would be very marginal. Still the sub-continent is revolving around the aryan-dravidian mis-concept.

AlokaParyetra "Prove the existence of an Aryan race or any different cult"

If there had been any foreign sect of people, it would be plainly seen like 'Mongols in Turkey'. To less somewhere you can have like mixed-race people of South America. To classify the Indian-subcontinent people by color, there�re pale brown, brown and thick brown people. Nasal, Skull are similar where the north-western region people have semi-Oblong skull and semi-piercing nasal shape. The south-eastern region people have squared skull and partly-piercing nasal shape. The few differentiating but intersecting groups could be the Kashmiri, Nepali, Tibeto.

This clearly shows the flow of the civilization from the Indus region to rest of the sub-continent. Moreover a civilization which existed for so long period will naturally have diversified 'sects'. To insist the above, the Han Chinese themselves have 80+ sects and a north-south fragment. The Native American Indian mass itself have 50+ sects with multiplicity by color, skull and nasal shape.

Nowhere can you match central-asian cult in this subcontinent.

Decebal "But I've never heard a satisfactory explanation of the linguistic connection between India and Europe and Iran, which did not take into account a migration."

AlokaParyetra "Language can exist independent to race"

Madwa caste people in india are kannadigas as well as marathis. South indian Vanniyakula caste people are tamils as well as telugus. Mongolia, Tibet, Manchuria, Thai too have heavy linguistic connection with indian languages. So will you connect those with this sub-continent? It doesnot require any mass migration or conquest for a region to speak a language. A foreign language can be imported and assimilated with the local colloquial speech to enrich the home slang. Same way, while long period of persistence people of same sect can be get absorbed into two different lingual. There had been many created languages like prakrit during gupta and maurgian regime. Both Black Afericanas and Philipino Malay follow same religion. So, Language and Religion are less to do with identification of the people of a region.

maqsad, there is no thuva/thiya here but wealthy stuffs which could help healthy discussions are good.