Author |
Share Topic Topic Search Topic Options
|
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Topic: What if this guy is right? Posted: 26-Feb-2014 at 18:36 |
Something right up RedClay's alley!
Please watch the entire video!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zs2bQHpy7uk
Regards to Red,
Ron
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 26-Feb-2014 at 22:09 |
For some reason, I'm unable to view it.
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 06:46 |
Try this;
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TZ0ViMVxKZA
Watch the open site, and then go to the right and click on "the artifacts of the Lost Global Civilization"
Ron
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
|
Arthur-Robin
General
Joined: 23-Feb-2006
Location: Australia
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 937
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 07:03 |
i couldn't view the first one either. & the second/last one says page not found. i google searched "the artifacts of the Lost Global Civilization" and got 10 results, 9 of the mention "guy in top hat" (the top/first link is this one http://www.g391.ru/video.php?yt=zs2bQHpy7uk ) is that the same one or different?
i can't watch videos due to software/hardware/update problems so i can only read the text & comments.
someone got told off in historum for "please don't post topics with just a video [without some details/explanation]" :)
|
|
Sidney
Colonel
Joined: 31-Jan-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 690
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 09:34 |
If you lack credibility in getting your theories noticed, resort to an outfit that will get you noticed. Usually results in ridicule, but at least you get talked about, and the attention is more important for some people.
NB - the chap in the hat is not the chap giving the presentation, but he did help organize and fund the event.
Edited by Sidney - 27-Feb-2014 at 09:40
|
|
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 10:02 |
Yes, the man in the Top Hat is an Australian who introduces the Austrian guest speaker.
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 10:57 |
Site not found.
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 11:29 |
Red, sorry for all the mess!
Just go to your search engine, and type in these words;
"you tube the artifacts of the Lost Global Civilization"
That will for sure get you there! It worked for me.
Ron
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 16:33 |
I already did that, just haven't had time to run it. I'll be interested in what he's got and how he connects it.
I do have my own ideas about the subject. The evidence is there, and it makes much more sense than "Aliens".
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
red clay
Administrator
Tomato Master Emeritus
Joined: 14-Jan-2006
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 10226
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 16:38 |
Originally posted by Arthur-Robin
i couldn't view the first one either. & the second/last one says page not found. i google searched "the artifacts of the Lost Global Civilization" and got 10 results, 9 of the mention "guy in top hat" (the top/first link is this one http://www.g391.ru/video.php?yt=zs2bQHpy7uk ) is that the same one or different? i can't watch videos due to software/hardware/update problems so i can only read the text & comments. someone got told off in historum for "please don't post topics with just a video [without some details/explanation]" :) |
I'm not going to tell anyone off about it, but I will mention that it might get more attention if folks have an idea of what it's about.
|
"Arguing with someone who hates you or your ideas, is like playing chess with a pigeon. No matter what move you make, your opponent will walk all over the board and scramble the pieces".
Unknown.
|
|
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 17:49 |
Well Red, this Austrian shows numerous photos and information about many of the places on this planet that seem to have shared a common written language and numerous other items that seem to indicate a very advanced civilization existing over 8,000 years ago.
I.e., the title of the talk; "the artifacts of the Lost Global Civilization"
Regards
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
|
Sidney
Colonel
Joined: 31-Jan-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 690
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 27-Feb-2014 at 19:12 |
Seems like massaging the figures. An archaeological site is dated to having evidence of human activity on it dating to 5000 - 8000 years old. This is highly likely, but the the presenter takes the monuments still existing on that site to be of that age (they are actually dated more recently), and assumes the upper reaches of that date to be the most likely (with no evidence given). He thus presents the site as it is now as evidence for civilization 8,000 years ago. Then other artifacts found in context with the existing monuments are said to be at least 8000 years old (there is no logic with this). Thus he gets an ancient civilization. The research and logic (what there is of it) feeds off of scenarios like this.
Many of the artifacts are intriguing, but I am skeptical of the supposed dates, provenances and interpretations given to them by this theorist. I agree with him that mainstream archaeologists do ignore these artifacts, but usually because they are of unknown or dubious origin and therefore untrustworthy for drawing conclusions from. However this is due to the nature of archaeological study methods. These artifacts could still be studied more.
|
|
opuslola
Tsar
suspended
Joined: 23-Sep-2009
Location: Long Beach, MS,
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 4620
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Feb-2014 at 15:17 |
Sidney. I agree with your analysis strongly.
I have read numerous excavation reports where material that should not exist within the excavation level of a site, is found, it is mostly explained away via the usage of these words, I.e. "..percolated from above.." or "...percolated from below..", or an "intrusive invasion", or other such terms. It is never, never considered as a possible item of the excavated level, which is mostly based upon "pottery or glass" items.
Ron
|
http://www.quotationspage.com/subjects/history/
|
|
Sidney
Colonel
Joined: 31-Jan-2012
Online Status: Offline
Posts: 690
|
Quote Reply
Posted: 28-Feb-2014 at 18:03 |
This has also struck me when reading some archaeological accounts. But not being the guy in the hole, I can't really conclude on how reliable that interpretation is.
|
|